VIRAL: SUV NA NAKASAGASA SA BGC, INAKSYUNAN!

Summary

This video transcript details a traumatic incident involving a pedestrian hit by a vehicle. The victim shares her experience of being struck by a Fortuner, the aftermath of the accident, and the interactions with the driver and authorities. It highlights the confusion and stress the victim faced, the emotional toll of her injuries, and the complications of dealing with insurance and legal matters. The discussion touches on the improper handling of the situation by police, the pressure to settle, and the victim's struggle to get proper compensation and justice, with a call for a more sensitive and correct procedure in handling such cases.

Takeaways

• 😀 The victim is experiencing significant physical pain and emotional trauma due to the accident, including difficulty sleeping and physical injuries.
• 😀 The victim has been unable to return to work for three days due to pain and fear of the route where the accident occurred, causing anxiety about resuming work.
• 😀 The driver of the Fortuner vehicle that caused the accident stopped after the collision and called for a marshal and medic assistance, but the owner of the vehicle took the car away before the police could arrive.
• 😀 The victim initially misunderstood the situation, believing that a police report and compensation would be offered for the accident, but was later informed by the traffic bureau that an 'arrangement' had already been made.
• 😀 The victim was asked to sign a settlement document at the police station, which they thought was for immediate medical compensation, but later realized it was part of a compromise agreement.
• 😀 The police advised the victim to write down their demands, but it was later clarified that this could be considered a settlement, and the victim was pressured into agreeing without fully understanding the situation.
• 😀 The driver and the registered owner of the Fortuner vehicle were involved in discussions with the victim’s family, but the victim was still emotionally affected and did not receive clear advice on their rights or options.
• 😀 The police involved in the situation were criticized for their role in facilitating an informal settlement at the station instead of following proper legal procedures, which could have led to a more thorough investigation.
• 😀 The victim was advised to file a formal case with the prosecutor's office for a proper legal process, rather than accepting an immediate settlement, as this would allow for a fairer resolution in court.
• 😀 The importance of allowing time for victims to recover mentally and physically before making decisions regarding settlements or legal actions was emphasized, as rushing them into decisions can lead to unfair outcomes.
• 😀 The victim's condition, both physically and mentally, required more time to heal before engaging in further legal processes, and the focus was placed on helping them get the necessary medical attention and emotional support.

Q & A

What is the condition of the person involved in the accident?

The person is experiencing severe body pain and has trouble sleeping due to the trauma caused by the accident. They are also dealing with emotional distress and have been seeing a psychiatrist for check-ups.

How long has the victim been unable to work since the accident?

The victim has been unable to work for three days since the accident and is uncertain whether they can return to work due to ongoing fear and trauma.

What happened after the victim was hit by the Fortuner?

After the victim was hit by the Fortuner, the driver of the vehicle stopped, and a Marshall called for medical assistance. The victim received first aid, and the vehicle owner arrived to retrieve the car before the victim was taken to the hospital.

What did the traffic authorities say about the vehicle involved in the accident?

The traffic authorities mentioned that the Fortuner was not present at the scene when the police arrived, suggesting that the car had been retrieved by the vehicle's owner, which raised questions about the situation.

What misunderstanding occurred regarding the settlement process at the police station?

The victim mistakenly believed that the police were facilitating an initial compensation settlement. However, they were actually being asked to write down what expenses the driver should cover, which later turned out to be part of a compromise agreement.

How did the police handle the situation at the station?

The police advised the victim to write down their demands and later considered this a form of settlement. However, it was unclear whether this was a proper legal procedure, and it seemed that the victim was not given enough time to consider their options.

Why was the victim pressured to settle immediately after the accident?

The victim was still in shock from the accident and was pressured by the police to write down a settlement agreement. They were not given enough time to process the event or consult with a lawyer, leading to a rushed decision.

What role did the police play in the settlement process?

The police were involved in facilitating the settlement process by advising the victim to write down their demands and agreeing to the terms. However, this intervention was criticized as improper, as it did not follow the correct legal procedures for handling such accidents.

What was the advice given to the victim by a higher official in the investigation?

A higher official advised that, in such cases, the victim should be given time to rest and think through the situation. They should not be pressured into making decisions on the spot. Instead, the case should be filed with the prosecutor's office for proper legal processing.

What steps are being taken to ensure proper handling of cases like this in the future?

The authorities have issued an order to prevent police officers from facilitating settlements in such cases. Instead, they will refer all incidents like this to the prosecutor’s office to ensure a fair and legal process, where the victim has time to make informed decisions.