Theory and Methods | O'level Sociology Crash Course #sociologylecture
Summary
TLDRThis lecture introduces the fundamental concepts of sociology, focusing on its theories and methods. It explains sociology as the study of human life and social structures, highlighting two main perspectives: structuralism, which views society's structures as determinants of human behavior, and interpretivism, which emphasizes individual agency. The video also covers consensus and conflict approaches, including functionalism, Marxism, and feminism. It outlines the research process in sociology, from hypothesis formulation to data collection and evaluation, and discusses various research methods such as questionnaires, interviews, experiments, case studies, and observation. The strengths and limitations of each method are examined, providing a comprehensive foundation for those interested in the sociological study of society.
Takeaways
- π Sociology is the study of human life, groups, and societies, focusing on social factors that affect human life and behavior.
- ποΈ Structuralism is a macro perspective in sociology that emphasizes the control and shaping of human life by societal structures like family, religion, and education.
- π§ Interpretivism is a contrasting approach to structuralism, positing that individuals and their experiences make up society and that humans actively shape societal norms and values.
- π€ Consensus approach in sociology, such as functionalism, views society as stable and harmonious, with institutions serving specific functions to maintain societal order.
- π Conflict approach, like Marxism and feminism, sees society as characterized by conflict, particularly between social classes or based on gender, with exploitation and power imbalances at the core.
- π Sociologists use various research methods to study society, including surveys, interviews, experiments, case studies, and observation, each with its strengths and limitations.
- π Research process in sociology involves steps like defining aims and hypotheses, conducting pilot studies, selecting representative samples, collecting and evaluating data.
- β The reliability of a research method refers to the consistency of results over time, while validity refers to the accuracy and richness of the explanations provided by the data.
- π Triangulation in research is the combination of multiple methods to enhance both reliability and validity, though it can be time-consuming and require skilled researchers.
- π Secondary data can be quantitative, such as government statistics, or qualitative, such as historical documents and personal accounts, offering different insights but also potential biases.
- π The importance of reading textbooks in conjunction with lecture series for a comprehensive understanding of sociology is emphasized, encouraging engagement and feedback from students.
Q & A
What is the fundamental focus of sociology?
-Sociology is fundamentally the study of human life, groups, and societies, focusing on how social factors affect human behavior and the ways in which society influences our daily lives and decisions.
What is the main perspective of structuralism in sociology?
-Structuralism is a macro perspective that believes society's structures, such as family, religion, and education systems, control and shape our lives, determining human experiences and behaviors.
How do interpretivists view the composition of society?
-Interpretivists believe that society is made up of individuals, whose experiences, thoughts, and actions shape the norms and values of society. They argue that humans, being conscious and critical, create society through their reflections and behaviors.
What is the basic premise of functionalism in sociology?
-Functionalism is a consensus approach that posits every institution in society has a specific function to perform, similar to organs in a body, to maintain the stability and functioning of society.
How does Marxism view societal structure and conflict?
-Marxism is a conflict approach that sees society as divided into two main classes: the bourgeoisie (elite or upper middle class) and the proletariat (working class). It argues that society is stable because the bourgeoisie exploits the working class, leading to a conflict that may result in revolution.
What is the core belief of feminism in the context of societal conflict?
-Feminism is a conflict approach that asserts patriarchy in society exploits women, leading to gender-based conflict. It focuses on the power imbalance and social structures that perpetuate the oppression of women.
What are the two types of experiments in sociology?
-The two types of experiments in sociology are laboratory experiments, which are conducted in artificial settings like labs, and field experiments, which take place in natural environments such as schools or homes.
What are the key differences between closed-ended and open-ended questionnaires?
-Closed-ended questionnaires have fixed options for respondents to choose from, which makes them more reliable but less valid as they don't capture the 'why' behind responses. Open-ended questionnaires allow respondents to write their answers, providing more valid and detailed information but are less reliable due to variability in responses.
What are the advantages and disadvantages of interviews as a research method?
-Interviews provide detailed and valid data due to the flexibility and direct interaction with respondents. However, they can be time-consuming, less reliable due to variations in questioning, and may lead to socially desirable answers influenced by the interviewer's characteristics.
How does participant observation differ from non-participant observation in research?
-In participant observation, the researcher takes part in the group being studied, which can lead to high validity but may also influence the behavior of the subjects. Non-participant observation involves studying a group from a distance without direct involvement, which can reduce the influence on behavior but may lack the depth of understanding gained from participation.
What is triangulation in research methods, and what are its benefits and challenges?
