The Rise of INDUSTRIAL CAPITALISM [APUSH Review Unit 6 Topic 6] Period 6: 1865-1898
Summary
TLDRThe video script provides an insightful look into the rise of industrial capitalism in America during the Gilded Age, a period characterized by the shift towards mass production and consumption. It highlights the dominance of large corporations, particularly in the railroad, steel, and oil industries, with key figures like John D. Rockefeller and Andrew Carnegie leading the way through horizontal and vertical integration, respectively. The video also discusses the expansionist tendencies of these industries, seeking new markets and resources abroad. The wealth accumulation of these industrial leaders is attributed to laissez-faire government policies, exploitation of cheap labor, and the application of Social Darwinism to economics. Carnegie's philanthropic efforts, known as the Gospel of Wealth, are presented as a counterbalance to the harsh business practices of the time. The video concludes by leaving it to the viewer to decide whether these figures should be seen as 'captains of industry' or 'robber barons'.
Takeaways
- 🏭 The rise of industrialism and capitalism in America during the Gilded Age led to mass production and consumption of goods.
- 📈 Large corporations and trusts, particularly in the railroad, steel, and oil industries, dominated markets, making small businesses obsolete.
- 🛢️ John D. Rockefeller's Standard Oil exemplified horizontal integration, controlling nearly 90% of the oil industry by the late 1880s.
- 🔩 Andrew Carnegie's steel empire grew through vertical integration, acquiring all aspects of steel production from mining to distribution.
- 🌍 American industries expanded globally, seeking new markets and resources, influencing the push for American imperialism.
- 💰 The wealth of industrial leaders like Rockefeller and Carnegie was facilitated by laissez-faire government policies and a lack of regulation.
- 👥 These industries relied heavily on underpaid labor, including immigrants, women, and children, due to an abundant labor pool and no wage regulations.
- 🧬 Social Darwinism was applied to economics, justifying the survival of the fittest companies and the concentration of wealth in fewer hands.
- 🤑 Andrew Carnegie's Gospel of Wealth argued that the extremely wealthy had a duty to give back to society through philanthropy, which he practiced.
- 🏛️ Carnegie's philanthropic efforts included donating $350 million for the establishment of libraries, concert halls, and universities.
- 🧐 The historical perception of figures like Carnegie and Rockefeller is divided, with some viewing them as 'captains of industry' and others as 'robber barons'.
Q & A
What does the term 'industrialism' refer to in the context of the AP U.S. History curriculum?
-Industrialism describes the shift in the way goods are produced and sold, specifically the transition towards mass production and mass consumption.
What is the historical period in American history known as The Gilded Age?
-The Gilded Age refers to the period of American history characterized by rapid industrialization and economic growth, despite underlying social and economic problems.
How did John D. Rockefeller manage to dominate the oil industry through his company, Standard Oil?
-John D. Rockefeller used shrewd business tactics to force his competitors to sell their companies to him, a practice known as horizontal integration, which led to Standard Oil controlling almost 90% of the oil industry by the late 1880s.
What is the difference between horizontal integration and vertical integration in the context of business practices?
-Horizontal integration involves a company buying out its competitors to eliminate competition, while vertical integration is when a company acquires all the complementary industries that support its business, from raw materials to distribution.
How did Andrew Carnegie's approach to business differ from John D. Rockefeller's?
-Andrew Carnegie focused on vertical integration, acquiring companies throughout the entire supply chain of steel production, rather than eliminating competitors through horizontal integration.
Why did large corporations and trusts look to foreign markets and resources during the Gilded Age?
-As these corporations grew in size and power, they sought to expand their control over foreign markets and resources to increase their profits and secure access to natural resources.
What was the laissez-faire government policy, and how did it contribute to the rise of wealthy industrialists?
-Laissez-faire government policies involved minimal government intervention or regulation in business practices, allowing industrialists like Rockefeller and Carnegie to consolidate their power without significant oversight.
How did the availability of underpaid laborers contribute to the wealth of industrialists during the Gilded Age?
-The influx of immigrants, along with the employment of women and children, provided a large pool of underpaid laborers, which allowed industrialists to maximize profits without significant wage increases.
What is Social Darwinism, and how was it applied to economics during the Gilded Age?
-Social Darwinism is the application of the concept of survival of the fittest from biological evolution to society and economics. It was used to justify the idea that strong companies should dominate or 'eat' weak ones, leading to the concentration of wealth in the hands of a few.
How did Andrew Carnegie's 'Gospel of Wealth' philosophy differ from the standard practices of his time?
-Carnegie's 'Gospel of Wealth' argued that the extremely wealthy had a moral duty to invest their wealth back into society through philanthropy, which he demonstrated by donating a significant portion of his wealth to various causes.
