Peligrosa maniobra del avión presidencial: Asi fue el diálogo entre el piloto y la torre de control

Summary

This transcript highlights a controversial incident involving the Argentine presidential plane, Argentina 01, where pilots performed dangerous maneuvers, violating flight regulations and risking other aircraft. Expert Jorge Polanco discusses the potential risks and the lack of proper oversight from aviation authorities. The incident also raises concerns about the aging condition of the aircraft, purchased at a high cost but nearing the end of its operational lifespan. Polanco emphasizes the need for accountability and proper safety measures, noting the discrepancies in how the situation was handled compared to international standards.

Takeaways

• 😀 The Argentine presidential airplane, known as 'ARG 01', was involved in a dangerous low-altitude maneuver that violated aviation regulations.
• 😀 The crew of the plane disregarded altitude instructions and performed a risky flyby, putting other aircraft and passengers at risk.
• 😀 Expert Jorge Polanco described the incident as a 'systematic violation' of aviation regulations, with the control tower clearly instructing the plane to follow proper procedures.
• 😀 The aircraft in question is a Boeing 757 that was previously used by Iberia and has since been repurposed for the Argentine government as an executive jet.
• 😀 The Boeing 757 has significant age and maintenance issues, and it will lose its airworthiness certification in March 2025, raising further concerns about its safety.
• 😀 The plane's maintenance and operational history have led to concerns about its long-term viability, especially given its outdated interior and aging components.
• 😀 There are conflicting opinions on who is responsible for overseeing the plane's operations—whether it falls under military or civil aviation authorities.
• 😀 The Argentine government has faced criticism for allowing the crew to perform dangerous maneuvers without consequence, with accusations of impunity due to the plane's presidential status.
• 😀 There is public concern about the financial cost of the aircraft, which was purchased for $25 million, despite its advanced age and ongoing maintenance challenges.
• 😀 The transcript also touches on another aviation safety incident, involving the tampering of a plane’s emergency door during a flight, raising further safety concerns in the aviation industry.
• 😀 Experts argue that the incident involving 'ARG 01' demonstrates a lack of professional oversight and accountability in Argentina’s aviation sector, especially given the lack of appropriate action from authorities.

Q & A

What is the main topic of discussion in the script?

The main topic is a controversial maneuver performed by the presidential aircraft, which violated several aviation regulations, raising concerns about the safety and legality of the actions taken by the pilot and crew.

Why was the maneuver performed by the presidential aircraft considered dangerous?

The maneuver was considered dangerous because the aircraft flew at an extremely low altitude (around 10 meters from the ground), violating safety regulations and putting other aircraft in the area at risk.

What did the air traffic controller observe during the flight?

The air traffic controller observed that the presidential aircraft descended without authorization, violated altitude regulations, and caused disruptions to other flights. The controller questioned the pilot about the unauthorized descent and the lack of coordination with other flights.

What was the primary violation according to the aviation expert?

The primary violation was the aircraft's failure to follow standard procedures, including maintaining the correct altitude and following the proper flight path, which endangered the safety of other aircraft in the vicinity.

What was the intended flight path for the presidential aircraft?

The intended flight path was to pass over the Quilmes area south of the airport and then coordinate with incoming flights to Aeroparque by following instrument-based navigation. However, the pilot ignored this sequence and tried to fly directly over the runway, causing confusion and delays.

Why did the pilot ignore the air traffic controller's instructions?

The pilot's actions seemed motivated by the desire to perform a symbolic maneuver or show that they could disregard regulations, potentially leveraging the status of the aircraft as the presidential plane to assert impunity.

What was the expert's opinion on the aircraft's condition?

The expert criticized the aircraft, stating that it was outdated and in poor condition. The aircraft had been previously owned by an airline and was now configured as an executive jet, with parts and furnishings that were over 20 years old. The plane was also close to losing its airworthiness certification.

What is the significance of the call sign 'ARG 01'?

The call sign 'ARG 01' is used for the presidential aircraft, but the expert pointed out that there is confusion over whether the aircraft belongs to civil aviation or military aviation, and there are questions about who monitors and oversees its operations.

What would have happened if the plane had been at cruising altitude during the dangerous maneuver?

At cruising altitude, the difference in pressure between the aircraft's cabin and the outside air would have made the maneuver far more dangerous. A sudden decompression could have resulted in serious injuries or fatalities if passengers had not been properly secured.

What is the implication of the expert's comment about the pilot's lack of professionalism?

The expert suggests that the pilots' actions reflect a lack of professionalism and responsibility, pointing out that in any other country, pilots would face immediate consequences for such reckless behavior. The failure of regulatory authorities to act is seen as a significant problem.