Why I'll Never Return to the US

Summary

The speaker reflects on their decision to renounce U.S. citizenship and live abroad, driven by disillusionment with American political and cultural systems. They discuss their quest for personal freedom, global opportunities, and the lack of alignment with U.S. values. Emphasizing a desire for autonomy and fulfillment, the speaker critiques nationalism and blind patriotism while highlighting the benefits of living in countries that align with their ideals. The message conveys a rejection of the U.S. as a personal choice for growth, not an act of running away or betrayal.

Takeaways

• 😀 The speaker renounced U.S. citizenship in 2017, citing frustration with the U.S. political system and a desire for a different lifestyle.
• 😀 They describe their decision as a response to the lack of individuality and personal freedoms within the U.S. system, particularly in relation to taxes and bureaucracy.
• 😀 The speaker critiques American attitudes and policies, noting that many people are unaware of the implications of their own political choices, such as immigration restrictions.
• 😀 Despite being criticized by others for leaving, the speaker emphasizes that their move was not about cowardice, but about seeking opportunities and adventure elsewhere.
• 😀 The speaker reflects on how the U.S. has changed, noting that the country no longer aligns with their values or personal needs, and thus holds no appeal for return.
• 😀 They highlight the contradictions in American society, where people advocate for individual freedom but support policies that limit personal autonomy.
• 😀 The speaker contrasts the U.S. with other countries that provide greater acceptance, freedom, and less judgmental attitudes, valuing the ability to live according to their own principles.
• 😀 They express satisfaction with their life abroad, where they feel more free and in control of their personal and professional destiny.
• 😀 The speaker believes that cutting off options or relationships that no longer serve one's personal growth can be a positive and strategic choice.
• 😀 The speaker rejects the idea of returning to the U.S. for nostalgic reasons, stating that they have found everything they need elsewhere, from adventure to freedom, and don’t regret their decision.

Q & A

Why did the speaker renounce their U.S. citizenship?

The speaker renounced their U.S. citizenship due to a combination of dissatisfaction with U.S. policies, especially on taxes and immigration, and a desire to pursue a life that aligns more with their values. They feel disconnected from the country's political climate and prefer the freedom and opportunities offered by other countries.

How does the speaker feel about Americans' perception of their decision to leave?

The speaker acknowledges that many Americans view their decision to leave as cowardly, but they reject this notion. They argue that their decision is not about avoiding conflict but about seeking personal growth and a better quality of life abroad, rather than staying in a system that feels increasingly stifling.

What is the speaker's view on the concept of individualism in the U.S.?

The speaker critiques the notion of American individualism, arguing that it is largely a myth. They believe that Americans are often expected to conform to majority opinions and policies, undermining the very idea of personal freedom and self-determination that the country promotes.

How does the speaker compare the U.S. immigration system with those of other countries?

The speaker compares the U.S. immigration system unfavorably with other countries, noting how restrictive and bureaucratic the U.S. system is. They highlight the absurdity of policies like requiring tourist visas and the lack of understanding about the consequences of such policies, which they feel are often supported by voters without any real understanding of their implications.

What is the speaker's opinion on people who move within the U.S. for tax reasons?

The speaker points out the hypocrisy of Americans who move from states like Wisconsin to Florida for tax advantages or better weather, yet criticize those who leave the U.S. for similar reasons. They see this as a form of 'abandonment' that is socially acceptable, while their own decision to leave the U.S. is not.

How does the speaker view the lifestyle they have chosen living abroad?

The speaker enjoys the flexibility and freedom of living in different countries, experiencing diverse cultures, and having multiple citizenships. They value the ability to choose places that align with their personal values and the benefits these countries offer, such as lower taxes and a higher quality of life.

What does the speaker think about the emotional connection to the U.S.?

The speaker expresses that they no longer feel an emotional connection to the U.S. They do not harbor any ill will toward the country, but they simply do not feel the need to return because they believe they can have a better life elsewhere.

Why does the speaker believe that moving abroad is not 'running away'?

The speaker argues that moving abroad is not about running away from problems but about seeking better opportunities and a sense of adventure. They believe that having options and choosing a life that aligns with their values is a positive and proactive decision.

How does the speaker describe their decision-making process regarding citizenship and living abroad?

The speaker views their decision as a strategic choice to optimize their life by cutting off certain options, such as U.S. citizenship, in order to gain more freedom and control over their personal and financial future. They value the ability to adapt and evolve, considering various countries as potential places to live.

What is the speaker's stance on the notion of 'closing doors' in life?

The speaker believes that sometimes the best way to move forward is by closing doors, such as renouncing citizenship, to remove unnecessary distractions and open up new opportunities. They see this as a way to achieve personal growth and avoid being held back by past decisions or societal expectations.