Trump New Attorney General Gets Up and HUMILIATES Nancy Pelosi and the Entire Dems in Congress

Summary

This transcript critiques the impeachment proceedings against President Trump, focusing on the connection between Hunter Biden's role at Burisma and potential conflicts of interest involving his father, Vice President Joe Biden. The speaker emphasizes that multiple international and U.S. sources raised concerns about this relationship. Despite criticisms, Hunter Biden continued his board position, with substantial compensation, raising questions about impropriety. The argument suggests that the impeachment narrative crumbles if the potential legitimacy of these concerns is acknowledged, highlighting the role of Biden and Burisma in shaping the impeachment debate.

Takeaways

• 😀 The House managers repeatedly referenced Hunter Biden and Burisma over 400 times, arguing that the President should be impeached for raising concerns about their activities.
• 😀 The defense counters that these references were intended to dismiss the issue as 'baseless' and 'fiction,' despite multiple credible sources raising questions about the matter.
• 😀 Various public entities, such as the UK Serious Fraud Office, the US State Department, and The Washington Post, all flagged concerns related to Hunter Biden and Burisma's dealings.
• 😀 In 2014, Joe Biden led US foreign policy in Ukraine, which was considered one of the most corrupt countries in the world at the time, with Burisma being a major player in the energy sector.
• 😀 Hunter Biden joined Burisma's board in April 2014, just after the UK launched a money laundering investigation into the company, raising immediate concerns about conflict of interest.
• 😀 British authorities froze $23 million in assets connected to Burisma and its oligarch owner, but Hunter Biden did not leave the board despite the growing controversy.
• 😀 Hunter Biden's involvement with Burisma raised eyebrows internationally, with even Democratic-leaning outlets questioning the potential conflict of interest.
• 😀 Chris Hines, Hunter's business partner, distanced himself from both Hunter Biden and Devon Archer due to concerns about Burisma's corruption and the political risks involved.
• 😀 The media continued to investigate Hunter Biden's position on Burisma's board, with some outlets calling it nepotistic and nefarious at worst.
• 😀 Hunter Biden's firm also became involved in business dealings in China shortly after accompanying Vice President Biden on a trip to Beijing in 2013, further intertwining the family's business interests with international politics.

Q & A

Why did the House managers repeatedly reference Hunter Biden and Burisma?

The House managers referenced Hunter Biden and Burisma over 400 times because they argued that President Trump must be impeached and removed for raising concerns about Hunter Biden's involvement with Burisma. They presented it as baseless, but their case would collapse if it were proven reasonable to raise such concerns.

What public sources raised concerns about Hunter Biden's involvement with Burisma?

Public sources including the United Kingdom's Serious Fraud Office, Deputy Assistant Secretary of State George Kent, Hunter Biden's former business associate, ABC News, The Washington Post, The New York Times, Ukrainian law enforcement, and even the Obama State Department raised concerns regarding Hunter Biden's role with Burisma.

What was Ukraine's reputation for corruption during 2014?

In 2014, Ukraine was considered one of the most corrupt countries in the world according to Transparency International's annual study.

How did Hunter Biden join the board of Burisma?

Hunter Biden joined the board of Burisma in April 2014, after being brought on by his business partner, Devin Archer. Archer had a meeting with Vice President Biden just two days before Hunter's appointment to the board.

What concerns did Chris Hines have regarding Hunter Biden's appointment to Burisma?

Chris Hines, Hunter Biden's business partner, expressed concerns about the corruption and geopolitical risks associated with Burisma. He distanced himself from the business relationship and even emailed senior State Department officials about the issue.

How did the media react to Hunter Biden's involvement with Burisma?

The media raised questions about the appearance of a conflict of interest. Outlets like The Washington Post and ABC News criticized the appointment, calling it potentially nepotistic or even nefarious.

How did the Obama administration respond to questions about Hunter Biden's role with Burisma?

White House Press Secretary Jay Carney referred questions to Vice President Biden's office, stating that Hunter Biden, as a private citizen, was free to make his own decisions, and that the administration did not endorse his involvement with Burisma.

What was the financial compensation for Hunter Biden's work at Burisma?

Between April 2014 and October 2015, Burisma paid over $3.1 million to Devin Archer and Hunter Biden, which amounted to over $83,000 per month, far more than the average pay for board members of major U.S. Fortune 100 companies.

What other business did Hunter Biden pursue that raised similar concerns?

In addition to his work with Burisma, Hunter Biden's business dealings also intersected with his father's diplomatic activities in China. His firm started an investment fund in China involving the government-controlled Bank of China, raising concerns about potential conflicts of interest.

What were the actions of the United Kingdom's Serious Fraud Office regarding Burisma?

In March 2014, the United Kingdom's Serious Fraud Office opened a money laundering investigation into Burisma and its owner, oligarch Zvi. This investigation began shortly before Hunter Biden joined Burisma's board.