AS-Level Economics Video 3 - Market and Planned Economies
Summary
TLDRThis video explores different economic systems, focusing on the free market and command economies. It discusses how resources are allocated in each system and their respective advantages and disadvantages. A free market system encourages innovation but can lead to inequality, while a command economy provides stability but lacks incentives for progress. Most countries operate under mixed economies, balancing market mechanisms with state intervention. The video concludes by questioning the ideal balance between private and state control.
Takeaways
- π Most countries have a mixed economy, where both market mechanisms and state planning allocate resources.
- πΌ A free market system is characterized by private ownership and allocation of resources by market forces, but this system does not exist in its pure form.
- π In a free market, profit incentives drive dynamic efficiency, leading to innovation and progress.
- π A free market can result in high-quality goods at lower prices due to competition among private firms.
- π Consumers have more choice in a free market system as they can select from a range of similar products.
- π Free market systems can lead to intolerable levels of inequality and lack of social safety nets for the vulnerable.
- π₯ Essential services like education and healthcare may be unavailable to the poor in a purely free market system.
- π’ Monopolies can exploit the public in a free market by dominating industries and eliminating competition.
- π A command economy, where the state controls all resource allocation, can lead to low or no unemployment as the government assigns jobs.
- π There is little incentive to improve in a command economy, leading to stagnation in product quality and innovation.
- π Mixed economies combine elements of both free markets and state control, with the balance being a subject of ongoing debate.
Q & A
What is the main topic of the third video in the AS level Economics series?
-The main topic of the third video is types of economic systems.
What is a mixed economy?
-A mixed economy is an economic system where both the market mechanism and the state allocate resources, with private and public ownership coexisting.
What are the advantages of a free market system?
-Advantages of a free market system include profit incentives leading to dynamic efficiency, high-quality goods at lower prices due to competition, more choice for consumers, and lower taxes.
What are the disadvantages of a free market system as discussed in the video?
-Disadvantages of a free market system include intolerable levels of inequality, unemployment during economic downturns, unavailability of essential services like education and healthcare for the poor, and the potential for monopolies to exploit the public.
What is a command economy?
-A command economy is an economic system where the state has complete control over the allocation of all resources, and everything is planned by the ruling party without market mechanisms.
What are the potential issues with a command economy?
-Potential issues with a command economy include a lack of incentive to work hard, no choice for consumers, no progress or innovation, and the state's inability to accurately allocate resources leading to shortages and overproduction.
Why did the command economy system fail according to the video?
-The command economy system failed because it could not adapt to the needs and preferences of the people, lacked innovation, and was not efficient in resource allocation.
How does the video describe the current economic situation in China?
-The video describes China as having a mixed economy with private ownership of businesses, unlike the command economy of the past, and is not a purely communist state.
What is the debate at the heart of economic policy according to the video?
-The debate at the heart of economic policy is finding the right balance between private and state ownership and allocation of resources within a mixed economy.
What will be the focus of the next video in the series?
-The next video will focus on the market mechanism and how the allocation of resources takes place in micro markets, starting with the demand curve.
What is dynamic efficiency as mentioned in the video?
-Dynamic efficiency refers to the continuous improvement and progress in an economy over time, driven by innovation and competition.
Outlines
π Free Market System Overview
This paragraph introduces the concept of economic systems and specifically focuses on the free market system. It explains that a completely free market system would allocate all resources to private businesses through market mechanisms. The paragraph outlines the advantages and disadvantages of such a system. Advantages include profit incentives leading to dynamic efficiency, high-quality goods at lower prices due to competition, and lower taxes. Disadvantages include high inequality, unemployment during economic downturns, lack of essential services for the poor, and the potential for monopolies to exploit the public.
π Command Economy Characteristics
The second paragraph discusses the command or planned economy, where the government has complete control over resource allocation. It highlights the potential benefits such as low unemployment, reduced waste, and no need for marketing. However, it also points out the drawbacks, including lack of incentive to work hard, limited consumer choice, and a lack of progress and innovation. The narrative includes a story about Alan Greenspan's observations in the Soviet Union, illustrating the stagnation in quality and innovation under a command economy.
π Mixed Economy Balance
The final paragraph discusses the mixed economy, which is a combination of private and state ownership of resources. It mentions that most countries, including China and the USA, have mixed economies but with different balances between private and state control. The paragraph questions the right balance between the two and suggests that this is a central debate among economists and politicians. It concludes by hinting at the next video's focus on the market mechanism and its role in micro markets.
