Algorithm Design | Algorithm Correctness #algorithm #algorithmdesign
Summary
TLDRThis educational video session delves into the importance of algorithm correctness, explaining that an algorithm is considered correct if its output matches the expected result. The instructor uses a simple example involving even numbers to illustrate the concept. The video outlines three primary methods for ensuring correctness: counterexamples, mathematical induction, and loop invariants. It emphasizes the necessity of total correctness over partial correctness and provides an example of an infinite loop to highlight the importance of a stopping condition in algorithms. The session aims to help viewers understand the principles behind creating and verifying accurate algorithms.
Takeaways
- 📘 Algorithm correctness is crucial because it ensures that the output of an algorithm matches the expected outcome.
- 🔍 Total correctness is the goal, as it means the algorithm produces the desired output for all possible inputs, while partial correctness indicates the algorithm may only work correctly for some inputs.
- 🔄 An infinite loop can occur if there is no increment or decrement operator within the loop, causing it to run indefinitely and not reach the stopping condition.
- 🔢 The importance of a stopping property in loops is highlighted, as it ensures the algorithm will terminate and provide a correct output.
- 🔑 Total correctness can be achieved by ensuring both partial correctness and the stopping property are met.
- 🔍 Three methods for proving algorithm correctness are discussed: counterexample, mathematical induction, and loop invariant.
- 🚫 Counterexamples serve as indirect proofs by providing an instance where a statement is false, thus disproving it.
- 📚 Mathematical induction is a direct proof method used to prove that a statement holds for all cases, starting with a base case and then proving the inductive step.
- 🔄 Loop invariants are conditions that are true before, during, and after the execution of a loop, ensuring that the loop behaves correctly and terminates as expected.
- 📉 The script provides an example of a summation formula represented as a mathematical model and discusses its time complexity implications.
- 📝 The presenter encourages students to understand the concepts of total and partial correctness, and to reach out if they have any questions or issues.
Q & A
What is the primary importance of algorithm correctness?
-Algorithm correctness is crucial because it ensures that the output of an algorithm matches the expected output, which is the desired outcome for a given problem.
What are the two main types of algorithm correctness discussed in the script?
-The two main types of algorithm correctness discussed are total correctness and partial correctness.
Why is total correctness preferred over partial correctness?
-Total correctness is preferred because it guarantees that the algorithm consistently produces the correct output for all possible inputs, whereas partial correctness may only be true for some inputs.
What is an example of an incorrect algorithm output mentioned in the script?
-An example given is a code to determine if a number is even. If the input is 10 and the output is 'odd', it is incorrect because the expected output should be 'even'.
What is the significance of the stopping property in the context of algorithm correctness?
-The stopping property ensures that an algorithm will terminate after a finite number of steps and produce the correct output, preventing infinite loops.
Can you explain the concept of a loop invariant as discussed in the script?
-A loop invariant is a condition that remains true before and after each iteration of a loop and upon termination of the loop. It helps in proving the correctness of an algorithm by ensuring that the loop maintains the invariant properties throughout its execution.
What are the three steps involved in checking a loop invariant?
-The three steps are the initial step (ensuring the loop starts correctly), the maintenance step (ensuring the loop maintains the invariant during each iteration), and the end step or stop step (ensuring the loop stops under the correct conditions).
What is the purpose of using counterexamples in proving algorithm correctness?
-Counterexamples are used to disprove a statement by providing an instance where the statement does not hold true, which is an indirect proof method.
How does mathematical induction differ from counterexamples in proving algorithm correctness?
-Mathematical induction is a direct proof method where one proves the base case and then assumes the statement is true for a certain case 'n' to prove it must also be true for 'n+1'. In contrast, counterexamples use specific instances to disprove a statement.
What is the relationship between total correctness and the stopping property?
-Total correctness is achieved when an algorithm is partially correct and adheres to the stopping property, which ensures the algorithm terminates with the correct output.
Can you provide an example of how mathematical induction is used in the script?
-The script uses the example of proving the summation of the first 'n' integers formula. It starts with the base case (n=1), assumes the formula holds for 'n', and then proves it for 'n+1', demonstrating the direct proof method of mathematical induction.
Outlines
📚 Introduction to Algorithm Correctness
This paragraph introduces the concept of algorithm correctness, emphasizing its importance and setting the stage for a deeper discussion. It explains that an algorithm is considered correct if its output matches the expected output. The instructor uses the analogy of a simple program to check for even numbers to illustrate the point. The paragraph also touches on the idea of partial correctness, where an algorithm might be correct for some inputs but not all, and contrasts this with total correctness, which is the ultimate goal for ensuring an algorithm works as intended for all possible inputs.