What are the two contrasting titles often used to refer to industrial leaders like Andrew Carnegie and John D. Rockefeller?
-The two contrasting titles are 'captains of industry,' which carries a positive connotation, and 'robber barons,' which implies a more negative view of their contributions to American society.
Outlines
🏭 The Gilded Age and Industrial Titans
This video segment explores the rise of industrial capitalism in America during the Gilded Age of the late 1800s, a period characterized by rapid economic growth and stark inequalities. The narrative describes how small businesses became obsolete with the rise of large corporations, particularly in the railroad, steel, and oil industries. Key figures like John D. Rockefeller and Andrew Carnegie are discussed for their roles in monopolizing these industries through strategies like horizontal and vertical integration, respectively. The segment also touches on the broader implications of such industrial growth, including the expansionist view toward acquiring foreign markets and resources.
🌟 Philanthropy vs. Exploitation in the Industrial Age
This paragraph contrasts the public images of prominent industrial leaders like Andrew Carnegie and John D. Rockefeller, who were seen either as 'captains of industry' for their business acumen and philanthropic efforts, or as 'robber barons' for their exploitative practices. Carnegie's significant contributions to public works are highlighted, alongside a critique of the harsh labor conditions fostered by these industrialists. The segment encourages viewers to form their own opinions on these historical figures, ending with a call to continue exploring U.S. history through the channel's other videos.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Industrialism
💡Gilded Age
💡John D. Rockefeller
💡Horizontal Integration
💡Andrew Carnegie
💡Vertical Integration
💡Laissez Faire
💡Social Darwinism
💡Underpaid Laborers
💡Philanthropy
💡Robber Barons
Highlights
The rise of industrial capitalism in America during the Gilded Age.
The shift from small, locally owned businesses to large corporations and trusts dominating industries.
John D. Rockefeller's use of horizontal integration to control almost 90% of the oil industry.
Andrew Carnegie's approach to vertical integration in the steel industry.
The expansion of American industries into foreign markets and resources.
The influence of industry leaders on the push for American imperialism.
The wealth accumulation of industrialists due to laissez-faire government policies.
Reliance on underpaid laborers, including immigrants, women, and children.
The application of Social Darwinism to justify business practices and economic disparity.
Carnegie's Gospel of Wealth and his philanthropic efforts to give back to society.
The contrasting titles of 'captains of industry' and 'robber barons' to describe industrial leaders.
The lack of governmental regulation on wages and working conditions.
The competition elimination strategy through business consolidation.
The moral ambiguity surrounding the wealth accumulation of industrialists.
The potential for viewers to form their own opinions on the legacy of industrial leaders.
The historical context of the Gilded Age as a period of economic growth and social challenges.
The role of immigration in the labor force and its impact on wages and working conditions.
The potential for viewers to subscribe for more APUSH review content.
Transcripts
Well hey there and welcome back to Heimler’s History. We’ve been going through unit 6 of
the AP U.S. History curriculum and in this video we’re going to talk about the rise of industrial
capitalism in America. So if you’re ready to get them brain cows milked, let’s get to it.
So as I said in the last video, industrialism describes the change in the way things are made
for sale, specifically the move toward mass production and mass consumption of goods.
And generally, historians call this period of American history The Gilded Age. If something is
gilded that means it’s covered in gold. But to say something is gilded tells you nothing about what’s
underneath the gold. In my estimation, the Gilded Age was something akin to a gold covered turd. In
this video we’re going to talk about the gold, and in the next video we’ll talk about the turd below.
So during the Gilded Age in the late 1800s small, locally owned businesses basically became
obsolete and defunct due to the rise of large corporations and trusts that eventually dominated
entire industries, especially the railroad, steel, and oil industries. Now I talked a good
deal about the railroads in the last video, so here let me just focus on oil and steel.
In the oil industry, the name you need to know is John D. Rockefeller. He was the
owner of Standard Oil, and as the company grew he made many shrewd business moves that forced
his competitors to sell their companies to him, thus eliminating the competition. By the late
1880s Standard Oil controlled almost 90% of the oil industry. Now this particular practice of
consolidation was called horizontal integration, and by definition, this just means that one
company eventually buys out all its competitors until there is effectively no competition left.
In the steel industry, the name you need to know is Andrew Carnegie. Carnegie was, like
Rockefeller, a shrewd businessman and grew his company to the point where it dominated the steel
industry, except Carnegie didn’t consolidate his interests through horizontal integration,
he was more of the vertical integration persuasion. Vertical integration is when
a company acquires all the complementary industries that support its business. For
example, over time Carnegie was able to buy up companies that handled all parts of steel
production from mining companies to processing companies to distribution companies. Again,
that means complete domination of the industry with little room for competition.