-Triangulation is the combination of two to three different research methods in a study, such as mixing qualitative and quantitative approaches. It aims to enhance both reliability and validity. However, it can be time-consuming, require a skilled researcher, and may be energy-intensive.
What are the strengths and limitations of using secondary data in sociological research?
-Secondary data, such as government statistics or historical documents, are readily available and can provide well-planned, valid, and reliable information. However, they may not be accurate, can be influenced by societal biases, and qualitative historical data may be unrepresentative and require cross-verification.
Outlines
π Introduction to Sociology: Theories and Methods
The script begins with an introduction to the first unit of sociology, focusing on theories and methods. It defines sociology as the study of human life, groups, and societies, and how social factors influence our daily lives and decisions. The speaker outlines two primary sociological perspectives: structuralism, which views society's structures as shaping human experiences, and interpretivism, which emphasizes the role of individuals in creating society. The paragraph also introduces conflict and consensus approaches, with functionalism as a consensus approach that sees societal institutions serving specific functions, and Marxism and feminism as conflict approaches highlighting class and gender exploitation, respectively.
π Sociologists' Research Process and Methodologies
This paragraph delves into the research process used by sociologists, starting with defining research aims and hypotheses. It discusses conducting pilot studies to test methods before full-scale research, selecting representative samples from a sampling frame, and the importance of sample diversity. The paragraph also covers data collection through primary and secondary research methods, the evaluation of research by peers for quality control, and the use of questionnaires, highlighting the differences between closed-ended and open-ended questions in terms of reliability and validity.
π£οΈ In-Depth Exploration of Interview Techniques in Sociology
The speaker explains the three types of interviews used in sociological research: structured, unstructured, and semi-structured. Structured interviews involve pre-prepared questions asked in a set order, while unstructured interviews allow for more spontaneity and natural conversation. Semi-structured interviews offer a balance by mixing pre-decided questions with those that arise during the interview. The paragraph discusses the strengths of interviews, such as obtaining detailed and valid data, and the limitations, including time and energy consumption, lack of generalizability, and potential interviewer effects that could influence responses.
π¬ Experiments, Case Studies, and Longitudinal Studies in Sociological Research
This section covers various research methods, including experiments, case studies, and longitudinal studies. Experiments are less common in sociology due to their low validity and ethical concerns. Case studies provide in-depth analysis of a single group or event and can be both quantitative and qualitative. Longitudinal studies involve observing a group over an extended period, offering a comprehensive view of changes over time. The paragraph outlines the strengths and limitations of each method, such as high validity in case studies and the time-consuming nature of longitudinal studies.
π Observational Research and Content Analysis in Sociology
The paragraph discusses two additional research methods: participant and non-participant observation, and content analysis. Observational research allows researchers to gain deep insights into groups, with the type of observation (overt or covert) affecting the behavior of the subjects and the ethical considerations. Content analysis involves studying documents and media to identify patterns and trends, which is reliable but may lack detailed explanations. The speaker also touches on the concept of triangulation, combining multiple methods for increased reliability and validity.
π Secondary Data Types and Their Implications in Sociological Research
The final paragraph addresses secondary data types, including hard and soft statistics from government sources, and qualitative historical data such as letters and autobiographies. It outlines the strengths of secondary data, such as availability and the potential for trend analysis, and the limitations, including potential inaccuracies and biases that may reflect the interests of certain societal groups. The speaker concludes by encouraging viewers to read their textbooks for a deeper understanding and to provide feedback for future video topics.
Mindmap
Keywords
π‘Sociology
π‘Structuralism
π‘Interpretivism
π‘Functionalism
π‘Marxism
π‘Feminism
π‘Research Methods
π‘Questionnaires
π‘Interviews
π‘Experiments
π‘Triangulation
Highlights
Sociology is the study of human life, groups, and societies.
Sociologists explore social factors that affect human life, such as norms and values instilled through education.
Structuralism is a macro perspective that views society's structures like family and education as controlling and shaping human life.
Interpretivism is the opposite of structuralism, emphasizing that individuals and their conscious actions make up society.
Consensus approach in sociology, such as functionalism, sees society as stable with institutions fulfilling specific functions.
Conflict approach, like Marxism, views society as unstable due to conflicts between social classes, particularly the exploitation of the working class.
Feminism, another conflict approach, argues that society operates through patriarchy, exploiting women based on gender.
Sociologists use various methods to study society, including research processes, pilot studies, and sampling.
