Addio, Firefox. Le migliori alternative nel 2025.

Summary

The video explores the recent changes Mozilla made to Firefox, including updated terms of use and privacy policies, which have raised concerns about user data usage. The speaker discusses how these changes may allow Mozilla more freedom in handling user data, leading to uncertainty among loyal Firefox users. Alternative browsers are recommended, such as LibreWolf, Mullvad, and Zen Browser, each offering different levels of privacy and customization. The speaker emphasizes the trade-off between privacy and functionality, concluding that while Firefox remains a solid option, exploring alternatives is a sensible approach for those prioritizing privacy.

Takeaways

• 😀 Mozilla has updated Firefox's terms of service, including new clauses about data usage and acceptable use, raising privacy concerns.
• 😀 Users must regularly check the Firefox terms since continuing to use the browser implies automatic acceptance of updates to the terms.
• 😀 Firefox now includes an 'acceptable usage policy' which restricts illegal activities but allows Mozilla to control what users can do with the browser.
• 😀 Mozilla's terms grant them a broad, royalty-free license to use the information users input via Firefox for various purposes, including content interaction.
• 😀 Mozilla clarified that they don't own user data, but there is concern that they might use it for training large language models or similar purposes in the future.
• 😀 The removal of the 'acceptable use policy' was intended to reduce confusion, but Mozilla's data practices are still under scrutiny, especially regarding selling data.
• 😀 Firefox's shrinking market share, due to Chrome's dominance and Mozilla's new policies, might result in the browser becoming obsolete for privacy-focused users.
• 😀 LibreWolf is a privacy-focused Firefox fork that removes Mozilla's proprietary elements and adds hardening features for improved privacy, though usability may be impacted.
• 😀 Mullvad's browser is an even more extreme privacy-focused browser, built with input from the Tor team, but it comes with significant usability sacrifices.
• 😀 Zen Browser is an appealing option for users seeking a nice-looking and customizable browser, though it may not be fully privacy-focused.
• 😀 While some Firefox forks are promising, like FLP from Japan, their sustainability and long-term updates are uncertain, posing risks for users relying on them.
• 😀 Chromium-based browsers like Brave, Vivaldi, and Thorium are alternatives, but they often have privacy trade-offs, such as tracking or lack of open-source transparency.

Q & A

What are the recent changes Mozilla has made to Firefox's terms of use?

Mozilla introduced new terms of use for Firefox on February 25, which include an updated privacy notice. These terms allow Mozilla to update the terms periodically, and the continued use of Firefox implies automatic acceptance of these updates.

What does the new acceptable usage policy for Firefox entail?

The new policy outlines what users can and cannot do with Firefox. For example, users are prohibited from engaging in illegal activities, promoting gambling, viewing or transmitting explicit content, and violating copyright laws.

Why was the concept of 'royalty-free license' concerning for many users?

The royalty-free license means that Mozilla could potentially use user-provided data in ways that could include training large language models. This raised concerns as it seemed Mozilla might gain more freedom to use personal data without clear limitations.

What clarifications did Mozilla provide regarding the royalty-free license?

Mozilla clarified that the royalty-free license does not imply ownership of user data, but it could still be used for things like training models. However, Mozilla emphasized that no immediate changes were expected to the current handling of data.

How does the new terms of use affect Mozilla's stance on selling user data?

Mozilla removed a statement declaring that they do not sell user data due to regulatory changes in jurisdictions like California, where even aggregated and anonymized data may be considered as personal data. The change was made to comply with legal definitions and to avoid future issues.

What is LibreWolf and why is it recommended as an alternative to Firefox?

LibreWolf is a community-driven fork of Firefox that focuses on enhancing privacy by removing Mozilla's telemetry and other privacy-invasive features. It's an option for users seeking a browser with more stringent privacy settings, though it may have some usability trade-offs.

What are the main drawbacks of using the Mullvad browser?

The Mullvad browser is highly privacy-focused, going to the extreme of resetting cookies on every browser session. While this is great for privacy, it limits functionality by not allowing users to stay logged into sites or maintain personalized settings, and the browser enforces a standard screen resolution to prevent fingerprinting.

What makes Zen Browser stand out compared to other Firefox forks?

Zen Browser, while not a privacy-oriented browser, offers a visually appealing and user-friendly experience. It's a Firefox-based browser with a focus on aesthetics and functionality but doesn't prioritize privacy. The browser may be a good option for those looking for a more attractive and easier-to-use browser, but it lacks significant privacy features.

What are the pros and cons of Vivaldi as a browser?

Vivaldi is highly customizable and feature-rich, making it a strong contender for users who like to fine-tune their browser experience. However, it is not fully open-source, which raises concerns about transparency and trust in its code.

Why is Brave Browser not recommended by the author, despite its privacy features?

While Brave Browser is privacy-focused, the author finds it lacking in terms of usability and customization. It has a lot of built-in features that may be unnecessary, and the interface is not as customizable as Firefox or other browsers. It also doesn't offer the same multi-account container features as Firefox, making it less convenient for managing multiple online identities.