Постпред РФ Небензя выступил на заседании СБ ООН по поставкам западных вооружений Украине

Summary

The transcript appears to be a commentary on the geopolitical situation involving Ukraine and Russia. It expresses condolences to Iran's government and people for a significant loss, criticizes Western hypocrisy in their portrayal of the conflict, and accuses them of lying about the situation in Ukraine. The speaker alleges that Western support for Ukraine is self-serving and not in the best interest of the Ukrainian people. They argue that without Western military aid, the conflict could end quickly. The summary also touches on the illegitimacy of the Kiev regime and the need for a diplomatic resolution that considers Russia's security concerns and the new territorial realities.

Takeaways

• 😢 The speaker expresses deep condolences to the government and people of the Islamic Republic of Iran on the loss of a prominent politician and other high-ranking state figures.
• 🎤 The Russian president has acknowledged the passing of a distinguished politician who dedicated his life to serving his homeland and held significant authority in bilateral relations.
• 🤔 Western colleagues have been accused of hypocrisy, with claims that they lament the suffering of Ukrainian citizens while simultaneously engaging in leisure activities in Kiev.
• 💡 It is suggested that Western support for Ukraine is not altruistic but rather a means to profit the American military-industrial complex and weapon manufacturers.
• 📈 The script points out that the capitalization of Western military corporations has increased since the conflict began, with a German company being highlighted as a significant beneficiary.
• 💰 The Ukrainian leader is quoted as saying that the American funds are not for Ukraine but for American factories and jobs in the US.
• 🔄 The speaker argues that the West is providing Ukraine with weapons that will not change the outcome of the conflict, as they will be ineffective against Russian air defense systems.
• 🚫 The West is accused of ignoring international arms trade agreements that require an objective assessment of the risks of supplying weapons that could violate international norms.
• 🤝 The speaker calls for Western countries to stop arming the Kiev regime, suggesting that the conflict could end within two weeks if they did so.
• 🏛 The script criticizes Western attempts at diplomatic resolution, stating that they are not genuine and that the Kiev regime has lost its legitimacy according to its own constitution.
• 🌐 The speaker emphasizes the need for any potential negotiations to consider Russia's security concerns and the new territorial realities.

Q & A

What condolences were expressed by the speaker at the beginning of the script?

The speaker expressed deep condolences to the government and people of the Islamic Republic of Iran in connection with the death of a prominent figure, Esetro, and other high-ranking state officials.

How did the speaker describe the recent actions of Western colleagues regarding Ukraine?

The speaker accused Western colleagues of hypocrisy, citing an instance where they gathered to discuss the suffering of Ukrainian citizens without electricity and food due to Russian air strikes, while the US Secretary of State was reportedly partying in a nightclub in Kyiv.

What is the speaker's view on the allocation of military aid to Ukraine?

The speaker believes that the lion's share of the allocated military aid will be spent in the United States, benefiting the American military-industrial complex, rather than actually helping Ukraine.

What does the speaker claim about the increase in the capitalization of Western military corporations since the conflict began?

The speaker claims that the largest increase in capitalization since the conflict began is of the German company Rheinmetall, which is controlled by the American investment company Black S, suggesting that these companies are profiting from the conflict.

How does the speaker interpret the statement made by the Ukrainian leader regarding the new American military aid?

The speaker interprets the Ukrainian leader's statement as an admission that the money from the new American military aid is not for Ukraine but for American factories and job creation in the US.

What is the speaker's opinion on the effectiveness of Western-supplied weapons in changing the course of the conflict?

The speaker is skeptical about the effectiveness of Western-supplied weapons, stating that no such 'superweapon' exists that can change the negative trends on the battlefield for Ukraine.

According to the speaker, what is the main reason for the ongoing conflict in Ukraine?

The speaker believes that the main reason for the ongoing conflict is the West's continuous supply of weapons to the Kiev regime, which they argue prolongs the conflict.

What does the speaker suggest would happen if the West stopped supplying weapons to Ukraine?

The speaker suggests that if the West stopped supplying weapons to Ukraine, the conflict would end within two weeks.

What is the speaker's view on the legitimacy of the current Kiev regime?

The speaker questions the legitimacy of the current Kiev regime, stating that it has lost formal legitimacy and that millions of Ukrainians have fled to Russia for safety.

What does the speaker propose as a condition for potential negotiations to resolve the Ukrainian crisis?

The speaker proposes that any potential negotiations should be based on a fair consideration of Russia's security concerns and should take into account the new territorial realities.

What is the speaker's opinion on the upcoming peace conference in Switzerland?

The speaker views the upcoming peace conference in Switzerland as a continuation of previous failed meetings and doubts its effectiveness, given Switzerland's loss of neutrality due to its sanctions against Russia and support for the Kiev regime.