Futbol Şube Sorumlusu ve Basın Sözcümüz Feyyaz Uçar'dan Açıklamalar | #SİVvBJK

Summary

In a passionate address following a football match, a spokesperson expresses frustration over what is perceived as unfair refereeing decisions against Beşiktaş. They highlight specific instances where penalties were either not called or reversed, questioning the consistency and fairness of VAR (Video Assistant Referee) interventions. The speaker notes a pattern of decisions seemingly against Beşiktaş and calls for transparency and fairness in officiating. They reveal plans to present a briefing to the management board, summarizing past refereeing statistics and insisting on the need for correct management without undue advantage. The speech underlines a deep-seated desire for justice and equitable treatment in Turkish football, emphasizing that Beşiktaş does not seek favoritism but fair play.

Takeaways

• 😠 They are trying not to talk about referees but referees insist they do
• 😤 Last week they didn't get a clear penalty, this week they did but VAR overruled it
• 😡 They don't understand why VAR keeps going against Beşiktaş
• 🤔 They want to listen to VAR audios and see what happens for other teams in similar situations
• 😫 This has happened over 3 generations of referees, they are tired of injustice against Beşiktaş
• 😩 Even the opponent team is complaining about the referee, they just want a fair match
• 😖 Past injustices, lack of cards for fouls are brought up again and again
• 😣 There was a clear penalty not given last week and one given then cancelled this week
• 😠 Why is it always against Beşiktaş, they want someone to explain this
• 👎🏽 The board will present referee stats and share it going forward for transparency

Q & A

Why does the speaker feel compelled to discuss referees despite their initial reluctance?

The speaker feels compelled to discuss referees because they believe the referees' decisions consistently invite scrutiny and controversy, especially in the context of penalties awarded or revoked against their team, suggesting a pattern of unfair treatment.

What specific incidents involving referees are mentioned as contentious?

The speaker mentions several contentious incidents involving referees, including a penalty not being called in a previous match, a penalty awarded in the current match being overturned upon VAR review without clear justification, and historical instances of perceived injustice against their team.

How does the speaker view the role of VAR in the decisions made during the games?

The speaker views the VAR (Video Assistant Referee) system with skepticism, highlighting instances where VAR decisions seem unjustified or lack transparency, particularly when it leads to the overturning of penalties in favor of their team.

What does the speaker imply about the fairness of referee decisions towards their team compared to others?

The speaker implies that referee decisions are consistently unfair towards their team compared to others, suggesting a bias or pattern of unfavorable rulings that they find difficult to understand or justify.

Why does the speaker mention the need for a 'briefing' to the management board?

The speaker mentions the need for a briefing to the management board to present a compilation of past incidents and referee statistics, aiming to highlight the pattern of perceived injustices and advocate for transparency and fairness in refereeing.

What long-term impact on their team does the speaker attribute to referee decisions?

The speaker attributes a long-term impact of demoralization and perceived injustice to their team due to referee decisions, suggesting that these decisions have historically and consistently disadvantaged their team.

What action does the speaker suggest their team does not need from referees?

The speaker suggests that their team does not need any unfair advantage or favorable decisions from referees, emphasizing the desire for fairness and integrity in the game rather than benefits from biased officiating.

What is the speaker's stance on the necessity of correct officiating for their team and Turkish football?

The speaker's stance is that correct officiating is crucial not only for their team but for the integrity of Turkish football as a whole, advocating for fair and accurate refereeing to ensure the sport's credibility and fairness.

Does the speaker plan to address their concerns with any football governing body?

Yes, the speaker plans to address their concerns with the Turkish Football Federation, indicating an intention to meet with its president to discuss issues related to refereeing and the long-standing grievances they have.

What is the emotional tone of the speaker towards the end of the script?

The emotional tone of the speaker towards the end of the script is one of frustration and exhaustion, expressing a heartfelt plea for fairness and an end to the perceived pattern of injustice against their team.