WHO Pandemic Treaty Fails... But Wait Until You See What the Globalists Are Planning Next | Redacted

Summary

This video delves into concerns over the World Health Organization's pandemic treaty and its potential impact on national sovereignty. Critics argue that the treaty could grant the WHO sweeping powers over areas such as vaccines, lockdowns, and food supply chains, undermining U.S. laws and freedoms. The discussion expands to a similar North American initiative, fearing further loss of sovereignty through international agreements. The video ends with a pitch for Canadine, a natural pain reliever positioned as a safe alternative to opioids, offering chronic pain relief without addictive risks. The focus is on global governance and individual freedoms.

Takeaways

• 😀 The World Health Organization's (WHO) pandemic treaty is seen as a power grab that threatens national sovereignty by giving the WHO control over health-related decisions globally.
• 😀 The treaty could allow the WHO to impose vaccine mandates, lockdowns, control food supplies, and surveillance, expanding their power beyond health emergencies.
• 😀 The idea that the WHO could control information deemed an 'infodemic'—even if the information is true—is concerning, as it could suppress dissenting views and limit freedom of expression.
• 😀 The treaty could set a dangerous precedent, allowing international bodies to override national laws, such as imposing mandates or restrictions without domestic approval.
• 😀 A bill in the U.S. House of Representatives aims to require a supermajority vote in the Senate before the President can sign a pandemic treaty with the WHO, to preserve U.S. sovereignty.
• 😀 There are fears that global treaties could pave the way for other agreements that undermine U.S. control over key areas like military decisions, trade, and taxes.
• 😀 The U.S. Senate and House of Representatives must both approve treaties before they can bind citizens, ensuring that the Constitution remains the supreme law of the land.
• 😀 There is a potential risk that international treaties could be used to implement social policies like vaccine mandates, lockdowns, and even gun control under the guise of global agreements.
• 😀 A new initiative, the North American Preparedness for Animal and Human Pandemics Initiative (NAPI), extends previous Obama-era regulations and could give more power to U.S., Canadian, and Mexican authorities over pandemics and public health crises.
• 😀 The speaker emphasizes the need for more scrutiny and accountability regarding the handling of global health crises, criticizing the WHO and other international bodies for their failure during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Q & A

What is the main concern raised by the speaker about the World Health Organization’s (WHO) pandemic treaty?

The speaker's main concern is that the WHO's pandemic treaty seeks to override national sovereignty, giving the organization control over areas like vaccine distribution, lockdowns, and even food supply, potentially infringing on the rights and freedoms of member nations.

What powers would the WHO gain under the pandemic treaty?

Under the pandemic treaty, the WHO would gain the authority to control vaccines, mandate lockdowns, surveil populations, manage food and supply chains, and regulate information, even in cases where the information contradicts the actions the WHO wants people to take.

Why does the speaker argue that the pandemic treaty could set a dangerous precedent?

The speaker argues that the treaty could pave the way for other international agreements that undermine U.S. sovereignty. These could potentially extend to areas like war decisions, gun control, and international trade, diminishing the power of the U.S. government and bypassing the Constitution.

How does the speaker view the role of international treaties in shaping U.S. domestic policy?

The speaker believes that international treaties should not be used to legislate or enforce domestic policy, as it bypasses the U.S. Constitution and the democratic process, where laws should be made by Congress, not imposed by foreign powers through treaties.

What is the significance of Alexander Hamilton’s writings mentioned in the script?

The speaker refers to Hamilton’s writings in Federalist 75 to argue that treaties cannot be used to create new laws for the U.S. or infringe upon national sovereignty. Hamilton emphasized that treaties are agreements between sovereign nations, not tools for imposing domestic policies without legislative approval.

What does the speaker warn could happen if the U.S. Senate approves the WHO pandemic treaty?

The speaker warns that if the Senate approves the WHO pandemic treaty, it could allow global organizations to override U.S. laws on issues such as health, defense, and trade, weakening the nation's ability to make independent decisions and protecting the freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution.

What is the North American Preparedness for Animal and Human Pandemics Initiative (NAPI)?

NAPI is an extension of an Obama-era initiative designed to manage animal and human pandemics in North America. The new version expands its scope, giving the U.S., Canada, and Mexico more control over pandemic preparedness, including potential measures like vaccine passports and restrictions on food supplies, even in the absence of a pandemic.

How does the speaker describe the changes in the NAPI initiative from its original version?

The speaker notes that the original NAPI focused on pandemic flu, while the new version broadens the definition of preparedness, allowing governments to intervene in areas like food supply and animal farming, based on the potential risk of a pandemic rather than the existence of one.

What are the concerns raised regarding border health measures under NAPI?

The speaker expresses concern that border health measures under NAPI could include vaccine passports and restrictions on movement across borders, effectively controlling citizens’ ability to travel and engage in commerce based on health mandates.

What criticism does the speaker have regarding the response to the COVID-19 pandemic?

The speaker criticizes the WHO and global health bodies for mishandling the COVID-19 pandemic, accusing them of suppressing scientific evidence and failing to follow proper protocols, which has led to a lack of trust in these organizations managing future pandemic responses.