Presentation 2b: Putting Arguments in Standard Form
Summary
TLDRThis lecture explains how to put arguments in standard form to clarify their structure for better understanding and evaluation. It outlines steps such as numbering and separating premises, identifying conclusions, removing indicators, and rewriting statements for clarity. An example involving the argument 'cats are warm-blooded' is used to demonstrate the process. The lecture also highlights handling implicit premises and conclusions, and rewording rhetorical questions. This method helps present arguments clearly, making it easier to assess their validity.
Takeaways
- š Standard form is used to clarify the structure of arguments.
- š¢ Number and display each premise on a separate line.
- āļø Split premises occurring in one sentence into two lines for clarity.
- š Move the conclusion to the last line, even if it appears earlier in the text.
- š« Remove premise and conclusion indicators once identified.
- š§¹ Rewrite premises and conclusions to be clear, explicit, and complete.
- š” Look for conclusion indicators like 'from all this it follows that' to identify conclusions.
- š± In the example, the conclusion is that 'cats are warm-blooded.'
- š Rhetorical questions may imply conclusions that should be stated explicitly.
- š§© Include any implicit premises or conclusions when putting an argument in standard form.
Q & A
What is 'standard form' in the context of arguments?
-Standard form is a way of organizing an argument by clearly displaying its premises and conclusion. It helps to clarify the structure and makes it easier to analyze and evaluate the argument.
How are premises arranged in standard form?
-In standard form, each premise is numbered and displayed on a separate line. If two premises occur in one sentence, they are split into two lines to make it clear that they are separate premises.
Where is the conclusion placed in standard form?
-The conclusion is always placed on the last line, even if in the original text it appeared at the beginning. Conclusion indicators are replaced with a simple indicator like 'therefore'.
What are premise indicators, and why are they removed in standard form?
-Premise indicators are words or phrases that signal the presence of a premise, such as 'because' or 'since'. In standard form, these are removed because the premises are already numbered, making them redundant.
What should be done if a premise or conclusion is written in a confusing or incomplete way?
-Premises and conclusions should be rewritten so that they are complete, explicit, and clear. This ensures that the argument is easier to understand and evaluate.
How was the argument about cats and mammals put into standard form?
-The argument was rewritten by identifying the conclusion ('Cats are warm-blooded') and displaying it after two separate premises: (1) 'If cats are mammals, they are warm-blooded' and (2) 'Cats are mammals.' This clarified the argument structure.
What should be kept in mind about the position of the conclusion in a text?
-The conclusion does not always appear at the end of a text. However, in standard form, it is always moved to the last line for clarity.
What should be done if an argument's conclusion is implied and not explicitly stated?
-If the conclusion is implied, such as in a rhetorical question, it should be reworded as a straightforward statement. For example, 'How can you believe it's OK to feed this to children?' should be reworded as 'It is not OK to feed this cereal to children.'
How should implicit premises be handled in standard form?
-Any implicit premises should be included in standard form to ensure the argument is complete. This makes the reasoning behind the conclusion fully explicit.
Why is it helpful to put an argument in standard form?
-Putting an argument in standard form clarifies its structure, making it easier to understand the relationship between premises and conclusion. This aids in evaluating the strength of the argument.
Outlines
š Introduction to Standard Form
This paragraph introduces the concept of putting arguments into 'standard form,' a method used to clarify the structure of arguments. The presenter emphasizes the importance of clearly identifying premises and conclusions to better understand, analyze, and evaluate arguments.
š Steps to Put Arguments in Standard Form
This section outlines the steps for converting arguments into standard form. It involves numbering and separating premises, ensuring clarity by splitting multiple premises in one sentence, and placing the conclusion at the end of the argument. Premise and conclusion indicators should be removed or simplified for clarity, and all statements should be rewritten to be explicit and understandable.
š Example Argument: Cats and Mammals
An example argument is provided, demonstrating how to identify premises and conclusions within a text. The argument suggests that if cats are mammals, they are warm-blooded. The presenter explains how to separate premises in a single sentence and label them accordingly, followed by identifying and clarifying the conclusion.
š Identifying Premises and Conclusion
Here, the presenter explains the process of identifying premises and conclusions using indicators. They show how the phrase 'from all this it follows that' is a conclusion indicator and how the premises should be rewritten to clarify the subject. In this case, 'they' is replaced with 'cats' to avoid ambiguity.
āļø Rewriting for Clarity
The importance of rewriting both premises and conclusions is emphasized in this paragraph. The rewritten version ensures that ambiguous terms like 'they' are clarified, making the argument's structure much easier to follow. The presenter stresses that presenting arguments in standard form simplifies evaluation.
š Key Tips for Standard Form
This section provides important reminders when putting arguments in standard form. The conclusion does not always appear at the end of a text, and it is crucial to include implicit premises and conclusions that may not be explicitly stated. The presenter also highlights how rhetorical questions might imply conclusions that should be clearly stated in standard form.
š¤ Handling Rhetorical Questions
An example of a rhetorical question is presented to illustrate how to handle implicit conclusions. The rhetorical question 'How can you believe itās OK to feed this to children?' is reworded into a clear, straightforward conclusion: 'It is not okay to feed this cereal to children.' This example demonstrates how implicit arguments should be made explicit when reformulating them.
šÆ Including Implicit Premises and Conclusions
This final paragraph stresses the importance of including implicit premises and conclusions when converting an argument into standard form. The presenter wraps up by reinforcing the need for clarity and explicitness in every part of the argument.
š Conclusion and Thanks
The video concludes with a brief farewell and a thank you message to the viewers, signaling the end of the presentation.