Now these industries and others like them grew so big and so powerful that they
began increasingly looking outside the United States to gain control over foreign markets and
resources. At the end of the century American is going to have the opportunity to become an
empire by acquiring overseas territories, and we’ll talk an awful lot about that
in another video. But here it's enough to know that many Americans had no interest
in America becoming an empire since, after all, no small part of our birth narrative
as a country had to do with breaking away from an empire. However, that was not the case with
these industry leaders. They looked abroad into places like the Pacific Rim and Asia
and Latin America and could see the opportunity to acquire new markets to sell stuff to people
and new places from which they could acquire natural resources. So the impetus for empire
in America is going to include a significant influence from these leaders of industry.
At this point you can start to see the gold wearing thin and the turd is starting to peek out,
but we’re going to cover that right back up and deal with it in the next video. Now both of
these men, and the others who followed similar practices grew fabulously wealthy during this
time. And there were several reasons they were able to get away with these kinds of practices.
The first reason was the proliferation of laissez faire government policies. As I’ve
mentioned before, laissez faire, when being translated, means something like
“let alone.” And so politicians during this time almost had an allergic reaction to any
government intervention or regulation over these business practices. And it could be that these
politicians really believed that government regulation was harmful to the noble principles
of free enterprise. Or maybe it was that guys like John D. Rockefeller kept stuffing buttloads
of money in their pockets to keep them from passing regulations. You know, potato, potahto.
The second reason these men were able to grow so wealthy is because they relied heavily on a
large pool of underpaid laborers like immigrants, women, and children. I mentioned in a previous
video that during this period there was a huge influx of immigrants from Europe,
and while some of them settled in the west, the vast majority of them streamed into
urban industrial centers looking for work. They were vastly underpaid, and again, there was no
governmental regulation on wages, and they weren’t able to ask for higher wages because if they did,
there were ten other immigrants looking for jobs who would work at the lower wage. Additionally,
factory owners realized that in this age of unskilled labor they could employ women and
children to work the machines as well. And they didn’t hire women
because they were all progressive and waving the flag of gender equality. No,
they discovered that they could employ women and pay them about a quarter of what they paid men.
The third reason these kinds of business practices were tolerated was because of
the application of Social Darwinism to economics. Now in case you forgot,
Social Darwinism is similar to biological Darwinism. In nature, the strong eat the
weak and it’s all survival of the fittest. Social Darwinism argued that if that’s how nature works,
why not apply that to society? Strong nations should eat weak nations. And in this case,
strong companies should eat weak companies, as is the way of nature. And in that way, these folks
argued, the world’s wealth would be concentrated into the hands of those who were deemed fittest.
Now all of these were standard practices for men like Rockefeller and Carnegie,
and those who followed their example. However, Carnegie mitigated these brutal practices
through what he called the Gospel of Wealth. Carnegie argued that those with extraordinary
wealth had a duty from God to invest their wealth back into society through generous
acts of philanthropy. And this wasn’t just a philosophical argument for him: Carnegie gave away
something like $350 million to build libraries and concert halls and universities. So in that way,
Carnegie had a little more gold than turd, and you know, small victories.
Now you’ll often hear guys like Carnegie and Rockefeller and Collins Huntington
and Mark Hanna referred to by one of two titles. Some folks refer to them
as captains of industry. And, of course, that title presupposes a favorable opinion
of them and their practices. On the other hand, you might hear them referred to as
robber barrons. And that would be the more negative connotation of their contributions
to American society. And the decision on which label is more appropriate, I’ll leave to you.
Thanks for watching, and if you need more help on Unit 6,
then click right here. Additionally if you need more help getting an A in your class and a five
if you want to consolidate Heimler’s History as the industry of your APUSH review world,
then go ahead and subscribe and I shall keep making videos for you. Heimler out.
Browse More Related Video
![](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/rN6SHokloTQ/hq720.jpg)
Development of the MIDDLE CLASS [APUSH Review Unit 6 Topic 10] Period 6: 1865-1898
![](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/tTbUP8bc0jY/hq720.jpg)
REFORM in the Gilded Age [APUSH Review Unit 6 Topic 11] Period 6:1865-1898
![](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/PzAlZ2E0wzg/hq720.jpg)
The American Yawp Ch. 18
![](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/Hby2JCS5vKE/hq720.jpg)
LABOR in the Gilded Age [APUSH Review Unit 6 Topic 7] Period 6: 1865-1898
![](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/H3FaGRRhszg/hq720.jpg)
RESPONSES to Immigration in the GILDED AGE [APUSH Review Unit 6 Topic 9] Period 6: 1865-1898
![](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/TONlwtPOoio/hq720.jpg)
TECHNOLOGICAL Innovation in the Gilded Age [APUSH Review Unit 6 Topic 5] Period 6: 1865-1898
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)