5G | Full Measure
Summary
TLDRThe transcript from 'Full Measure' discusses the concerns surrounding 5G technology and its potential health impacts. It highlights the abrupt halt of a major government study on wireless radiation's effects, which had already shown evidence of cancerous heart tumors in male rats and DNA damage in animals. Critics argue that the industry has been more effective than tobacco in influencing public opinion. The debate continues as the wireless industry maintains that no definitive proof of adverse effects exists, pointing to government agencies like the FDA and FCC. Meanwhile, experts suggest simple measures to reduce exposure, such as making devices sleep when not in use.
Takeaways
- 📱 The 5G technology, the fifth generation of wireless cellular technology, was deployed without a pause for health impact studies despite global calls for caution.
- 🛑 A significant government study on the potential dangers of wireless radiation was abruptly halted midstream, raising questions about transparency and motives.
- 🤔 There are concerns about the health risks of cell phones emitting radiofrequency microwave radiation, with ongoing debates about the safety of this technology.
- 🔍 Deborah Davis, a professor of medicine, has been warning about cell phone health risks for 16 years and advised against carrying phones close to the body.
- 🚫 The halted government research was supposed to investigate the impacts of cell phone microwave radiation on behavior, stress, and DNA damage.
- 🐀 Research findings indicated clear evidence that high levels of cell phone radiation caused male rats to develop cancerous heart tumors and increased DNA damage.
- 🏛️ Government advisors recommended continuing the research due to worrisome results, but it was stopped for reasons that remain unclear.
- 🌐 The National Institutes of Health declined to answer questions about the halted research, citing technical challenges and resource intensity.
- 📡 Some experts, like Professor Martin Paul, believe that EMF impacts on our bodies can cause a range of health issues, including neurological and reproductive problems.
- 🚫 The wireless industry maintains that there is no definitive proof of adverse health effects from RF energy emitted by wireless phones, citing FDA and FCC agreements.
- 🛡️ Simple measures could be taken to reduce exposure to wireless radiation, such as making devices go to sleep when not in use, indicating that solutions are within reach.
Q & A
What is 5G technology?
-5G is the fifth generation of wireless cellular technology designed to improve the speed and functionality of smartphones and other devices.
Why were there global calls for a pause on 5G deployment before it was deployed around 2019?
-There were concerns about potential health impacts, and governments, activists, and scientists called for a pause to allow for studies to be conducted on these health impacts.
What is EMF and why is it a concern?
-EMF stands for Electric and Magnetic Fields, which are invisible areas of radiation produced by electrical appliances, computer screens, and cell phone technology. Concerns arise due to potential health risks as technology advances.
What was the National Institutes of Health (NIH) study that was abruptly halted?
-The halted NIH study was investigating the effects of cell phone microwave radiation on behavior, stress, and DNA damage.
Who is Deborah Davis and what is her stance on cell phone health risks?
-Deborah Davis is a professor of medicine who has been warning about the health risks of cell phones for 16 years. She believes that the industry has been effective in downplaying these risks and that microwave radiation should be kept out of our homes.
What were the findings of the halted government research on cell phone radiation?
-The research found clear evidence that high levels of cell phone radiation caused male rats to develop cancerous heart tumors and significant increases in DNA damage in the brains of male mice and rats, as well as blood cells of female mice.
Why did the National Institutes of Health decline to answer questions about the halted study?
-The National Institutes of Health did not provide specific reasons but issued a statement citing technical challenges and the study being more resource-intensive than expected.
What is Martin Paul's view on the impact of EMF on our health?
-Martin Paul, a preeminent scientist on the topic, believes that EMF impacts the cells of our bodies, causing neurological, neuropsychiatric, reproductive issues, and oxidative stress, which are linked to chronic diseases.
What concerns have been raised about the rollout of 5G and the COVID-19 pandemic?
