Perpres Jurnalisme Berkualitas lebih Berbahaya dari yang Kalian Sangka

Summary

In this video, the creator discusses the implications of the proposed Presidential Regulation (Perpres) on quality journalism in Indonesia. While acknowledging the good intentions behind the regulation, the creator highlights its potential dangers, particularly the control over algorithms that could lead to the manipulation of digital media. The regulation could concentrate power, allowing elites to shape public opinion, suppress criticism, and control narratives. The creator urges a reevaluation of the regulation, especially the algorithm control aspect, to protect democratic freedoms and ensure media integrity. The video also touches on the role of platforms and the future of content creators.

Takeaways

• 😀 The proposed Perpres Jurnalisme Berkualitas regulation has raised concerns among content creators about its potential to control digital platforms and content distribution.
• 😀 The regulation aims to support quality journalism by ensuring journalists are paid fairly for their work and receive royalties for content shared on digital platforms.
• 😀 A major issue with the regulation is the potential for government or authorities to control algorithms, which could shape public opinion and censor content.
• 😀 Content creators fear that the regulation could result in the suppression of voices and the rise of state-controlled narratives, affecting democracy and freedom of expression.
• 😀 The regulation's goal of eliminating unreliable sources of information could be beneficial, but the method of regulating algorithms may cause more harm than good.
• 😀 Influencers and media figures, like Deddy Corbuzier, have already discussed the Perpres and its potential implications for creators and digital platforms.
• 😀 While there is support for the regulation's efforts to protect journalism, there is a strong call to remove the aspect of algorithm control to avoid authoritarian misuse.
• 😀 The regulation gives significant power to the Dewan Pers (Press Council), allowing them to determine what constitutes 'quality' journalism, which raises concerns about fairness and bias.
• 😀 The potential for algorithm manipulation could allow powerful political figures to control public opinion by promoting favorable content and suppressing critical voices.
• 😀 The presenter encourages a balanced approach, urging that the regulation should support journalists without risking the suppression of freedom of expression or digital content creators.

Q & A

What is the main concern of the speaker regarding the proposed Presidential Regulation (Perpres) on quality journalism?

The speaker's main concern is the potential for the Perpres to control and manipulate digital platforms, especially through the regulation of algorithms, which could severely impact freedom of speech and democracy.

Why does the speaker believe that the Perpres could lead to greater dangers than the demise of content creators?

The speaker argues that the Perpres could enable powerful entities, such as political elites, to control public opinion and suppress critical voices by manipulating algorithms, which is a far more dangerous outcome than just the death of content creators.

What does the speaker think about the government's intention behind the Perpres, in theory?

In theory, the speaker acknowledges that the intention behind the Perpres is to combat unaccountable information and support quality journalism, which they agree with. However, the concern arises with the potential consequences of its implementation, especially in terms of algorithm control.

What is the issue with giving the Indonesian Press Council (Dewan Pers) control over algorithms, according to the speaker?

The speaker believes that giving the Press Council control over algorithms could lead to biased decisions about which content is considered 'quality' and which is not, thus allowing the council to influence which narratives rise and fall in public discourse.

How does the speaker compare the Perpres proposal to a similar law in Australia?

The speaker acknowledges that a similar law in Australia allows for the payment of royalties to media for news content displayed on digital platforms. However, the key difference is that Australia does not allow control over algorithms, which the speaker sees as a dangerous potential in the Indonesian version of the Perpres.

What role does social media algorithm play in content visibility, as explained in the transcript?

Social media algorithms determine the visibility of content based on how well it matches the platform's profile of what people like to see. The algorithms, therefore, decide which content appears on users' feeds, making them a powerful tool in shaping public perception.

What is the speaker's view on the Press Council's criticism of social media algorithms?

The speaker agrees that some social media algorithms have flaws, particularly in promoting unreliable news. However, they argue that the solution is to improve the algorithms, not to give the Press Council the power to control them, which could lead to dangerous manipulation.

How could the Perpres affect media companies financially, according to the speaker?

The speaker suggests that if the Perpres is implemented correctly, it could benefit media companies by ensuring that they receive royalties for their content displayed on digital platforms, which could provide them with a more sustainable income model.

What potential misuse of the Perpres does the speaker warn about?

The speaker warns that the Perpres could be misused by political elites to control public opinion. By manipulating algorithms, those in power could suppress unfavorable content and amplify favorable narratives, leading to a distorted public perception.

What is the speaker's stance on the potential signing of the Perpres by President Joko Widodo?

The speaker expresses cautious optimism, believing that President Joko Widodo will carefully consider the implications of the Perpres before signing it, especially given his awareness of the digital space and its importance to the country's democratic processes.