"This Epstein files drop is a limited hangout, there's no other way to read it" | Redacted News

Summary

In this conversation, Owen Shroyer of Infowars discusses corruption within the FBI, particularly its involvement in the Epstein case. He reflects on his confrontation with former FBI director James Comey and critiques the FBI's role in destroying crucial evidence related to Epstein’s activities. The conversation questions the slow release of Epstein files by the Trump administration, citing suspicions of a 'limited hangout.' Shroyer emphasizes the need for full transparency, raising concerns about the protection of powerful figures involved in Epstein's network and the lack of accountability surrounding the scandal.

Takeaways

• 😀 Owen Shroyer, an Infowars host, confronts former FBI Director James Comey, accusing him of corruption and covering up crimes related to Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump.
• 😀 Shroyer challenges the notion that Comey’s supporters are unaware of his alleged corruption, suggesting that many have been influenced by media coverage surrounding Comey’s conflict with Donald Trump.
• 😀 Shroyer explains his motivation behind confronting Comey, stating that Americans need to stop fearing powerful figures in positions like the FBI and stand up for their rights.
• 😀 The discussion shifts to the destruction of classified FBI documents, including individual servers that may contain terabytes of footage related to Jeffrey Epstein's operations.
• 😀 Whistleblowers have reported that the Epstein footage, stored on offline servers, might have been destroyed by the FBI, potentially concealing key evidence of Epstein's blackmail activities.
• 😀 Shroyer raises the concern that the slow release of Epstein-related documents, such as those released by Pam Bondi, could be a 'limited hangout,' offering only partial information while protecting powerful individuals involved.
• 😀 Shroyer is frustrated that the Trump administration has not fully delivered on its promise to release all Epstein-related files unredacted, which raises questions about transparency and accountability.
• 😀 The interview emphasizes that the American public deserves to know the full truth about Epstein's activities, including who was blackmailed and the scope of the operation.
• 😀 Shroyer expresses doubt about the real motivation behind the redactions in the released Epstein files, questioning whether the protection of victims' identities is being used as an excuse to withhold crucial information.
• 😀 Shroyer discusses the political pressure that led to the partial release of Epstein files, attributing the delay to an ongoing internal struggle within the FBI and other intelligence agencies over how much information to reveal.
• 😀 Shroyer warns that if the Epstein files are not fully released, it could permanently damage the Trump administration’s legacy, undermining public trust and transparency.

Q & A

What was Owen Shroyer's confrontation with James Comey about?

Owen Shroyer confronted former FBI Director James Comey about his role in corrupt activities, including his illegal investigation of Donald Trump, covering up Hillary Clinton's crimes, and setting the stage for the FBI to cover up Biden's alleged crimes. Shroyer used the moment to publicly call out Comey's actions.

What did Shroyer highlight about the media's portrayal of James Comey?

Shroyer pointed out that the media built up James Comey as a hero, particularly during his posturing against Donald Trump, leading to a fan base for Comey among liberals, despite his controversial actions as FBI Director.

What did Owen Shroyer do that made him stand out during the event with James Comey?

Shroyer stood up and openly criticized Comey, calling him out for his actions, while others at the event remained silent. His approach caught the attention of the crowd, especially with his sarcastic and enthusiastic tone, which caused confusion among the audience about whether he was genuinely supporting Comey.

What is the controversy surrounding the Epstein files?

The controversy centers around the delayed and partial release of Epstein-related files, with accusations that crucial documents are being withheld by the FBI. Shroyer and others worry about the potential for a 'limited hangout,' meaning that only partial information will be released, protecting certain powerful individuals from full exposure.

What role does Pam Bondi play in the release of Epstein files?

Pam Bondi, the Attorney General, has been involved in releasing Epstein-related documents, but there are concerns that the information being provided is incomplete. Some of the files are reportedly already publicly available, and the real key documents are allegedly being withheld by the FBI.

What are the reports about the FBI destroying evidence in relation to Epstein?

Reports suggest that the FBI is actively destroying critical evidence related to Epstein, including servers that contained large amounts of surveillance footage from Epstein’s properties. The footage is believed to have been used for blackmail purposes and was stored offline to avoid network access.

What is the significance of the alleged shredding of documents at the FBI?

The shredding of documents at the FBI is significant because it points to the possibility of deliberate destruction of evidence related to the Epstein investigation. This raises concerns about the FBI’s efforts to cover up crucial information regarding Epstein’s operations.

Why is there concern about the release of the Epstein files under the Trump Administration?

There is concern because the Trump Administration promised full transparency regarding Epstein's case but has yet to deliver all the relevant files. The slow release of documents, coupled with allegations of withholding crucial information, has led to distrust and frustration among the public.

What does the term 'limited hangout' refer to in the context of the Epstein case?

A 'limited hangout' refers to a strategy where only a portion of the truth is revealed, while key pieces of information are kept hidden. In the context of the Epstein case, there are fears that only a small fraction of the files will be released, protecting powerful individuals from exposure.

What is the broader political implication if the Epstein files are not fully released?

If the Epstein files are not fully released, it could severely impact the public's trust in the Trump Administration. The failure to fully disclose crucial information would cast a shadow over the administration's commitment to transparency and justice, especially as the public demands answers about Epstein’s powerful connections.