Is ChatGPT-4o Actually Better Than GPT-4? OpenAI's Newest Flagship Model and Its Capabilities

Corbin Brown
14 May 202409:57

Summary

TLDR本视频对比测试了Open AI的新模型GBT 4与旧版GBT 4的性能。通过相同的查询和任务,包括网页浏览、PDF分析、图像处理和编程,来评估新模型的速度和效果。测试结果显示,GBT 40在速度和输出质量上均优于GBT 4。特别是在编码和文章创作任务中,GBT 40不仅响应更快,而且输出的结构和内容也更为优秀。此外,视频还提到,即使在免费计划中,用户也可以免费使用GBT 40,引发了是否需要保留GBT Plus计划的讨论。

Takeaways

  • 🚀 视频介绍了Open AI的新模型GBT 40,并计划通过测试比较它与GBT 4的性能差异。
  • 🕒 视频作者将使用计时器来量化比较新旧模型的速度,并阅读响应来评估质量。
  • 📊 根据Twitter上的反馈,GBT 40被认为比GBT 4更好,视频将验证这一观点。
  • 🔍 测试将涵盖编码、PDF分析、图像处理等多个方面,以全面评估模型能力。
  • ⏱️ 在基于网页浏览特性的测试中,GBT 40使用了更多参考资料,但比GBT 4快了4秒。
  • 📝 在PDF分析测试中,GBT 40提供了更清晰、更易读的答案,而GBT 4的格式和结构较差。
  • 💻 在编码测试中,GBT 40不仅速度更快,而且提供的代码结构更具体、更完整。
  • ✍️ 在版权写作测试中,GBT 40在27秒内给出了结构良好的文章,而GBT 4用了一分钟,且内容质量较差。
  • 🆓 令人惊讶的是,即使在免费计划中,用户也可以免费使用GBT 40。
  • 🤔 视频最后提出了一个问题,即是否还有必要保留Chad GBT Plus计划。
  • 📹 视频作者计划制作一个新的视频,探讨为什么用户可能还想保留Chad GBT Plus计划。

Q & A

  • 视频的主题是什么?

    -视频的主题是对OpenAI的新模型GBT 4和GBT 40进行比较测试,以验证GBT 40是否确实比GBT 4更快更有效。

  • 视频作者通过什么方式来测试新旧模型的性能?

    -视频作者通过计时和阅读响应的方式来测试新旧模型的性能,包括响应速度和回答质量。

  • 视频作者在Twitter上收到了怎样的反馈?

    -视频作者在Twitter上收到了GBT 40比GBT 4更好的反馈,这给了他一个积极的预兆。

  • 视频测试中使用了哪些功能来评估模型?

    -视频测试中使用了网页浏览、PDF分析、图像处理和编码等功能来评估模型。

  • 在网页浏览测试中,哪个模型使用了更多的参考资料?

    -在网页浏览测试中,GBT 40使用了更多的参考资料,并且比GBT 4快了4秒给出答案。

  • PDF分析测试中,哪个模型的回答结构更好?

    -在PDF分析测试中,GBT 40的回答结构更好,更易读,而GBT 4的回答格式和结构较差。

  • 编码测试中,哪个模型的输出更快且质量更高?

    -在编码测试中,GBT 40的输出更快,且提供的代码结构更具体,质量更高。

  • 视频作者在测试中提到了哪些宠物?

    -视频作者提到了澳大利亚牧羊犬和哈士奇作为可能的宠物选择。

  • 在文章创作测试中,哪个模型的回答更快且结构更清晰?

    -在文章创作测试中,GBT 40的回答更快,且结构更清晰,质量也更好。

  • 视频作者最后得出的结论是什么?

