Ade Armando: Saya Yakin Masyarakat Mayoritas Bukan Pelaku Intoleransi | Catatan Demokrasi

Summary

The speaker discusses the importance of tolerance in Indonesia, particularly in terms of religious freedom and coexistence. They express concern over the increasing intolerance, such as the banning of places of worship, and emphasize that religious disagreements shouldn't lead to conflicts. The speaker highlights specific cases, including the controversial banning of churches in certain regions and the disagreement over the Muhammadiyah's Idul Fitri determination. The speaker stresses the need for government intervention to prevent such acts of intolerance, which undermine Indonesia's democratic and pluralistic values.

Takeaways

• 😀 Tolerance is a crucial value in Indonesia, with almost all speakers agreeing on its importance, especially in preventing religious intolerance.
• 😀 Intolerance, especially in the form of banning places of worship, is seen as something that must not be accepted, as it contradicts both Indonesian values and Islamic principles.
• 😀 The issue of religious intolerance extends beyond interfaith issues, reaching into intra-faith disputes, such as differences in methods for determining religious observances like Eid al-Fitr.
• 😀 Religious intolerance cases, such as the ban on churches in areas like Cilegon, highlight the role of local government in either protecting or restricting religious freedoms.
• 😀 The banning of places of worship, especially churches, is seen as a significant violation of rights and must be addressed by the government, including using past cases like the Yasmin Church in Bogor as examples for resolution.
• 😀 Local politicians, like those in Cilegon and Purwakarta, have been influenced by certain groups in the community, leading them to restrict places of worship, which is legally questionable.
• 😀 The government has been urged to take a firmer stance to ensure that religious freedoms are protected and that intolerance does not persist in any form.
• 😀 The speaker points out that many of these issues are driven by small militant groups within communities, rather than the majority, suggesting that these actions are not representative of the broader population's stance.
• 😀 The case of the Yasmin Church is used as an example to show that religious disputes can be resolved with a balanced approach, but there remains significant frustration with how such matters are handled by the authorities.
• 😀 There is an ongoing concern that Indonesia, as a nation with religious diversity, still sees restrictions on religious worship, which is deeply embarrassing and reflects a failure in upholding democratic principles.

Q & A

What is the main issue discussed in the script?

The script discusses the issue of intolerance in Indonesia, particularly focusing on the prohibition of religious practices such as the banning of places of worship, such as churches and mosques.

How does the speaker feel about the current state of religious tolerance in Indonesia?

The speaker expresses concern over the widespread intolerance in Indonesia, specifically the increasing incidents where religious practices are being restricted, despite the country’s supposed commitment to religious tolerance.

What example does the speaker provide to illustrate religious intolerance in Indonesia?

The speaker references the case of the Muhammadiyah organization determining the date for Idul Fitri, which led to issues in different regions, where some areas prohibited the use of public spaces for the prayer due to differing methods of determining the date.

What is the government's role in addressing intolerance according to the speaker?

The speaker stresses that the government should take a more active and firm stance in preventing religious intolerance, citing cases like the banning of churches in certain regions and the need for the Ministry of Religious Affairs and Ministry of Home Affairs to intervene.

How does the speaker describe the situation in Cilegon regarding the banning of churches?

The speaker describes the case in Cilegon where the mayor banned the construction of a church, which was backed by community pressure. Despite intervention from the Ministry of Religious Affairs, there was no resolution, and the mayor’s stance was still unchallenged.

What is the speaker's view on the role of local communities in these religious intolerance issues?

The speaker suggests that local communities, often through pressure from certain groups, play a significant role in religious intolerance cases, though they may not always represent the majority opinion in those regions.

How does the speaker describe the events surrounding the Yasmin Church case in Bogor?

The speaker describes how initially the GKI Yasmin Church faced no opposition, with local residents even signing petitions in favor of the church. However, this changed when certain militant groups started opposing the church, leading to ongoing controversy and the eventual relocation of the church by the local government.

What is the broader implication of these incidents of religious intolerance according to the speaker?

The speaker argues that these incidents are a disgrace to Indonesia as a democratic nation, and they highlight a failure to uphold the country’s ideals of religious freedom and harmony.

What role does the speaker believe the Indonesian government should take to prevent religious intolerance?

The speaker believes the government should be more proactive and take firm legal action against any form of religious intolerance, ensuring that public spaces are not restricted for religious practices based on differences in belief or method.

How does the speaker contrast religious intolerance within Islam with interfaith intolerance?

The speaker notes that intolerance is not only present between different religions but also within the same religion, such as within Islam itself, citing examples where disagreements over religious practices led to prohibitions, highlighting the internal challenges to religious tolerance.