Jaksa : Ferdy Sambo Dituntut Penjara Seumur Hidup Kasus Pembunuhan Brigadir J!
Summary
TLDRThe prosecution presents its case against the defendant, Ferdi Sambo, emphasizing factors that aggravate his crime, including the loss of the victim’s life, public disturbance, and the defendant's lack of remorse. The prosecution argues that Sambo's actions, as a high-ranking law enforcement officer, have severely tarnished the reputation of the Indonesian police force both domestically and internationally. No mitigating factors are cited. The prosecution demands a life sentence for the defendant, also addressing related legal charges, and concludes by requesting the return of evidence for use in other connected cases.
Takeaways
- ⚖️ The prosecutor begins by presenting the factors considered in submitting the criminal charges against the defendant.
- 💔 The defendant's actions resulted in the death of the victim, Noviansyah, causing deep pain for the victim's family.
- 🤥 The defendant was uncooperative, did not confess to his actions, and gave contradictory statements in court.
- 😨 The defendant's actions led to public unrest and widespread concern in society.
- 🚓 As a law enforcement officer and a high-ranking Polri official, the defendant's actions were deemed highly inappropriate.
- 🌍 The defendant's conduct tarnished the image of the Indonesian Police both domestically and internationally.
- 👮♂️ The defendant's actions led to the involvement of other Polri members in the crime.
- ⛓️ The prosecutor found no mitigating factors in favor of the defendant.
- 📜 The prosecutor requests the court to declare the defendant guilty of premeditated murder under Article 340 of the Indonesian Criminal Code (KUHP) in conjunction with Article 55, paragraph 1.
- 🏛️ The prosecutor demands a life sentence for the defendant and asks the court to return evidence to be used in related cases.
Q & A
What is the main accusation against the defendant in this case?
-The defendant, Ferdi Sambo, is accused of premeditated murder and causing widespread disturbances in the community, as well as disrupting electronic systems unlawfully.
What are the aggravating factors mentioned by the prosecutor?
-The aggravating factors include the death of the victim Noviansyah, the emotional pain caused to the victim's family, the defendant's lack of remorse and denial during the trial, the disruption caused to society, and the damage to the reputation of the Indonesian National Police (Polri) and internationally.
What impact did the defendant’s actions have on the public and the police force?
-The defendant’s actions caused widespread concern and unrest in society. Additionally, they tarnished the reputation of the Indonesian National Police (Polri), both domestically and internationally, and involved other police officers in the case.
Did the prosecutor identify any mitigating factors for the defendant?
-No, the prosecutor did not identify any mitigating factors for the defendant.
What charges are the defendant facing according to the prosecutor’s statement?
-The defendant is facing charges of premeditated murder under Article 340 of the Indonesian Penal Code (KUHP), and unlawful electronic system disruption under Law No. 19 of 2016 in relation to Law No. 11 of 2008 on Information and Electronic Transactions.
What punishment is the prosecutor seeking for the defendant?
-The prosecutor is seeking a life sentence for the defendant.
What evidence is mentioned in the prosecutor's statement?
-The prosecutor mentions evidence from exhibits A to 41, which are to be returned to the public prosecutor for use in related cases involving Hendra Kurniawan and others.
Who else is involved in related cases, as per the prosecutor’s statement?
-Hendra Kurniawan and other unnamed individuals are involved in related cases.
When and where was the prosecutor’s demand read out?
-The prosecutor’s demand was read out in the South Jakarta District Court on Tuesday, January 17, 2023.
What instructions were given to the defendant after the prosecutor presented the demands?
-The defendant was instructed to consult with his legal counsel following the reading of the prosecutor’s demands.
Outlines
⚖️ Prosecution's Arguments Against the Defendant
The prosecutor begins by outlining the grounds for their demands, emphasizing the severity of the crime committed by the defendant. The defendant's actions resulted in the death of Noviansyah, causing deep pain to the victim's family. The prosecutor highlights the defendant's lack of remorse, refusal to admit guilt, and uncooperative behavior during the trial. These actions have caused widespread public unrest and tarnished the reputation of the police institution both in Indonesia and internationally. Furthermore, the defendant's actions also implicated other members of the police force, and no mitigating circumstances were found.
📜 Legal Charges and Penalties Requested
The prosecutor officially requests the court to declare the defendant, Ferdi Sambo, guilty of premeditated murder as per Article 340 of the Criminal Code, in conjunction with Article 55, Paragraph 1, Clause 1 of the Criminal Code. The defendant is also charged with violating electronic information systems, per Article 49 or Article 33 of Law No. 19 of 2016 (amending Law No. 11 of 2008 on Electronic Information and Transactions), combined with Article 55, Paragraph 1, Clause 1 of the Criminal Code. As a result, the prosecutor demands a life sentence for the defendant.
🔍 Evidentiary Matters and Other Defendants
The prosecutor requests that the evidence, labeled items A through 41, be returned to the prosecutor's office to be used in a separate case against other defendants, including Hendra Kurniawan and his associates. The prosecutor also requests that the court assign all legal costs to the state.