    -视频作者得出的结论是GBT 40在速度和质量上都优于GBT 4,并且对于免费用户来说,GBT 40是免费提供的。

Outlines

00:00

🚀 测试新模型GBT 4的性能

视频脚本的第一部分介绍了一个新的AI模型GBT 4,该模型被宣称比前一版本更快更有效。为了验证这一说法,视频作者计划通过同时向两个模型提出相同的问题,并计时比较它们的响应速度和质量。作者还提到了在Twitter上收到的反馈,这些反馈表明新模型确实有所改进。视频将涵盖编码、PDF分析和图像处理等多个方面的测试。

05:00

🔍 GBT 4与GBT 40的比较测试

第二部分详细描述了对GBT 4和GBT 40进行的一系列比较测试。首先测试了它们的网页浏览功能,结果显示GBT 40在速度和引用资料的数量上都优于GBT 4。接着进行了PDF文件分析测试,GBT 40在提供支持论文论点的关键事实方面表现更好,并且格式化和结构化也更优。此外,还进行了编码测试,GBT 40在提供React代码的质量和速度上都胜过GBT 4。最后,测试了版权写作能力,GBT 40在文章结构和速度上同样表现出色。视频作者得出结论,GBT 40在速度和质量上都优于GBT 4,并提到了免费计划用户可以免费使用GBT 40,这引发了关于是否需要保留GBT Plus计划的讨论。

Mindmap

Keywords

💡GBT 4

GBT 4指的是OpenAI开发的一种新模型,它被认为比前一版本GBT更快更有效。在视频中,主持人通过对比测试来验证这一说法。例如,在脚本中提到'we're going to gut check GBT 40, and see if it's actually better than GBT',这表明视频的主要目的是评估GBT 4的性能。

💡效率

效率是指完成任务的速度和效果。在视频中,效率是衡量GBT 4与GBT 40性能的关键指标之一。例如,脚本中提到'it's a lot faster and, a lot more effective than GBT 4',说明新模型被期望在速度和效果上都有提升。

💡对比测试

对比测试是一种评估方法,通过比较不同版本或模型的性能来确定哪个更好。视频中,主持人通过对比测试来评估GBT 4和GBT 40。如脚本中所述'I'm going to time, both of these models ask them the exact, same prompt and see if it's actually, faster',这展示了对比测试的实施方式。

💡PDF分析

PDF分析是指对PDF文件内容的解读和处理能力。在视频中,PDF分析被用作评估GBT 4和GBT 40性能的一个测试项目。脚本中提到'dealing with large data, files can 4o perform better than four in, this context',这表明PDF分析是衡量模型处理大数据文件能力的一个重要方面。

💡编码

编码通常指的是编写计算机程序的过程。视频中,编码能力是评估GBT 4和GBT 40性能的另一个重要指标。例如,脚本中提到'we're going to see which one codes better',这表明编码测试是用于比较两个模型在编程方面的能力的。

💡响应时间

响应时间是指系统接收到请求后给出响应所需的时间。在视频中,响应时间被用来衡量GBT 4和GBT 40的速度。如脚本中提到的'we're going to be looking at this together the, first problem we're going to try out is, going to be basing it off its web, browsing feature',这里通过计时来评估不同模型的响应速度。

💡格式化

格式化是指对文本或代码进行结构化排列,以提高可读性和清晰度。在视频中,格式化是评估编码输出质量的一个标准。例如,脚本中提到'but definitely worse formatting and, worse uh structuring of the answer, itself',这里强调了格式化对于编码输出质量的重要性。

💡版权

版权通常指的是对原创作品的法律保护,禁止未经授权的使用。视频中,版权被用作测试GBT 4和GBT 40创作能力的一个方面。脚本中提到'let's go ahead and see how good it is at, copyrighting',这里指的是模型在创作文章时的原创性和版权合规性。

💡文章创作

文章创作是指撰写文章的过程,通常涉及构思、组织和表达思想。在视频中,文章创作能力是评估GBT 4和GBT 40性能的一个测试项目。如脚本中提到的'creating an article',这表明文章创作是衡量模型语言生成能力的一个重要方面。

💡用户反馈

用户反馈是指用户对产品或服务的使用体验和意见。在视频中,用户反馈被用作评估GBT 40性能的一个参考。脚本中提到'on my Twitter I've been getting some, respon is telling me it is better',这说明用户反馈对于了解新模型性能有重要作用。