Data collection can be done through primary and secondary research methods, each with its strengths and limitations.
Questionnaires can be closed-ended for reliability or open-ended for validity, with each type having its own advantages and disadvantages.
Interviews, which can be structured, unstructured, or semi-structured, provide detailed and valid data but may lack reliability.
Experiments in sociology are less common due to ethical and validity concerns, with field experiments being more valid than lab experiments.
Case studies offer in-depth analysis of a single group or event, with potential for wider conclusions but limited generalizability.
Longitudinal studies track a group over time, providing valid data but are time-consuming and may suffer from respondent dropout.
Participant and non-participant observation offer high validity but come with ethical considerations and potential influence from the researcher.
Content analysis examines patterns in documents and media, providing reliability but potentially lacking in validity.
Triangulation combines multiple research methods to enhance both reliability and validity, though it can be time and energy-consuming.
Secondary data types include hard and soft statistics, which have strengths like availability but also limitations like potential inaccuracies.
Qualitative historical secondary data, such as letters and autobiographies, offer high validity but may be biased and unrepresentative.
The lecture series encourages further reading of textbooks for a deeper understanding and invites feedback for future content.
Transcripts
hello everyone welcome back once again
so
now we'll start with unit one of
sociology which is theories and methods
but before moving on we need to
understand what is sociology the basic
question that everyone thinks so
sociology is basically the study of
human life the groups and the societies
that you live in so sociologists
basically explore social factors that
affect human life for example social
factors can be how you may dress when
you go to a funeral or when you go
outside you always think that what i'm
going to wear how i'm going to look how
people will think about me so these
social factors affect you and the way
society influences our daily lives so
society in a number of ways influences
our daily lives
and our daily decisions and our daily
behaviors for example
there there is a certain age you get
married there is a certain there is a
certain role that that that is
associated with boy or a girl
okay so in order to understand societies
we need to understand two main
approaches and it's very simple so one
first approach is structuralism so
basically
what do structuralists believe in and
how do structuralists who study the
society so structuralism is basically a
macro perspective
they believe that the structures of the
society including the family religion
these these larger structures family
religion education systems they
basically control our life and they
basically shape our lives so basically
these structures make up humans and
these structures determine human
experiences because these structures
basically
tell us how to live our life for example
the norms and values that may be
instilled in you
while you went to school so structures
are basically making up humans decay the
way you turn out to be so patriotic the
way you respect the way you become so
responsible so what makes us and what
makes you and i is totally dependent on
structures this is a simple argument
that structuralists believe in
secondly our second approach is exactly
opposite from structuralism which is
interpretivism so interpretivist believe
that the society is made up of
individuals on the other hand where we
see it's this this becomes very
confusing but it's exactly the opposite
so i'd like to point out one thing
you see the structuralists say that the
society makes up humans
but on the other hand interpretive say
that the individuals
make up the society
our experiences
make up the society and the argument
that they put forward is that because
human beings are conscious living beings
and unlike animals they're not like
animals we are not like animals we think
we analyze we critically
see things so we basically
make up the society the norms the values
that are present in the society
are because humans
reflect critically
now moving on to three main
approaches in sociology which is the
conflict and consensus approaches now
what is consensus so we all may have
heard the term consensus is when you
reach an agreement and on the other hand
conflict conflict is when
there is a disagreement over certain
things
so basically you need number one
approach is functionalism now
functionalism is basically a consensus
approach
functionalists believe that
every institution that is present in the
society has certain functions and they
give the analogy of a human body
so just like our heart our mind
our stomach our liver our hands our eyes
of a certain function
in a similar way the society and its
institutions have certain functions to
carry out and to make it more simpler
i'd like to give you some examples for
example in the society the function of
the education system is to educate a
child so that they can think critically
and can better analyze things and can
think out of the box or or simply the
education system can give them a number
of skills so that these skills can be
used in order to attain a certain degree
and then a certain job
so your education system has a function
the family's function is basically
to financially support a child to
emotionally support a child so that they
can become competent members of the
society thirdly you see that religion
also has a function a religion's main
function is to create a cohesive society
is to unite people in times of crisis
every institution that is present in the
society has a certain function to keep
the society running
more
stably you may have heard the term
marxism so marxism is basically a
conflict approach and they believe that
the society is made up of two classes so
you have the
the bourgeoisie so the term may sound
difficult to you but it's really easy
wazi in
common terms you'd say the elite people
the upper middle classes the people who