-Some scientists have noted that the COVID-19 pandemic broke out in areas after the rollout of 5G, suggesting that wireless communication radiation might have been a toxic environmental factor contributing to various health issues.
What is the wireless industry's stance on the safety of RF energy from wireless phones?
-The wireless industry maintains that based on currently available data, it has not determined that RF energy from wireless phones causes risks, pointing to government agencies like the FDA and FCC that agree adverse effects have not been definitively proven.
What are some simple steps that could be taken to reduce exposure to cell phone radiation?
-Simple steps include using speakerphone, making phones and routers go to sleep when not in use, and programming devices to reduce radiation emission.
Outlines
📱 Health Concerns Surrounding 5G Technology
The script discusses the introduction of 5G, the fifth generation of wireless cellular technology, and the health concerns that arose before its deployment around 2019. There were global calls for a pause in 5G implementation to study potential health impacts, but these were largely ignored. A significant government study on the possible dangers of wireless radiation was abruptly halted in 2023. The script explores the debate from both sides, highlighting the invisible areas of radiation produced by electronic devices and the controversy surrounding cell phones emitting radiofrequency microwave radiation. It mentions a National Institute of Health program that was cut off, despite the fact that it had already found evidence of DNA damage and cancerous heart tumors in male rats due to high levels of cell phone radiation. The script also features an interview with Deborah Davis, a professor of medicine who has been warning about the health risks of cell phones for years, and her concerns about the influence of the industry on research and public health.
🌐 Electromagnetic Fields and Health Risks
This paragraph delves into the links between certain kinds of electromagnetic fields (EMFs) and health risks, particularly cancer, with a focus on child leukemia. It mentions expert medical groups and a European scientific committee that have studied the effects of cell phones. The script also addresses the broader impacts of EMF exposure, such as depression, sleep issues, headaches, and anxiety. It discusses the controversial connection between the rollout of 5G and the COVID-19 pandemic, with a 2021 study suggesting that wireless communication radiation might have contributed to health complications related to the virus. The paragraph contrasts these concerns with the wireless industry's stance, which asserts that there is no definitive proof of adverse health effects from radiofrequency (RF) energy. It also includes perspectives from government agencies like the FDA and FCC, and an interview with Christopher Collins, a radiology professor at New York University, who has consulted for the wireless industry. Collins suggests that more careful studies are needed and offers practical advice for reducing exposure to cell phone radiation.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡5G
💡EMF (Electromagnetic Fields)
💡Radiofrequency Microwave Radiation
💡National Institute of Health (NIH)
💡Cancer
💡DNA Damage
💡Wireless Industry
💡FDA (Food and Drug Administration)
💡FCC (Federal Communications Commission)
💡5G Rollout
💡Hyper Coagulation
Highlights
5G is the fifth generation of wireless cellular technology intended to improve speed and functionality.
In 2019, there were global calls for a pause on 5G deployment to study potential health impacts, which were ignored.
A major government study on the potential dangers of wireless radiation was abruptly halted midstream in early 2024.
EMFs, or electromagnetic fields, are invisible areas of radiation produced by various electrical devices and cell phone technology.
Deborah Davis, a professor of medicine, has been warning about the health risks of cell phones for 16 years.
Davis issued a memo advising against carrying phones close to the body due to potential health risks.
The halted government research was investigating the impact of cell phone microwave radiation on behavior, stress, and DNA damage.
The halted research had already produced worrisome results, including evidence of cancerous heart tumors in male rats due to high levels of cell phone radiation.
There were significant increases in DNA damage in the brains of male mice and rats, and blood cells of female mice due to cell phone radiation.
Government advisors recommended continuing the research due to clear evidence of cancer found in the study.
The National Institutes of Health declined to answer questions about why the research was terminated.
Martin Paul, a preeminent scientist on EMFs, expressed deep concern about the impact of EMFs on all cells of our bodies.
Paul believes that EMF exposures are already having major health effects and that 5G will be vastly worse.