Highlights

视频介绍了Open AI的新模型GBT 4,并计划通过测试来验证其速度和效果是否优于前一版本。

通过Twitter收集用户反馈,初步判断新模型性能可能更好。

使用计时器量化比较两个模型的速度,并阅读回答以评估质量。

测试包括编码、PDF分析和图像处理等多个方面。

在网页浏览功能测试中,GBT 40使用了更多网站作为参考,并比GBT 4慢了4秒。

GBT 40的回答在某些方面比GBT 4更详细,例如分析师情绪。

在PDF分析测试中,GBT 40和GBT 4的处理时间相同,但GBT 40的格式和结构更好。

两个模型选择了不同的事实来支持PDF中的论点,观众需自行判断哪个更相关。

在编码测试中,GBT 40提供了更具体和有用的代码结构。

GBT 4在编码测试中的表现不如GBT 40,尤其是在CSS提供方面。

在版权创作测试中,GBT 40比GBT 4快了近一倍,并且结构更加清晰。

视频得出结论,GBT 40在速度和质量上都优于GBT 4。

即使在免费计划中,用户也可以免费访问GBT 40,引发了对GBT Plus计划价值的疑问。

视频最后提到将制作一个新的视频,探讨是否还有必要保留GBT Plus计划。

视频还提到了如何下载GBT应用程序到桌面,暗示可能有更多高级功能。

视频以一个幽默的结尾,提示观众点击随机视频可能会有不可预知的结果。

Transcripts

play00:00

we got a new model from open AI called

play00:02

gbt 4 now what we've been told about

play00:04

this model is that it's a lot faster and

play00:07

a lot more effective than gbt 4

play00:09

therefore in today's video we're going

play00:10

to put it to the test I'm going to time

play00:13

both of these models ask them the exact

play00:16

same prompt and see if it's actually

play00:18

faster and then we're going to just read

play00:20

the response and see if it's actually

play00:21

better welcome back y'all in today's

play00:23

video we're going to gut check gbt 40

play00:25

and see if it's actually better than gbt

play00:27

4 on my Twitter I've been getting some

play00:29

respon is telling me it is better so

play00:31

that's a good indication make sure to

play00:33

follow me here let's see if it actually

play00:35

is though cuz a lot of times when we are

play00:37

told that a new models come out oh my

play00:40

gosh it's so much better and you

play00:42

actually play with it and you're just

play00:42

like wait I don't really see a

play00:44

substantial difference this is why we're

play00:46

actually going to quantify that with a

play00:48

timer and read it let's go ahead and

play00:51

begin I have two chats open one is GT4

play00:54

one's gb4 gbt 4

play00:58

gbtb let's see if it works better we're

play01:00

going to do coding we're going to do PDF

play01:01

analysis we're going to do images we're

play01:03

going to everything above the board

play01:04

let's begin so my timer looks good but

play01:06

you can see there's a little like

play01:08

there's like a void that's just because

play01:10

the button's green green screen I'm

play01:12

going be timing both of these we're

play01:13

going to be looking at this together the

play01:15

first problem we're going to try out is

play01:16

going to be basing it off its web

play01:17

browsing feature I've been getting

play01:18

feedback that it's a lot faster than it

play01:20

used to be let's try it I'm going to go

play01:22

ahead and shrink myself so I don't take

play01:24

up anything I can't run both at the same

play01:26

time just cuz how it's built and as you

play01:27

see like it will switch the models so

play01:29

we're going to use use my timer on my

play01:30

phone I'm going to do 40 here let's see

play01:33

if this thing is actually better so I'm

play01:35

going to reset this and right when I hit

play01:37

enter here I'm hit start

play01:41

boom okay we're looking at around 10

play01:43

seconds I know this is like this is

play01:45

probably not the best because you it's

play01:47

like flipped but 10 seconds for 40 same

play01:51

question four and boom wait oopsie and

play01:57

boom so left has three right has two and

play02:02

that was around 14 seconds two major

play02:05

things that we just took from this is

play02:07

first one is that the one on the left

play02:10

use more sites to reference uh left is

play02:13

40 right is four I'm just going to say

play02:15

chbt 4 and four I would say four 40 four

play02:18

used two sites and it took four seconds

play02:21

longer to give us the answer let's read

play02:23

the answers now to When comparing the

play02:25

two answers it seems like 4L is better

play02:27

and you can pause the video and check

play02:28

out yourself but the one thing I really

play02:30

like about the 40 response specifically

play02:32

to the question I asked is analyst

play02:33

sentiment remains positive with a bu

play02:35

consensus and then this one doesn't

play02:36

really outline that but it does have

play02:38

like an overall positive you know

play02:41

sediment on the underlying stock and we

play02:43

go to the first prompt here 40

play02:44

definitely outshines for now another big

play02:46

thing that a lot of people come to my

play02:47

channel for or seen videos on is PDF

play02:50

analysis or dealing with large data

play02:52

files can 4o perform better than four in

play02:56

this context let's go ahead and upload a

play02:58

