Catch and Kill no more: Hush Money trial set to expose jury to lies Trump wanted to hide from voters

Summary

The transcript discusses the potential motivations behind the squashing of a story related to Donald Trump, suggesting personal relationships and political influence may have played a role. It also delves into the challenges Trump may face during a trial, highlighting his lack of experience in dealing with tough questions and the potential impact of his past actions and associates on the jury's perception. The conversation anticipates the complexity of the trial, including the possibility of lengthy jury selection and the unique historical context of a former president on criminal trial.

Takeaways

• 🗣️ The conversation revolves around the motivations behind squashing a story that could potentially impact public opinion on Donald Trump ahead of the 2016 election.
• 🤝 There is a suggestion that the story was suppressed due to personal relationships, specifically between the individual running AMI and Donald Trump.
• 🏛️ The script discusses the upcoming trial and the challenge for the jury to determine whether actions were taken to influence voter sentiment during the election.
• 💰 Reference is made to a witness who was paid to remain silent, indicating a potential cover-up or hush money situation.
• 🧐 The speakers express skepticism about the likelihood of a not guilty verdict given the apparent evidence and the cast of characters involved.
• 🎭 Trump's modus operandi is highlighted, including his tendency to avoid taxes and his bragging about thumbing his nose at societal norms.
• 📚 Mention is made of Trump's deposition where he confused E. Jean Carroll with his ex-wife, suggesting his testimony may not be favorable.
• 🕒 The script anticipates the complexity of the trial, including the coverage challenge of balancing day-to-day proceedings with ongoing appeals.
• 🚫 It is emphasized that this is a unique situation as it is the first criminal trial for a former president, and the implications of Trump being in the defendant's chair.
• 📈 The potential impact on Trump's brand and image is discussed, as the trial could expose him as powerless and contrary to his public persona.

Q & A

What is the main reason mentioned in the transcript for squashing the story?

The main reason mentioned is to protect someone's image, as it was believed that the actions were taken to avoid hurting the individual involved.

What potential impact is discussed in relation to the 2016 election?

The potential impact discussed is how the actions to suppress the story might have influenced voters' feelings about Donald Trump ahead of the 2016 election.

Who is mentioned as having a personal relationship with the person running AMI?

Donald Trump is mentioned as having a personal relationship with the person running AMI.

What is the significance of the witness who was paid money to stay quiet?

The significance is that the witness's payment for silence suggests a possible cover-up or attempt to manipulate public perception and election outcomes.

How does the speaker view the likelihood of the defendant being found guilty?

The speaker expresses a strong belief that given the known facts and the cast of characters involved, it seems highly likely that the defendant will be found guilty.

What is the defendant's typical response to the types of charges he faces?

The defendant typically does not deny the charges but rather embraces them as part of his brand, portraying himself as someone who is too smart for the system.

What is the significance of the E. Jean Carroll incident mentioned in the transcript?

The significance is that it highlights the defendant's pattern of behavior and his tendency to make false or misleading statements, even in legal depositions.

Why is the defendant's potential testimony in this case seen as problematic for him?

The defendant's potential testimony is seen as problematic because it would require him to answer tough questions honestly, which is something he has not had to do in the past, and it would remove his usual tactics of control and power.

What is the expected duration of the jury selection process?

The expected duration of the jury selection process is at least two weeks, considering the complexity and the number of potential jurors to be questioned.

How does the upcoming Passover holiday affect the trial proceedings?

The Passover holiday may introduce additional complications and delays in the trial proceedings, as it could affect the availability of jurors and court schedules.

What is the challenge for the defendant in organizing chaos during this trial?

The challenge for the defendant is that he cannot focus on organizing chaos outside the courtroom and maintaining control over the situation, as he is confined to the courtroom and under close scrutiny.