LSE100: Measuring Fairness
Summary
TLDRIn this insightful discussion, scholars examine the complexities of digital inequalities through various research methodologies. Prof. Ellen Helsper advocates for a multi-method approach, combining quantitative surveys with qualitative insights to capture both structural data and personal experiences. The conversation highlights the significance of neighborhood mapping and counterfactual analyses in understanding different outcomes for individuals in varying environments. Scholars emphasize the necessity of mixed methods to explore the nuances of inequality, with qualitative research giving voice to marginalized perspectives. Ultimately, the dialogue underscores the interplay between qualitative and quantitative methods in fostering a deeper understanding of societal issues.
Takeaways
- π Multiple methodologies are essential in studying digital inequalities, incorporating both quantitative and qualitative approaches.
- π Research includes both international comparisons and within-country analyses, addressing inequalities at various levels.
- ποΈ Innovative methods like neighborhood mapping help visualize the distribution of digital resources and access.
- π Surveys provide valuable data on structural aspects of inequality but often overlook wealth at both extremes.
- π₯ Qualitative methods capture personal experiences and voices that are typically marginalized or unheard.
- π The 'hermeneutics of suspicion' and 'hermeneutics of faith' frameworks are important for analyzing qualitative data critically.
- βοΈ Mixed methods research enhances understanding by combining depth (qualitative) and breadth (quantitative) perspectives.
- π§βπ€βπ§ Diverse perspectives in research contribute to richer, more nuanced findings about social phenomena.
- π¬ Quantitative methods can generalize findings to larger populations, while qualitative methods provide detailed insights into individual experiences.
- π Both methodologies are necessary to understand the dynamic processes of inequality and the challenges faced in everyday life.
Q & A
What methodologies does Prof. Ellen Helsper use in her research on digital inequalities?
-Prof. Ellen Helsper employs a multi-method approach that includes quantitative surveys, qualitative research, and innovative methods such as neighborhood mapping to study digital inequalities.
How does Helsper differentiate between types of inequalities in her research?
-Helsper examines inequalities at both international levels, comparing Global North and Global South contexts, as well as within-country disparities, highlighting the need for diverse methodologies to capture these complexities.
What limitations of surveys does Prof. Mike Savage identify?
-Savage points out that surveys often miss data from the very wealthy and the poorest individuals, which can lead to an incomplete understanding of inequality. Additionally, the response rate from low-income individuals is declining.
What role do qualitative methods play in understanding power dynamics according to Dr. Flora Cornish?
-Dr. Flora Cornish argues that qualitative methods help uncover the voices of marginalized groups and can expose power dynamics, but she emphasizes that the impact of these methods depends on the analysis and values of the researcher.
What is the 'hermeneutics of suspicion' as discussed by Cornish?
-The 'hermeneutics of suspicion' involves critically analyzing what people say, questioning their motives, and exploring underlying power relations in an unequal society.
How does Prof. Tim Newburn view the relationship between qualitative and quantitative research?
-Newburn believes that both qualitative and quantitative researchers address similar questions of fairness and equity but prioritize different aspects of the experience. He supports mixed methods to enrich understanding.
What is the value of quantitative methods in research according to Prof. Wendy Sigle?
-Sigle notes that quantitative methods allow for generalizations about larger populations and can identify statistically significant differences and relationships, which are essential for understanding broader patterns of behavior.
Why does Sigle argue that qualitative methods are important?
-Sigle argues that qualitative methods provide rich, in-depth descriptions of individuals' everyday lives, which help reveal the complexities of macro processes related to inequality that quantitative methods may overlook.
What is a counterfactual approach in Helsper's research?
-A counterfactual approach examines how similar individuals living in different environments experience different outcomes, allowing for an analysis of how structural factors influence individual experiences.
How do the researchers suggest addressing the challenges of studying digital inequalities?
-The researchers suggest using mixed methods to combine the breadth of quantitative data with the depth of qualitative insights, ensuring a comprehensive understanding of both individual experiences and structural issues related to inequality.
Outlines
This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.
Upgrade NowMindmap
This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.
Upgrade NowKeywords
This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.
Upgrade NowHighlights
This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.
Upgrade NowTranscripts
This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.
Upgrade NowBrowse More Related Video
Research Methods in Sociology: Quantitative and Qualitative (Sociology Theory & Methods)
Prof. Dr. Sugiyono : Metode Sequential Exlpanatory dalam Mixed Methods-Eps.2 @Suyantoid
Berbagai Metode Pengumpulan Data dalam Penelitian Kualitatif
Prof. Dr. Sugiyono: Desain Penelitian Mixed Methods-Eps.1 @Suyantoid
Development Research Methods
Metode Penelitian Kualitatif | Prof. Dr. Sugiyono, M.Pd #7
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)