PDF study about sugar I got a free pdf

play03:00

here found on the internet about the

play03:02

impact of sugar on the body the brain

play03:04

and behavior so we're going to ask a

play03:05

couple questions here first let's go

play03:06

ahead and attach this file and see what

play03:09

it comes up with I'm going to click

play03:10

attach here we have uploaded the PDF

play03:12

let's ask a prompt got to make sure I

play03:14

switch it back to 40 as you know anytime

play03:16

you do one chat in one area it will

play03:17

switch to the default model there we're

play03:19

going to go ahead and I guess I need to

play03:21

reattach the PDF with this PDF attached

play03:23

we're going to ask the question what is

play03:25

the biggest fact that supports the

play03:26

thesis in this PDF so me saying PDF a

play03:29

lot hit enter here and start

play03:33

boom all right so we're looking at a

play03:35

time around 17 17 and a half seconds to

play03:39

give us an answer the biggest fact that

play03:41

supports the thesis so in this context

play03:43

it says the biggest fact that supports

play03:44

the thesis is excessive sugar intake is

play03:47

associated with obesity inflammatory

play03:48

diseases and so on let's see what gbt 4

play03:51

says PDF is attached we're in chat gbt 4

play03:54

we're asking the same question let's hit

play03:56

start other one took 17 and a half

play03:58

seconds uhoh same amount of

play04:01

time but definitely worse formatting and

play04:04

worse uh structuring of the answer

play04:06

itself this is three paragraphs easier

play04:08

and more legible this is one paragraph

play04:11

let's see what it says for the biggest

play04:13

fact though interesting so they both

play04:15

actually chose different facts here gbt

play04:17

4 went with the fact that sugar is an

play04:20

addictive behavior gbt 40 though went

play04:23

over the fact that it causes different

play04:25

types of diseases therefore you should

play04:27

make a judgment on which fact you think

play04:28

is more relevant in this cont context

play04:30

let's try something else let's try some

play04:32

coding yes coding we're going to go

play04:35

ahead and see which one codes better one

play04:36

of the easiest ways for me to see which

play04:38

one could perform better on code is to

play04:39

take a screenshot of a website and ask

play04:41

for the j6 of in react for the code so

play04:45

we can see which one formats the code

play04:46

better which code looks better and then

play04:48

overall see which one is faster yes I'm

play04:51

doing the chewy website again do I have

play04:53

a pet no if I were to get a pet what

play04:56

would it be I'm thinking Australian

play04:59

shepher

play05:00

I'm not too sure yet I would prefer a

play05:03

husky but I feel like you got to live in

play05:04

a very cold environment and I would

play05:05

never want to put a husky in the summer

play05:08

in a very like you know if I'm in like

play05:09

the heat you don't want to husky in the

play05:11

Heat come on you want to be in the cor

play05:12

environment for that slight Sidetrack

play05:14

and I didn't realize they sell for

play05:16

chickens or farm animals okay let's

play05:18

screenshot this now that I've screenshot

play05:20

it I'm going to Simply add it as an

play05:22

attachment click the little paper clip

play05:24

we are loading up the image here and

play05:25

also if you didn't even know you could

play05:27

do this this is pretty cool I'm going to

play05:28

open this this is the screenshot we have

play05:30

here let's make our prompt now I can get

play05:32

more complex on how I structure this

play05:34

prompt if you actually want to learn how

play05:35

to code with Chad gbt check out this

play05:37

video right here I show you how I code

play05:39

with Chad gbt everything inail with it

play05:41

it isn't as simple as just at like a

play05:42

oneliner like this let's go and test

play05:45

this right here resetting my phone and

play05:46

my clock and we're going to get hit boom

play05:50

and we're going

play05:53

okay this is what I love gbt like even

play05:56

if the code is not perfect at least it

play05:58

gives you like some structuring right

play05:59

cuz who wants to type all that all right

play06:01

we'll keep going here and

play06:04

stop around 36 seconds it took for this

play06:08

output we're going to Quality check it

play06:10

well let's go ahead and first ask that

play06:12

same question to chbt 4 we're going to

play06:14

add this file add the exact same prompt

play06:16

no bias found here we going ahead and