🔍 Understanding Algorithm Correctness with Examples
This section delves into the specifics of algorithm correctness using an example of a loop intended to sum elements of an array. The example highlights common errors such as infinite loops due to missing increment operators and the importance of the stopping property in loops. The paragraph explains that total correctness is achieved when an algorithm is partially correct and adheres to the stopping property. It also introduces the three methods used to prove algorithm correctness: counterexamples, mathematical induction, and loop invariants, with a brief mention of other approaches like case enumeration and contradictions.
🔧 Loop Invariants and Their Role in Algorithm Correctness
The focus of this paragraph is on loop invariants, a method used to ensure that loops in an algorithm behave as expected. The instructor explains the three steps involved in maintaining a loop invariant: initialization, maintenance, and the stop step. It is emphasized that all three steps must be true for a loop to be considered invariant. The paragraph also provides an example of a loop with an incorrect initialization step, demonstrating how this can lead to incorrect results and the importance of each step in achieving total correctness.
📉 Counterexamples and Mathematical Induction in Correctness Proofs
This paragraph discusses two methods for proving algorithm correctness: counterexamples and mathematical induction. Counterexamples are used as indirect proofs to disprove a statement by providing a specific instance where the statement does not hold. The instructor uses the ceiling function as an example to illustrate this method. On the other hand, mathematical induction is a direct proof method, typically used in mathematics to prove statements that hold for all natural numbers. The paragraph briefly explains the process of induction, which involves proving a base case and then proving that if the statement holds for n, it also holds for n+1.
📝 Summary of Algorithm Correctness Methods and Their Importance
The final paragraph wraps up the session by summarizing the key points discussed in the video. It reiterates the importance of total correctness in algorithms and distinguishes it from partial correctness, which is undesirable. The paragraph also briefly explains that total correctness is achieved by combining partial correctness with the stopping property. The instructor reminds viewers of the three main methods for proving correctness: mathematical induction, counterexamples, and loop invariants. The session concludes with an invitation for viewers to ask questions if they have any, highlighting the interactive nature of the educational content.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Algorithm Correctness
💡Expected Output
💡Current Output
💡Partially Correct
💡Totally Correct
💡Infinite Loop
💡Stopping Property
💡Loop Invariant
💡Counterexample
💡Mathematical Induction
💡Partial Correctness
Highlights
Introduction to the importance of algorithm correctness and its types.
Explanation of why an algorithm's output must match the expected output to be considered correct.
The concept of partial correctness versus total correctness in algorithms.
Example illustrating the difference between expected and current output in algorithm correctness.
Importance of total correctness for achieving the desired algorithmic outcome.
Discussion on the stopping property and its role in ensuring total correctness.
The role of increment operators in preventing infinite loops for algorithm correctness.
Explanation of the three-step process involving initialization, maintenance, and stopping for loop invariants.
Introduction to the methods used for proving algorithm correctness: counterexamples, induction, and loop invariants.
Counterexamples as a method of indirect proof to disprove an algorithm's correctness.
Mathematical induction as a direct proof method for establishing algorithm correctness.
The process of using mathematical induction in steps: base case, inductive hypothesis, and inductive step.
Demonstration of proving a mathematical formula using mathematical induction.
Differentiating between total correctness, which requires partial correctness plus stopping property.
Practical applications of algorithm correctness in real-world programming scenarios.
The significance of loop invariants in ensuring consistent and correct algorithm behavior.
Summary of the session's learning objectives and an invitation for questions from the audience.