Mindmap
Keywords
π‘Economic Systems
π‘Mixed Economy
π‘Free Market System
π‘Command Economy
π‘Dynamic Efficiency
π‘Inequality
π‘Business Cycle
π‘Essential Services
π‘Monopolies
π‘Market Mechanism
π‘Government Intervention
Highlights
Introduction to types of economic systems
Explaining the concept of a mixed economy
Definition and characteristics of a free market system
Advantages of a free market system: profit incentive and dynamic efficiency
Advantages of a free market system: high quality goods and lower prices
Advantages of a free market system: consumer choice and low taxes
Disadvantages of a free market system: intolerable levels of inequality
Disadvantages of a free market system: unemployment and extreme business cycles
Disadvantages of a free market system: essential services may be unavailable to the poor
Disadvantages of a free market system: potential for monopolies to exploit the public
Introduction to a command or planned economy
Characteristics of a command or planned economy
Advantages of a command economy: low or no unemployment
Advantages of a command economy: less waste of resources and no marketing
Disadvantages of a command economy: lack of incentive to work hard
Disadvantages of a command economy: no choice for consumers and no progress
Disadvantages of a command economy: mismatch between what the state produces and what people want
The fall of command economies and the rise of mixed economies
Definition and characteristics of a mixed economy
Examples of mixed economies: China and the USA
Debate on the balance between private and state control in mixed economies
Preview of the next video on the market mechanism and micro markets
Transcripts
hello welcome to the third video of this
as level uh series of Economics videos
um and video 3 is about types of
economic systems because uh it is
possible uh that the resources the
limited resources in the economy are not
allocated by the market mechanism most
of the as level economics course is in
is about looking at how the market
mechanism demand and Supply decides how
we use our the limited resources that we
have uh to solve the basic economic
problem and also uh how government
sometimes intervenes to override the
market mechanism but we should remember
that it's possible for National
economies to be uh set up in different
ways and having different uh
methods for allocating those limited
resources now most countries in the
world have what's called a mixed economy
uh it that means that there are some
resources allocated by market mechanism
and other resources allocated by the
state through planning um but there is
possible it is possible to have extremes
uh and and that's what I want to look at
here so as we look at types of economic
systems the first type of economic
system we're going to look at is the
free market system the free market
system a completely free market system
would be where every single
resource available would be allocated by
the market mechanism to private
businesses owned by private individuals
and this uh this system which doesn't
actually exist in the world uh there are
no there's no country which does not
have a state uh system of allocation of
resources as well as private own ship
but were it to be true that a country
had merely private ownership um this
would throw up certain advantages but
certain disadvantages as well and
they're listed here so there are nice
features and nasty features of of such a
system the nice features profit
incentive so there would be dynamic
efficiency but if everything is owned
privately then everything is driven by
The Profit incentive and it would be in
the interests of firms to come up with
new products and develop and research
the new product prod s which people
would want to buy from them and not
their competitors and in this way we get
Dynamic
efficiency Dynamic efficiency which uh
is when the economy is set up in such a
way that we get the most progress over
time so Dynamic
efficiency would exist under a free
market system and we'd likely see lots
of innovation and progress secondly some
people say that in such a system there
would be high quality goods and lower
prices because private firms are
competing with each other to win Custom
so they have an incentive to drive the
price as low as possible and make the
quality of the good as as high as
possible in order to win Custom and be
successful in competition and consumers
would have more Choice as they have a
range of uh similar products from uh
from different companies and different
businesses to buy to buy from um and
finally there would be low tax uh
because after if the state is not having
to provide uh Services then it doesn't
need to collect tax because it doesn't
have to pay out to to public sector
workers and the provision of public
sector services so consumers who are
workers would and businesses would also
enjoy lower tax and that leaves uh more
disposable income for consumers uh as
workers as well to uh go out and spend
who could raise living standards and it
leaves businesses with more money to
spend on investment
research however there will be
intolerable levels of inequality because
there' be no uh provision for or social
safety net for those who are most
vulnerable in society those with the
lowest skills or the no skilled and the
inequality would be even greater uh
during the business cycle during
downturns we would see more unemployment
and during the upturns we see in booms
uh there'd be greater booms as and so
the the distance between the the output
gaps of the the boom and the downturn
the the trough in the business cycle
would be more extreme and those uh and
there will be greater suffering
therefore for those caught uh the wrong
part of that business
cycle essential Services specifically
education and Health Care would be
unavailable to the poor because it would
be a it would be a good that has to be
paid for and there would be those who
could not afford to pay for uh private
education and private healthcare and
there would be those who would choose
not to pay for private education so as
we have it in our in Britain and in in
all Western countries the law says
children must go to school and it's
provided free and uh that's uh that's
the intervention of the state who
recognize that were it left were it to
be left of the free market system it
would be
unacceptably uh it would be unacceptable
because only those who could afford
would be able to access those essential
