Extrusion Quality - Mystery issue resolved !
Summary
TLDRこの動画スクリプトでは、高品質な3Dプリンティングの理論と実際の課題について解説されています。特に、ハイエンドマシンで表面品質を維持する困難さについて焦点を当てています。スクリプトでは、時間の管理、ノズルの位置、および樹脂の量の排出が表面品質に影響を与える可能性があることが示されています。また、Extruderの精度が重要であることが強調されており、Bowden設置と直接駆動Extruderの違いも検証されています。最後に、改善されたExtruder歯車や平面ベアリングを使用した実験が行われ、それらが表面品質にどのように影響するかが詳細に説明されています。
Takeaways
- 🔍 品質の良い印刷の理論は、適切な量のプラスチックを適切な場所とタイミングで提供することです。
- 💡 高級機で高品質の印刷面を実現するのが難しい理由は、多くの要因が関与しているからです。
- 🌟 照明条件は、3Dプリンティングで作られた部品の外観に大きな影響を与えることができます。
- 📊 印刷品質の問題は、時序、ノズル位置、Z軸の揺れ、プラスチックの排出量のいずれかの要因による可能性があります。
- 🔧 時序の問題は、ソフトウェア、エクストラハーサのモーター、XおよびYの動きのタイミングによって管理されます。
- 🎯 ノズルの位置の問題は、XまたはY軸の位置、安定性、およびZ軸の揺れに関連する可能性があります。
- 🚀 ボウルデンアダプターを使用したことで、非常に高品質の印刷が得られました。これは、直接駆動エクストラハーサの過剰な直接性を示唆しています。
- 🔩 エクストラハーサのシステムを分解し、正しい根本原因を正確に特定するために、個々の要素を調査する必要があります。
- 📐 歯車や軸の精度は、エクストラハーサシステムの印刷品質に直接影響を与えるため、精密な部品が必要です。
- 🔄 フィラメントの品質と直径の一致も、エクストラハーサシステムの精度に影響を与えるため、品質の高いフィラメントを使用することが重要です。
- 🛠️ イドラーギアや軸の配置が適切でない場合、フィラメントの位置が変わり、印刷品質に影響を与える可能性があります。
Q & A
高品質の印刷を実現するために必要な要素は何ですか?
-高品質の印刷を実現するためには、適切な量のプラスチックを正確な場所とタイミングで供給することが重要です。
なぜ高級機でも表面品質を向上させることが難しいのですか?
-高級機でも表面品質を向上させることが難しいのは、印刷機のタイミング、ノズルの位置、Z軸の揺れ、プラスチックの供給量など、多くの要因が関係しているからです。これらの要因を完全にコントロールすることは困難であり、運要素も一定の影響を与えるためです。
どのような設定がFDM印刷において最悪の照明条件を作り出しますか?
-FDM印刷において最悪の照明条件は、頂部から尖锐な光が当たる状況を作り出します。これにより、レイヤーの積み重ね方や不規則な表面が明らかに見えてしまいます。
Bowden方式の印刷機がどのような利点を持ちますか?
-Bowden方式の印刷機は、長いチューブが使用されるため、ノズル内のプラスチックの圧力が安定し、表面品質が向上することが期待できます。しかし、再tractionや圧力の調整が必要なため、調整が難しい場合があります。
エクストラダーの精密度が表面品質に与える影響は何ですか?
-エクストラダーの精密度が表面品質に与える影響は大きいです。エクストラダーの歯車や軸の精度が不足していると、プラスチックの供給量にばらつきが生じ、表面に不規則なパターンが現れる可能性があります。
製造公差がエクストラダーの性能に与える影響は何ですか?
-製造公差がエクストラダーの性能に大きな影響を与えます。歯車のHub gearの軸へのオフセットやフィラメントの直径の变化など、わずかな公差もレイヤーの厚さや幅に影響を与え、最終的な表面品質に大きな違いをもたらす可能性があります。
Z軸の揺れが原因となっている場合、どのような症状が見られますか?
-Z軸の揺れが原因となっている場合、印刷物の表面に一定の間隔で繰り返し出现的する異常なパターンが見られます。これは、Z軸の揺れがフィラメントの供給位置に影響を与え、連続したレイヤーに同じエラーが現れることを意味します。
3Dプリンタのエクストラダーシステムを改善するためにどのようなアプローチを取ることができますか?