Transcripts
hello students welcome to edus today's
session is all about to read the
algorithm correctness here we will
discuss why algorithm correctness is
important and how many types of
correctness of algorithms are there and
what are the methods are getting used to
correct an algorithm or to find
correctness inside an algorithm we will
be discussing that one in the next uh
slides so here correctness of an algor
them is important as we discussed in the
previous video those who are new to this
video please watch the previous video
here correctness is important if the
current output if the current output of
your algorithm is equivalent to the
expected
output expected output then only you can
say your algorithm is desired algorithm
or correct algorithm like you know the
same same example I I'll say if you know
you have written a code to find whether
a number is even or not in that time if
uh if you're putting a number is a uh 10
that time if that you know as for the
expectations you know 10 is even if your
code is giving 10 is odd so your current
output which is odd is not equal to the
expected output which is even in that
case even is not equivalent to odd that
what happens you can say it is not
meeting with the uh expected output so
that's why it is not correct if some
part are getting matched so you can say
it is partially
correct okay if everything is getting
match you can say totally correct
suppose you can say you have given a you
know answer given an answer for a
question which is totally correct that
you know so you know it's two marks that
you got out of two out of two is given
by the teachers to you okay that is
totally correct sometimes what the
students are doing like to get 0.5 so at
least give us5.5 means they know5 will
be one okay but5 you are actually going
for uh you know arguing with the faculty
so please give us five because you are
partially correct you know you're
partially correct you're not fully
correct so in that case what happened
like the correct is somehow you meeting
with the expected output suppose instead
of getting with uh suppose 1 2 3 4 like
up to 10 suppose you would need to find
instead of getting up to 10 you are
getting 1 2 3 like uh up to again you
are repeating with 2 1 2 1 like this
suppose you you know infite Loop you can
up to three it is running somehow you're
matching with the expected one but it is
not totally correct the partially
correct answer we are actually not
needing an algorithm is partially
correct is not our Target the Target is
to get total correct why because we need
a desired algorithm that is why we
should get the totally correct answer so
the then what why total correctness is
needed that you understood now total
correct if you want to find what are the
structures that you have to find uh
before that we should have to discuss
one example through which you can easily
understand what is happening now so this
is an algorithm we have written or you
can say it's a sudut where array is
given and length is given where sum is
decided as zero because no need to keep
the garbage value that's why it is
written as zero so I is z it started
from zero okay so length which is we
defined it has given there sum equal to
sum plus a RR like each element will be
added here it's a you can say the code
it is WR is to add all the numbers
inside the r indexes okay we are adding
the numbers or digits inside the r
indexes okay but one more thing you can
remember your while condition is correct
not an issue but within that sum is
equal to Su plus a r i the I which is
zero is there but there is no increment
operator if there is no increment or
decrement at least operator that time
the while loop will not run the while
loop Loop will be okay throughout you
know it's a infinite Loop rather than
going to stop it we have you know
infinite Loop like it will check yes
then it will be printing some then
whether it will check yes then it will
be printing because there is no such
increment like how do we say it will
stop if if the condition will be I is
greater than equal to length either in a
different way also if I is greater than
length okay
I is greater than Len or I is equal to
Ln then only we can stop so that is why
I'm just writing it if I is greater than
equal to l then only we can stop so to
reach to that condition we cannot do
without any operator which is increment
operator you can say okay though
increment operator we do not have in
that case it is considered as the
stopping property in one case it could
not be infinite Loop if length is is
considered as uh zero but length could
not be zero okay if you have written
length is zero that time it will stop
not an issue one time it will run and it
will stop but if you have written one as
length means one index is there in that
case what happens like it has to be one
is always greater than zero okay that
time it will be you know condition like
it gives you the result but not the
correct result because there are
suppose uh four indices 0 1 2 3 so there
are four indices in that indexes what
you are doing like 1 2 3 are the values
are being there so sum would be or you
can say
sum would be 1 + 2 + 3 + 4
okay what would be considered as 10 okay
sum should be 10 but instead of getting
10 so in this case suppose you are
writing
length I start mov zero and length
is 4 in that case it will be checking
the condition but the first only will
give you the correct answer sum equal to
sum plus a r r i a r i means sum will be
zero then one so that will be your
answer like we are going to far from the
10 also like it is infinite Loop though
we are going far from it so we might get
the correct answers as 10 but we are far
from it okay because it's infinite Loop
sometimes though it is not stopping so
we are getting partially correct answers
it is wrong okay it's not totally
correct answers we getting so to stop it
we have to use this operator which we
discussed now so uh you can say total
correct is equal to the mathema model
you can
say partial
correct plus it should be partially
correct plus stopping property or stop
property it has to be
followed okay if both are there then
only we can say we can expect total
