Canon RF vs EF 50mm f/1.2L USM Lens Challenge!

Summary

In this video, the host compares the Canon 50mm f/1.2 EF and RF lenses through a studio shoot with model Donna. While the RF lens is praised for its faster autofocus and sharper images, particularly at wide apertures like f/1.2 and f/1.4, the EF lens is noted for being softer but still producing good results. The video highlights key differences in performance, helping viewers decide which lens best suits their needs, whether for sharpness, budget, or autofocus speed. Both lenses are tested by the host and photographer Carlo, providing a comprehensive comparison.

Takeaways

• 😀 The presenter is comparing the Canon 50mm f/1.2 EF and RF lenses in a studio shoot.
• 😀 The RF version of the lens is the presenter's go-to lens and is praised for its sharpness and autofocus performance.
• 😀 The EF lens is less expensive but has noticeably slower autofocus, possibly due to the use of an adapter.
• 😀 Autofocus speed is a significant difference between the two lenses, with the RF lens being faster and more responsive.
• 😀 Both lenses are tested in a studio session with the model Donna, and Carlo helps with some additional shots.
• 😀 Image quality comparison shows the RF lens performing better, particularly at wide apertures like f/1.2, f/1.4, and f/1.8.
• 😀 The EF lens is softer at wide apertures but still delivers a usable image, especially at smaller apertures like f/2.8.
• 😀 If sharpness and performance at wide apertures are important, the RF lens is the clear winner.
• 😀 Despite the RF lens's superiority, the EF lens is a viable option for those on a budget who don't need the ultimate sharpness.
• 😀 The video ends with a thank you to the model and photographer, as well as a call to action for viewers to subscribe and check out their social media profiles.

Q & A

What is the main purpose of the video?

The main purpose of the video is to compare two Canon 50mm f/1.2 lenses—the EF version and the RF version—by testing their performance in a studio shoot, particularly focusing on autofocus speed, image sharpness, and overall image quality at different apertures.

Why is the RF version preferred by the presenter?

The RF version is preferred because of its superior autofocus speed, sharper image quality, and better overall performance, especially at wide apertures like f/1.2, where it provides a crisper and more defined image.

What lens was used first during the shoot, and why was this significant?

The EF version was used first. This was significant because the presenter wanted to evaluate its performance in comparison to the RF version, especially considering the EF lens is older and paired with an adapter, which could affect autofocus and image quality.

How did the autofocus speed differ between the EF and RF lenses?

The autofocus speed of the EF lens was noticeably slower than the RF lens. The EF lens may have been affected by using an adapter, while the RF lens, designed for the mirrorless system, provided faster and more responsive autofocus.

How did both lenses perform at wide apertures like f/1.2 and f/1.4?

At f/1.2 and f/1.4, the RF lens was significantly sharper compared to the EF lens, which was noticeably softer. The sharpness of the RF lens was particularly evident in detailed areas and in low-light conditions.

Was there any noticeable difference in performance at apertures like f/1.8 and f/2.8?

At f/1.8 and f/2.8, the differences between the two lenses became less obvious, but the RF lens still outperformed the EF lens in terms of sharpness and clarity, although the gap was smaller than at wider apertures.

Why is aperture performance important when choosing a lens like the 50mm f/1.2?

Aperture performance is crucial because lenses like the 50mm f/1.2 are often purchased for their ability to create beautiful, sharp images at wide apertures. If sharpness and detail are critical for your work, particularly at f/1.2, the RF lens would be the better choice.

How does the price difference between the EF and RF lenses affect the decision-making process?

The EF version is cheaper than the RF version, making it a more budget-friendly option. However, the price difference reflects the performance disparity, especially in terms of sharpness at wider apertures and autofocus speed. For those prioritizing performance, the RF version might justify its higher price.

What role did the studio setting play in the comparison between the lenses?

The studio setting allowed for controlled lighting conditions, making it easier to observe the sharpness and clarity of images at different apertures. The EF lens's slower autofocus and softer image quality were more noticeable in this controlled environment where precision was important.

Who were the key contributors in the video besides the presenter?

The key contributors were model Donna, who posed for the shoot, and Carlo, the photographer who assisted by using both lenses to take additional shots during the comparison.