[FULL] Diplomat Muda RI Silvany Pasaribu Serang Balik PM Vanuatu Soal Isu Papua

Summary

In this statement, the Indonesian representative responds to criticism from Vanuatu, defending Indonesia's sovereignty and territorial integrity, particularly regarding the provinces of Papua and West Papua. The speaker condemns Vanuatu's advocacy for separatism under the guise of human rights concerns and emphasizes Indonesia's commitment to human rights, diversity, and democracy. They highlight Indonesia's role in promoting respect for international human rights conventions and call out Vanuatu for failing to ratify key human rights treaties. The representative underscores that Papua is an irrevocable part of Indonesia, a stance recognized by the United Nations and the international community.

Takeaways

• 😀 Indonesia expresses frustration with Vanuatu's continued focus on how Indonesia should govern itself.
• 😀 Indonesia accuses Vanuatu of ignoring the fundamental principles of the United Nations Charter, particularly regarding sovereignty and non-interference.
• 😀 Indonesia emphasizes that respecting the sovereignty and territorial integrity of other countries is essential for doing what is right.
• 😀 Indonesia promotes a 'win-win approach' to international relations, which they believe Vanuatu ignores in favor of division and separatism.
• 😀 Indonesia rejects Vanuatu's advocacy for separatism, especially during times of global health crises and economic adversity.
• 😀 Indonesia highlights its commitment to human rights, diversity, tolerance, and equality, noting that it has ratified key international human rights treaties.
• 😀 Indonesia points out that Vanuatu has not signed significant international human rights conventions, questioning their commitment to human rights.
• 😀 Indonesia criticizes Vanuatu for not signing the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, raising doubts about their concern for indigenous peoples.
• 😀 Indonesia refutes claims of representing the people of Papua, asserting that Papuans are Indonesians and that all citizens play a vital role in the country's development.
• 😀 Indonesia reiterates that the provinces of Papua and West Papua are irrevocable parts of the nation, with the international community having endorsed this since 1945.

Q & A

What was the main reason for Indonesia's representative to take the floor in this session?

The main reason was to exercise Indonesia's right of reply to a statement made by Vanuatu, which Indonesia felt was overly critical and misinformed regarding its sovereignty and governance.

How did Indonesia respond to Vanuatu's concerns about its governance?

Indonesia dismissed Vanuatu's concerns as an unwarranted obsession, asserting that Vanuatu was interfering with Indonesia's internal affairs, which goes against the principles of the United Nations Charter, particularly non-interference in domestic matters.

What does Indonesia believe is the fundamental principle of international relations?

Indonesia emphasizes the importance of respecting sovereignty, territorial integrity, and the principle of non-interference in the domestic affairs of other nations.

What criticism did Indonesia make of Vanuatu’s advocacy for separatism?

Indonesia criticized Vanuatu for promoting separatism and dividing nations under the guise of human rights concerns, especially during a time of global health crises and economic challenges.

What argument did Indonesia make about its commitment to human rights?

Indonesia argued that it is a diverse, multicultural nation that values human rights, including equality before the law. It highlighted its commitment by ratifying key international conventions, such as the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination.

What was Indonesia’s stance on the issue of Vanuatu’s signing of international human rights conventions?

Indonesia pointed out that Vanuatu has not signed significant human rights treaties, such as the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights or the Convention Against Torture, raising doubts about its genuine commitment to human rights.

What did Indonesia say about Vanuatu's representation of the people of Papua?

Indonesia rejected Vanuatu's claims to represent the people of Papua, asserting that Papuans are Indonesians, and all citizens, including those in Papua, contribute to Indonesia’s development.

What was Indonesia’s position on the territorial integrity of Papua and West Papua?

Indonesia firmly stated that the provinces of Papua and West Papua are irrevocable parts of Indonesia, a stance supported by the United Nations and the international community since 1945.

How did Indonesia view Vanuatu’s advocacy of separatism?

Indonesia viewed Vanuatu’s advocacy for separatism as an unjustified attempt to undermine its sovereignty and territorial integrity, rejecting any such efforts as contrary to international law and the U.N. Charter.

What did Indonesia emphasize regarding its position on separatism?

Indonesia emphasized that it will defend itself against any advocacy of separatism, stressing that the territorial integrity of Papua and West Papua is final, irreversible, and permanent, as endorsed by the international community decades ago.