-エクストラダーシステムを改善するためには、歯車や軸の精度を向上させること、製造公差を緩和すること、またエクストラダーの設計を最適化することが有効です。また、Bowden方式のシステムと比較して、直接駆動のエクストラダーの利点と課題を検討し、適切な方法を選択することも重要です。
なぜエクストラダーの歯車や軸が表面品質に影響を与えるのですか?
-エクストラダーの歯車や軸が表面品質に影響を与えるのは、これらの部品の精度がプラスチックの供給量に直接影響を与えるからです。歯車や軸の歪みや軸の回転中心からのずれが、プラスチックの流量を変動させ、最終的に表面に不規則なパターンを生み出すことがあります。
どのようにしてエクストラダーの精度を向上させることができますか?
-エクストラダーの精度を向上させるためには、高精度な部品を使用することが効果的です。また、エクストラダーの設計を改善し、歯車や軸の一体化、軸の支えを強化することが役立ちます。さらに、製造プロセスを改善して公差を減らすことで、エクストラダーの全体的な精度を向上させることができます。
エクストラダーの調整において、PIDチューニングとは何ですか?
-PIDチューニングは、エクストラダーのホットエンドの温度制御を最適化するプロセスです。PID(比例・積分・微分)コントローラーは、温度エラーを最小限に抑えるために、加热期、保温期、および冷却期の時間を調整します。これにより、プラスチックの熔融状態を安定させ、表面品質を向上させることができます。
エクストラダーシステムのトラブルシューティングにおいて、フィラメントの品質はどのよう影響を与えるのですか?
-エクストラダーシステムのトラブルシューティングにおいて、フィラメントの品質は重要な要素です。フィラメントの直径が均一でない場合や、品質が低い場合は、流量の変化を引き起こし、表面品質に影響を与える可能性があります。したがって、高品質なフィラメントを選択し、管理することで、エクストラダーシステムのトラブルシューティングが容易になります。
Outlines
🖨️ 印刷品質の謎
高品質な印刷の背後にある理論は単純であり、適切な量のプラスチックを適切な場所に、適切なタイミングで供給することです。しかし、高価な機械でもPrusaやよく調整されたEnder 3と同等の表面品質を実現するのが難しい理由を探ります。FDM印刷のための最悪の照明条件を使用して、層の積み重ねが醜いことを露呈します。高価なプリンターの一部で見られる表面品質の問題の原因を探求し、ソフトウェアのタイミング、ノズルの位置、エクストルーダーの圧力など、可能性のある原因を分析します。バーズモードでの印刷とX、Yガントリーの位置合わせの検証、Z軸のウォブル問題への対処方法など、品質問題の解決に向けた探求を始めます。
🔍 エクストルーダーシステムの分析
エクストルーダーシステムを細分化して、品質問題の根本原因を特定します。ステッパードライバーからフィラメントを押し出す一連の部品まで、システムの各要素を詳細に検証します。以前のボーデンプリントの成功から、ステッパードライバー、モーター、フィラメント、ホットエンドを問題の原因から除外し、システムの他の部分に焦点を当てます。一つずつ変数を変えながらのテストを通じて、表面品質に影響を与えない要因を排除し、BMGクローンのエクストルーダーギアへの変更が表面テクスチャの向上につながることを発見します。
🎯 精度問題の特定
ハブギアの軸ずれがエクストルーダーの精度に大きな影響を与えることを発見します。製造公差によってハブギアが軸からずれ、これが押し出されるプラスチックの量に影響を与えることが明らかになりました。ハブギアのわずかな軸ずれでも、押し出されるフィラメントの量に大きな違いが生じ、これが表面品質に影響を与えることをシミュレーションを通じて確認します。この発見は、エクストルーダーの精度が3D印刷の品質に非常に重要であることを示しています。
🛠️ ソリューションの模索
金属ギアの軸ずれを解決するために、さまざまな改良策を試みますが、問題は依然として残ります。プラスチックギアにも同様の軸ずれがあり、これが品質問題の一因であることに気づきます。Bontechから新しいシャフトを試すものの、依然として問題は解決せず、物理的なギアの精度が根本的な問題であることが明らかになります。新しい、より精密なギアの導入とそのテストを経て、表面品質における改善を観察しますが、完全な解決には至りません。
🔬 精密なエクストルーダーの重要性
エクストルーダーの精度が3D印刷品質に極めて重要であることを再確認し、フィラメントの製造公差も品質に大きく影響することを指摘します。精密なエクストルーダーシステムを構築するためには、より良いコンポーネントの選択が重要であること、また、精度の高いフィラメントを選択することの重要性を強調します。改良されたダイレクトドライブ構成の下で、Bowden方式に近い品質が得られたと述べ、最終的に、エクストルーダーの精度を向上させることが3D印刷の表面品質を高める鍵であると結論づけます。
Mindmap
Keywords
💡quality printing
💡layer stacking
💡pressure advance
💡Z wobble
💡extruder system
💡Bowden setup
💡manufacturing tolerances
💡flow variation
💡direct drive extruder
💡radial runout
💡surface quality
Highlights
The core principle of quality printing is the precise delivery of plastic to the correct location at the right time.
