Do Stocks Return 10% on Average?

Ben Felix
28 Mar 202408:43

Summary

TLDRIn this insightful video, Ben Felix from PWL Capital challenges the common belief that stocks will return 10% or more per year on average, explaining that this expectation may lead to misguided financial decisions. He delves into the history of stock market returns, highlighting the difference between nominal and real returns, and emphasizes the impact of inflation on investment gains. Felix also critiques the reliance on recent U.S. market history for setting future expectations, citing research that suggests more modest long-term returns. He advocates for a more realistic approach to estimating expected returns, considering global stock performance and current market valuations, ultimately advising investors to prepare for lower than anticipated stock returns.

Takeaways

  • 🧐 The common belief that stocks will return 10% or more per year on average is often misguided and can lead to poor financial decisions.
  • 📈 The origin of the 10% return figure is based on US stock market performance from 1950 to 2023, which may not be a reliable indicator for future returns.
  • 🔄 It's crucial to differentiate between nominal and real returns, with real returns being more reflective of actual purchasing power and thus more important for investors.
  • 🌐 The real return on US stocks from 1950 through 2023 was 7.63%, indicating that even exceptional returns should be viewed in real terms.
  • 📊 Rising stock valuations, driven by falling discount rates, suggest lower expected returns in the future rather than higher, contrary to investor expectations.
  • 🔍 A 2002 paper by Eugene Fama and Ken French suggests that the higher returns post-1950 are due to rising stock valuations and not necessarily sustainable for future investment strategies.
  • 🎯 The historical US equity risk premium for 1872 to 1950 is close to the realized premium over the same period, suggesting that past performance should inform future expectations.
  • 🌍 Global stock returns, excluding the US market, have been lower, with an average real return of 4.35% from 1900 through 2023.
  • 🤔 The 'equity premium puzzle' refers to the higher than predicted returns of the US stock market, which researchers attempt to resolve by examining global data and considering economic models.
  • 📝 PWL Capital uses a comprehensive approach to estimate expected returns, considering global historical data, removing valuation changes, and accounting for current market conditions.

Q & A

  • What is the common belief about stock returns that Ben Felix addresses in the video?

    -The common belief that Ben Felix addresses is that stocks will return 10% or more per year on average, which he suggests is misguided and can lead to poor financial decisions.

  • What does the nominal return of 11.32% for US stocks from 1950 to 2023 not account for?

    -The nominal return of 11.32% does not account for inflation. It is important to consider real returns, which do take inflation into account, as they provide a more accurate picture of the actual value growth of investments.

  • What is the real return on US stocks from 1950 through 2023?

    -The real return on US stocks from 1950 through 2023 was 7.63%. This figure is adjusted for inflation, providing a more accurate measure of the growth in value of these investments.

  • What does the term 'Equity risk premium' refer to?

    -The Equity risk premium refers to the excess return that stocks provide over and above the return on risk-free assets, such as government bonds. It compensates investors for taking on the additional risk associated with investing in the stock market.

  • Why do rising stock valuations suggest lower expected returns?

    -Rising stock valuations suggest that stocks are currently expensive relative to their earnings or assets. High valuations imply that a significant portion of the potential for growth in stock prices has already been realized, leading to the expectation of lower future returns.

  • What is the 'rear view mirror bias' in investing?

    -The 'rear view mirror bias' is the tendency of investors to assume that the high returns experienced in the past will continue indefinitely into the future. This bias can lead to overconfidence and unrealistic expectations about future investment performance.

  • How does the concept of 'survivorship bias' affect historical equity premium calculations?

    -Survivorship bias occurs when the analysis focuses only on companies that survived over a certain period, leading to an overestimation of the historical equity premium. This is because failed or underperforming companies are excluded from the sample, which can skew the results to appear more favorable than they actually were.

  • What is the historical real return on global stocks from 1900 to 2023, excluding the US market?

    -The historical real return on global stocks from 1900 to 2023, excluding the US market, is 4.35%. Including the US market, the figure is 5.16%.

  • What is PWL Capital's estimated real expected return for a total market index fund portfolio?

    -PWL Capital's estimated real expected return for a total market index fund portfolio is 4.62%, with a nominal expected return of 7.24% assuming an expected inflation rate of 2.5%.

  • Why is it important to have accurate estimates of expected returns for financial planning and portfolio management?

