KING Fedor BUT...

Summary

In this video, the speaker expresses admiration for Fedor Emelianenko, the legendary heavyweight fighter, acknowledging his prime achievements and continued success even at 45 years old. While praising Fedor's past victories and influence, the speaker shares an opinion that during a specific window in time, Fedor may not have been the best heavyweight. The speaker discusses the context of Fedor's losses to fighters like Bigfoot Silva and Dan Henderson, and reflects on how fighters like Brock Lesnar and Cain Velasquez may have outperformed him during that period. Despite this, the speaker affirms Fedor's greatness and legacy, celebrating his impressive knockout victory in his later years.

Takeaways

• 😀 The speaker expresses deep admiration for Fedor Emelianenko, calling him one of the greatest heavyweights of all time.
• 😀 Despite his respect for Fedor, the speaker believes Fedor's performance in the 2009-2012 window was not as dominant as in his earlier years.
• 😀 The speaker clarifies that their opinion about Fedor's career is based on a specific period and not on his overall legacy.
• 😀 The speaker loves Fedor but points out the slowing of his hand speed and the rise of more well-rounded fighters during the later years of his career.
• 😀 The speaker emphasizes that Fedor's wins in PRIDE, especially over fighters like Nogueira and Arlovski, were incredible and still hold value.
• 😀 The speaker references how other fighters like Stipe Miocic are considered the best UFC heavyweights, but Fedor's overall achievements are unmatched.
• 😀 Fedor's resilience is highlighted, as he is still knocking out opponents at 45, showing that age doesn’t diminish his power.
• 😀 The speaker recalls almost fighting Fedor, adding a personal touch and credibility to their opinion on Fedor’s career trajectory.
• 😀 The speaker criticizes the trend of devaluing legendary fighters when they enter their later years, using Anderson Silva's career as an example.
• 😀 Despite disagreeing with Fedor's effectiveness in his later years, the speaker acknowledges his historical significance and gives credit for his performances even at an advanced age.

Q & A

What is the speaker's overall opinion of Fedor Emelianenko?

The speaker expresses deep admiration for Fedor Emelianenko, calling him the greatest heavyweight of all time. However, they note that in a specific time window (2009-2012), they believe Fedor was less effective compared to his earlier years.

Why does the speaker believe Fedor was less effective in the later years of his career?

The speaker attributes Fedor's decreased effectiveness to a combination of factors, including slowing hand speed and the rise of more well-rounded fighters. They also mention that bigger fighters, like Brock Lesnar and Shane Carwin, emerged during this period, which may have posed challenges for Fedor.

Does the speaker believe Fedor's entire career is devalued due to his later losses?

No, the speaker clarifies that while Fedor's recent losses and decline in performance don't overshadow his prime years, they emphasize that a fighter's later career should not erase the accomplishments made during their peak.

How does the speaker compare Fedor to other fighters like Anderson Silva?

The speaker draws a parallel between Fedor and Anderson Silva, suggesting that both are often judged harshly based on their later losses. The speaker believes this type of judgment is unfair because it overlooks the greatness achieved during their prime years.

What is the significance of Fedor's victory at 45 years old?

The speaker highlights Fedor's remarkable achievement of knocking out Tim Johnson at the age of 45. This is presented as an inspiring testament to Fedor's lasting power and skill, especially in the context of his age and the challenges of aging in combat sports.

What does the speaker mean by 'Fedor is the ninth wonder of the world'?

The speaker uses this phrase to emphasize Fedor's exceptional abilities, particularly his continued success at an age when many fighters would be past their prime. It underscores the admiration and awe the speaker has for Fedor's career longevity and performance.

Did the speaker have a chance to fight Fedor, and how does this influence their opinion?

Yes, the speaker reveals that they were very close to fighting Fedor at one point, but Fedor lost a fight to Bigfoot Silva, preventing the bout. The speaker's opinion is shaped by this near-encounter, as they reflect on the honor and challenge of facing Fedor in the octagon.

How does the speaker feel about the public perception of fighters who age and experience losses?

The speaker criticizes the tendency to devalue fighters' careers based on their later losses. They argue that fighters like Fedor and Anderson Silva should not be judged solely by their later years, as their earlier achievements are a significant part of their legacy.

What role does Fedor's physical appearance and demeanor play in the speaker's admiration?

The speaker mentions Fedor's physical presence and stoic demeanor, describing him as someone who exudes a sense of awe. They note that Fedor's body and his reserved nature make him stand out as a larger-than-life figure, further contributing to the respect the speaker has for him.

What is the speaker's stance on Fedor's legacy in the context of modern fighters like Stipe Miocic?

The speaker acknowledges Stipe Miocic as the greatest UFC heavyweight of all time but maintains that Fedor's legacy in Pride, including his victories over fighters like Antonio Rodrigo Nogueira and Andrei Arlovski, solidifies him as the greatest heavyweight overall, regardless of the UFC's current dominance.