Three expert medical groups have linked certain kinds of electromagnetic fields to cancer, particularly child leukemia.
A 2021 study suggested that wireless communication radiation might have contributed to worsened health effects during the COVID-19 pandemic.
The wireless industry maintains that RF energy from wireless phones does not cause risks, citing FDA and FCC agreements.
Christopher Collins, a professor of radiology and consultant to the wireless industry, suggests that studies showing adverse effects are not reproducible.
Collins recommends using speakerphone or other methods to reduce exposure if concerned about cell phone radiation.
Simple measures such as making phones and routers sleep when not in use could reduce exposure to EMFs.
The National Science Foundation announced a $25 million investment in tax measures related to wireless radiation research.
Transcripts
>>> WELCOME TO FULL MEASURE. I
AM SHARYL ATTKISSON. THE NEWEST
TECHNOLOGY THAT POWERS OUR
SMART PHONES IS 5G, THE FIFTH
GENERATION OF WIRELESS CELLULAR
TECHNOLOGY THAT IS SUPPOSED TO
MAKE THINGS WORK BETTER AND
FASTER. BEFORE IT WAS DEPLOYED
AROUND 2019, THERE WERE GLOBAL
CALLS FOR A PAUSE OF
GOVERNMENTS, ACTIVISTS AND
SCIENTISTS UNTIL HEALTH IMPACTS
COULD BE STUDIED. THAT DIDN'T
HAPPEN. EARLIER THIS YEAR, A
BIG GOVERNMENT STUDY ON THE
POSSIBLE DANGER OF WIRELESS
RADIATION WAS ABRUPTLY HALTED
MIDSTREAM. TODAY, WE WILL HEAR
FROM BOTH SIDES AS TO WHAT
MIGHT BE GOING ON. EMF,
ELECTRIC AND MEDICAL FIELDS ARE
INVISIBLE AREAS OF RADIATION
PRODUCED BY ITEMS LIKE
ELECTRICAL APPLIANCES, COMPUTER
SCREENS, AND CELL PHONE
TECHNOLOGY. BUT AS TECHNOLOGY
HAS LEAPT FORWARD, THERE ARE
NAGGING SAFETY QUESTIONS. WHEN
IT COMES SPECIFICALLY TO CELL
PHONES WHICH EMIT
RADIOFREQUENCY MICROWAVE
RADIATION, THERE'S A NEW
CONTROVERSY, IMPORTANT SAFETY
RESEARCH UNDER THE NATIONAL
INSTITUTE OF HEALTH. IT WAS
SUDDENLY CUT OFF.
>> THE NATIONAL PROGRAM HAD
COMMITTED MAJOR RESOURCES AND
MILLIONS OF DOLLARS TO DOING A
STUDY THAT WOULD CLARIFY SOME
OF THE MECHANISMS OF HOW
MICROWAVE RADIATION AFFECTS THE
CELL. THE PLUG WAS PULLED ON
THAT FOR REASONS THAT NOBODY
KNOWS.
>> DEBORAH DAVIS IS A PROFESSOR
OF MEDICINE WHO HAS BEEN
WARNING ABOUT THE HEALTH RISKS
OF CELL PHONES FOR 16 YEARS. IN
2008, SHE WAS BEHIND ISSUING A
MEMO WITH THE CANCER
INSTITUTE'S CENTER FOR
ENVIRONMENTAL ONCOLOGY WHERE
SHE WAS FOUNDING DIRECTOR.
ADVISED THE CANCER DOCTORS NOT
TO CARRY PHONES IN THEIR
POCKETS OR CLOSE TO THEIR
BODIES. THE NEW GOVERNMENT
RESEARCH , NOW HALTED, WAS TO
FURTHER INVESTIGATE HOW CELL
PHONE MICROWAVE RADIATION
IMPACTS BEHAVIOR , STRESS, AND
HOW IT DAMAGES DNA.