    -Accurate estimates of expected returns are crucial for making informed financial decisions. They impact how much an individual needs to save for retirement, how much they can spend during retirement, and when they can retire. Over time, even small differences in expected returns can lead to significant changes in these outcomes due to the compounding effect.

  • How often does PWL Capital update its estimates for expected returns, and where can these estimates be found?

    -PWL Capital updates its estimates for expected returns twice a year, and these figures are made available for free on their website.

Outlines

00:00

📉 Debunking the 10% Stock Return Myth

This paragraph discusses the common misconception that stocks will return an average of 10% per year. Ben Felix, a portfolio manager at PWL Capital, explains that this belief is misguided and can lead to poor financial decisions. The historical data shows that from 1950 to 2023, US stocks delivered a nominal annualized return of 11.32%, but when adjusted for inflation, the real return was significantly lower at 7.63%. The paragraph emphasizes the importance of distinguishing between nominal and real returns, and how rising valuations, rather than fundamentals, have driven up stock returns. It also references a 2002 paper by Eugene F. and Ken French, which suggests that the higher returns post-1950 are not sustainable due to the current high valuations and lower expected returns.

05:01

🌍 Global Stock Returns and the Equity Premium Puzzle

The second paragraph delves into the concept of the equity premium puzzle, where historical US stock returns have exceeded predictions from economic models. It compares the US stock returns to global stock returns, highlighting that the global real stock returns from 1900 to 2023 were 4.35% excluding the US, and 5.16% including the US. The paragraph discusses research that suggests a median real return of 5.28% for international stocks and 4.78% for domestic stocks. It also addresses the rear view mirror bias, where investors may assume that high historical returns will continue indefinitely. The paragraph concludes by presenting PWL Capital's expected real return estimates of 4.62% and nominal 7.24%, taking into account current valuations and expected inflation. It underscores the significant impact that even small differences in expected returns can have on financial planning and portfolio management.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡expected returns

Expected returns refer to the anticipated profit or loss from an investment over a specific period. In the context of the video, it is crucial for investors to have accurate estimates of expected returns to make informed financial decisions, such as how much to save, asset allocation, and whether to invest or pay off debt. The video emphasizes that the commonly believed 10% annual return on stocks may not be a reliable estimate and that a more realistic figure, taking into account historical data and current market conditions, is necessary for sound financial planning.

💡nominal returns

Nominal returns are the face value of an investment's profit or loss without adjusting for inflation. While nominal returns can give a sense of how an investment has performed, they do not provide a complete picture of its purchasing power over time. The video script points out that nominal returns do not account for the erosion of value due to inflation, which is why real returns, which do account for inflation, are more meaningful for investors.

💡real returns

Real returns are the investment returns that have been adjusted for inflation, providing a more accurate reflection of an investment's purchasing power over time. In the video, the importance of focusing on real returns is emphasized because they indicate the actual growth in value that an investor can expect after accounting for the decrease in purchasing power due to inflation.

💡valuations

Valuations refer to the assessment of the value of a company or asset, often based on financial metrics like price-to-earnings ratios. In the context of the video, valuations are critical because they can influence expected future returns. High valuations suggest that a stock is expensive relative to its earnings and may预示着 lower future returns, while low valuations may预示着 higher returns.

💡equity risk premium

The equity risk premium is the additional return that investors expect to receive for taking on the higher risk associated with investing in stocks compared to less risky investments, such as bonds. It represents the compensation for the extra risk that stock investors take on. The video emphasizes that the realized equity risk premium from 1951 to 2000 was much higher than the historical average, suggesting that the higher returns during this period were not typical and should not be used as a basis for future expectations.

💡rear view mirror bias

Rear view mirror bias is a cognitive bias where individuals believe that the future will resemble the past, particularly in terms of investment returns. This bias can lead investors to overestimate future returns based on recent historical performance, ignoring changes in market conditions or valuations. The video warns against this bias by explaining that past high stock returns, driven by rising valuations, may not be sustainable in the future.

💡survivorship bias

Survivorship bias is an error in analysis that occurs when data is collected only from entities that have survived or performed well, while those that have not are excluded. This can lead to an overestimation of the performance of a particular group or investment. In the context of the video, survivorship bias may have contributed to the historical US equity premium by overlooking companies that did not survive or perform as well as those that did.

