대통령 못 만나 성난 상인들에게 나름 대통령 변호(?)를 해보지만… [안본뉴스] / YTN

Summary

The transcript depicts a heated exchange between a reporter and an official regarding the president's brief visit to a disaster-stricken market area. The reporter asserts the president failed to meet with vendors on the upper floors, while the official maintains it was an oversight due to the president believing the lower level contained all the vendors. The reporter demands to know the purpose of the president's visit, insisting his questions be directly answered rather than avoided. Despite repeated probing, the official does not provide a clear reason for the visit beyond general intentions to inspect the site and console vendors.

The video is abnormal, and we are working hard to fix it.
Please replace the link and try again.

Q & A

What is the overall context of the conversation?

The conversation is about a presidential visit to a disaster-stricken area and interaction with affected vendors and shop owners.

What promise did the president initially make regarding support for the affected people?

The president promised to provide support even if it was not legally allowed.

How long did the president meet with people on the first floor?

Only for a few minutes, less than 1 minute according to the transcript.

Why are the vendors upset with the president?

The vendors on the second floor did not get to meet or see the president during his brief visit.

What misunderstanding happened regarding the president's visit?

The president thought the vendors were on the first floor, but they were actually on the second floor.

What does the transcript suggest about the president's intentions for the visit?

The transcript suggests the president intended to visit the scene, meet affected people, and offer words of consolation.

What point does the speaker try to convey regarding the visit?

The speaker tries to convey that the essence of the visit was for the president to offer comfort, which did not fully happen due to the misunderstanding.

How does the speaker recommend resolving the issue?

The speaker recommends acknowledging the mistake and miscommunication, and focusing on the original intention of consoling the affected people.

What is the speaker's relationship to the location and event?

The speaker implies being present at the location since early morning, so likely someone affiliated with the affected vendors.

What is the overall tone and tenor of the conversation?

There is frustration and accusation on the part of the speaker, and defensiveness and attempts at explanation on the part of the representative.