DPR TOL[]L !! IPHONE 16 DI BLOKIR di Indonesia !! APPLE Telah Melecehkan Negara INI !! APA IYA ???

Summary

In this video, the speaker critiques the Indonesian government's rejection of Apple's request for a 50-year tax holiday in exchange for investment in local manufacturing. The speaker argues that such decisions are short-sighted, stifling Indonesia’s economic growth and pushing foreign investors to other countries like Vietnam and China. They emphasize the importance of creating a business-friendly environment, attracting international investments, and moving beyond nationalism to build a sustainable, high-tech industry in Indonesia. The video calls for critical thinking about how policies should evolve to benefit the country's long-term prosperity.

Takeaways

• 😀 The Indonesian economy is impacted by dollar-to-rupiah conversions, with significant implications for local businesses and vendors.
• 😀 Some Indonesian officials emphasize nationalism and pride, but these sentiments may not translate into economic success.
• 😀 There is a debate about whether focusing on national pride, such as developing local products like iPhones or cars, is a practical approach for Indonesia’s future.
• 😀 The speaker argues that Indonesia’s heavy focus on nationalism could hinder economic growth, as foreign investors are more attracted to countries like Vietnam, China, and Thailand.
• 😀 Indonesia's government should consider adopting a more investor-friendly approach, similar to other nations that have succeeded in attracting foreign capital.
• 😀 The geopolitical tensions between the U.S. and China present an opportunity for Indonesia to attract American businesses looking for alternatives to China.
• 😀 The speaker questions whether Indonesia’s pride in national self-sufficiency is holding back the country from embracing beneficial partnerships with foreign companies.
• 😀 There is a call to critically evaluate whether Indonesia should continue pushing for self-sufficiency or focus on pragmatic partnerships with successful foreign models.
• 😀 The idea of developing locally-produced high-tech products like the iPhone, national cars, or fighter jets is raised but questioned for its feasibility in the current economic landscape.
• 😀 The speaker suggests that Indonesia might benefit more from collaborating with global companies rather than pushing them away, especially in the context of rising global competition for investment.
• 😀 The video ends with an invitation for viewers to share their thoughts and opinions on Indonesia's economic strategies and the future of foreign investments.

Q & A

What is the main issue being discussed in the transcript?

The transcript primarily discusses the debate over whether Indonesia should accept Apple's investment proposal, which includes a 50-year tax holiday, and the broader implications of such foreign investments on the nation's economy and national pride.

What are the arguments against granting Apple a 50-year tax holiday in Indonesia?

The main argument against granting the tax holiday is that it could be seen as a form of national humiliation, with critics arguing that it would prioritize foreign interests over local development and that it may lead to Indonesia's dependency on foreign companies instead of fostering homegrown industries.

What is the alternative viewpoint regarding Apple's investment in Indonesia?

The alternative viewpoint suggests that allowing Apple to invest could bring significant economic benefits, such as job creation, technology transfer, and development of the manufacturing sector, helping Indonesia compete with other countries like Vietnam and China in attracting foreign investment.

How does the transcript compare Indonesia's approach to foreign investment with that of other countries?

The transcript compares Indonesia unfavorably to countries like Vietnam and China, which are seen as more successful in attracting foreign investment by offering favorable terms and incentives to companies, in contrast to Indonesia's more cautious or protectionist approach.

What is the significance of the ongoing geopolitical tension between the U.S. and China in this context?

The geopolitical tension, particularly between the U.S. and China, is presented as a potential opportunity for Indonesia to attract American businesses and investors who may seek alternatives to China, positioning Indonesia as a favorable investment destination.

Why does the speaker question the competency of Indonesian policymakers?

The speaker suggests that Indonesia’s decision-making process may be flawed due to a lack of critical thinking and vision, highlighting concerns that the country’s leadership might be too focused on nationalism and pride instead of pursuing pragmatic economic strategies.

What role does national pride play in the debate about Apple's investment proposal?

National pride is a central theme in the debate. Some argue that rejecting foreign investments like Apple's is a way to protect Indonesian sovereignty and assert national pride, while others argue that such pride might hinder the country’s economic growth and its ability to compete globally.

What does the speaker believe about Indonesia’s potential to develop homegrown industries like electronics or vehicles?

The speaker expresses frustration, questioning why Indonesia cannot develop its own industries, such as creating its own smartphones or automobiles, like South Korea. They suggest that with the right vision and leadership, Indonesia could achieve such goals.

What is the speaker’s opinion on how Indonesia handles proposals for foreign investment?

The speaker criticizes Indonesia’s handling of foreign investment proposals, suggesting that the country often rejects or mishandles investment opportunities, especially in comparison to countries like China and Vietnam, which are seen as more adept at attracting foreign capital.

How does the speaker conclude the discussion on whether to accept or reject Apple's investment?

The speaker leaves the question open-ended, urging the audience to consider whether Indonesia should support Apple’s investment and learn from other countries, or whether it should take a stand against foreign companies to protect national interests, reflecting the complex nature of the issue.