services for a civilization and finally
monopolies um would exploit the public
it's very possible that giant private
companies would come to dominate
Industries um creating barriers to entry
where other firms could not challenge
them and compete with them and in the
end consumers wouldn't get choice and
would be forced to buy from monopolies
perhaps low quality Goods at high prices
so there are features of this uh free
market system which um are so
undesirable that that governments of any
political persuasion have said no we
can't accept that there must be some
State
involvement but how far should the state
involvement go of course the ultimate is
Communist States where the the ruling
Communist Party have had complete and
utter control over the allocation of all
resources nothing is decided by the the
market mechanism everything is planned
as the party commands what will be
produced and how resources limited
resources should be used and that is
called a command economy and let's look
at some of the features of a command or
planned
economy so a command or planned economy
would have certain desirable features
there would be low or no unemployment
because the government would allocate
each unit of labor each worker into a
specific job there will be less waste of
resources presumably and and no waste on
marketing because there'd be no need for
private firms to to use marketing to try
and convince consumers to buy their
goods the government would be providing
the goods so there might be a better use
of resources in that sense however there
would be no incentive to work hard and
the quality of work would certainly
suffer because under the price mechanism
if a company is not producing the good
which people want or is not producing it
at a competitive level they will go out
of business that's not going to happen
and workers will know that and so the
quality of work will very likely Fall
there'll be no choice for consumers they
have to buy the the product that is
allocated to them by the government
supplier um and there might be no
progress as well and that reminds me of
a very nice story which Alan Greenspan
the
uh Federal Reserve uh chairman uh told
he was on a trip while working for the
Federal Reserve Bank uh of America he
was on a trip to uh the USSR as it was
then the Soviet uh uh Republic and as he
was being driven from the airport uh to
the to the city um he was passed some
agricultural fields and he saw some
tractors working in in a field and these
tractor struct is extremely old and he
asked about the tractors and the reply
he got was that well these are the
tractors that the Soviet Union has been
making for many many years and they're
perfectly okay and the government
tractor Factory that makes these works
very well and produced these tractors
for for a long long time but of course
what Greenspan realized was that in the
US where he had come from competing
tractor companies
had fought against each other to come up
with better and better tractors to be
the tractor that uh Farmers wanted to
buy and in that way the quality of
tractors in the US had uh progressed
this is dynamic efficiency there was
nothing wrong with the original tractors
but the quality of tractors and the
innovation in tractor
manufacturing uh had had had progressed
leaving behind uh what what the Soviets
were still making the concept was let's
improve the quality of tractors so
people buy our tractors that was the
attitude of private tractor companies in
the US whereas the attitude in the
Soviet Union was well we' allocated uh
resources into a tractor Factory they
make tractors that work that's fine we
can leave that there was no pressure to
improve the quality of the tractors and
this is what uh struck Greenspan as he
was uh in his first few minutes in in in
the Soviet Union um and uh and I think
that that that is a major problem with
the command economy there is no progress
if there doesn't need to be
progress and finally perhaps what the
what the state decides should be made is
is not what people want what gets
produced is not what people want it's
the government deciding what will be
produced and in what quantities but
inevitably there are both shortages as
the government does not allocate enough
resources into a particular product uh
and there are gluts or there's over
production of some Goods as well as the
government over allocates resources how
can the government planning committee
know precisely what quantities of every
single good to produce uh inevitably
they get those quantities wrong now the
command or planned economy does not
exist uh anymore uh there were around 30
countries who attempted to run command
or planned economies but when communism
collapsed in the late 1980s early
199s um it was Illustrated that this was
not a system that worked of course North
Korea is still a communist country and
still attempts to do this it would be
wrong though to say China is this
because there is private ownership of of
businesses in China so although China is
still ruled by the Chinese Communist
party they have allowed it to become a
mixed economy like nearly all of the
economies in the world so a mixed
economy is where private and state
ownership of resources
coexists where Market mechanism where
the market mechanism loates some
resources and yet plan Decisions by
government determine output and price in
other Industries so it's a combination
of the market mechanism at work in some
markets and the state overriding that
market mechanism in other markets
typically Education Health Care
defense but what is the right balance
because China and the USA are both
examples of mixed economies so not all
mixed economies are the to the same
extent extent the balance between
private and uh and State control of
course there's huge differences and
that's there in lies the debate that is
at the heart of um many economists uh
and politicians uh no one really argues
strongly for any other system but a
mixed economy but where should the
balance be between private and state
ownership of and and and allocation of
resources that's the issue um
that that is
debated okay so from here we move on and
look at specifically the market
mechanism and how in first of all micro
individual markets micro markets um how
the allocation of resources takes place
and so in the next video video four we
look at the demand curve so I'll see you
in that
video
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)