Greek Christian Is Educated About The Bible By Muslims | Hashim | Ijaz

Summary

This conversation delves into the theological debate surrounding the authenticity and preservation of the Christian Bible versus the Quran. Key points include the question of whether the Bible has been corrupted and the linguistic differences between the Greek New Testament and the original languages of Jesus, such as Aramaic. Participants also discuss the idea of the Bible’s inspiration and the implications of changes in its textual transmission over time. The discussion ends with an invitation for further dialogue, emphasizing the belief in Muhammad as the final prophet and the continued relevance of Islamic teachings.

Takeaways

• 😀 The primary debate in the transcript revolves around whether the New Testament is corrupted, as suggested in the Quran, or remains preserved and unaltered.
• 😀 One participant (George) asserts that the Bible is divinely inspired and uncorrupted, despite being written by human authors.
• 😀 Another participant clarifies that 'corrupted' refers to changes or alterations in the text, which could make the Bible inauthentic or distorted from its original message.
• 😀 A key point in the discussion is the language of the Gospels. While Jesus preached in Aramaic, the New Testament was primarily written in Greek, raising questions about potential distortions during translation.
• 😀 The Quran acknowledges the previous scriptures but asserts that they have been altered or corrupted over time. It does not validate the Christian Bible as it exists today.
• 😀 A theological argument is made that a merciful God would provide a final, preserved scripture after earlier texts were corrupted, and this final scripture is the Quran.
• 😀 The conversation also addresses the historical accuracy and authenticity of the New Testament. The challenge is made that there are no first-century manuscripts of the New Testament, which raises questions about its reliability.
• 😀 There is a discussion on the linguistic differences in how certain words are translated in the Bible, such as the use of 'expire' versus 'death,' with the suggestion that later translations may alter the meaning of key terms.
• 😀 The role of Prophet Muhammad is emphasized, with the argument that he is the Seal of the Prophets, providing the final, unaltered revelation (the Quran) to guide humanity.
• 😀 The conversation concludes with an invitation for George to consider the Quran as the final, preserved scripture and to reflect on the logic that God would provide a clear, uncorrupted path to salvation.

Q & A

What is the main topic of the conversation in the transcript?

The main topic revolves around the preservation and authenticity of sacred texts, specifically the Bible and the Quran, and whether the Christian scriptures have been corrupted over time.

What is the key issue discussed regarding the Bible's authenticity?

The key issue discussed is whether the Bible, particularly the New Testament, has been corrupted or altered. One participant argues that the Bible has been preserved, while the other suggests that it may have been changed through translations and edits.

What is meant by 'corruption' of the Bible in this discussion?

'Corruption' refers to the idea that the original message of the Bible may have been altered, added to, or removed over time, distorting the intended message of God.

What language was Jesus believed to have spoken, and how does this relate to the Gospels?

Jesus is believed to have spoken Aramaic, but the Gospels were written in Greek. The conversation discusses whether this shift in language may have introduced changes or distortions in the original message.

What is the significance of the word 'corrupted' in the context of the Bible?

The word 'corrupted' in this context means that the text has been changed or modified, making it no longer an authentic representation of the original message. This can involve adding, omitting, or altering words or meanings in the text.

What is the argument about the differences between Greek and Aramaic in the discussion?

The discussion argues that because the Gospels were written in Greek, a language Jesus did not speak, there may have been unintended changes in the meaning of the text. The Aramaic language of Jesus' time is considered more authentic, and the absence of Aramaic texts raises questions about the purity of the Gospel's message.

How does the speaker in the conversation interpret the differences in Gospel translations?

The speaker points out specific differences, such as the translation of the word 'death' in relation to Jesus' final breath, arguing that some words may have been misinterpreted or changed in translation, leading to potential alterations in the understanding of the text.

What is the role of the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) in the speaker’s argument?

The speaker argues that after the Bible became corrupted, God sent the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) as the final prophet, with the Quran serving as a preserved scripture that corrects earlier mistakes in previous texts.

What does the speaker believe about the authorship of the Gospels?

The speaker suggests that the Gospels were not directly written by the apostles but were based on their teachings. This challenges the idea that the Gospels are purely the word of those who personally witnessed Jesus' life.

What is the significance of the Greek word for Jesus' final breath in Matthew 27:46?

The speaker highlights that the Greek word used in Matthew 27:46, when describing Jesus' final breath, is different from the word used for death in other parts of the Bible. This distinction suggests that the meaning of Jesus' death may have been differently interpreted in later translations.