play06:19

reset the timer here reset and we are

play06:22

going to proceed last one was 36 seconds

play06:26

we are still going here we're reaching

play06:28

40 seconds here it hasn't given us CSS

play06:30

it's just j6 right now oh okay we're

play06:34

seeing a pretty dramatic difference here

play06:35

y'all and

play06:38

stop 36

play06:40

seconds 56 seconds

play06:44

here 20 seconds more and the quality of

play06:47

output was not as good how do you know

play06:48

that Corbin right off the bat it didn't

play06:50

give me even though it's simple CSS it

play06:52

didn't even give me some CSS I could

play06:54

play around with it just gave me the j6

play06:57

on top of that let's go and go to the

play06:58

top of each file here imported a

play07:00

slightly relevant class I suppose but

play07:02

coming to the actual structuring itself

play07:05

H this one took more of a route of let's

play07:08

just be more General smooth the cake

play07:12

this one took a route of let's be more

play07:14

specific what could be wrong like one

play07:17

thing that could be very annoying in the

play07:20

context of this output is it assumed all

play07:23

these different images and the paths to

play07:25

the images like it didn't this one

play07:27

didn't assume that which is better

play07:29

because if I wanted to give like it gave

play07:31

it one time here this one gave it

play07:33

multiple times here and when dealing

play07:35

with code and dealing specifically a

play07:36

path to an image you would probably want

play07:38

to provide that so it just puts it out

play07:40

right off the bat furthermore we got the

play07:42

CSS here and this was overall a faster

play07:45

output so it seems like 40 is going to

play07:47

take the cake there last test here let's

play07:49

go ahead and see how good it is at

play07:51

copyrighting so specifically I'm going

play07:52

to put a prompt here that's pretty long

play07:54

but it's going to be for the context of

play07:55

creating an article so boom we got a

play07:58

very long prompt here we're going to go

play08:00

ahead and put the desired headline for

play08:02

said article we will go ahead and just

play08:04

say poses impact on your health good and

play08:07

bad I'm going to command a command C and

play08:09

before we begin here let me make sure I

play08:10

time this and boom it's going faster

play08:15

it's structuring it

play08:16

nicely I don't know if nicely is a word

play08:18

or not there you go in 27 seconds let's

play08:23

try this exact same prompt in gbt 4 27

play08:26

seconds here I'm going reset and boom oh

play08:30

they give us a big header okay y'all

play08:32

there is actually a very significant

play08:34

difference between the 40 output and the

play08:36

four and we have Quantified that in

play08:39

today's video because right now we are

play08:40

reaching around we have reached around

play08:44

an endpoint of a minute so a minute to

play08:47

do this output compared it to this

play08:49

output which was 27 seconds here and

play08:52

just from a brief skimming look how it's

play08:54

structuring

play08:56

this comparative to how we got this oneu

play08:59

structured out here which when it does

play09:02

provide a specific point it's one

play09:04

sentence and just not as good and it

play09:07

took basically twice as long therefore

play09:10

is Chad gbt 40 better than four I think

play09:12

we can come to the conclusion yes we've

play09:14

Quantified it with time when it comes to

play09:15

speed and then we also double checked it

play09:18

with quality and overall it seems like

play09:20

40 is better than four what's even

play09:22

crazier is that supposedly if you have a

play09:24

free plan you get access to 40 for free

play09:27

so I'm going to make a video later this

play09:28

week of why you even keep your Chad gbt

play09:30

plus plan as that has come into question

play09:32

for a lot of people so make sure to

play09:34

subscribe make sure to leave a like if

play09:36

you found value in today's video and

play09:38

I'll see you in the next video this

play09:40

video right here shows you how to

play09:41

download the Chad gbt app on your

play09:43

desktop what is that Corbin there's a

play09:45

lot of cool stuff that we couldn't do on

play09:47

the web version that's a random video

play09:50

maybe good maybe bad that's my face

play09:52

click it something may or may not happen

play09:55

I don't know

Rate This

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

Related Tags
模型对比性能测试编码能力PDF分析网页浏览反应速度内容质量技术评测AI效率用户体验
Do you need a summary in English?