DCUO: I Was Removed

Summary

Obsidian Chill discusses his removal from a program that hasn't even publicly released yet, highlighting the subjective nature of 'censorship' within the community. He shares his experience to inform others about what to expect, emphasizing the program's strict standards against any negative connotation in content. The video serves as a cautionary FYI for content creators considering joining such programs, underscoring the potential for even minor criticisms to be labeled as harmful or defamatory.

Takeaways

• 😀 Obsidian Chill is the speaker and they are discussing their removal from a program that hasn't even been publicly released yet.
• 😲 The speaker found it surprising that they got kicked from the program, even though they were cautious about potential subjective censorship.
• 📢 The purpose of the video is to inform viewers about the speaker's experience and to serve as an FYI for content creators interested in the program.
• 🚫 The speaker is clear that they don't expect to be part of the Creator League anymore due to their removal.
• 🤔 The speaker questions the subjective nature of what constitutes censorship and how it was not clearly defined when they joined the program.
• 📝 They list the reasons they were kicked, including making inflammatory, false claims, misleading statements, and defamatory content.
• 🔍 Obsidian Chill challenges the definitions of these violations, arguing that many things could be subjectively interpreted as such.
• 🎥 The speaker is open about sharing the violations they were found guilty of and doesn't see why it would be an issue.
• 🤨 They express a desire for transparency from the program, asking for a detailed comparison of what was reported and what was actually fixed.
• 📉 Obsidian Chill points out specific issues with the game, such as bugs and misleading statements from the developers, and how these were not addressed.
• 📢 Despite being removed from the program, the speaker is committed to continuing to create content and inform their audience.

Q & A

What is the primary purpose of Obsidian Chill's video?

The purpose of the video is to inform the audience that Obsidian Chill has been removed from the Creator League program and to share his experience with what he believes is subjective censorship in the program.

Why was Obsidian Chill removed from the Creator League program?

Obsidian Chill was removed from the Creator League program due to his content being labeled as violating guidelines, which included accusations of making 'inflammatory, false claims, misleading, accusatory, and defamatory' statements.

What specific examples does Obsidian Chill provide for the reasons behind his removal?

Obsidian Chill mentions that two of his videos were flagged for issues like reporting on bugs that were not addressed, describing the content as 'purposely designed to waste time,' and stating that the episode 'wasn't ready,' which were considered violations.

How does Obsidian Chill respond to the accusations of making false claims and misleading statements?

Obsidian Chill argues that the claims are subjective and provides examples where his statements were based on his interpretation of the game’s state. He states that some issues he reported were factually correct, and the disagreement is over semantics and interpretation.

What is Obsidian Chill’s stance on the content guidelines for the Creator League?

Obsidian Chill believes the guidelines for the Creator League are vague and can be used to justify the removal of any content that has a negative connotation, making it difficult for creators to give honest feedback.

What suggestions does Obsidian Chill make regarding transparency and communication within the Creator League?

He suggests that the Creator League should provide clearer guidelines and be transparent about what is considered a violation to prevent ambiguity and ensure that creators are fully aware of the expectations.

Does Obsidian Chill feel that his removal was justified?

No, Obsidian Chill believes his removal was not justified. He argues that his feedback was constructive and aimed at improving the game, not harming its reputation.

What impact does Obsidian Chill’s removal have on his future content plans?

Obsidian Chill states that his removal from the Creator League will not change his content plans. He intends to continue making videos for the DC Universe Online community, focusing on content such as guides and updates.

What advice does Obsidian Chill give to other content creators considering joining the Creator League program?

He advises potential creators to be cautious and aware of the subjective nature of the program’s guidelines. He emphasizes understanding that any critical feedback could be perceived as a violation.

What broader message does Obsidian Chill want to convey through this video?

Obsidian Chill wants to highlight the risks of subjective censorship in community programs like the Creator League, encouraging transparency and open communication to support fair treatment of content creators.