💡global stock returns

Global stock returns refer to the overall performance of stock markets around the world. The video script uses global stock returns to provide a broader perspective on historical investment performance, showing that returns outside of the US have been lower than the exceptional returns seen in the US market. This information is important for investors to consider when estimating expected returns and diversifying their portfolios.

💡equity premium puzzle

The equity premium puzzle refers to the economic phenomenon where stocks have historically provided much higher returns than can be explained by economic models. This discrepancy between the observed returns and the predicted returns based on these models is known as the equity premium puzzle. The video discusses this puzzle and suggests that historical US stock returns have been high enough to be considered a puzzle, as they are much higher than what most economic models would predict.

💡financial planning

Financial planning is the process of evaluating an individual's or organization's current financial status and developing a strategy to achieve their financial goals in the future. In the video, the importance of accurate expected return estimates for financial planning is emphasized, as it affects decisions related to saving, investing, and retirement planning.

💡portfolio management

Portfolio management involves the selection, monitoring, and adjustment of investments to achieve a client's financial goals. It includes decisions about asset allocation, diversification, and risk management. In the video, the speaker, Ben Felix, explains that PWL Capital applies sensible expected return estimates to portfolio management to provide better financial advice to their clients.

Highlights

The belief that stocks will return 10% or more per year on average is misguided and can lead to poor financial decisions.

The 10% return figure originates from US stock market history, particularly from 1950 to 2023, which delivered a nominal annualized return of 11.32%.

It's crucial to differentiate between nominal and real returns, with real returns being more significant for practical financial planning.

The real return on US stocks from 1950 through 2023 was 7.63%, indicating that the approximate 7% real return is still exceptional.

The pre-1950 US stock market delivered a real annualized return of 5.57%, suggesting that historical periods should also be considered when estimating expected returns.

Rising stock valuations, driven by falling discount rates, do not guarantee repeating the high returns of the past and may indicate lower expected future returns.

Eugene Fama and Ken French's 2002 paper suggests that the higher return post-1951 is due to rising stock valuations and falling discount rates, which point to lower expected returns.

Survivorship bias and the perception of the US market as 'safe' have contributed to the historical US equity premium, driving up stock valuations.

Global real stock returns from 1900 through 2023, excluding the US market, were 4.35%, and including the US market were 5.16%.

Research indicates a median real return of 5.28% for international stocks and 4.78% for domestic stocks, reflecting a lower expected return than the often cited 10% nominal return for stocks.

The historical US stock returns have been termed an 'equity premium puzzle' as they are higher than most economic models predict.

At PWL Capital, expected returns are estimated by considering global historical returns, removing valuation changes, and accounting for current valuations.

PWL Capital updates their real expected return estimates to 4.62% and nominal 7.24%, assuming 2.5% expected inflation, twice a year.

The difference between a 10% and a 7% expected return is significant, impacting decisions like savings for retirement and the timing of retirement.

Stocks have historically beaten bonds and are expected to continue doing so, but their expected returns are not as high as commonly believed.

Using the best historical periods for the best-performing stock market as an estimate of expected returns can be misleading, especially when current market valuations are high.

For more information on PWL's approach to financial planning and portfolio management using sensible expected return estimates, one can book a meeting with them.