own lands the people who are
who own big businesses and then you have
the exact opposite opposite who are the
proliterates these are the working
classes now the main argument that
marxist give is that
there is a conflict in the society
because the bourgeoisie or in other
words the upper middle class are
exploiting the labor of the working
class and how are they exploiting
they're exploiting it by
by giving them low low wages
and by telling them that whatever they
whatever wages they're giving them
they're fair enough so they're also
manipulating them
okay whatever you're getting
it's it's fair and then this vicious
cycle
carries on the working class will
continue to suffer this exploitation and
azir khan
and the bhujawazi are continually going
to exploit them
so they believe that the society
is only stable because
the proliterate are being exploited and
once they
proliterate the working classes are
going to revolt they're going to they're
going to go against the bourgeoisie
you're going to rise up against them and
ask their rights
then they'll then will see a more equal
society so marx's basic argument is that
two classes there are two classes and
the two
both of them are in conflict
thirdly we have feminism now feminism
feminism is also a conflict approach and
they believe that patriarchy
is present in the society which
basically exploits women
so
in feminism we have a basic argument
which is gender-based conflict
the society runs by exploiting
one gender which is women
moving on
the basic thing that you need to
understand is how do
sociologists study society
so sociologists we
tend to call sociology as a social
science and there are certain ways and
certain methods we study society
okay so there is a research process that
you need to understand the first is your
aim and your hypothesis so aim of your
research what you're trying to study
what you're trying to investigate
hypotheses is a testable statement that
you form before carrying out a
research
so your next step is carrying out a
pilot study now pilot study is a small
scale
study that you carry out before
actually doing the research itself
because the research is going to take
your time your
money so
you carry out a small scale trial run
which is carried out before the main
research so it can save you time money
and effort in the long run because the
researcher can check whether the chosen
research method which can be interview
questionnaire or
participant observation is likely to be
useful or not then we come on to our
third step which is
selecting a sample now what is a sample
a sample is a selection of population
that is used for a study
and how do you select a sample a sample
is selected from a sampling frame a
sampling frame is a list of members of
the population for example you select a
sample from a school register
a list of member subscriptions on the
royal mail's list of postcard addresses
and
your sample needs to be representative
now what does representative means it
means that it needs to be representative
of the entire population so your sample
needs to have a good ideal sample is
that which covers people from all ages
from all sexes
and from all um ethnicities and races so
it should be maximum it should be
representative of the society because
you cannot take
millions of people in your sample
so you take only five to ten people so
which means if in these five to ten
people should be representative of the
entire society that you are
doing the research for so that your
results can be more accurate
then comes another step which is data
collection now in data collection you
can
collect data by
using primary research methods or
secondary research methods people mainly
use a mixture of two which is primary
plus secondary primary basically is the
first hand information that you
gather by yourself for example by
designing your questionnaire and then
giving out to people this is how you
basically uh carry primary data and
secondary data is basically for example
the government stats that are
present on the internet on the official
websites this is secondary data
and then comes the data evaluation so
before the research can be published it
is evaluated by the experienced
sociologists this form of peer
assessment acts as a form of quality
control so there is proper evaluations
you see your strengths and your
weaknesses what is lacking and then you
can publish your research
so moving on with questionnaires so
questionnaires can be close-ended or
they can be open-ended now what i mean
by closed close ended is that the
options that you give are fixed
so you only have to choose from the
options yes no
or other options that you may give but
an open-ended questionnaires you have
the option to write your answer
now bigger strength of questionnaires is
that they
are cheaper
and they are less time consuming and
they are more and they are more reliable
especially when you have closed-ended
questions questionnaires now why are
they reliable
reliability basically means that you get
these same results
over and over again so
even if i give this questionnaire two
years later i'll get the same results
what i got
two years before so this is reliability
and in close ended questionnaire you
basically have options and from these
options you
pick one but
if you have questionnaire with
open-ended answers then
its trends are going to vary it is going
to be less it is going to be cheaper it
is going to be less time consuming it is
rather than having high reliability it
is going to going to have high validity
and what does validity mean validity
means when you get results which are
rich in explanations when you get that
why answer when people are more ex when
people explain things to you so you get
more valid answers you get to understand
that why so these are some of these
trends of questionnaires now moving on
to the weaknesses now the biggest
weakness of closed-ended questionary is
that you don't get the why part you
don't understand so it's very low in
validity and
questioners can have low response rate
or in questionnaires you may not
understand or people may lie or you may
not um
you may not people may lie and you also
don't know who may have filled the
questionnaire and people may have
understood the question or not so these