>> WHEN YOU HEARD THAT THE PLUG
WAS PULLED, WHAT WENT THROUGH
YOUR MIND?
>> I WANTED TO FIGURE OUT WHAT
WAS BEHIND IT. I HAD
SUSPICIONS. THIS INDUSTRY HAS
BEEN VERY EFFECTIVE . MORE
EFFECTIVE THAN THE TOBACCO
INDUSTRY. OF COURSE, IT'S A
VERY VALUABLE INDUSTRY. NOBODY
WOULD DENY THAT MICROWAVE
RADIATION HAS REVOLUTIONIZED
OUR ABILITY TO COMMUNICATE, TO
SEND MISSILES INTO SPACE, AND
TO SEND DRONES INTO
BATTLEFIELDS. HOWEVER, THERE IS
NO QUESTION IN MY MIND AND THAT
OF HUNDREDS OF OTHER EXPERTS IN
THIS FIELD. WE SHOULD KEEP
MICROWAVE RADIATION OUT OF OUR
BEDROOMS AND OUR HOMES.
>> FOR THE RESEARCH WAS
TERMINATED, IT HAD ALREADY
PRODUCED WORRISOME RESULTS.
RESEARCHERS CONCLUDED THERE WAS
CLEAR EVIDENCE THAT HIGH LEVELS
OF CELL PHONE RADIATION CAUSED
MALE RATS TO DEVELOP CANCEROUS
HEART TUMORS. THERE WAS
SIGNIFICANT INCREASES IN DNA
DAMAGE IN THE BRAINS OF MALE
MICE AND RATS, AND BLOOD CELLS
OF FEMALE MICE. DAVIS SAYS AN
IMPORTANT BOARD OF GOVERNMENT
ADVISORS SAID THE RESEARCH
SHOULD CONTINUE MOVING FORWARD.
>> WHAT IS THE MOST IMPORTANT
THING YOU THINK PEOPLE SHOULD
KNOW ABOUT THE STOP STUDY?
>> THEY BROUGHT IN THESE
REVIEWERS. HERE'S WHAT THE
REVIEWERS SAID. WE HAVE NOT
LOOKED AT ALL THE EVIDENCE. AND
WE THINK THERE IS, QUOTE, CLEAR
EVIDENCE OF CANCER. THAT WAS
WHAT THE STUDY FOUND. THAT IS
WHY THE BOARD RECOMMENDED THE
ADDITIONAL PROGRAM OF RESEARCH.
WHY WAS THE PLUG PULLED? YOU
WILL HAVE TO ASK THEM.
>> WE ASK. THE NATIONAL
INSTITUTES OF HEALTH DECLINED
TO ANSWER OUR QUESTIONS. AGENCY
REFERRED US TO A STATEMENT THAT
SAID THERE WOULD BE NO FURTHER
RESEARCH BECAUSE IT WAS
TECHNICALLY CHALLENGING AND
MORE RESOURCE INTENSIVE THAN
EXPECTED. IN THIS FULL MEASURE
REPORT FIVE YEARS AGO, WE SPOKE
WITH PROFESSOR MARTIN PAUL, ONE
OF THE WORLD'S PREEMINENT
SCIENTISTS ON THE TOPIC.
>> WE KNOW THAT THE EMF IMPACT
THE CELLS OF OUR BODIES, ALL
THE CELLS OF OUR BODIES, BY
ACTIVATING SOME CHANNELS. AND
WHEN THEY DO THAT, THEY PRODUCE
ALL KINDS OF AFFECT . THOSE
INCLUDE NEUROLOGICAL,
NEUROPSYCHIATRIC, REPRODUCTIVE,
OXIDATIVE STRESS, WHICH
INVOLVED ESSENTIALLY ALL
CHRONIC DISEASES. SO I AM
DEEPLY CONCERNED ABOUT THE
SITUATION.
