Innatism (a quick lesson)
Summary
TLDRThis transcript discusses the theory of innatism, particularly in language learning, championed by Noam Chomsky. It argues that language acquisition is primarily driven by innate cognitive structures, with minimal input from the environment. Chomsky's 'poverty of the stimulus' highlights how children learn perfect grammar despite incomplete and flawed speech input. The process involves hypothesis testing and rule acquisition, not imitation. The theory introduces concepts like universal grammar, which is present in the brain and shaped by specific languages. Language acquisition is considered unique to humans and separate from general cognitive development.
Takeaways
- 🧠 Innatism, also known as nativism, believes that the mind is the primary driver of language learning, with minimal help from the environment.
- 📚 Noam Chomsky is the main proponent of innatism and criticized behaviorism for its inconsistencies in explaining language learning.
- 🗣️ Chomsky introduced the concept of 'poverty of the stimulus,' arguing that environmental input is insufficient to explain language acquisition.
- 👶 Despite being exposed to imperfect speech, children develop grammatically correct language, which supports Chomsky's theory.
- ❌ Errors in language learning are viewed as hypothesis testing by learners, who internally develop grammar and occasionally make mistakes.
- 🔄 Over-generalization occurs when learners apply grammar rules to exceptions, demonstrating that learners acquire rules rather than merely imitate speech.
- 🧩 Innatists argue that there is a specific part of the brain, known as the Language Acquisition Device (LAD), dedicated to learning language.
- 🌍 Universal grammar, an innate mental structure, shapes the grammar of all languages, and learners mold it to fit specific languages like English.
- 🔬 Universal grammar provides constraints on grammar possibilities, while input from the environment determines which specific grammar rules are followed.
- ⏳ The Language Acquisition Device is most effective in early childhood and typically becomes less accessible after puberty, aligning with a critical period for language learning.
Q & A
What is innatism, also known as nativism, in language learning theory?
-Innatism, or nativism, is the belief that the primary driver of language learning is the mind, with minimal influence from the environment. It argues that humans are born with an innate ability to acquire language.
Who is the main proponent of innatism in language learning?
-The main proponent of innatism in language learning is Noam Chomsky.
What is Noam Chomsky's criticism of behaviorism in relation to language learning?
-Chomsky criticized behaviorism, claiming that it does not adequately explain how children learn language. He argued that behaviorism fails to account for the real-world complexities of language learning.
What does Chomsky mean by the 'poverty of the stimulus'?
-The 'poverty of the stimulus' refers to the idea that the linguistic input children receive from their environment is insufficient to explain their ability to acquire complex grammar and language.
How does Chomsky illustrate the concept of 'poverty of the stimulus'?
-Chomsky points out that children are often exposed to incomplete or incorrect speech, yet they develop grammatically correct language. For example, children instinctively know that certain sentences are wrong without having been explicitly told.
What role do errors play in language learning according to innatists?
-Innatists believe that errors occur when learners test their hypotheses about language rules. These errors are part of the learning process and reflect an internal understanding of grammar that may differ from socially accepted norms.
What is over-generalization in language learning?
-Over-generalization happens when language learners apply a grammatical rule to situations where it doesn't apply, such as using 'tooths' instead of 'teeth'. This shows that learners are actively forming rules, not just imitating speech.
What is the role of the Language Acquisition Device (LAD) according to innatists?
-The LAD is a hypothetical mechanism in the brain, proposed by Chomsky, that enables children to acquire language. It provides the child with innate principles of grammar, which are then shaped by their exposure to a specific language.
What is Universal Grammar according to Noam Chomsky?
-Universal Grammar is the concept that all human languages share a common underlying structure, and it is this shared structure that humans are born with. Language learning involves shaping this universal grammar into the specific grammar of the language being learned.
What is the critical period in language acquisition?
-The critical period refers to the time frame during which the Language Acquisition Device (LAD) is active, allowing children to acquire language easily. After puberty, this device typically atrophies, making language learning more difficult.
Outlines
🧠 The Role of Innatism in Language Learning
Innatism, also known as nativism, posits that language learning is primarily driven by the mind, with minimal input from the environment. Noam Chomsky is the main proponent of this theory, criticizing behaviorism for its inability to explain how people, especially children, acquire language. Chomsky's 'poverty of the stimulus' argument highlights that even with incomplete or flawed language input, children still develop perfect grammar. This suggests an innate language faculty.
🔍 Chomsky's Poverty of the Stimulus
Chomsky uses examples to illustrate his poverty of the stimulus theory. Despite hearing fragmented and incorrect speech, children develop an accurate understanding of grammar. He gives an example where people intuitively know a grammatically incorrect sentence without prior correction, supporting the idea that language rules are internally derived rather than solely learned from the environment.
🧪 Hypothesis Testing in Language Learning
Innatists believe that language learners, including children, make errors as part of testing their internal hypotheses about language rules. Learners use these errors to refine their understanding of grammar, with over-generalization being a common phenomenon. For example, children may say 'sheeps' or 'tooths,' applying grammatical rules even to exceptions. This process, according to innatists, demonstrates that language learners acquire rules rather than imitate speech.
🧬 The Language Acquisition Device (LAD)
Chomsky and other innatists argue that there is a specific part of the brain, the Language Acquisition Device (LAD), dedicated to language learning. This LAD is tied to the concept of universal grammar, which represents an innate set of grammar principles that are shaped by language input. Learners use a finite set of sounds and words to produce infinite sentences, reflecting the presence of internal grammatical structures.