are some of the weaknesses of
questionnaires now in
i'd say
the sim these same weaknesses can also
be applied for open-ended question
questionnaires except that in open-ended
questionnaires you have low reliability
this is one of the weaknesses
except
other than that you have same weaknesses
as i earlier told you for closed-ended
questionnaires now moving on to our
second research method which is
interviews now first you need to
understand there are three types of
interviews there is structured
interviews unstructured interviews and
semi-structured interviews in
unstructured interviews or casual
interviews for example
you your question your for example your
friend may want to interview
you for a a for fraud project that they
are doing and she may tell you or he may
tell you that it's a very casual form of
interview
where each question the interviewee
thinks right there in front of you and
ask you another question so these are
unstructured interviews and they are
structured into restructured interviews
in structured interviews you basically
go to an interview with prepared
questions and you ask those questions
in order and then there are
semi-structured interviews which are a
mix of
pre-decided questions and these
questions that you come up during the
interview
okay
so in interviews you have certain
strengths and limitations
in interviews you get detailed and valid
data
so your flexibility allows you for
detail interviews can act interviews can
access because the respondent is present
in front of you so you may explain the
question you know how they're answering
them and you can bring out more info for
your study but the limitations are that
you need to select a time space so this
can be quite quite time and energy
consuming
another weakness of interviews is that
you're not able to make generalization
the standard questions are not used
they're less reliable and
because everybody is going to respond in
a different way and so they they they
have high validity but they are low in
reliability
and another thing a very important thing
another weakness is that people may
change their answers because we get
intimidated by the person
sitting in front of us so we may give
answers that the other person may expect
from us so we may alter our answers this
can
leave a huge loophole in your research
study people monitor their answers their
their behavior so you call this they may
give socially desirable answers in order
to impress you and this usually happens
because of the interview your
interviewer effect which may be because
of the interviews age gender or
ethnicity and then we move on to a third
research method which is experiments
so
experiments are not frequently used in
sociology
you need to understand that in sociology
you have two kinds of experiments there
are live watery experiments
which are carried out in a artificial
setting
and they're carried out most in labs as
the name suggests
and then there are field settings so
field settings are carried out in your
natural environment for example in your
school environment in your home
environment in the shopping area like
water experiments are
not
are not easy to carry out because
one of the biggest weakness of libor
experiments is that
they are very low in validity because
you are observing people's you're
observing a person's behavior in a lab
and
they may not act
naturally as they
may usually behave in your in their
natural environment so these
and they also they also have these
ethical and moral limitations because
you cannot study living human beings in
libraries so they're not frequently used
in sociology
and then you move on to the field
experiments so field experiments so in
field experiments you have a biggest
strength which is that people do not
alter the behavior because when you
study someone in the national setting
they are behaving as in in a very candid
way so this this gives you a good so
this gives you a good idea of what
you're trying to see and
feel experiments have good validity good
reliability
but the weakness is that it is it is a
lot of time consuming
and it takes a lot of energy
case studies so another method that is
used as case studies so case studies
so case studies are basically detailed
study of one group or one event so case
studies can be quantitative or they can
be qualitative mostly they're
qualitative so there is one person
that you may be studying very
in in much more detail so this trends
are they can explore it's through case
studies you can explore the different
types of a case deep and detailed
account of a case if a case is carefully
chosen then wider conclusions can be
made can be tested by the researchers as
well but on the other hand you have
certain limitations which are that they
only apply to a case so generalizations
cannot be made the findings cannot be
replicated because as i told you
when you have high reliability you get
the same results
but one person's findings may vary from
another person the weakness is that the
deep involvement of researcher can
influence the findings so your own
biases may come into the research which
is not good for your research and then
you move on to another method which is
longitudinal studies so longitudinal
studies is a survey taking place at
intervals for a long time
so basically you study a group for a
long period of time
and these trends are so these trends are
you basically get a snapshot of what you
are
researching so from the beginning till
the end it's like a movie long film that
you are seeing and respondents will
usually provide valid data as they have
been committed as they have been
committed to the research and you
basically see from where it all started
and where it all ended
limitations and limitations you see that
they are very time consuming and they
require respondents commitment and
researchers biases can also come in and
re respondents may leave at any point in
time and then your research may be left
incomplete so in order to carry out
longitudinal studies you require a lot
of time and effort and a lot of
pre-planning so they're not easy to
carry out then you have participant and
non-participant observation so in so in
participant observation as the name
suggests
researcher takes part in that study and
