The Hunt for the BEST Controller (Hall Effect)

Summary

In this video, a series of game controllers are compared for their performance, value, and features. The discussion highlights how even less-known brands like the X20 and Ultimate 2C outperformed some established gaming brands. Factors like trigger sensitivity, ergonomics, rumble motor quality, and overall build are assessed. While some controllers like the Apex 4 and Vader 4 are praised for premium feel and performance, the value-oriented X20 stands out as an exceptional choice. The video concludes with a sponsor mention for Boot dodev, an engaging platform to learn coding with a focus on backend development.

Takeaways

• 😀 The video reviews various gaming controllers, comparing their performance, features, and value across different price points.
• 😀 The Apex 4 controller is praised for its overall build quality and performance, standing out as a high-quality option in the mid-tier range.
• 😀 Despite its $30 price tag, the budget controller performs admirably, especially with precise throttle adjustments, but lacks the premium feel of higher-end controllers.
• 😀 The Easy SMX X20 controller is considered a strong performer, offering great value for its price and solid overall features.
• 😀 Several controllers were compared against popular brands like Razer and Turtle Beach, with some lesser-known brands outperforming the bigger names.
• 😀 The X20 controller is particularly noted for its excellent rumble motor and responsive analog sticks, which contribute to its high rating.
• 😀 There is a significant focus on the importance of ergonomics, with some controllers like the Vader 4 criticized for poor stick placement under the faceplate.
• 😀 The value of controllers is often determined by a combination of features like analog stick quality, trigger precision, and rumble motors.
• 😀 Controllers like the Ultimate 2C offer a balance of value, good sticks, and low input latency, making them great all-rounders, but some users may dislike their ergonomics.
• 😀 The video emphasizes that just because a controller didn’t make it to the podium doesn’t mean it’s a bad option; the competitive nature of the comparisons is highlighted.
• 😀 The importance of consulting the tier list before purchasing a controller is stressed, as it provides a better perspective on the strengths of each product.

Q & A

What is the main focus of the video?

The video focuses on comparing various gaming controllers, evaluating their performance, features, value, and user experience. It highlights budget-friendly options, mid-range controllers, and some premium models.

How does the Apex 4 compare to cheaper controllers like the $30 model?

The Apex 4 stands out for its premium feel and better performance, especially with its trigger design and overall ergonomics. However, the cheaper $30 controller offers good throttle control, though it lacks the same high-quality feel as the Apex 4.

What makes the X20 controller stand out in the comparison?

The X20 is praised for its nice rumble motor, good analog sticks with rubberized tops, and excellent performance, especially for its price. It's recognized for its solid features and comfort, despite not being from a major gaming brand.

Why did the Vader 4 controller get an honorable mention?

The Vader 4 offers good value and performance for its price, but its unique design, such as the positioning of the stick controls under the faceplate, was a point of contention. Despite this, its value and performance were strong enough to be considered for the honorable mention.

What makes the Ultimate 2C controller a recommended choice?

The Ultimate 2C is recommended for its combination of value, good input latency, and solid stick controls. Despite some ergonomic issues, it’s considered a great all-around controller that performs well in various areas.

What did the reviewer think of the ergonomic design of the controllers?

The reviewer mentioned that while performance and features were the main factors in choosing the best controllers, ergonomics were also important. Some controllers had good features but poor ergonomics, like the Ultimate 2C, which they acknowledged but still recommended for its performance.

How did the budget controllers fare against the premium options?

Despite some premium controllers having better ergonomics and features, budget controllers like the $30 model and the X20 performed surprisingly well. The budget controllers showed that good value can still be found in lower-priced options, offering great performance for the cost.

What role did Labs play in determining the best controllers?

Labs played a key role by providing input latency testing, performance metrics, and overall feedback, which helped highlight controllers like the Ultimate 2C. The data from Labs combined with the reviewers' subjective experiences helped shape the final rankings.

Why was it surprising that no major gaming brands were at the top of the rankings?

It was surprising because the top controllers were not from well-known gaming brands like Razer or Turtle Beach, which are typically associated with high-quality gaming peripherals. Instead, lesser-known brands and budget controllers outperformed them in some areas.

What was the significance of the X20 controller in the final rankings?

The X20 was considered one of the best controllers overall due to its combination of outstanding value and solid performance. It was praised for its rumble motor, analog sticks, and ergonomics, making it a top choice even when compared to premium models.