High-end machines sometimes struggle to match the print surface quality of a Prusa or well-tuned Ender 3.
The presenter aims to reveal the truth about high-end printers and the role of luck in achieving good wall surface quality.
The timing of the print is managed by the software, extruder motor, and the synchronization of X and Y movements.
Pressure advance ensures the correct amount of plastic is available during starts, stops, and cornering.
The presenter questions the role of timing in surface quality issues, as it is not the focus of the day's investigation.
Nozzle positioning on the heater bed is crucial and should be carefully aligned and stable to avoid artifacts.
Z-wobble can cause horizontal artifacts but is unlikely to be the cause if the pattern distance varies with part size.
The extruder system is broken down into elements to pinpoint the root cause of surface quality issues.
The stepper driver, motor, and hot end are ruled out as causes due to their consistent performance in a Bowden setup.
A BMG clone extruder gear assembly produced better results, indicating the importance of gear quality.
Manufacturing tolerances can affect the position of the hub gear on its shaft, leading to uneven extrusion.
A simulation is run to demonstrate the impact of gear runout on the extrusion process and print quality.
The extruder should be considered a precision instrument, and better components are needed for direct drive machines.
Filament quality and consistency also play a significant role in the extrusion process and final print quality.
A revised gear assembly that combines the shaft and hub gear as one part is developed to reduce runout.
After testing various components, the idler gear is identified as the likely source of the persistent artifact.
Replacing the idler gear with plane bearings eliminates the artifact, indicating the importance of maintaining proper alignment.
The presenter concludes that a more precise extruder system directly translates to better surface quality.
Transcripts
the theory behind quality printing is
fairly simple
the right amount of plastic to the right
location at the right time
this sounds easy
so tell me why is it that we struggle so
much with our high-end machines to
achieve the same print surface quality
as a prusa or a well-tuned Ender 3.
every picture or video showcasing
printed Parts on the internet will make
use of a soft light coming from the side
to make your part look good
very rarely do we see these prints under
a sharp light coming from the top
in this video I will be using the worst
lighting conditions for fdm printing
ever
be ready to see some very ugly layer
stacking
I think it is one of the biggest Untold
Truth About a lot of high-end printers
until now luck has been playing a huge
role into your printer's ability to
produce nice wall surface quality
I may receive rocks for making this
comment but I can tell you that this was
the case for my printer as well until
now
today we will find the answers to your
surface quality issues once for good
what could be the cause of this artifact
sometimes horizontal or at angle other
times creating irregular surfaces let's
try to isolate which of these three
elements could be responsible
the timing portion of the print is
managed via the software extruder motor
needs to be in perfect sync with X and Y
movements the pressure Advanced function
will ensure that the right amount of
plastic is available for starts stops
and during cornering
since I used vase mode for this cylinder
pressure Advance would not have much
impact because there is no stop and go
it is a continuous and steady Extrusion
flow
therefore I don't think timing is
involved in what we're looking for today
the next probable cause is the
positioning of the nozzle on the havort
I took extra care about the location
alignment and stability of the X and Y
Gantry during design
by selected Quality Parts and validated
the installation at every step
the typical artifact from a defective X
or y-axis would repeat itself at the
same spot for each layer this would
eventually create a vertical pattern
that we don't see right here
and horizontal artifact could be related
to Z Wubble
on a core x y z wobbling is usually
caused by the lateral movement of the
print bed due to misaligned or crooked
lead screws
you can see my previous video on the
topic right here
the triple z-mounted on both screws for
this printer is the part that gave me
the most challenges
but I have reached my goal with the
wobble X isolators
thanks to my good friend Oleg for coming
up with this idea
you will see more on this solution in a
future video so make sure to subscribe
and activate the notification button so
you don't miss any of that
the issue I'm looking at right now has a
weird Behavior the pattern distance will
vary if I change the size of the part
being printed therefore chances that it
is the result of z-wobbling are very
slim
Z wobbling would be constant no matter
what I print the same distance between