in non-participant observation the
researcher is not present with the group
but they
but they basically
studied the group or um
they basically studied the group from a
distance
you understood what is participant and
what is non-participant observation
then there are also two dice or covert
and oh but as the name suggests covert
is when you hide your identity while
you're studying a group and overt is
when you tell the group that you are a
researcher and you're participating in
this research and you need to collect
certain
data so the strength of
observation is that there is high
validity because you're present with the
re you're present with the respondents
they're giving you the answers you can
get detailed information
you can have deep understanding of the
groups so these are some of these trends
and then there is there are limitations
so limitations are going to vary from
over to covert so when you have overt
people may change their behavior they
may act differently because they know
that they're being observed in covet you
have that they may be this this can be
ethically challenging because you may
lie because you're lying and receiving
the group and you're hiding your
identity so these are some of the
weaknesses of overt and covert and again
going to vary from group to group our
last method which is content analysis
so basically content analysis is this
when you study the content of documents
and mass media you define a set of
category and classify the material by
seeing how much it appears so basically
you see the trends and the patterns the
strength is that it is in statistical
form so it is high in reliability you
can carry out comparative analysis
because it's
you basically are seeing these stats
you're seeing patterns and trends
limitations are the statistics and
interesting but that does not tell us
the y answer so when something does not
tell you the y answer so it is obviously
going to be low in validity because
you're not getting the
detailed information
there is another method which is
triangulation so triangulation is
basically the amalgamation of two to
three types of research methods
in a study you may choose one
quantitative method one qualitative
method so one qualitative method could
be observation and one quantitative
method could be structured interviews
and when you have a mixture of both
quantitative and qualitative methods
then you get both reliability in both
validity because as i told you earlier
reliability is has to do
mostly with statistics mostly with
getting same results patterns and trends
and validity has to do mostly with
with detailed information
and limitations is that when you combine
two to three two to three methods they
can be time consuming the researcher
needs to be skilled and
obviously it is going to be energy
consuming and time consuming
okay lastly we see that we have
secondary data types so secondary data
ties can be in the form of national
local governments they can be hard taken
behind statistics for heart statistics
can be heart statistics are free from
error or incompleteness
they are
like your they're like birth rates or
marriage rates or death rates of a
society and soft statistics depend on
people making choices what they record
crime and unemployment so you need to
understand what are some of the
strengths and weaknesses of
secondary data types so they're readily
available in the free of charge because
they're present on the internet produced
by research and then second is that
they're produced by research that is
well planned more valid reliable and
representative
part longitudinal research thus it shows
trends obviously youth collecting stats
they allow comparisons to be made and
they are mainly used for they're mainly
used by sociologists who basically want
to come up with the policy or want to
give a new
idea
a practical idea but the limitations is
that these charts may not be accurate
the stats may be changed by the
government for their own benefits you so
you have to take everything with a pinch
of salt
some say the marxists for example say
that these stats basically reflect the
interests of the upper class and
interpretivists argue that these are
socially constructed rather than
objective facts so basically they're
influenced by the society okay so lastly
we see that in secondary data types we
also have these
on one hand i told you we have this
quantitative secondary data which is in
the form of national and local
government statistics hard stats and
soft stats
but you also have qualitative historical
secondary data which can be in the form
of letters and diaries
and
in the form of
people's autobiographies or biographies
which you may collect and there are
certain strengths and limitations of
that strengths are that they're high in
validity the first in account of people
involved descriptive detail and insights
missing in statistics limitations are
there unrepresentative they can be
biased and they
need to be
checked against other sources
so
this is the end of our chapter the unit
one this was just a short crash course
an overview of theories and methods i
would recommend you all to please go
through your book
it is a must that you need to read your
book and then you can watch my lecture
series or listen to my lecture series
then you then you can get a better
understanding of what i'm trying to
teach you
and lastly if you like my lecture series
then please do comment down below and
share your feedback because it gives me
a lot of motivation to continue my
channel and so if you want me to make a
short video on unit 2 culture identity
and socialization
a crash course on that unit then please
do comment down below and share your
feedback
it would mean the world to me literally
and please subscribe to my channel and
like my video
and thank you so so much for listening
Browse More Related Video
Major Sociological Paradigms: Crash Course Sociology #2
Theoretical Perspectives
Observation - Research Methods [ A Level Psychology ]
Theories About Family & Marriage: Crash Course Sociology #37
1.1 Het sociologische perspectief | Inleiding Sociologie
Persuasion #1 - Attitude, comportement, communication persuasive - Psycho Sociale
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)