🌍 Universal Grammar and Language Acquisition
Innatists believe that universal grammar contains fundamental language rules common to all languages, making these easier to learn than specific, unique rules. Universal grammar provides a structure, and environmental input helps learners choose the correct options for a specific language. Markedness refers to rules not derived from universal grammar, and innatists compare language acquisition to biological evolution.
👶 The Role of the Child's Acquisition Device
The primary driver of first language acquisition is the child’s genetically endowed Language Acquisition Device, which helps children form principles about grammar. The LAD becomes less effective with age, typically ceasing to function by puberty. Language learning is a process of hypothesis testing, where children relate their mother tongue to universal grammar principles, solidifying language acquisition.
🧠 Language as a Cognitive Process
In conclusion, innatists view language as a human-specific cognitive faculty that is separate from general intellectual mechanisms. Language is believed to exist independently in the mind, and although it interacts with broader cognitive functions, it operates based on principles rooted in universal grammar. Language acquisition is an innate mental process.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Innatism
💡Noam Chomsky
💡Poverty of the stimulus
💡Behaviorism
💡Universal Grammar
💡Hypothesis testing
💡Overgeneralization
💡Markedness
💡Language Acquisition Device (LAD)
💡Errors in language learning
Highlights
Innatism, also known as nativism, believes the main driver of language learning is the mind, with minimal help from the environment.
Noam Chomsky is the primary proponent of innatism and criticized behaviorism for its inconsistencies with real-world language learning.
Chomsky's 'poverty of the stimulus' concept argues that environmental input is insufficient to explain language acquisition, especially in children.
Despite exposure to incomplete or incorrect language input, children develop perfect grammar.
Innatism suggests that learners' errors result from testing their hypotheses about language rules.
Over-generalization occurs when language learners apply a rule to exceptions, such as 'sheeps' or 'tooths.'
Chomsky's evidence for rule acquisition is that learners produce sentences they have never heard before, proving they aren't just imitating speech.
Innatists argue for a distinct brain faculty, called the Language Acquisition Device (LAD), which is responsible for language learning.
Universal Grammar (UG) is the innate structure in the brain that determines how language grammar is shaped.
Language universals, or properties common to all languages, are easier to learn than those specific to individual languages.
Universal Grammar limits the range of possible grammar rules, with input from the environment guiding specific language acquisition.
Markedness refers to the idea that certain rules not found in Universal Grammar need to be learned from the environment.
The LAD becomes less effective as people age, typically becoming unavailable after puberty.
Innatists believe language is a human-specific faculty, separate from other cognitive mechanisms responsible for intellectual development.
Language acquisition involves hypothesis testing, where learners relate their mother tongue's grammar to Universal Grammar principles.
Transcripts
in aidism inadism also known as nativism
believes that the main driver of
language learning is the mind with only
a little help from the environment
the main proponent of innatism is noam
chomsky chomsky wrote a scathing
criticism of behaviorism
and pointed out what he considered to be
inconsistencies with the real world and
the theory of behaviorism as applied to
language learning
noam chomsky uses the term poverty of
the stimulus to refer to the
insufficiency of the input from the
environment to account for the ability
of language learners including children
to learn a language
according to chomsky a child is exposed
to slurred speech
half sentences slips of the tongue and
mispronunciations
yet the language the child develops
particularly the grammar
is perfect here's an example of what
chomsky is talking about
you know that the first two sentences
are grammatically correct
john himself went to the market john
went to the market himself
for the third sentence you know that
this is wrong without anyone telling you
before
that it is wrong neither did you hear
anyone saying this and getting corrected
you just know this is an example of the
poverty of the stimulus
innateists believe that errors are the
result of learners testing their
hypotheses about the rules
learners try to know if their hypothesis
is correct or not
the learner's grammar is internally
correct errors are just inconsistency
with the socially accepted grammar
an example of this hypothesis testing is
called over-generalization
over-generalization happens when
children or other language learners
apply a certain rule
even to cases that are supposed to be
exceptions to the rule
examples actually heard from children
and adult second language learners are
the following
sheeps tooths goat bring
this shows that children or other
learners are applying grammar rules
according to chomsky and other innatists
this is evidence that learners acquire
rules
instead of imitating speech inatists
believe that there is a separate faculty
or portion of the brain dedicated to
language acquisition
the lat is found in the universal
grammar universal grammar is the
unformed grammar in the brain that needs
to be molded into specific grammars
such as english grammar the universal
grammar determines how grammar is shaped
through the use of constraints rules not
sentences
are acquired with a finite set of sounds
and words
learners produce infinite sentences
frequently
you have never heard the same sentence
being said before but you know its
meaning
here's a summary of what a natives
believe language is a human-specific
faculty
animals don't have language language
exists as an independent faculty in the
human mind
meaning although it is part of the
learner's total cognitive apparatus
it is separate from the general
cognitive mechanisms responsible for
intellectual development
properties of language that are common
to all languages or language universals
are easier to learn than properties
specific to only a few languages
or to just one language this may explain
why the contrastive analysis hypothesis
failed
universal grammar limits the possible
options that core grammar rules may take
it is the environment or input that
tells the learner which of the options
is to be followed for a given language
this is like biological evolution there
are rules that are not obtained from the
universal grammar
this is called markedness the primary
determinant of first language
acquisition is the child's acquisition
device
which is genetically endowed and
provides the child with a set of
principles about grammar
the acquisition device atrophies with
age usually it becomes unavailable
during puberty
the process of acquisition consists of
hypothesis testing
by which means the grammar of the
learner's mother tongue is related to
the principles of the universal grammar
in conclusion language is all in the
mind
thank you for listening
you
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)