Transcripts

play00:00

a lot of people seem to think that

play00:01

stocks will return 10% or more per year

play00:05

on average I think this belief is

play00:07

misguided and can lead to bad financial

play00:09

decisions I'm Ben Felix portfolio

play00:11

manager at pwl Capital and I'm going to

play00:14

tell you where the 10% return figure

play00:16

comes from why it's probably not a good

play00:18

estimate of expected returns and what a

play00:21

better estimate looks like the

play00:22

assumptions that investors make about

play00:24

expected returns impact important

play00:26

decisions like how much they need to

play00:27

save how they allocate their assets and

play00:30

whether they should invest or pay off

play00:31

debt small differences in expected

play00:33

returns can have big impacts on

play00:35

decisions this makes estimating expected

play00:38

returns an important exercise but many

play00:40

people seem to believe that stocks will

play00:42

return 10% or more per year on average

play00:45

to understand why this is problematic

play00:47

let's start by understanding where the

play00:49

idea that stocks return 10% per year on

play00:51

average comes from going back to 1950

play00:54

through 2023 US Stocks delivered a

play00:57

nominal before inflation annualized

play00:59

return of

play01:00

11.32% for the 20 years ending 2023 the

play01:04

total US market returned 9.81%

play01:07

annualized the Genesis of that often

play01:09

quoted 10% figure is easy to see

play01:11

especially for people primarily familiar

play01:14

with recent US market history before

play01:16

going any further we need to make a

play01:17

distinction between nominal and real

play01:20

returns it doesn't actually mean much to

play01:22

say that the stock market returns 10% on

play01:24

average because nominal returns don't

play01:26

put food on the table real returns do

play01:29

take the 15 years ending April 1985 as

play01:32

an example the US Stock Market returned

play01:34

10.58% annualized for 15 years which

play01:37

seems great but inflation ran at 7.05%

play01:41

over the same period eroding a huge

play01:42

portion of the nominal return for this

play01:45

reason it's important to think in real

play01:47

terms the real return on US stocks from

play01:50

1950 through 2023 was

play01:52

7.63% and it was 7.16% for the last 20

play01:56

years to be clear this roughly 7% real

play01:59

return is still exceptional even for the

play02:01

US market from 1900 through 1950 US

play02:04

Stocks returned a real annualized

play02:07

5.57% the big question is whether the

play02:09

pre-1950 sample or the post 1950 sample

play02:13

are more relevant in setting

play02:14

expectations for the future to make this

play02:16

determination context matters a

play02:19

significant portion of the exceptional

play02:21

return for US Stocks over the more

play02:23

recent period is due to rising

play02:25

valuations from 1950 to today US Stock

play02:29

valuations increased dramatically Rising

play02:32

valuations are not something that

play02:33

investors should count on repeating

play02:35

valuations are kind of like a weak form

play02:37

of gravity in financial markets High

play02:39

valuations suggest lower expected

play02:41

returns not higher the question of

play02:43

whether pre or post 1950 returns are

play02:46

more representative of expected returns

play02:48

was examined by Eugene F and Ken French

play02:50

in a 2002 paper I know the paper's a bit

play02:53

dated but US market valuations are

play02:55

similarly high today as in their

play02:58

analysis period they estimate made

play03:00

expected stock returns from dividends

play03:01

and earnings to judge whether the

play03:03

realized average return is high or low

play03:06

relative to its expected value they find

play03:08

that their estimate for the expected

play03:09

Equity risk premium for the period 1872

play03:12

to 1950 is very close to the realized

play03:15

Equity risk premium over the same period

play03:17

but that the 1951 to 2000 realized risk

play03:19

premium is almost three times their

play03:21

estimated premium this suggest that the

play03:24

earlier period delivered on expected

play03:26

returns which should inform expectations

play03:29

while the later period delivered

play03:30

unexpectedly higher returns which should

play03:32

not be counted on expectation their

play03:34

evidence suggests that the higher return

play03:36

post 1951 is due to Rising stock

play03:38

valuations driven by Falling discount

play03:41

rates this context is important because

play03:43

falling discount rates indicate lower

play03:45

expected returns going forward not

play03:47

higher the idea that Rising valuations

play03:49

drive up past returns and push down

play03:52

expected returns while investors assume

play03:54

that the high returns will continue

play03:55

forever has been called the rear view

play03:58

mirror bias a more recent paper

play03:59

examining past us stock returns suggests

play04:02

that survivorship has contributed a

play04:03

significant amount to the historical us

play04:05

Equity premium basically the US has been

play04:08

lucky disasters that could have happened

play04:10

to the US and have happened to other

play04:12

countries simply have not happened as a

play04:15

result investors have learned over time

play04:17

that the US market is safe this learning

play04:19

has driven down the discount rate

play04:21

driving up the valuations of US Stocks

play04:24

the combination of good luck and

play04:25

valuation increases together explain

