I Ranked 1,069 Earphones (so you don't have to)

crinacle
29 Aug 202315:15

Summary

TLDRThe speaker introduces 'The Hangout,' a public lounge to try out various headphones and earphones, while discussing updates to their extensive IEM ranking list. They explain the history of the ranking system, changes in grading and value metrics, and how it now follows a normal distribution for better statistical accuracy. The speaker emphasizes the importance of reading disclaimers before commenting and encourages discussions on disagreements with the rankings. Future content includes a deep dive into IEMs with the best price-to-performance value. The video closes with an invitation to visit 'The Hangout.'

Takeaways

  • 🎧 The speaker introduces a new place called 'The Hangout,' a public lounge where visitors can test headphones, relax, and grab coffee.
  • 📊 The main focus of the video is the IEM (In-Ear Monitor) ranking list, which has been updated and revamped.
  • 🗓️ The IEM ranking list started in 2017 to address the overwhelming number of questions about IEM performance comparisons.
  • 📈 The ranking list now follows a normal distribution (bell curve) for tone and technical grades, making it more statistically accurate.
  • ❌ The 'Note weight' column, which hadn't been updated in 3 years, has been removed from the ranking list.
  • ⭐ The value star requirements have been raised; now a B-minus grade is needed for the first value star (previously C+).
  • 💡 The speaker advises sorting the IEM list by value stars, which offers a better understanding of price-to-performance ratio than the letter grades.
  • 📉 There’s a focus on avoiding ranking inflation, with fewer IEMs in higher ranks and a bell curve approach to ensure more average ratings.
  • 🤝 The speaker encourages viewers to read disclaimers before commenting on rankings but is open to discussing criticisms or differing opinions.
  • ☕ The speaker plugs 'The Hangout' again as a place for people to demo IEMs and headphones, and promotes future videos covering the best IEMs at each price point.

Q & A

  • What is 'The Hangout' mentioned at the beginning of the video?

    -'The Hangout' is a new public lounge area opened by the speaker. It's a space where people can relax, have coffee, and test the speaker's extensive collection of headphones and earphones. A barista is available, and the address details are provided in the video's description.

  • What is the purpose of the IEM ranking list?

    -The IEM ranking list is a comprehensive ranking of all the in-ear monitors (IEMs) that the speaker has tested, measured, and auditioned. It provides performance evaluations to help users understand how different IEMs compare.

  • Why did the speaker create the IEM ranking list?

    -The speaker created the IEM ranking list to provide a 'one-stop solution' for people who constantly asked how various IEMs compared. The ranking list reduces the need for repeated questions and gives users easy access to the speaker's thoughts on different IEMs.

  • What are some of the changes made to the ranking list in the latest update?

    -Some major changes include: adopting a normal distribution (bell curve) for tone and technical grades, removing the 'note weight' column, increasing the requirements for the first value star from a C+ to a B-, and removing references to target curves like Harmon or diffuse field in the signature column.

  • Why did the speaker remove the 'note weight' column from the ranking list?

    -The 'note weight' column was removed because it hadn't been updated for three years, making it obsolete.

  • How does the speaker suggest people use the ranking list effectively?

    -The speaker suggests sorting the ranking list by value stars instead of letter grades. Value stars reflect the price-to-performance ratio, which provides a better understanding of whether an IEM is worth buying, rather than just focusing on letter grades.

  • What philosophy does the speaker follow in their ranking system?

    -The speaker follows the philosophy of creating a normal distribution where average-performing IEMs are the most common, and higher grades are rare. This prevents a system where too many IEMs are highly rated, diluting the meaning of higher grades.

  • How does the speaker address criticism of their ranking system?

    -The speaker acknowledges that the IEM hobby is subjective and that their ranking list may not please everyone. They encourage respectful discussions but also warn that they may 'clown' on those who leave unreasonable or uninformed comments.

  • What is the speaker's stance on price affecting IEM performance?

    -The speaker admits that while they try not to focus too much on price, bias can sometimes creep in. However, the scatter plot analysis of price versus performance shows that there's little correlation between higher prices and better performance.

  • What future content does the speaker plan to release?

    -The speaker plans to release two upcoming videos: one where they respond to viewer comments and another video highlighting the IEMs that provide the best price-to-performance value at various price points.

Outlines

plate

This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.

Upgrade Now

Mindmap

plate

This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.

Upgrade Now

Keywords

plate

This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.

Upgrade Now

Highlights

plate

This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.

Upgrade Now

Transcripts

plate

This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.

Upgrade Now
Rate This

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

Related Tags
IEM rankingsHeadphone reviewsAudio gearThe HangoutTech reviewsEarphonesAudio performanceSound qualityPrice vs valueTone grading