Alegasyon ni FPRRD na may mga blangkong bahagi sa 2025 nat'l budget, kasinungalingan ayon... | Saksi

Summary

Former President Rodrigo Duterte’s claims about President Bongbong Marcos signing a flawed 2025 national budget were called fake news by Malacañang. Duterte had criticized the Bicameral Conference Committee Report, citing blank sections in the proposed budget, particularly for agencies like NIA and PCA. Marcos denied these claims, stating it was impossible for a budget to be signed with missing details. Malacañang emphasized that the 2025 budget had been thoroughly reviewed and that any errors would be addressed through proper legal channels. The issue has sparked legal debates, with potential petitions to the Supreme Court.

Takeaways

• 😀 Malacañang dismissed former President Duterte's claims about a faulty 2025 National Budget as fake news.
• 😀 Duterte alleged that parts of the 2025 National Budget, signed by President Bongbong Marcos, contained blank sections.
• 😀 Congressman Isidro Ungab criticized the budget's bicameral conference report, highlighting blank sections in key areas such as irrigation and agricultural projects.
• 😀 The blank sections in the budget raised concerns about incomplete or missing funding details for various government agencies.
• 😀 Executive Secretary Lucas Bersamin called the accusation of blank budget items malicious and criminal, denying any flaws in the document.
• 😀 The Department of Budget and Management (DBM) ensured that every project in the 2025 National Budget had properly allocated funds and no blank items were present.
• 😀 The General Appropriations Bill (GAB), not the bicameral conference report, is submitted for presidential signature, with all details carefully reviewed beforehand.
• 😀 The DBM reiterated that the budget has no items with missing project details or funding allocations, as required by the Constitution.
• 😀 Attorney Salvador Panelo, former Chief Presidential Legal Counsel, agreed with the government's stance, labeling the allegations as false.
• 😀 Former Congressman Ungab questioned the validity of the bicameral report and suggested the possibility of legal action, including a petition to declare the 2025 budget unconstitutional.

Q & A

What was the claim made by former President Rodrigo Duterte regarding the 2025 National Budget?

Former President Rodrigo Duterte claimed that President Bongbong Marcos had signed the 2025 National Budget with blank sections, particularly in key areas like the National Irrigation Administration (NIA) and the Philippine Coconut Authority (PCA).

How did Malacañang respond to Duterte's statements about the 2025 National Budget?

Malacañang called Duterte's statements fake news, categorically denying that the budget had any blank sections. They emphasized that every detail in the budget had been thoroughly reviewed before it was signed by the president.

What did Davao Congressman Isidro Ungab point out about the 2025 National Budget?

Ungab pointed out that there were blank sections in the first page of the Bicameral Conference Committee report for the 2025 budget, especially in the budgets for the NIA, PCA, and Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (BFAR), as well as for agricultural machines and irrigation projects.

What did President Bongbong Marcos say in response to claims about blank sections in the budget?

President Marcos firmly rejected the claim, asserting that it was impossible for the General Appropriations Act (GAA) to be signed with blank sections, calling the accusations lies.

What was Executive Secretary Lucas Bersamin's response to the fake news claims?

Executive Secretary Lucas Bersamin also denounced the accusations, calling them malicious and criminal. He stressed that there were no blank sections in the 2025 National Budget and that every project had been thoroughly reviewed.

How did the Department of Budget and Management (DBM) address the claims of blank sections?

The DBM clarified that under the constitution, the General Appropriations Bill (GAB), not the Bicameral Conference Committee report, is submitted to the president for signing. They confirmed that the 2025 National Budget was a complete document with no missing details.

What did former Chief Presidential Legal Counsel Salvador Panelo suggest regarding the 2025 budget?

Salvador Panelo suggested that if the claims about blank sections in the budget were true, those responsible could face criminal charges. He also questioned the legitimacy of the ratification process by Congress.

What legal actions were being considered in response to the 2025 National Budget's approval?

Davao Congressman Ungab indicated that legal action might be taken, with some petitioners considering filing a case in the Supreme Court to declare the 2025 National Budget unconstitutional due to alleged flaws in its approval process.

How did Malacañang express confidence regarding the 2025 National Budget despite the claims?

Malacañang expressed confidence in the legality of the General Appropriations Act, but acknowledged that they could not prevent individuals from filing a case in the Supreme Court if they wished to challenge the budget.

Where can the full details of the 2025 National Budget be accessed for public verification?

The full details of the 2025 National Budget are available for public verification on the Department of Budget and Management's official website.