"Absolu" de Margot Dessenne : vlog lecture et avis

Summary

This video offers a thoughtful critique of a fictional novel, focusing on both objective and subjective elements. The reviewer explores key aspects such as character development, plot credibility, writing style, and overall narrative structure. While acknowledging the novel’s solid construction and engaging pace, the reviewer expresses mixed feelings about its unresolved nature as the first installment of a series. The story’s dark, oppressive atmosphere is highlighted, along with the promise of deeper revelations in future books. The reviewer’s balanced analysis invites viewers to consider whether this book aligns with their tastes and reading preferences.

Takeaways

• 😀 Reading is a subjective experience; a book that one person loves may be disliked by another due to different sensitivities, personalities, and past experiences.
• 📚 The appreciation of a book can be based on both subjective feelings and objective factors like character credibility, plot coherence, writing style, and text construction.
• 🧑‍🤝‍🧑 Credible and well-developed characters are essential for a good story, and their evolution plays a key role in making the book engaging.
• 🎭 Some characters in the book are more believable and relatable, while others may feel too perfect or lacking depth.
• 🧐 The plot is coherent and well-structured, though some readers might feel it lacks certain explanations that could make it more immersive and believable.
• ✍️ The writing style is elegant, fluid, and clear, though not extraordinary or overly refined. It supports the narrative well without drawing attention to itself.
• 🔨 The construction of the book is solid, with a strong introduction, a successful climax, and a well-paced progression of events that keeps the reader engaged.
• ⏳ The book does not have significant slow moments, and the tension increases as the story unfolds, making it an engaging read.
• 💥 While the book is engaging, the lack of closure and key answers in the first book might leave some readers feeling unsatisfied and eager for the next installment.
• 💀 The story is dark and heavy, set in an oppressive atmosphere where death and terror are prevalent, making it unsuitable for those looking for lighter, uplifting reads.
• 🛒 Despite the absence of a monumental emotional connection, the reviewer expresses a desire to read the next volume, indicating that the book successfully hooks the reader for the series.

Q & A

What is the primary point the reviewer makes about the subjective nature of art?

The reviewer highlights that the appreciation of books, like all forms of art, is subjective. Different readers can have opposing opinions about the same work due to their unique tastes, experiences, and personalities.

How does the reviewer suggest evaluating a book objectively?

The reviewer suggests evaluating a book through objective criteria such as the credibility of its characters, the coherence and believability of its plot, the quality of its writing style, and the effectiveness of its structure.

What are the key strengths of the book as identified by the reviewer?

The key strengths include well-developed and credible characters, a coherent plot that avoids contradictions, a clear and elegant writing style, and a well-constructed story with an engaging flow and rising tension.

What is the reviewer's opinion about the characters in the book?

The reviewer finds that some characters are very well-developed and credible, such as the character of 'Dio'. However, they criticize the character of 'Crime' as being somewhat too perfect and lacking depth.

What aspect of the book's plot does the reviewer feel could have been improved?

The reviewer feels that the plot could have benefited from more explanations or backstory to make certain elements more believable. They mention that while the plot is coherent, some mysteries or details are left underexplained.

How does the reviewer describe the writing style of the book?

The reviewer describes the writing style as smooth, clear, and elegant, though not particularly refined or exceptional. It is accessible without being extraordinary, maintaining a fluid and sober tone throughout.

What is the reviewer's opinion about the book's structure?

The reviewer praises the book's structure, noting that it has a strong introduction, an engaging climax, and a well-paced progression with no dull moments. The story flows well, with a buildup of tension that keeps the reader interested.

Why does the reviewer mention that the book is not a 'monumental' favorite?

The reviewer mentions that the book is not a 'monumental' favorite because, as the first in a series, it sets up future plot developments but does not provide full resolution or clarity, leaving the reader with a sense of dissatisfaction and the desire for more information.

What is the general atmosphere of the book, according to the reviewer?

The reviewer describes the atmosphere as dark and oppressive, with themes of fear, loss, and hopelessness. The mood is somber, and the characters are trapped in a grim world where death is ever-present, making it unsuitable for readers seeking a light, uplifting read.

What does the reviewer say about the second book in the series?

The reviewer expresses interest in reading the second book, stating that they plan to buy it as soon as it's released. Despite their dissatisfaction with the first book's ending, they are hopeful that the series will build to a more satisfying conclusion.