each artifact would repeat across the
so if it is not X or Y
if it is not Z
and if it is not the timing
this leaves us with the amount of
plastic being extruded
really
but you're going to tell me my extruder
was perfectly calibrated using the 120
and 100 millimeter technique and then
with the single wall Cube to calibrate
the flow multiplying Factor
I've even performed PID tuning of the
hot and eater with cooling fan on and
filament extruding how can this be
related to extruding system
I never thought of deep diving into
extruders until I made a Bowden adapter
for my printer
Magic
the nicest print I ever produced
appeared in front of my eyes at the
first use of this Bowden setup
why is Bowden producing such nice prints
could it be that our very short path
direct drives extruders are in fact too
much Direct
could the dampening effect of the Bowden
tube and the filament compression on all
that length contribute to stabilize the
pressure inside the nozzle
I like printing fast and you know it
but the length of the tube required from
my printer size made the retraction and
pressure at best to slow things down by
a way work
so slow that I could not live with this
what could I do to smoothen the extruder
system without using this long tube so
let's break the extruder system into
elements so we can properly pinpoint to
the right root cause
it all starts with the stepper driver
providing inputs to the stepper motor
with the help of its pinion gear the
stepper motor will then drive the
extruder plastic gear that is connected
to the shaft
holding the extruder gear itself
that extruder gear is then providing
power to The Idler gear via the gear
teeth at the end
both gears are then squeezing the
filament and pushing it downwards into
the hot end
this sounds like a very simple system
but I think we can shorten that list
even more
so just remember for my Bowden print
that looked so good before I was using
the same filament the same hot end the
same stepper driver and the same motor
so let's remove them from the equation
for now
with a methodical approach I printed the
same G-Code while changing only one
parameter at the time
this allowed me to eliminate many things
that had no significant impact on the
surface quality
it was not due to microstepping not due
to motor current not due to the motor
itself not to backlash between the motor
pinion and the drive gear not the
meshing of The Idler gear yeah you
probably think that this has to do
something but trust me I even went and
grinded the teeth off of one of my idler
gear to test that one
no impact
I then swap to another extruder gear
assembly one that came into a BMG clone
that I had in stock
surprise
the results were much better I still had
a bit of that artifact but overall the
texture was way smoother
we are getting closer I feel
looking at the BMG gear carefully I
realized that the Hub gear could get out
of axis the thing is that the current
design allows for the manufacturing
tolerances to affect the position of the
Hub gear on its shaft
if tolerances for the gear inside
diameter are at the maximum and the ones
for the shaft at the minimum
the set screw will be able to pull the
Hub gear out of its rotation Center
the gear will now be rotating in a
manner where we get more plastic on half
of the rotation and less on the other
half of the rotation
we could picture the flow variation as a
sine wave
you can try printing a 30 millimeter
single wall cylinder like this one and
then change the timing of this sine wave
by increasing the Extrusion flow or
reducing it as you are printing
see how the artifact pattern is
completely changing with flow variation
on this tube
to quantify the flow variation I
measured the amount of run out of the
Hub gear of my BMG units and noticed a
slight amount of the aviation
but how much is too much
can I run out of three thou of an inch
create such an artifact
yeah okay I know inches here in Canada
we mix both systems
I drive at 100 kilometers an hour but I
am six foot one tall
anyways because 3D printing is using the
good system
let's convert that 3000 inch into
something more meaningful
three thou of an inch multiplied by 25.4
millimeter per inch gives us 76.2
microns that still does not sound like a
whole lot to me
but what does that really mean when we
let's run a little simulation
our gear has a diameter at the Hub of
7.2 millimeter if we offset that gear by
half of that total run out that we
measured before we are going to shift it
to one side by 38.1 microns the gear
assembly will now act as a 7.276
millimeter Hub gear when that side
reaches the filament
then when the opposite side gets to the
filament
the effective diameter of our extruder
becomes
7.124 millimeter
so a total oscillation of 152 microns
now we can start to feel the impact of
this situation in theory if our gear was
perfectly Centered for every millimeter
of extruded filament we would get 2.405
cubic millimeter of plastic
but because our gear is tricking us we