>> IS IT YOUR FEELING THAT
MOBILE PHONE USE AND 5G IN THE
FUTURE HAVE BEEN AND ARE
CAUSING DISEASE, AND EPIDEMICS
IN THE COUNTRY?
>> I BELIEVE THAT THE EXPOSURES
WE ALREADY HAVE OUR PRODUCING
MAJOR EFFECTS ALREADY ON OUR
HEALTH , AND 5G WILL BE VASTLY
WORSE THAN ANYTHING WE ARE
ALREADY EXPOSED TO.
>> AT LEAST THREE EXPERT
MEDICAL GROUPS HAVE LINKED
CERTAIN KINDS OF
ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS TO
CANCER. PARTICULARLY, CHILD
LEUKEMIA. THE NATIONAL
INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL
HEALTH SCIENTISTS, A WORKING
GROUP UNDER THE WORLD HEALTH
ORGANIZATION, AND A EUROPEAN
SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE WHICH
STUDIED CELL PHONES IN
PARTICULAR. PAUL SAYS THERE IS
MORE TO WORRY ABOUT.
>> WHAT HAS BEEN SHOWN, YOU GET
DEPRESSION. YOU KNOW, I CAN'T
SLEEP. I'M TIRED ALL THE TIME.
I AM DEPRESSED. I HAVE GOT
HEADACHES. I CAN'T
CONCENTRATE. I AM ANXIOUS. ALL
THE THINGS THAT EVERYBODY
COMPLAINS ABOUT NOW, WE KNOW
ARE CAUSED BY EMF EXPOSURES,
NOT JUST ONE TYPE, BUT MULTIPLE
TYPES OF EMF EXPOSURES.
>> SINCE THAT REPORT IN 2019,
THERE HAVE BEEN MORE CONCERNS.
SOME SCIENTISTS NOTED THE COVID
PANDEMIC IN WUHAN, CHINA, AND
NEW YORK CITY BROKE OUT AFTER
THE ROLLOUT OF 5G. WHILE MANY
DISMISSED ANY CONNECTION AS A
CONSPIRACY THEORY, A 2021 STUDY
FOUND WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
RADIATION MIGHT HAVE BEEN A
TOXIC ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR WITH
COVID-19 THAT CONTRIBUTED TO
HYPER COAGULATION OR BLOOD
CLOTTING, AMPLIFIED IMMUNE
SYSTEM DYSFUNCTION, AND HYPER
INFLAMMATION, WORSENED HEART
ARRHYTHMIAS, CARDIAC DISORDERS
AND MORE. THERE IS ANOTHER
SIDE. THE WIRELESS INDUSTRY
SAYS, BASED ON DATA CURRENTLY
AVAILABLE, IT HAS NOT
DETERMINED THAT RF ENERGY FROM
WIRELESS PHONES CAUSES RISKS.
IT POINTS TO GOVERNMENT
AGENCIES LIKE THE FDA AND FCC
THAT AGREE ADVERSE EFFECTS HAVE
NOT BEEN DEFINITIVELY PROVEN.
WE SPOKE WITH CHRISTOPHER
COLLINS ABOUT THE GOVERNMENT'S
HALTED RESEARCH.
>> SO PEOPLE WATCHING FROM THE
OUTSIDE WERE LOOKING FOR
ANSWERS TO THIS MIGHT
REASONABLY ASK THE QUESTION,
WAS IT SHOWING SOMETHING
NEGATIVE ABOUT 5G? IS THAT WHY,
FOR SOME REASON, SOMEBODY
CONVINCED THEM TO STOP IT?
>> THAT IS INTERESTING. I
DON'T THINK THAT'S THE CASE.
>> COLLINS IS A PROFESSOR OF
RADIOLOGY AT NEW YORK
UNIVERSITY. HE HAS BEEN A PAID
CONSULTANT TO THE WIRELESS
INDUSTRY.
