Why Sex Education Is So Bad In The U.S.
Summary
TLDRThe transcript discusses the state of sex education in the U.S., highlighting the economic and public health implications of inadequate sexual education. It outlines the debate between abstinence-only and comprehensive sex education, emphasizing the importance of providing accurate information to young people. The economic burden of unintended pregnancies and STIs is underscored, with calls for improved sex education policies and programs that foster personal agency and critical thinking skills among youth.
Please replace the link and try again.
Please replace the link and try again.
Mindmap
Please replace the link and try again.
Keywords
Please replace the link and try again.
Highlights
Please replace the link and try again.
Transcripts
sex ed in the u.s is kind of a joke take
for example this clip from tina fey's
mean girls don't have sex
because you will get pregnant and die
with the majority of u.s students
reporting they've had sex before
graduating high school the type of sex
ed they receive is a big deal for
themselves personally and for the
economy direct medical cost of
unintended pregnancy in the united
states totaled at least 5.5 billion
dollars in 2018 a rise from the 2011
estimate of 4.6 billion dollars but
there's been a debate spanning decades
about what information to include in the
curriculum we believe that sex education
is an economic justice issue for the
ability of giving young people the
determination over their own decision
making as it relates to families and
sexual activity and behavior
as a society becomes more diverse it's
ever more difficult to have any sort of
consensus on a subject like sex and
sexuality because it's so deeply
connected to our ideas about ourselves
as human beings
so the politics of this are complicated
most young people are getting something
they're just not getting very much sex
education there is no national or
federal mandate around sex education and
so what kids are taught in schools
varies by
state by county even by school only in
sex ed is the sex ed teacher and joint
actually change how the kids behave out
of school and this may be an impossible
burden so what does sex education mean
for the economy and what happens when
some students are left behind
sex education didn't become a part of
the public school system until the early
20th century why do babies have fathers
there was a panic in american cities
about sexually transmitted diseases
middle and upper middle class white men
were patronizing prostitutes which has
always been a conduit for stds infected
prostitutes are being legally removed
for cure and rehabilitation and we're
going home and infecting their wives
there was a rise in reported cases of
venereal disease among young people
during the first world war
as more and more soldiers got in effect
with stds that the federal government
started to sponsor efforts at sex ed
preventing the spread of sexually
transmitted infections is one common
goal of sex ed another is preventing
unintended pregnancies especially among
teenagers
there are two general approaches to
adolescent sex education one is
abstinence only until marriage which is
also called sexual risk avoidance this
curriculum teaches that abstaining from
sex is the expected behavior for
teenagers and frequently excludes
information about contraception options
and other safe sex practices my name is
marianne mozak and i'm the president and
ceo of a national nonprofit called
ascend and we support the sexual risk
avoidance education when you say the
word abstinence only it seems that it
would be inferring that abstinence is
the only thing we talk about in a sexual
risk avoidance program it's way more
than that it's very holistic and talks
about lots of broader topics that impact
a person's life the second curriculum is
called comprehensive sex education which
provides students with information about
abstinence as well as safer sex
practices such as contraception use and
ways to reduce risk for contracting an
sti
these programs may also include
discussions of miscarriages abortion
sexual orientation and gender identity
those are the extremes most programs
fall someplace in the middle the middle
ground curriculum is usually called
abstinence plus these programs typically
stress abstinence as the best way to
prevent pregnancy and sti transmission
while also including information about
contraception and condom use i think we
all agree that very young adolescents
ought not to be engaging in behaviors
that could get them pregnant or cause
them to have an std
i think that really the divide is on how
do you get there do you get there by
withholding critical information or do
you get there by providing the
information and developing the skills
that young people are going to need to
stay out of risky situations the
government doesn't set any requirements
for sexual health education policy
unless a program is receiving federal
funding that means each state sets its
own policies which leads to inconsistent
curricula across the country i did a
study that showed that even among
republicans there was support for
teaching practically every topic in sex
education when we've had controversy in
this country over sex education the
truth is it has really been caused by a
very small vocal minority and i think
that's created the perception that there
is more debate and dissent about sex
education than there actually is in
communities across the country despite
this narrowing of public opinion sex
education policy is still inconsistent
across the u.s with some states not
requiring schools to teach any sex
education at all 32 states and
washington dc require students receive
some kind of sex education according to
the sex ed advocacy group secas 33
states require the curricula to
emphasize abstinence whenever sex or hiv
education is taught and 16 states
require instruction on contraception
only 19 states require that lesson plans
be medically accurate what we discovered
was that most kids can get access to
that basic information about you know
condoms and
and so forth from a variety of sources i
mean you know you see it on tv mtv shows
like 16 and pregnant and teen mom
potentially contributed to lower teen
birth rates according to a 2014 study
from the national bureau of economic
research because i'm pregnant
the researchers concluded that these
shows led to a 5.7 reduction in team
births between 2009 and 2010.