correct answer it should be a partially
correct answers means infinite Loop is
there and stop property should be
followed well then only we can say it is
totally correct correct okay so here it
is written as you can see uh here Stops
Plus correct output is considered as
totally correct answers or total
correctness you can say
okay
now there are uh
three uh you can say methods are getting
used one is counter example another is
induction or which is mathematical
induction third one is Loop invariant
and other approaches are there but this
is not inside the Corman anywhere but
you can remember by cases enumerations
also by contradictions by contrapositive
this could be done but we should
remember counter examples induction
method or mathematical inductions or
Loop invariant so Loop invariant is you
can if the loop is not getting
consistent okay so if you are not
getting the consistent result definitely
there will be a problem that's why we
focusing on Loop in valant and the
number of statements it is is running
that we know uh the statements will give
you the correct output as one time it is
running but Loop there might be a
problem in a conditions so whether it is
stopping or not it it has to be stopped
with the correct answer that's why Loop
will have some problem that's why we are
focusing on Loop invariant first time
how it is running like this is your
initial steps next how many times it is
running like you you are in a
maintenance step once maintenance is
okay also you have to check whether it
is stopping or not there are three steps
first is initial steps next is
maintenance step last is your end step
or you can say the stop step you can
have to check if three will be true then
you can say Loop is invariant or Loop
inent holds okay Loop inent holds you
can say if only one step is uh holding
only Loop andant you cannot say every
every sh or all the you know Loop
element ments would be inv variant here
it is not holding because only one is
not enough suppose initial is okay not
an issue suppose for Loop you are saying
for I = 1 and I is less than 10 I ++
your initial will be you have to check I
value you have initialized it you have
to check whether one is less than 10 or
not if it is done you can enter into the
statements written there once it is done
initial part is over like you have
installed the SE if you are having a
problem like air condition you need to
install installation is done next you
paying money for the
maintenance maintenance will be from it
will be running until the condition will
hold okay like you paying the
maintenance without know initializing or
without installing AC you are not paying
the money like you are not paying the
maintenance fee that that is how it is
running okay so first step is
initialization second step is a
maintenance you're checking it checking
it how much time like until 9 is greater
than 10 like up to this you can have
expir date before the expired date okay
up to that we can have the food we can
have to use the maintenance everything
would be maintained well but if you have
to check if it is not working then we
are throwing the products clear so where
the I value like it is 10 10 is not
equivalent to 10 which is you can say if
I value which we said if it is equal to
10 it will stop and if I is greater than
10 then it will stop this stop is end
version of it or stop property of it
which is the third one where you have to
check the loop is invariant or not okay
so it's a though Loop is a problem so
that's why we are focusing that one next
is counter example which is said as
indirect proof and uh induction which is
mathematical induction is direct proof
so counter example everyone when you are
quarreling with a person okay with an
example I'm telling you whenever you are
quarreling okay that time nobody in the
earth is
saying this is my fault nobody is
accepting that fault of thems that's why
the coring will be the growth of the
coring would be any know more than that
more than the you can say super polom
okay it's it's a super polom if nobody
is understanding that fault their own
fault everyone is aling no I'm not doing
you have done so like this the counter
example is like this so whenever uh uh
you know have the problem is given there
you can take a random value you have to
fix it you have to disprove or prove it
basically we are going to disprove it
which is easy for us because we people
are actually not maining like not
thinking no we are culprit we are always
saying in front of us who is there he is
a culprit or see is the con like this is
what a counter example is so you can say
to prove or disprove it so X Y within
this sing function whether it is
equivalent to sing of X Plus sing of Y
or not to check
that so we have taken x value as like 1X
two y value is 1x two you can check the
LHS and rhs side of it okay in LHS it is
there X + Y which is having sing
function you can say 1 by 2 which is the
value of x and 1 by 2 which the value of
y with the ceiling function that you
know sing function will be picking the
next value of it if there is a decimal
here is no decimal so the same value
will be considered as one as a ciling
function here and rhs side is like x
with a ciling plus y with a ceiling is
there you can say 1X 2 with the ceiling
plus again 1x2 with the ceiling is there
which is 1 + 1 is 2 like five5 the sing
will be the next round value or next
whole number will be written so that's
why it is two where LHS is not
equivalent to rhs here you are
disproving it okay by taking any example
that's why it is said to be indirect
proof you are not do doing it directly
you to taking any any of this okay so
like this every positive integer is sum
of two squares of integers it is written
you can take the example of three also
here in the third example it is written
so for all X for all X and for all y XY
is greater than equal to uh X so that
you can take any value of x here the
value of x is min-1 value of 3 is y is 3
so X into Y is - 3 because -1 into 3 is
- 3 so - 3 is not always or equal to
greater than equal to the X okay which
is said to be minus one though it is not
equal you have dis it this is how the
counter example is working okay now
