In wessen Sold steht Sellner?

Gerald Grosz

29 Jan 202404:11

Summary

TLDRIn a detailed discussion, the speaker addresses the perceived connections between Herbert Kickl, Martin Sellner, and the broader right-wing political spectrum in Austria and Germany. They emphatically deny any personal or political affiliation with Sellner, criticizing his tactics and questioning his motives, especially in the context of elections and the rise of 'change' sentiment. The speaker argues that Sellner's actions serve to undermine patriotic parties by casting them in a negative light. Moreover, they advocate for a clear separation from extremist elements to preserve the integrity of conservative messages, while also critiquing Germany's handling of Sellner's entry, suggesting it reflects a double standard in political and moral judgments.

Takeaways

📝 The speaker asserts no connection between Herbert Kickl and Martin Sellner, stating they have never met.
🔥 The speaker criticizes Martin Sellner, suggesting he may act as a controlled provocateur during election times to undermine patriotic parties.
🛡‍ The Freedom Party (FPÖ) maintains a strict separation from the Identitarian Movement, with a resolution preventing dual membership.
💬 Attempts to associate Martin Sellner with the FPÖ are seen as trying to shift individual blame to the party, which the speaker condemns.
👨‍💻 The speaker distances themselves from Sellner, citing his controversial actions and connections to a mass murderer.
🔨 The speaker advocates for conservative and patriotic forces to maintain clear boundaries from extremists to preserve their message's integrity.
🙅‍♂‍ Herbert Kickl's lack of public disavowal of Sellner is defended; the speaker believes there's no need to distance from those you have no connection with.
🚫 The speaker labels the ban on Sellner entering Germany as absurd, noting Sellner's clean legal record and questioning the consistency of legal standards.
🌎 Suggests Sellner could ironically qualify for asylum in Germany, given his conflicts in Austria, comparing his actions to those tolerated within Germany.
🔨 Critique of Germany's stance on Sellner is framed as highlighting hypocrisy and inconsistencies in political and legal reactions to controversial figures.

Q & A

What is the speaker's position regarding a connection between Herbert Kickl and Martin Sellner?
-The speaker asserts that there is no connection between Herbert Kickl and Martin Sellner, emphasizing that, to their knowledge, Kickl and Sellner have never met.
Has the speaker personally met Martin Sellner?
-No, the speaker has not met Martin Sellner and states a critical view of him.
Why does the speaker view Martin Sellner critically?
-The speaker criticizes Martin Sellner for repeatedly emerging in the political scene with significant uproar, usually around election times or during significant regime changes, suggesting Sellner might be a controlled provocateur.
What is the speaker's view on Martin Sellner's influence on right-wing parties?
-The speaker believes that there is an attempt to shift the public opinion's focus from patriotic, conservative, or liberal parties to Martin Sellner, especially during critical political times.
What is the speaker's opinion about the Freedom Party's (FPÖ) stance on the Identitarians?
-The speaker notes that the Freedom Party (FPÖ) has a clear and strict separation from the Identitarians, with an incompatibility resolution in place, indicating that one cannot be a member of both groups.
How does the speaker describe the current role of the Identitarian movement in Austria?
-The speaker suggests that the Identitarian movement in Austria, comprising about 70 people, is insignificant in election campaigns and has minimal influence.
What is the speaker's perspective on attempts to associate Martin Sellner with the AfD (Alternative for Germany)?
-The speaker believes that there are efforts to unfairly attribute the individual actions and failings of Martin Sellner to the entire AfD, thereby tarnishing the party's reputation.
What is the speaker's stance on Herbert Kickl's public statement distancing himself from Martin Sellner?
-The speaker thinks it's unnecessary for Herbert Kickl to publicly distance himself from Martin Sellner, as Kickl does not feel a connection with Sellner.
How does the speaker view the travel ban against Martin Sellner in Germany?
-The speaker considers the travel ban against Martin Sellner in Germany as an act of absurdity, citing Sellner's lack of criminal record and suggesting that the ban is more of a moral-political judgment.
What is the speaker's ironic suggestion about Martin Sellner seeking asylum in Germany?
-The speaker ironically suggests that Martin Sellner would be an ideal candidate for asylum in Germany, given his conflicts in Austria and his actions, comparing them to other groups and individuals tolerated or supported in Germany.