Mindmap
Keywords
š”Standard form
š”Premise
š”Conclusion
š”Premise indicators
š”Conclusion indicators
š”Conditional claim
š”Implicit premises
š”Rhetorical question
š”Rewriting arguments
š”Evaluation
Highlights
Introduction to putting arguments in standard form to clarify structure.
Standard form makes it clear what the premises are and what the conclusion is.
To put an argument in standard form, number each premise on a separate line.
If a sentence contains multiple premises, split them into separate lines.
The conclusion is displayed on the last line, regardless of its original position.
Remove all premise indicators, as they are redundant once premises are numbered.
Use 'therefore' as a simple conclusion indicator and remove other complex indicators.
Rewrite premises and conclusions to be clear, complete, and explicit.
Example given: Cats are mammals; they are warm-blooded, and it follows that cats are warm-blooded.
In standard form, split premises and conclusion into separate lines for clarity.
Rewritten premise for clarity: Replace ambiguous pronouns like 'they' with explicit references.
Putting arguments in standard form helps clarify the reasoning and structure for evaluation.
The conclusion of an argument is not always the last sentence in the original text.
Implied conclusions can occur, such as those posed as rhetorical questions.
Implicit premises should be made explicit when putting an argument in standard form.
Transcripts
Hello, and welcome to lecture 2b: PuttingĀ Arguments in Standard Form. In this presentation,Ā Ā
we will talk about how to put arguments in whatĀ we will call āstandard formā, which is one way ofĀ Ā
recasting them that clarifies their structure. In order to understand, analyze, and evaluate anĀ Ā
argument, it can be helpful to display it aĀ way that makes clear precisely what are theĀ Ā
premises and what is the conclusion. This way of displaying arguments isĀ Ā
known as the standard form (or standard format) Here is how to put an argument in standard form. Ā
Number and display each premise on a separateĀ line. Sometimes two premises will occur in oneĀ Ā
sentence. Split these up over two lines so itāsĀ clear that there are two separate premises. Ā
Display the conclusion on the last line. SometimesĀ in a text, the conclusion occurs at the beginning.Ā Ā
Move it to the end. Remove all premise indicators.Ā Ā
We already know what the premises areĀ from our numbered list of premises. Ā
Remove all conclusion indicators or replace withĀ a simple conclusion indicator like āthereforeā. Ā
Rewrite premises and conclusionĀ so that they are complete,Ā Ā
explicit, and clear. Sometimes premisesĀ and conclusions are written in a confusing,Ā Ā
incomplete, or implicit way---clean allĀ that up so itās clear just what they are. Ā
Letās go through an example of puttingĀ an argument in standard form. Ā
Here is the original argument text: If cats are mammals, they are warm-blooded,Ā Ā
and they are indeed mammals! From all thisĀ it follows that cats are warm-blooded. Ā
To put an argument in standard form, we first needĀ to identify the premises and the conclusion. Ā
And to do this, it helps to look forĀ premise and conclusion indicators. Ā
Here āfrom all this it followsĀ thatā is a conclusion indicator. Ā
So, we can see that the conclusionĀ is that cats are warm-blooded. Ā
We labeled the conclusion with a āCāĀ and replaced the wordy conclusionĀ Ā
indicator with the simple one āthereforeā. Ā
Letās turn now to the premises. In this text, the premises comeĀ Ā
before the conclusion, thoughĀ this neednāt always be the case. Ā
The premises are the conditional claim thatĀ if cats are mammals, they are warm-blooded, Ā
and the claim that cats are mammals. These premises occurred in one single sentence,Ā Ā
but to put the argument in standard form, we haveĀ to separate the two premises into two sentencesĀ Ā
and display them on two separate lines. I labeled them as (P1) and (P2). Ā
I could have also just labeled them asĀ (1) and (2)---that would have been fine. Ā
Notice that we rewrote the first premise toĀ make it clear that ātheyā refers to cats. WeĀ Ā
also rewrote the second premise to make clearĀ that ātheyā, there again, refers to cats. Ā
And there you have it. Weāve presentedĀ the argument in standard form. Ā
As we can see, the argumentĀ presented in standard form isĀ Ā
much clearer than the original text.Ā Itās much easier to understand and,Ā Ā
eventually, to evaluate it. We can see more clearly what theĀ Ā
conclusion is supposed to be and what areĀ the reasons put forth for believing it. Ā
When putting an argument in standard form,Ā here are a few things to keep in mind. Ā
The conclusion of an argument need not be theĀ last line in a text containing the argument. Ā
Another thing to keep in mind is that sometimesĀ an argumentās conclusion is not explicitly stated.Ā Ā
For instance, it might be impliedĀ by a rhetorical question. Ā
For example, consider this argument:Ā This cereal is full of toxic chemicals.Ā Ā
How can you believe itās OK to feed this toĀ children? The conclusion is in the form of aĀ Ā
rhetorical question. Of course, in putting thisĀ argument in standard form, we would reword theĀ Ā
conclusion more straightforwardly as āIt isĀ not okay to feed this cereal to childrenā. Ā
Similarly, a premise might not be explicitlyĀ stated but might rather be left implicit. Ā
When putting an argument in standard form, weĀ include any implicit premises and conclusions. Ā
Thank you for watching. Thatās it for now.
Browse More Related Video
Presentation 2a: Identifying Statements and Arguments
Logic (Studying Arguments) Part 1
3. Berpikir kritis menilai argumen
Presentation 2c: Introduction to Validity and Soundness (Phil 1230: Reasoning and Critical Thinking)
VALIDITY OF AN ARGUMENT (MATH IN THE MODERN WORLD) - Tagalog Tutorial
A Very Basic Introduction to Logic and Syllogistic Logic
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)