EXKLUSIV: Die WAHREN Hintergründe der SKANDAL-SITZUNG im Thüringer Landtag!

Summary

In the Thuringian state parliament, a heated debate occurred between the AFD's parliamentary manager and the presiding officer over differing interpretations of parliamentary procedure. The session was disrupted by heated exchanges and interruptions, leading to its suspension. The AFD argued for adherence to the rules while other factions sought to establish an agenda. The constitutional court is expected to provide clarity on the matter, with the parliament set to reconvene once legal certainty is achieved.

Takeaways

• 🗣️ The speaker is Torben Bräger, the parliamentary manager of the AFD party in the Thuringian state parliament, who has been frequently called to the speaker's podium today.
• 🤝 Communication between parliamentary managers and the presidium usually revolves around organizational matters or interpretation of the rules of procedure.
• 🚫 There have been attempts to represent the party's legal standpoint, but it has been met with opposing views that also need to be presented.
• 🔥 The speaker noted a lack of willingness to engage in conversation during today's plenary session, with heated exchanges and interruptions.
• 📜 The presiding officer was interrupted multiple times while trying to present his legal perspective and position, which is not permissible according to the rules.
• 📅 The session was temporarily adjourned due to the inability to proceed calmly and quietly, highlighting a need for different legal interpretations to be discussed.
• 📋 Very little was accomplished on the agenda before the session was interrupted, with only the opening of the session and the presiding officer's speech being addressed.
• 🏛️ Other factions intended to hold a debate on the agenda and to decide on it, but this did not happen due to disagreements on the interpretation of the rules.
• 🏛️ The speaker believes that the session's agenda is predetermined by the rules of procedure and should only be debated after the election of the president.
• 🏢 The speaker anticipates that the Constitutional Court will be asked to provide legal clarity on how sessions should be conducted.
• ⏰ The Thuringian state parliament is scheduled to reconvene on Saturday at 9:30 AM, and the speaker expresses hope that with legal clarity, the session will proceed more smoothly.

Q & A

Who is Herr Torben Bräger and what is his role?

Herr Torben Bräger is the parliamentary managing director of the AFD (Alternative for Germany) in the Thuringian state parliament.

What was the main issue discussed in the parliamentary session?

The main issue discussed was the interpretation of the rules of procedure and the conduct of the parliamentary session, particularly the communication between the parliamentary managing directors and the presidium.

What was the reason for the interruptions during the session?

The interruptions were due to disagreements over the legal interpretation and the rules governing the session, with members making interjections and calls that were not permissible under the rules.

What was the outcome of the session?

The session was eventually postponed due to the lack of agreement on the legal interpretations and the inability to proceed with the agenda.

What was the first item on the agenda that was addressed?

The first item on the agenda was the opening of the session by the acting president and his speech.

What was the second item on the agenda that was supposed to be addressed?

The second item was the determination of the provisional secretary, but this was not reached due to the session being interrupted.

What is the role of the constitutional court in this situation?

The constitutional court is expected to provide legal clarity and a decision on the matter, acting as an independent third party.

Is there concern about the impartiality of the constitutional court judges?

There is some concern expressed about the potential bias of judges due to their party affiliations and possible preconceptions.

What was the reaction of Herr Bräger to the proceedings of the session?

Herr Bräger expressed disappointment and described the conduct during the session as shameful, noting that it did not honor the dignity of the house.

What is the next step according to the script?

The next step is for the Thuringian state parliament to reconvene, with the expectation that it will happen after the constitutional court has provided legal clarity.

What was the general sentiment expressed by Herr Bräger about the behavior of the parliamentarians?

Herr Bräger expressed that the parliamentarians did not adhere to the rules of procedure and that their behavior was unprecedented in his experience.