play04:28

about 2% of the historical us Equity

play04:30

risk premium for the period 1920 through

play04:32

March 2020 the thing about the us being

play04:35

a great place to invest is that everyone

play04:37

knows that it is prices for US stocks

play04:40

are high reflecting how awesome

play04:42

investors think the market is but again

play04:45

high prices suggest lower expected

play04:47

returns not higher for future returns to

play04:49

resemble the past there will need to be

play04:51

more good luck more rising valuations or

play04:54

some combination netting the 2% return

play04:56

from luck and learning out of the total

play04:58

return the real return on US Stocks over

play05:01

the period examined by the paper is

play05:03

5.28% a figure much closer to the

play05:05

pre-1950 US return and as you will see

play05:08

in a minute to Global stock returns

play05:11

historical US Stock returns have been

play05:12

high enough to be deemed a puzzle the

play05:15

equity premium puzzle they're much

play05:17

higher than the predictions of most

play05:18

economic models one of the ways that

play05:20

researchers have tried to resolve the

play05:22

equity premium puzzle is by looking at

play05:24

data outside of the US market Global

play05:27

real stock returns back to 1900 through

play05:29

2023 excluding the US market are

play05:32

4.35% and 5.16% including the US market

play05:37

research drawing on data for 38

play05:39

developed markets extending as far back

play05:40

as 1890 and using block bootstrap to

play05:43

simulate plausible return scenarios

play05:45

finds a median real 5.28% return for

play05:49

international stocks and 4.78% for

play05:52

domestic stocks remember the often cited

play05:54

10% or higher average nominal return for

play05:57

stocks is roughly equivalent to saying a

play05:59

7% % or higher real return this 7%

play06:02

figure is about 2% higher than unbiased

play06:04

estimates of us expected returns US

play06:07

Stock returns before 1950 and Global

play06:09

stock returns for periods spanning 1890

play06:12

through 2023 to answer the question

play06:14

posed in the title of this video no

play06:16

stocks do not typically return 10% or

play06:19

more per year on average US Stocks

play06:22

specifically did for the last 70 or so

play06:24

years largely in the back of rising

play06:26

valuations but Global stock returns for

play06:28

the last 124 years and US Stock returns

play06:31

from 1900 through 1950 were much lower

play06:34

at pwl Capital we need to have estimates

play06:37

for expected returns to give people

play06:38

Financial advice rather than using

play06:40

relatively recent us historical returns

play06:43

and ignoring valuations we start with

play06:45

the global historical return from 1900

play06:47

through 2023 remove the return over that

play06:50

period attributed to valuation changes

play06:52

and then account for current valuations

play06:55

we update these figures twice a year and

play06:57

post them on our website following this

play06:59

process gives us a real expected return

play07:01

of

play07:02

4.62% or a nominal 7.24% assuming 2.5%

play07:07

expected inflation these figures are

play07:09

before fund fees which should also be

play07:11

accounted for net of fees pw's expected

play07:14

return for a total market index fund

play07:15

portfolio is a nominal

play07:18

7.08% the difference between a 10% and a

play07:21

7% expected return is huge it may not

play07:24

seem huge but remember that returns

play07:26

compound over time with small changes in

play07:29

expect itive returns differences in

play07:30

things like how much you need to save

play07:32

for retirement how much you can spend in

play07:34

retirement and when you can retire can

play07:36

be huge I do want to make sure it's

play07:38

clear that I'm not suggesting that

play07:39

stocks are bad Investments or that

play07:41

people should avoid the stock market in

play07:43

all of the long-term historical data

play07:45

that I've mentioned and in pw's expected

play07:47

returns stocks have beaten and are

play07:49

expected to beat bonds the main takeaway

play07:52

is not that stocks are bad just that

play07:54

their expected returns are not as high

play07:55

as many people think using one of the

play07:57

best historical periods for one of the

play07:59

best performing stock markets as an

play08:01

estimate of expected stock returns

play08:03

especially when valuations for that

play08:04

market are currently at the 97th

play08:06

percentile of expensiveness relative to

play08:08

history a condition associated with

play08:10

lower future returns is in my opinion a

play08:13

little ridiculous more reasonable

play08:15

estimates include the historical

play08:17

experience of global stocks and account

play08:19

for current market conditions both of

play08:21

these adjustments point to lower

play08:22

expected returns relative to recent US

play08:24

Stock Market history fortunately pwl

play08:27

runs these numbers twice a year and

play08:28

posts them on our website for free

play08:30

thanks for watching I'm Ben Felix

play08:32

portfolio manager at pwl Capital if you

play08:34

want to learn more about how pwl applies

play08:36

sensible expected return estimates to

play08:38

financial planning and portfolio

play08:40

management you can book a meeting with

play08:41

us below

Rate This

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

Related Tags
Stock MarketFinancial PlanningExpected ReturnsInvestment MythsAsset AllocationEconomic HistoryGlobal ReturnsRisk ManagementPWL Capital