sex education has some big public health
goals and if they aren't achieved they
can have serious economic consequences
teenagers who unintentionally become
pregnant tend to receive less education
and are less likely to have a spouse
with whom they can share in the
financial support of raising a child
society as a whole loses big time
because we lose the productivity babies
born to teens are much more susceptible
to being low birth weight and having
other health conditions that bear down
on the health care system raise our
health care costs a lot of those costs
get funded through public dollars when
it comes to teen pregnancy it is a
little bit challenging to figure out
economic impacts because all too often
the young people who experience teen
pregnancy are already very low income so
the fact that they remain low income may
be more the result of the fact that it's
really hard to change economic quintiles
in this country
versus really being associated with
being an early parent the high cost of
teen pregnancy may have pushed
mississippi into legislating sex
education requirements in 2009 teen
births in mississippi cost taxpayers
nearly 155 million dollars according to
a report from the mississippi economic
policy center the report attributes
these costs to lower wages among teen
parents higher incarceration rates for
the children of teen parents and
increased foster care costs in 2011
mississippi governor haley barbour
signed a law that required all school
districts to adopt a sex education
curriculum family planning allows
parents to control the timing of when
they have children how many children
they have which allows them to
be able to prioritize how to pursue
their education and career there have
been a number of studies on birth
control itself which shows that any one
dollar investment in family planning
ends up saving four to seven dollars in
terms of preventing unintended pregnancy
on the other end that certainly saves
money in terms of the economy absolutely
but sexual delay is so important three
out of five children who are living in
poverty live in families that are headed
by unwed mothers and we know the impact
of single parents in terms of the
benefits the entitlement programs that
we have in place for them and that that
all impacts the economy access to birth
control options such as the pill is
correlated with higher earnings
potential for women many women with
access to the pill have lower wages in
their 20s as they pursue more education
but then their income grows more rapidly
in their 30s and 40s compared to women
who did not have access to the pill
preventing the spread of sexually
transmitted infections also has economic
impact the cdc estimates that in 2018
about one in five people in the u.s had
an sti with half of new sti cases among
people aged 15 to 24.
the cdc estimates stis cost the us
nearly 16 billion dollars in healthcare
costs alone
care for 15 to 24 year olds made up an
estimated 26 of that total cost testing
and trading for sexually transmitted
infections does incur a huge cost
through
both public insurance private insurance
individual costs and of course the
lifelong costs of some of the viral stds
for a particular individual who may be
having to go to the doctor more
buy more treatments throughout their
life it can be a really high cost
there is no federal policy in the united
states that governs sex education
rather the way that the federal
government is involved in sex education
is by appropriating limited funding for
certain kinds of approaches the us
government began funding abstinence-only
programs in the 1980s during the reagan
administration as fear of hiv and aids
spread throughout the country frequently
these programs were faith-based the
amount of money the federal government
puts into sex education really expanded
as part of welfare reform in 1996 and
since then there has been some funding a
couple hundred million dollars that has
really gone back and forth the funding
for abstinence-only education has varied
with the electoral cycle so during the
obama era it went down during the trump
era it went back up in 2015 the federal
government provided about 55 million
dollars in 2021 that number was up to
110 million the obama administration was
the first to try to establish some
evidence-based metrics to federal
funding they also created the teen
pregnancy prevention program in order to
strengthen federal funding for more
medically accurate evidence-based
programs but they did not discontinue
the sexual risk avoidance programs the
teen pregnancy prevention program which
was established in 2010 is a national
evidence-based grant program to develop
and evaluate new approaches to prevent
unintended pregnancies and stis among
adolescents the program has been funded
to the tune of about 100 million dollars
each year through fiscal year 2021. in
july 2021 the house passed a bill that
would allocate 130 million dollars to
the program that would last through
september 2022. as of december 2021 that
bill has not passed the senate the
federal government also provides funds
through the competitive personal
responsibility education program this
funding stream supports a variety of
evidence-based programs that focus on
young people ages 10 to 19 who are
homeless in or aging out of foster care
living with hiv or aids
victims of human trafficking or living
in areas with high adolescent birth
rates the program's goals are to prevent
pregnancy and stis by emphasizing
abstinence and contraception it
typically receives roughly 70 to 75
million dollars in funding per year
[Music]
both abstinence-only and comprehensive
sex ed proponents claim victory in that
the teen birth rate in the u.s has
fallen to a new low every year since
2009.
the american approach has always
emphasized collectivity after all that's
what a rate is right an std rate or a
pregnancy rate that's a collective
measure a collective outcome and the
european approach has been much more
focused on the individual helping each
individual develop what the sex
educators call a healthy sexual life now
that's really difficult in a diverse
society because healthy is an extremely
loaded and evaluated term and what's
healthy to one set of individuals or
communities may not be healthy to
another i hope to see in the world is
really universal comprehensive sex
education being offered we are working
with the federal government
and members of congress to advance new
legislation the real education and
access for healthy youth act that speaks
directly to those needs i also believe
that it means that we are doing the
right thing by talking about sex
education from this bigger
goal perspective than just preventing
teenage pregnancy it's really important
that we reinforce those good habits that
the teens are making right now by
helping them with refusal skills
self-regulation skills helping them with
goal setting putting an eye on their
future personal agency is extremely
important and we're only there to
provide the medical facts and to also
begin to instill some critical thinking
Browse More Related Video
Aula 02 Tema O aumento de DSTs entre os jovens brasileiros
SA has highest teenage pregnancy rate globally - WHO
RH Bill: The Grand Debate (Part 3 of 8)
Panel Discussion: Teenage Pregnancy by MVA AM 1
Nirbhaya of Mumbai | Can we make INDIA safer for women? | Abhi and Niyu
No Sex Marriage – Masturbation, Loneliness, Cheating and Shame | Maureen McGrath | TEDxStanleyPark
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)