Why Meghan Markle Will (Likely) Never Succeed At Anything

Summary

The video script critiques Meghan Markle's public persona and approach to her projects. It argues that she often distances herself from her work when facing criticism or failure, describing her as insecure, lacking resilience, and unwilling to take ownership of her mistakes. The speaker contrasts Meghan’s behavior with their own experiences, emphasizing the importance of resilience and learning from setbacks. The video also touches on Meghan’s upcoming projects, suggesting uncertainty and skepticism about their success, and humorously hints at the idea that 2025 might be her year to ‘sparkle’ despite past disappointments.

Takeaways

• 😀 Meghan Markle is criticized for distancing herself from projects she is involved in, particularly when they face criticism or don't meet expectations.
• 😀 She is accused of lacking resilience, often abandoning projects at the first sign of adversity or failure.
• 😀 The speaker views Meghan's tendency to avoid responsibility for underperforming projects as a sign of insecurity and a lack of self-belief.
• 😀 Meghan's involvement in the polo series and other projects is questioned, with her name being seen as merely a marketing tool rather than a hands-on contributor.
• 😀 The speaker highlights that while projects fail, it’s important to own up to mistakes and continue to improve, a trait Meghan supposedly lacks.
• 😀 The 'American Riviera Orchard' project is seen as a flop, with trademark issues and unclear plans making it difficult to move forward.
• 😀 There’s criticism of Meghan for being overly concerned with public perception, especially regarding how her projects are received online.
• 😀 Despite multiple failures, Meghan is portrayed as overly optimistic, claiming that 2025 will be her big year, despite no clear evidence of success.
• 😀 Meghan is accused of trying to present a perfect image while avoiding any accountability for the less glamorous realities of her career.
• 😀 The speaker contrasts Meghan's actions with their own, noting that they embrace failure, learn from it, and continue to move forward.
• 😀 The speaker believes Meghan's lack of backbone and self-belief will prevent her from ever finding true success in her ventures.

Q & A

What is the primary critique of Meghan Markle's approach to her projects in the script?

The primary critique is that Meghan Markle distances herself from her projects when they seem to be struggling or about to flop, which is seen as a lack of confidence and responsibility. The speaker calls this behavior cowardly, claiming Meghan does not take ownership of her mistakes or setbacks.

How does the speaker describe Meghan Markle's involvement in the polo series?

The speaker suggests that Meghan Markle is an executive producer of the polo series, but they question her actual involvement, implying that her role may have been limited to just putting her name on it, rather than actively participating in its creation.

What does the speaker imply about Meghan Markle's insecurities?

The speaker suggests that Meghan's insecurities stem from her inability to believe in her own work or stick with her projects through difficult times. This lack of self-belief is contrasted with what they view as true resilience and confidence, where individuals take ownership of their work regardless of challenges.

What is the significance of the 'American Racism Orchestra' mentioned in the transcript?

The 'American Racism Orchestra' is mentioned as part of Meghan Markle's earlier project which the speaker views as underwhelming and unsuccessful, citing trademark issues and a lack of progress. It’s used to highlight the contrast between Meghan's initial excitement for projects and their eventual lack of impact.

Why does the speaker refer to Meghan Markle as a 'coward'?

The speaker refers to Meghan Markle as a 'coward' because they believe she avoids taking responsibility for her projects when they don’t succeed. She allegedly distances herself from them before they are released, demonstrating a lack of resilience and an unwillingness to face potential criticism or failure.

How does the speaker view their own approach to failure compared to Meghan Markle's?

The speaker contrasts their own approach by explaining that they continue to work on projects, even when they flop, because they believe in them and are willing to learn from failure. Unlike Meghan, they do not distance themselves from their work but instead face it head-on.

What point is made about Meghan Markle’s 2025 projects?

The speaker is skeptical about Meghan Markle’s 2025 projects, mentioning that despite her previous excitement about upcoming initiatives, it’s unclear whether any of them will come to fruition. The speaker suggests that her track record of underwhelming projects may lead to more of the same in 2025.

What does the speaker think about the 'black carpet' event Meghan attended in 2023?

The speaker criticizes the 'black carpet' event Meghan attended in 2023, implying that it was an embarrassing moment for her. They mention it in the context of Meghan discussing her excitement for her 2024 projects, which ultimately did not seem to materialize, making the event appear pointless or disappointing.

What does the speaker mean by 'soft launch' in reference to Meghan Markle’s American Racism Orchestra?

The term 'soft launch' refers to a low-key introduction of Meghan Markle's American Racism Orchestra project, which the speaker views as underwhelming and lacking substance, citing trademark issues and unclear progress.

What is the speaker’s opinion on Meghan Markle's ability to handle criticism?

The speaker believes that Meghan Markle struggles to handle criticism, as she tends to abandon her projects or disassociate from them as soon as they receive any negative feedback or fail to meet expectations. This is used to further critique her lack of resilience and confidence.