will sometimes get more plastic and
other times we will get less
when the Hub gear is shifted towards the
filament The Hub gear will pretend to
have a diameter of 7.276 millimeter
therefore being 1.05 percent bigger than
the perfect 7.2 we had earlier
and because of that augmentation we are
not getting the requested 2.405 cubic
millimeter of plastic anymore
we are getting 2.43 cubic millimeter
on the other hand we are only getting
2.38 cubic millimeter of plastic when
the Hub gear is shifted at the opposite
side of the filament and therefore
pretending to be only 98.94 of the real
thing
between the two scenarios we now have a
total difference of 0.05 cubic
millimeter of plastic and this is for
only a length of one millimeter of
filament extruded okay I give it to you
we are back with small numbers again but
bear with me for a moment if we were to
take that theoretical 2.405 cubic
millimeter of plastic from our perfect
gear and shape it into a 0.5 millimeter
wide by 0.1 millimeter thick layer
profile it would have to be 48.1
millimeter long
where am I going with this
remember your mom's cake icing bag or
that silicone caulking gun you used the
last time redoing the shower seal
what would happen if you apply that
icing or caulking at constant speed
while maintaining a nice and even layer
thickness but you keep varying the flow
you guessed right you're not going to
push yourself into going faster and
neither will you go higher only that
nice Extrusion bead is now going to be
wider I prepared that little 3D model to
show the difference between the lean
layers and the over extruded ones from
our previous example the under extruded
lines have now a width of 495 microns
the over extruded ones on the other hand
have expanded to 505 microns although
this is only a variation of 10 microns
we can clearly see on this model the
impact on the surface quality
this is an eye-opener for me the
extruder should be considered as a
Precision instrument
we need better components for our direct
drive race machines
the level of precision on the quantity
of material extruded is also directly
impacted by the manufacturing tolerances
of your filament if we use the same
simulation Model A variation of plus or
minus 0.05 millimeter on the filament
diameter could mean a layer width
varying between 0.47 millimeter wide and
0.53 millimeter this is huge but usually
this variation will be spread over a
greater distance of filament but this is
something to keep in mind look at this
weird spiral caused by the poor quality
from the end of a spool that I had in
stock
if you wish to up your print quality
game it is therefore important that you
choose a filament manufacturer with
pretty tight tolerances
the work involved in making this video
started back in August a lot of work
material components and time has been
invested my patrons were able to read a
weekly report on my findings during this
journey dear patrons thank you very much
you are covering a portion of the costs
involved at producing these kinds of
research if you two would like to help
me out and would like to benefit from
the detailed insights about my
experiments I invite you to visit my
patreon page by clicking on the address
link here Below in the video description
over and above the support from my
patrons I also benefit from a huge moral
support from my good friend VES 3D
well perhaps he is not the best to
provide any kind of moral advice with
his lack of self-discipline but I do
appreciate our long scientific
discussions and his large sense of drama
I like what Simo does with his visibot
nah seriously man thank you very much
for allowing me to bounce ideas on you
and for keeping me focused when I get
discouraged thank you brother
understanding the considerable variation
that such a radial runout would give I
approached bontech and explained the
situation earlier this year they've been
super responsive from the start and we
then worked on a revised gear assembly
that would combine the shaft and the Hub
gear as one single part therefore
removing chances of having a hub gear
out of Center
after a few months of wait I was very
excited to try these new gears on
if this works we will be able to
maintain our tiny direct drive's
extruders and get much better quality
with a little over 5 10 of a thou
yeah oops sorry inches again
12.7 microns should I say of run out
these shafts should be much better
well nothing in life is easy I am
getting the same artifact once again a
little less pronounced but it is
definitely still there
just like a ton of brick in the forehead
it hit me
what about the plastic gear
oh my God it was such a downer to
realize that I was focusing on the metal
gear while the plastic gear was just as
bad if not much worse
in some cases reaching up to 152.4
microns of run out so I had to try
pressing on my best plastic gear coming
from the BMG clone unit that I had onto
that new shaft from bontec
ah [ __ ] some days are better than others
that was not the case for today
