광고❌ 하도 물어보셔서 각 잡고 찍어보는 쿼드쎄라 후기

Summary

In this review, a YouTuber shares their honest, 1-year experience with a skincare device, emphasizing its non-promotional nature. They discuss the device's effectiveness in improving skin texture but clarify that it doesn't deliver dramatic results like professional treatments. The YouTuber compares the device to clinic-based treatments, noting that while the output may be lower, its benefits are still noticeable with consistent use. They address common questions about skin issues, product absorption, and give practical advice on usage. Overall, the review highlights that while the device isn't a miracle worker, it provides value for at-home skincare routines.

Takeaways

• 😀 The reviewer emphasizes that the video is a 'pure' review without any financial influence or sponsorships, despite receiving the product as a gift.
• 😀 The product being reviewed was used for about a year, with the reviewer stating their personal experience with its performance over time.
• 😀 The reviewer clarifies that they have previously undergone LDM (Low Density Microcurrent) treatments at a clinic and compares it to the product being reviewed, but stresses the differences in treatment time and settings.
• 😀 The reviewer mentions that although the device may not provide the same intensity as a clinic, it can still be effective for skin care and skin texture improvement when used consistently at home.
• 😀 The reviewer discusses the differences in the device's output power compared to clinical machines, indicating that although home devices have lower output, the actual difference in results might not be substantial for home use.
• 😀 LDM is not considered an aggressive treatment; it is a mild therapy intended for skin conditioning and improvement, rather than dramatic lifting or contouring effects.
• 😀 The reviewer indicates that for people seeking more aggressive treatments, like tightening or lifting, a different device or treatment might be necessary.
• 😀 While the reviewer did not notice significant lifting or contouring effects, they acknowledge that some users may experience these benefits, although it's not guaranteed.
• 😀 The device’s role is more about boosting the absorption of skincare products and promoting skin cell activation, rather than providing extreme results like clinical treatments.
• 😀 For those who are unsure about whether to switch devices, the reviewer suggests that if the current device works well, there's no need to change, but they personally prefer the newer product for its better suitability to their skin type.

Q & A

What is the main purpose of the review in the video?

The main purpose of the review is to provide an honest, unbiased opinion on a skincare device, with a focus on its effectiveness and potential benefits for users, without any financial incentives from the manufacturer.

Is the reviewer a professional in skincare or dermatology?

No, the reviewer emphasizes that they are not a skincare expert or professional. They are an average consumer sharing their personal experiences with the product.

What is the reviewer’s experience with the device over the past year?

The reviewer mentions that they have used the device for about a year, intermittently, and have experienced improvements in skin texture, particularly in terms of smoother skin.

Does the reviewer recommend the device for home use?

Yes, the reviewer recommends the device for home use, especially for those who previously benefited from professional LDM treatments. However, the reviewer notes that the device is not as powerful as hospital-grade equipment.

What are the key differences between the device in the video and professional LDM treatments?

While the device has similar frequencies to professional LDM treatments, it has a lower output power (1.5W) compared to the 3W typically used in hospitals. Despite this, the reviewer argues that the power difference is not significant for home use.

What skin issues did the reviewer experience after using the device?

The reviewer did not experience any major skin issues like irritation or acne. They reported that the device did not cause any discomfort and did not experience breakouts, even though they have oily and sensitive skin.

Did the device help with lifting and tightening effects?

No, the reviewer did not experience noticeable lifting or tightening effects from the device. They mention that although some people report seeing improvements in lifting, they personally did not notice any significant changes in their skin's elasticity or lines.

How does the reviewer compare the device to the 'Booster Pro' device?

The 'Booster Pro' is primarily for helping skincare products penetrate deeper into the skin, whereas the device in the video uses ultrasound to stimulate and activate skin cells. The reviewer notes that both devices serve different purposes, with the latter focusing on cell activation and skin regeneration.

What is the recommended usage of the device in terms of products to apply during treatment?

The reviewer suggests using an aloe gel as a medium during the treatment for better transmission of ultrasound. They advise against using high-end, expensive products, as the device works well with basic gel products.

How does the reviewer recommend using the device for best results?

The reviewer recommends using the device regularly for best results, especially for people with skin conditions like excess oil or dehydration. They suggest using the device with a basic hydrating product, such as an aloe gel, and combining it with a consistent skincare routine.