Asep Iwan: Tak Salah Semboyan NKRI (Negara Koruptor Republik Indonesia), Itu Fakta #kontroversi

Summary

In this candid discussion, Kang Asep expresses deep frustration with Indonesia's legal and corruption enforcement system. He criticizes the weakening of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) and the ineffectiveness of judicial bodies, particularly judges who seem complicit in allowing corruption to thrive. The speaker emphasizes the failure of the justice system to follow through on corruption cases, leaving the public disillusioned. Despite the increasing revelation of corruption cases, the lack of accountability and resolution perpetuates a cycle of distrust, leading to the speaker’s belief that Indonesia’s justice system is fundamentally flawed.

Takeaways

• 😀 The speaker expresses frustration with the ongoing corruption in Indonesia, especially in relation to law enforcement and government institutions.
• 😀 There is a belief that despite efforts by authorities to uncover corruption, the system remains ineffective and corrupt activities continue unabated.
• 😀 The speaker mentions that the weakening of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) has led them to believe it should be disbanded.
• 😀 The speaker is disillusioned with the legal system, particularly the lack of progress in high-profile cases involving judges and prosecutors.
• 😀 The failure to address corruption, especially at high levels, is a key theme in the speaker's criticism of the system.
• 😀 The speaker criticizes the judiciary, particularly Supreme Court judges (Hakim Agung), for not being held accountable for their involvement in corruption.
• 😀 The speaker points to specific cases where evidence was available, but no further action was taken, including the case involving mafia-like judicial behavior.
• 😀 There is a sense of hopelessness, with the speaker stating that they no longer trust the justice system to address corruption effectively.
• 😀 The speaker references ongoing issues with state-owned enterprises (BUMN), such as Pertamina, suggesting that corruption continues to thrive in these areas.
• 😀 The speaker concludes that the corruption problem in Indonesia has reached a point where they no longer believe in the possibility of reform or resolution.

Q & A

What is the main frustration expressed by the speaker regarding corruption in Indonesia?

The speaker expresses frustration with the ongoing corruption in Indonesia, particularly with the ineffective law enforcement and judicial systems. They feel that despite many cases being exposed, no substantial action is taken to address the issue.

How does the speaker feel about the Indonesian Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK)?

The speaker is highly critical of the KPK, suggesting that it has been weakened and should be disbanded. They believe that the KPK has failed to make a significant impact, especially after its power was diminished.

What is the speaker's view on the role of judges in tackling corruption cases?

The speaker is disillusioned with the judiciary, particularly the Supreme Court judges, whom they believe are either corrupt or unwilling to follow through on corruption cases. They mention the lack of progress in cases involving high-profile individuals.

Why does the speaker refer to Indonesia as the 'Republic of Corruption'?

The speaker refers to Indonesia as the 'Republic of Corruption' due to the widespread and systemic nature of corruption. They feel that the government and law enforcement are complicit, and no real progress has been made to tackle corruption.

What is the speaker's opinion on the role of the Attorney General's Office in handling corruption cases?

The speaker is disappointed with the Attorney General's Office, claiming that it has failed to prosecute key figures involved in corruption, and cases often stall or are not pursued to completion.

How does the speaker view the involvement of high-ranking officials in corruption?

The speaker implies that high-ranking officials, including Supreme Court judges, are involved in or are protecting corrupt practices. They believe these figures should be named and prosecuted, but the legal system fails to hold them accountable.

What is the speaker's stance on the state-owned enterprises (BUMN) and corruption?

The speaker criticizes the state-owned enterprises (BUMN), particularly Pertamina, for being involved in corruption. They view these enterprises as 'games' that continue to be exploited for personal gain, indicating that the problem persists across various sectors.

What does the speaker mean by 'mafia peradilan' (judicial mafia)?

The speaker refers to the 'mafia peradilan' as a network of corrupt practices within the judicial system. This includes the manipulation of cases and the protection of corrupt individuals, which hinders the legal process.

How does the speaker perceive the government's commitment to tackling corruption?

The speaker is skeptical about the government's commitment, stating that despite appearances, there is no real effort to tackle corruption. They believe that government officials and law enforcement agencies are part of the problem rather than the solution.

What is the speaker's conclusion about the state of corruption in Indonesia?

The speaker concludes that corruption in Indonesia is pervasive and systemic, with little hope for meaningful reform. They are deeply frustrated and have lost faith in the ability of the government and legal system to address the issue.