I will sleep on it
while in bed I started to shop around
for better drive gears could we get some
machine gears pressed on should I
completely change my extruder design
just as I was ready to close my eyes
this thing appeared physic just released
a new improved gear
better Precision apparently seems to be
a machined plastic gear oh well let's
order a few
four weeks have passed and here we are
the new gears have arrived
how precise are they
well they are not perfect but with just
under 50 microns of run out this is by
far the best units I've seen let's try
to press it on the shaft but this time
around I will preheat the shaft before
trying to press it in
foreign
[Music]
there it is
it looks very good and I was able to
maintain the initial run out tolerances
intact for both the plastic gear
and the hot gear
and now let's print
so right now I could teach you a few
swear words in French Canadian
because let me tell you I've used a lot
of them so new shaft more precise New
Gear more precise
looks a bit better but it is not what
I'm expecting
there is definitely something else going
on there what is that artifact once
again changing flow of the extruder
would change the pattern it is
definitely related to the extruder
Could It Be The Idler Hub at this point
even if I don't have any logical theory
about it let's try to swap it and
replace the idler Hub gear for a stack
of plane bearings I may get less
traction but at this point I could not
care less
oh wow it is gone but why what is going
on why is that artifact gone
so The Idler gear seems to hold the
answers to our questions so here's my
theory
if the idler gear shaft is slightly
tilted
and it wouldn't take much as we've seen
earlier with very small numbers having
noticeable impact on the surface quality
this tilt could apply a force at angle
on the filament this means that the
filament could be pushed forward or
backward and therefore changing its
position inside the Hub gear Groove
changing position in the groove would
also mean changing the effective
extruding diameter of the Hub gear using
our cat simulation model we can see how
much impact can this condition where the
filament is Walking In the Groove have
on the print surface
it can definitely throw things off by a
much greater margin than our 76 Micron
Hub gear run out hand look at that
incredible
the design of my tiny extrudort could be
in cause for not maintaining The Idler
shaft parallel properly to the drive
gear the limited amount of actual
backlash on The Idler might not allow
for a perfect self-alignment of that Hub
Group
print accuracy of the extruder body
could also play a role many factors need
to be perfectly under control for an
extruder gear system like the BMG to
work properly now that I know the source
of this annoying artifact I can retest
properly The Hub gear shaft assemblies I
have in stock using an idler made from
bearings the first one on the left was
done with the bontecht original extruder
gear shaft assembly
we can clearly observe the Ripple
artifact from the extrator gear wobbling
around its axis
in the middle comes the new shaft
assembly that I made from the bontec new
experimental integrated shaft and the
plastic gear from physet the repetitive
Rippling is practically gone although a
few artifacts are still showing up the
quality is much better
and on the right I reprinted a tube
using my Hamera in Bowden mode to
compare although it is still the best
tube from the three I think the results
obtained with my revised direct drive
configuration is pretty close to what
Bowden gives we have to remember that
this observation is being done with the
light coming from the top and every
little variation in flow will show up
either caused by pid heater pulses
filament homogeneity filament diameter
nevertheless it is clear to me that the
more precise your extruder system will
be the better surface quality you'll get
I'm currently having discussions with
montec for a potential solution to be
offered that would help those of us with
a compact direct drive extruder based on
the BMG internals I'll keep you guys
posted when something is ready
in summary the last two months have
thought me a lot in what is going on
into the extruders they are probably the
most important part of a 3D printer
their impact is also Amplified if you're
using them into a direct drive extruder
because we're not benefiting from the
dampening effect of a Bowden tube every
single little defect or variation will
directly be translated to your print and
as explained today it does not take much
to create visual artifacts
I hope this video can help you to
increase your print quality let me know
in the comment section below what was
the mod that had the best impact on your
print quality
now that you have seen me naked with all
my defects let's get dressed let's put
back on this very nice light dress that
makes us shine under our best angle for
the photo
see you soon happy printing
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)