Outlines

00:00

🗣️ Critique of Martin Sellner's Influence and Political Maneuvering

The speaker denies any connection between Herbert Kickl and Martin Sellner, emphasizing that neither he nor Kickl have ever met Sellner, whom the speaker views critically. The speaker argues that Sellner appears to disrupt conservative and nationalist parties' momentum during crucial election periods, suggesting Sellner might be a controlled provocateur. This pattern is noted during significant political shifts in years like 2017, 2019, and the present, aiming to undermine the credibility and influence of these parties. Despite attempts to link Sellner to the Freedom Party (FPÖ), the party maintains a strict separation from Sellner's Identitarian Movement, underlining a no-membership overlap policy. The speaker criticizes Sellner for his problematic history, including associations with a mass murderer and extremist actions, urging conservative forces to distance themselves from such figures to preserve their integrity. The speaker also comments on the absurdity of barring Sellner from entering Germany, pointing out inconsistencies in the treatment of other controversial figures, and humorously suggests Sellner could qualify as an asylum seeker in Germany due to his conflicts in Austria.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Herbert Kickl

Herbert Kickl is mentioned as a figure distinct from Martin Sellner, suggesting he has no close ties with Sellner. Kickl is implied to be a political figure (possibly from the Freedom Party of Austria - FPÖ), and the speaker asserts that neither he nor Kickl have met Sellner. This distinction underscores the narrative that political figures or parties may actively distance themselves from individuals or groups perceived as extreme or problematic.

💡Martin Sellner

Martin Sellner is portrayed as a controversial figure associated with far-right ideologies, possibly linked with the Identitarian Movement. The speaker criticizes Sellner, suggesting he acts as a provocateur, especially during election times or when a regime change seems possible, insinuating that Sellner's actions could be orchestrated to discredit patriotic or conservative parties. The mention of Sellner's alleged activities, such as receiving funding from a terrorist and defacing a synagogue, further paints him as a divisive and problematic figure.

💡Regime change

The term 'regime change' refers to the process of altering a country's government or political system, often implying significant political shifts. In the script, it is mentioned in the context of elections and the potential for political change, suggesting that Martin Sellner's activities become more pronounced during such pivotal times, potentially as a means to influence or disrupt the political landscape.

💡Patriotic parties

Patriotic parties are referred to in the context of being potential targets of Sellner's actions, which are implied to be designed to shift public opinion away from these parties. The script suggests these parties are conservative or right-leaning and that Sellner's interventions are seen as attempts to discredit them or undermine their credibility before elections.

💡Identitarian Movement

The Identitarian Movement is mentioned indirectly through the critique of Martin Sellner, who is associated with this far-right group known for its anti-immigrant and nationalist ideologies. The script discusses the Freedom Party of Austria's (FPÖ) explicit separation from the Identitarians, highlighting the political and ideological divisions within the broader right-wing spectrum.

💡Unvereinbarkeitsbeschluss

This term, which translates to 'incompatibility resolution,' refers to a formal decision by the Freedom Party of Austria (FPÖ) to maintain a clear boundary from the Identitarian Movement. It suggests that members cannot simultaneously belong to the FPÖ and the Identitarian Movement, emphasizing the party's attempt to distance itself from the more extreme ideologies of the latter.

💡Election campaigns

Election campaigns are highlighted as moments when the activities of figures like Martin Sellner become particularly prominent. The script suggests that Sellner's actions, which are framed as provocations, are timed to coincide with elections, implying a strategic attempt to influence political outcomes or public perception of certain parties.

💡Public statement

The lack of a public statement from Herbert Kickl distancing himself from Martin Sellner is discussed. This absence is critiqued by the interviewer, highlighting the nuances of political affiliations and the expectations for public figures to explicitly reject controversial associations. The speaker argues that distancing is unnecessary when no actual closeness is felt, introducing a debate about the obligations of political figures to publicly reject extremist affiliations.

💡Asylum seeker

The concept of asylum seeking is sarcastically suggested for Martin Sellner, juxtaposing his controversial actions with the criteria that might typically qualify someone for asylum. The speaker uses irony to critique the German stance on Sellner, suggesting that if Germany tolerates other controversial figures or groups, it should, by the same logic, accept Sellner as well. This comparison serves to critique perceived inconsistencies in how different countries handle controversial figures.

💡Freedom Party of Austria (FPÖ)

The FPÖ is mentioned as having taken a firm stance against the Identitarian Movement, highlighting the party's efforts to distance itself from far-right extremism. The script outlines the party's ideological boundaries and its attempts to maintain a certain political identity, emphasizing the complex landscape of right-wing politics in Austria.

Highlights

No connection between Herbert Kickl and Martin Sellner is observed, nor have they ever met.

The speaker has never met Martin Sellner and critically assesses him.

Martin Sellner is perceived to emerge with significant noise around election times, potentially influencing the narrative around patriotic parties.

Sellner is suspected to be a controlled provocateur, disrupting right-wing parties' chances of success.

The Freedom Party (FPÖ) maintains a strict separation from the Identitarians, with an incompatibility decree in place.

Attempts are being made to associate Sellner with the AfD (Alternative for Germany), shifting individual failure to collective blame.

Martin Sellner is considered problematic due to his controversial actions and connections.

The speaker advocates for a clear separation from extremists to preserve the integrity of patriotic messages.

No need for Herbert Kickl to publicly distance himself from Sellner if no connection is felt.

The ban on Sellner's entry into Germany is viewed as absurd, considering his legal status.

The speaker humorously suggests Sellner could qualify for asylum in Germany based on his actions and the treatment of similar cases.

The discussion highlights the complex interplay between legal, moral, and political dimensions in dealing with controversial figures.