📅 Closing of the Prosecutor's Statement
The closing section indicates that the prosecution's statement and demands were presented in court on Tuesday, January 17, 2023. The defendant is then given the opportunity to consult with their legal counsel regarding the prosecutor's demands.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Terdakwa
💡Pembunuhan Berencana
💡Pasal 340 KUHP
💡JPU (Jaksa Penuntut Umum)
💡Sistem Elektronik
💡Undang-Undang ITE
💡Keresahan dan Kegaduhan
💡Institusi Polri
💡Hukuman Seumur Hidup
💡Barang Bukti
Highlights
The defendant's actions resulted in the loss of Noviansyah's life and caused deep suffering for his family.
The defendant refused to admit his actions and gave contradictory statements during the trial.
The defendant's actions caused widespread unrest and anxiety in society.
The defendant, a senior law enforcement official, should not have committed such acts, given his position in the police force.
The actions of the defendant tarnished the reputation of the Indonesian National Police (Polri) in both national and international perspectives.
The defendant's actions led to the involvement of numerous other police officers.
No mitigating factors were found in favor of the defendant.
The prosecution sought a life imprisonment sentence for the defendant.
The defendant was found guilty of premeditated murder in collaboration with others, violating Article 340 of the Indonesian Penal Code.
The defendant was also found guilty of disrupting electronic systems, violating Article 49 of Law No. 19 of 2016 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions.
The prosecution referred to multiple sections of the law, including Article 55 paragraph 1 of the Penal Code, in charging the defendant.
Evidence from the case is to be returned to the Prosecutor's Office for use in the case against Hendra Kurniawan and others.
The court was asked to charge all court fees to the state.
The prosecution's statement was read in court on Tuesday, January 17, 2023.
The defendant was given the opportunity to consult with his legal counsel after the charges were presented.
Transcripts
sebelum kami sampai berjuntutan pidana
atas diri terdakwah perkenankanlah kami
mengemukakan hal-hal yang kami jadikan
pertimbangan mengajukan tuntut tuntutan
pidana yaitu hal-hal yang memberatkan
perbuatan terdakwah mengakibatkan
hilangnya nyawa korban Noviansyah dan
luka dan luka yang mendalam bagi
keluarganya
terdakwa berbelit dan tidak mengakui
perbuatannya dan memberikan keterangan
di persidangan
akibat perbuatan terdakwa menimbulkan
keresahan dan kegaduhan yang meluas di
masyarakat perbuatan terdakwa Tidak
sepantasnya dilakukan dalam kedukannya
sebagai aparatur penegak hukum dan
petinggi Polri
perbuatan telah mencoreng institusi
Polri di mata masyarakat Indonesia dan
dunia internasional
perbuatan tertawa telah menyebabkan
banyaknya anggota Polri lainnya turut
terlibat hal-hal yang meringankan tidak
ada
Berdasarkan uraian yang dimaksud kami
penuntut umum dalam perkara
terdakwa Ferdi sambo dengan
memperhatikan ketentuan undang-undang
yang bersangkutan menuntut mohon agar
majelis hakim pengadilan negeri Jakarta
Selatan yang memeriksa dan mengadili
perkara atas nama terdakwa hampir
disambut memutuskan satu menyatakan
tanda wafer disambung telah terbukti
secara sah dan meyakinkan bersalah
melakukan tindak pidana pembunuhan
berencana secara bersama-sama melanggar
pasal 340 KUHP
Jungkook pasal 55 ayat 1 ke-1 KUHP dan
menyatakan telah terbukti secara sah dan
meyakinkan melakukan tindak pidana tanpa
hak atau melawan hukum melakukan tindak
tindakan yang berakibat terganggunya
sistem elektronik menjadi tidak bekerja
secara bersama-sama sebagaimana mestinya
melanggar pasal 49 ujung atau pasal 33
undang-undang nomor 19 tahun 2016
tentang perubahan atas undang-undang
nomor 11 tahun 2008 tentang informasi
dan transaksi elektronik jungto pasal 55
ayat 1 ke 1 KUHP
sebagaimana
dan dakwaan kedua
pertama primer
menjatuhkan pidana terhadap terdakwa
dengan pidana
seumur hidup
[Musik]
Nyatakan barang bukti berupa mulai a
sampai 41
dikembalikan kepada JPU untuk digunakan
dalam perkara atas nama Hendra Kurniawan
dan kawan-kawan 4 membebankan biaya
perkara kepada negara
Demikian surat tuntutan ini kami bacakan
dan diserahkan dalam sidang pada hari
ini Selasa tanggal 17 Januari 2023
ya terdakwa saudara-sauda mendengar
tuntutan dari penutup umum Silahkan
berkonsultasi dengan penelitian hukum
saudara
Browse More Related Video
The Crown Court
PALABRAS SUCIAS Y ALTERACIÓN A LA PAZ POR MARIPILY - Entrevisto al abogado de Rey Charlie
Murder arraignment for Kian Willis, 21, at Brockton District Court
PERAN LEMBAGA PENEGAK HUKUM DALAM MENJAMIN KEADILAN DAN KEDAMAIAN
What is the difference between civil cases and criminal cases?
ABC Nightline Duke Case Dismissed
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)