Cracks in the US-Israel relationship are beginning to show | The Listening Post

Summary

The United Nations Security Council passes a ceasefire resolution in response to the crisis in Gaza, but its effectiveness is questioned as Israel continues its actions and the US calls it non-binding. The role of media in shaping public opinion is highlighted, with Western media criticized for biased coverage. Additionally, the use of mass surveillance by Israel in Gaza and the political strategy of India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi's re-election campaign are discussed, emphasizing the power of technology and messaging in contemporary politics.

Takeaways

• 🌍 A ceasefire resolution at the United Nations regarding Gaza was passed, marking a significant moment despite Israel's non-compliance and the US's declaration of it being non-binding.
• 📡 The resolution's defiance by Israel and the lack of enforcement highlight challenges in the international rules-based order, where rules are selectively applied.
• 🇺🇸 The US's stance of supporting the resolution's objectives while labeling it non-binding illustrates complex political dynamics and undermines the resolution's impact.
• 🔍 The lack of interest from American news outlets in the story underscores media biases and the influence of domestic politics on coverage of international events.
• 🔎 Accusations against the UN of anti-Semitism by Israeli officials reflect tensions and the complex history of Israel's relationship with the UN.
• 📲 Narendra Modi's reelection campaign in India is powered by an extensive ground campaign and a digital blitz, leveraging WhatsApp and social media.
• 🗳️ Modi's government's control over mainstream media and its portrayal in a positive light showcase the interplay between politics and media in shaping public perception.
• 🛰️ Israel's use of surveillance technology in Gaza for control and monitoring raises human rights and privacy concerns.
• 💡 The BJP's election strategy in India combines extensive volunteer networks and digital platforms, showcasing the power of technology in modern political campaigns.
• 🚫 Criticism of the UN special rapporteur on Palestine by the US and Israeli governments highlights the contentious nature of discourse surrounding the Israel-Palestine conflict.

Q & A

What was the significance of the United Nations Security Council resolution demanding a ceasefire in Gaza?

The resolution was significant as it marked the first time the UN Security Council called for a ceasefire in Gaza, and it represented a potential shift in the international community's stance towards Israel's actions. However, the US's characterization of the resolution as 'non-binding' and Israel's defiance of it complicate the situation and raise questions about the effectiveness of such resolutions.

How has the Israeli media reacted to the UN's call for a ceasefire?

The Israeli media has shown almost unanimous opposition to the UN vote, with some officials dismissing the UN as anti-Semitic. This reaction reflects a broader narrative in Israel that views international criticism as biased and unjustified.

What does the US's stance on the UN resolution's binding nature indicate?

The US's claim that the resolution is 'non-binding' suggests a reluctance to pressure Israel into changing its actions. This stance has been criticized as hypocritical and politically motivated, as it undermines the authority of the UN Security Council and sends a message to Israel that it can act with impunity.