Malaysia Baru Sadar Indonesia Seberani Ini, Tolak Iphone 16 Masuk Gara Gara Tidak Mau Bayar Pajak

Summary

Indonesia has banned the iPhone 16 due to its failure to meet the country’s local content requirements (TKDN), which mandate that technology products sold in Indonesia must include at least 35% locally sourced components. This decision reflects Indonesia’s growing economic power and commitment to local industry development, as the government enforces stricter regulations on foreign companies. While policies like these aim to attract investment and strengthen manufacturing, they also present challenges for global companies like Apple. The move highlights Indonesia's increasing influence in Southeast Asia, positioning it to become one of the world’s top economies by 2050.

Takeaways

• 😀 Indonesia has banned the iPhone 16 due to Apple's failure to meet the local content policy (TKDN), which requires at least 35% of the components to be sourced domestically.
• 😀 The Indonesian government has been pushing for local content policies to encourage foreign investment and boost the local manufacturing sector, although the results have been mixed.
• 😀 Apple previously avoided the TKDN requirement by investing millions in local tech initiatives like the Apple Developer Academy, but failed to meet new investment needs for the iPhone 16.
• 😀 Indonesia's local content policy aims to create jobs and strengthen the local economy, but it can also increase production costs and be difficult for foreign tech companies to comply with.
• 😀 Despite facing challenges, Indonesia’s political leadership has shown a strong willingness to defend its policies, even against global brands like Apple.
• 😀 The country has a large consumer base, with 300 million people, which gives it substantial purchasing power despite lower average wages compared to countries like Malaysia or Singapore.
• 😀 By 2050, Indonesia is expected to become the world’s 4th largest economy, increasing its global economic influence and positioning as a major player on the international stage.
• 😀 Indonesia has previously banned other foreign companies like TikTok Shop, but was able to negotiate terms that allowed the platform to re-enter after complying with regulations.
• 😀 The iPhone 16 cannot be sold in Indonesia without TKDN certification, which Apple currently lacks, but the phones can still enter the country through passengers’ personal baggage in limited quantities.
• 😀 Indonesia’s stance on enforcing the TKDN policy, including monitoring and shutting down sales of the iPhone 16 through marketplaces, shows its commitment to economic fairness and protecting local industries.

Q & A

What is the reason for the iPhone 16 being banned in Indonesia?

The iPhone 16 was banned in Indonesia because it failed to meet the local content policy known as TKDN, which requires foreign tech companies to use at least 35-40% locally sourced components in their products sold in the country.

What is the TKDN policy, and why is it important for foreign companies like Apple?

The TKDN (Tingkat Kandungan Dalam Negeri) policy is a requirement for foreign companies to include a certain percentage of locally sourced components in their products sold in Indonesia. It aims to boost local manufacturing and encourage foreign investment, but it can also present challenges for companies like Apple that do not have significant local production facilities.

Why did Apple previously avoid the TKDN certification for the iPhone 16?

Apple had previously avoided the TKDN certification for the iPhone 16 because it did not meet the local component requirements. While Apple had invested in local tech initiatives like the Apple Developer Academy, it fell short in 2024 by approximately $15 million in investments needed to meet the TKDN criteria for the iPhone 16.

What economic strategy is Indonesia pursuing with the implementation of TKDN?

Indonesia is using the TKDN policy as part of its broader economic strategy to promote local manufacturing, attract foreign investment, and create jobs. The policy aims to reduce reliance on imports and strengthen the domestic economy by encouraging global brands to source or produce parts locally.

How has the ban of iPhone 16 been perceived in Indonesia?

The ban on the iPhone 16 has been viewed as a bold and wise decision by the Indonesian government, reflecting its growing economic power. The policy demonstrates that Indonesia is no longer just a passive participant in global trade but is willing to enforce regulations to protect its local economy and ensure fair practices.

What are the potential long-term implications of Indonesia’s stance on foreign companies?

In the long term, Indonesia's stance could lead to stronger local manufacturing sectors and greater foreign investment in the country. However, it may also cause some companies to reconsider their operations in Indonesia if the costs of complying with local content requirements become too high or complex.

How does Indonesia’s economic potential compare to other countries in Southeast Asia?

Indonesia’s economy is growing rapidly and is expected to become the fourth-largest global economy by 2050. With a population of over 300 million, it has significant purchasing power, which gives it an advantage over smaller Southeast Asian economies like Malaysia in terms of local market influence.

What is the significance of Indonesia's decision to ban TikTok Shop and challenge foreign companies?

Indonesia’s decision to ban TikTok Shop and challenge foreign companies like Apple shows the country’s willingness to assert its authority in economic and trade matters. By enforcing strict regulations, Indonesia is signaling that it wants to ensure local businesses have equal opportunities and that global companies must comply with its rules to operate there.

How does the ban on iPhone 16 impact Apple's business in Indonesia?

The ban on iPhone 16 restricts Apple from selling this particular model in Indonesia. However, Apple can still sell older models like the iPhone 15 as long as they meet the TKDN requirements. This could potentially limit Apple’s market share in Indonesia unless it invests more in local production to comply with the policy.

What could be the future for Indonesia’s local content policies and other Southeast Asian countries?

Indonesia’s local content policies could set a precedent for other Southeast Asian countries looking to boost their own local economies. Countries like Malaysia may adopt similar policies to protect their domestic industries, though the success of these policies will depend on balancing local economic growth with attracting foreign investment.