proving of mathematical inductions
maximum of you have done this in know uh
intermediate level or might be 10th
level that time you have already seen so
a summation is given like we have in
this mathematical model which is uh this
summation in indirect way if you can ask
me in mathematical way you can say it's
a for Loop where I is starting from one
here with it has there written I equal
to 1 okay so I will be starting from one
I will be ending with this one so I will
be less than n or equal to you can it is
sumission then the value it is running
is though it is one like adding of the
thing you can say i++ it is a
mathematical representation of a for
Loop basically we are using okay so and
also though though you can say it is
running for n Square time the time
complexity in that case what you have to
say again one for Loop the same for Loop
you can say uh running for two times if
you say the the time complexity of this
summation is how much time like if
you're following this one so you have to
use another for Loop for it where the
same condition is running for two times
the time complexity could be uh for this
is n² but it will be read by you the
next videos don't worry okay so it's
just an you know discussion that we have
done next you focus like the
mathematical induction the mathematical
induction is needed to prove it directly
whether it is falling or not so for that
first case you have to take the best
solution like you know from starting
from a simple one like you can check
with the one the N value you have to
take as one once you have taken with one
then you have to go for the proof okay
so this is how the first step is step
one says step
one less or you can say
U smaller
value will be taken as input okay so
here you can start with one if you want
to take five also as so you can check
that one whether 15 the side is
equivalent to that one or not okay so
you have to check it it is okay now okay
next for this mathematical induction as
we told to prove that one we have
checked it one one side and equal to we
have written is one so it is there and
next we have to in step two in step two
step one we have checked with a smaller
value next in step two we assume
that it run for already run for end
times and it we got correct answer next
we have to
prove with n + one time why because if
the next step is true then definitely
the previous step could be true so to
say previous step is true we are
assuming let us take it is okay next we
have to prove the uh plus one or the
next step of the N or might be anything
which you have taken so the here uh I
kept for the left hand side and right
hand side as an example so here we know
the sumission is all about to add the
thing so we have just added it 1 2 3 up
to n it has to run and here we kept as
it is then here what exactly we have to
do by writing
this n + 1 okay we just add to Next Step
because this is true for us this is what
a true that we said true if it is
running for n + one time so what we have
to do we have to just run for one n +
one time which is you can say instead of
one you put n + 1 okay here also you can
put instead of n you can put to n + 1
because you are saying n is uh true okay
n is true you are saying now you are
proving you are proving n + 1 will be
true so though you are proving n + 1 is
true you have to put
the N +1 in place of n okay so here this
is the answer next to you know to equate
this you are getting the answer as like
1 + 1 - one will be cut as zero then up
to this you got the answer as you know
which is uh the proof that you said like
it is true that that's why you are
writing it so uh I kept it on bracket
here you have written as the answer that
you have already proven this is correct
and you kept as you and here also no
need to do anything so you keep the
right hand side and other way here when
you are actually doing it like you have
to add it whenever you are adding the
total will be looking like this so I'm
just writing it here
okay done so which will be written like
this if you add this only one like here
two will be there under this where you
can write aners like this
okay and then you have to take common of
n + one once you have taken common here
LHS equivalent to rhs
okay though it happens so you can say we
have
proven uh like the the pro the the
formula is getting proved for n + 1 so
though we proved it for n + one so we
can say
n is also true this is how the
mathematical induction works okay so
mathematical induction is a direct proof
without mathematics we can know say
whether it is true or not so in this way
we
said the methods we are using in our
correctness is mathematical induction
which is a direct proof counter example
which is indirect proof any values you
keeping and third one is loop invariant
which you actually studied and during
the slides and correctness are two types
one is total correctness another is
partial correctness partial correctness
we don't want for getting total
correctness uh is partial correctness
plus to property this is how our to
today's session is all about I hope it
is understood by you if any problem you
can message below okay and thank you for
watching have a good day
Browse More Related Video
![](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/6hfOvs8pY1k/hq720.jpg)
What's an algorithm? - David J. Malan
![](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/8nrBG6kJoDs/hq720.jpg)
While Loops | Godot GDScript Tutorial | Ep 07
![](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/GU0YW689fTM/hq720.jpg)
Algorithm Design | Approximation Algorithm | Vertex Cover Problem #algorithm #approximation
![](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/i_wDa2AS_8w/hq720.jpg)
31 nooby C++ habits you need to ditch
![](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/m1gDEmXPAAM/hq720.jpg)
Algorithm Design | Network Flow | Ford-Fulkerson Algorithm | MAXIMAL FLOW PROBLEM | MAX FLOW PROBLEM
![](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/xlUFkMKSB3Y/hqdefault.jpg?sqp=-oaymwEXCJADEOABSFryq4qpAwkIARUAAIhCGAE=&rs=AOn4CLDjpbhInp63-UwmyZevhJWX86Ss2A)
Lecture 1 - Propositional Logic
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)