>> THERE IS MORE THAN ONE STUDY
THAT SHOWS THERE'S AN ADVERSE
AFFECT. PEOPLE WHO ARE WORRIED
ABOUT CELL PHONES, YOU KNOW,
WILL LOOK AT ALL THE STUDIES
THAT SAY THERE'S IMAGE -- AN
ADVERSE AFFECT AND SAY, THERE
ARE ADVERSE EFFECTS. THE THING
IS, GENERALLY, THE STUDIES THAT
SAY THERE'S AN ADVERSE AFFECT
OUR EITHER NOT REPRODUCIBLE, OR
HAVE NOT BEEN REPRODUCED BY
INDEPENDENT GROUPS, OR THEY ARE
CLEARLY A THERMAL EFFECT.
>> IT'S MY UNDERSTANDING THE
FDA SAID SOME YEARS AGO,
CONGRESS PUSHED THE INDUSTRY ON
THIS POINT, THAT THERE SHOULD
BE STUDIES DONE TO TRY TO
DETERMINE MORE ABOUT 5G. IF
THAT'S THE CASE, WHAT YOU
THINK THE NEXT STEP SHOULD BE?
>> THAT'S AN INTERESTING
QUESTION. IF YOU ASK ME,
PERSONALLY, I THINK THAT TRYING
TO DO MORE CAREFUL STUDIES
MAKES MORE SENSE THAN HIGHER
RADIATION LEVELS IN ANIMALS. IN
ANIMALS, THE POWER LEVELS FOR
HIS THESE THINGS ARE VERY, VERY
LOW COMPARED TO WHAT WE USE IN
MEDICINE, COMPARED TO WHAT YOU
GET FROM THE SUN. IN TERMS OF
WHAT TO DO IF YOU ARE WORRIED
ABOUT IT, I MEAN, THERE ARE
OPTIONS FOR USING YOUR
SPEAKERPHONE OR SOME OTHER
THINGS IF YOU WANT TO AVOID
USING YOUR CELL PHONE. YOU CAN
DO THAT.
>> THAT RAISES AT LEAST ONE
BURNING QUESTION. AS AN
AMERICAN POPULATION ADDICTED TO
ITS CELL PHONE HABIT EVEN CARE?
>> EVEN IF A HUGE SEGMENT OF
AMERICA BECAME AWARE OF HARMFUL
RADIATION, WOULDN'T THERE BE A
LARGE NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO SAY,
I WILL TAKE MY CHANCES? I
DON'T CARE?
>> CERTAINLY. LET ME SAY, IT'S
NOT THAT HARD TO REDUCE
EXPOSURES DIRECTLY. THERE ARE
SIMPLE THINGS THAT COULD BE
DONE TOMORROW. YOU COULD MAKE
PHONES AND ROUTERS THAT GO TO
SLEEP EXCEPT WHEN YOU NEED THEM
TO WAKE UP. NOW, IN YOUR HOME,
THE ROUTER IS ON 24/7. YOU ARE
NOT USING IT 24/7. IF YOU HAVE
TEENAGERS TRYING TO, YOU SHOULD
CUT IT OFF. IN FACT, IT IS VERY
SIMPLE TO PROGRAM THE SOFTWARE
OF THESE DEVICES, RIGHT NOW.
IT'S NOT ROCKET SCIENCE.
>> INTERESTING.
>> THINK ABOUT THIS. WHEN
FRANCE BANNED THE iPHONE 12 FOR
SALES, WITHIN TWO WEEKS, WITHIN
TWO WEEKS, THE iPHONE COMPANY
HAD FIGURED OUT HOW TO CHANGE
SOFTWARE ON THOSE PHONES SO THE
PHONES WOULD PASS THE FRENCH
TEST. IT'S NOT THAT HARD.
>> WHILE ONE ARM OF THE
GOVERNMENT STOPPED ITS RESEARCH
ON WIRELESS RADIATION, THE
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
ANNOUNCED IT WOULD SPEND $25
MILLION IN TAX MONE
Browse More Related Video
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)