The Pygmalion Effect and the Power of Positive Expectations
Summary
TLDRPsychologist Robert Rosenthal and school principal Lenore Jacobson conducted a study demonstrating the Pygmalion effect in education. They informed teachers that certain students, labeled as 'late bloomers,' were expected to excel academically despite prior underperformance. Surprisingly, these students showed significant improvement, attributed to the teachers' positive expectations. The study identified four key factorsโclimate, input, response opportunity, and feedbackโthat influence how teachers' expectations can transform students' performance.
Takeaways
- ๐ The Pygmalion effect demonstrates that teacher expectations can significantly impact student performance.
- ๐ In Rosenthal and Jacobson's study, teachers were led to believe certain students were 'late bloomers' destined for academic success.
- ๐จโ๐ซ Teachers unconsciously treated students labeled as 'late bloomers' differently, affecting their self-perception and performance.
- ๐ Students identified as 'late bloomers' showed greater academic improvement compared to their peers.
- ๐ The study showed that positive expectations can counteract the negative effects of low expectations, as seen in Jane Elliot's study.
- ๐ง The experiment involved a fake test to predict academic blooming, influencing teacher behavior towards students.
- ๐ Teachers were not supposed to reveal their expectations to students, maintaining the integrity of the study.
- ๐ After a year, the students expected to improve indeed showed greater intellectual gains, indicating the power of expectations.
- ๐ก๏ธ The 'climate factor' suggests teachers create a more positive environment for students they expect to do well.
- ๐ The 'input factor' reveals teachers are more likely to teach more material to students they view as capable.
- ๐ฃ๏ธ The 'response opportunity factor' shows students expected to perform better are given more chances to respond and participate.
- ๐ The 'feedback factor' indicates that students expected to excel receive more personalized and constructive feedback, even when they make mistakes.
Q & A
What is the Pygmalion effect as discussed in the script?
-The Pygmalion effect refers to the phenomenon where high expectations lead to an increase in performance and intellectual ability, as demonstrated in the study by Rosenthal and Jacobson where students labeled as 'late bloomers' performed better due to their teachers' positive expectations.
Who conducted the study on the Pygmalion effect in an educational setting?
-Psychologist Robert Rosenthal and school principal Lenore Jacobson conducted the study on the Pygmalion effect in an educational setting.
What was the main objective of Rosenthal and Jacobson's study?
-The main objective was to show the extent to which teachers' expectations could affect pupils' intellectual performance, such as their IQ scores.
How were the 'late bloomers' in the study selected?
-The 'late bloomers' were selected randomly by taking names out of a hat and using a table of random numbers, without any actual basis on their academic performance or potential.
What were the teachers told about the students labeled as 'late bloomers'?
-Teachers were told that these students were expected to show significant intellectual gains in the academic year ahead, based on a test that supposedly predicted academic blooming.
How did the teachers' expectations manifest in their behavior towards the 'late bloomers'?
-Teachers treated the 'late bloomers' differently, creating a warmer climate, teaching them more material, giving them more opportunities to respond, and providing more positive and differentiated feedback.
What were the four factors identified that mediate the communication of self-fulfilling prophecies in the classroom?
-The four factors are: climate, input, response opportunity, and feedback.
How does the 'climate factor' influence students' performance?
-The 'climate factor' refers to teachers creating a warmer and more positive environment for students they have favorable expectations for, which can enhance their performance.
What is the 'input factor' and how does it affect students?
-The 'input factor' is when teachers provide more material and instruction to students they expect more from, which can lead to better academic performance.
Can you explain the 'response opportunity factor'?
-The 'response opportunity factor' is when teachers give students they expect more from more chances to respond, allowing them to participate more in class discussions and activities.
How does the 'feedback factor' work in the context of the study?
-The 'feedback factor' involves teachers providing more positive reinforcement and differentiated feedback to students they have high expectations for, especially when they give correct answers or need help with incorrect ones.
Outlines
This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.
Upgrade NowMindmap
This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.
Upgrade NowKeywords
This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.
Upgrade NowHighlights
This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.
Upgrade NowTranscripts
This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.
Upgrade NowBrowse More Related Video
The Pygmalion Effect, Growth Mindset, & Learning ft. Robert Rosenthal
My Advice to B+ Students with Ivy League Goals
Education: Labelling and Social Class
Education: Gender and Teacher Expectations
Union Hill Elementary School: Turnaround Practices in Achievement Gain Schools
HLPs #8 and #22 Provide Positive & Constructive Feedback to Guide Students' Learn
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)