Why You Can Never Argue with Conspiracy Theorists | Argument Clinic | WIRED
Summary
TLDRThis video script delves into the world of conspiracy theories, illustrating how they often resist falsification, a key aspect of scientific theories. It uses the flat Earth theory as an example, highlighting how believers dismiss evidence against their beliefs as part of the conspiracy. The script explains the concept of falsifiability, introduced by philosopher Karl Popper, which differentiates science from pseudoscience. It emphasizes that a good scientific theory makes predictions that could be proven wrong, unlike conspiracy theories that are immune to disproof. The video concludes by encouraging viewers to apply these ideas to evaluate the validity of arguments they encounter online.
Takeaways
- π The script discusses the flat Earth theory and how it's a conspiracy theory that contradicts scientific evidence.
- π« It mentions how some people believe that flight patterns are controlled to make it seem like the Earth is spherical when it's not.
- π The concept of 'argument clinic' is introduced, focusing on identifying and understanding bad arguments found on the internet.
- π€ The script explores various conspiracy theories, such as the JFK assassination, faked moon landing, and chemtrails, and how they are pervasive.
- πΈ It highlights the issue with conspiracy theories where any evidence that contradicts them is seen as further proof of the conspiracy.
- π§ The idea of falsifiability is explained, which is the ability to prove a hypothesis wrong through observation.
- π¨βπ¬ Carl Popper's concept of falsifiability is discussed, which differentiates science from pseudoscience by its testable predictions.
- π The script uses the example of white swans to illustrate how a falsifiable claim can be disproven with new evidence.
- π It mentions how good scientific theories make specific predictions that could invalidate them if proven wrong, unlike conspiracy theories.
- π§ The script points out that theories that are not falsifiable are not worth debating, as they cannot be proven or disproven through evidence.
Q & A
What is the main argument presented in the video script against the idea that Earth is a flat disc?
-The main argument is that photographs of Earth from space, which show it as a sphere, are dismissed by flat Earthers as part of a conspiracy. However, the script suggests that any evidence contradicting their belief is seen by them as further proof of the conspiracy, making their argument unfalsifiable.
How does the script explain the concept of falsifiability in the context of scientific theories?
-The script explains that a scientific theory is falsifiable if there is a way to prove it wrong through observation. It uses the example of the philosopher Carl Popper's idea that a good scientific theory is one that forbids certain things from happening, and the more it forbids, the better it is.
What is the significance of the 'Black Swan' example mentioned in the script?
-The 'Black Swan' example illustrates the concept of falsifiability. It shows that if all swans observed were white, the assumption that all swans are white would be falsifiable because seeing a black swan would disprove the assumption.
Why does the script argue that conspiracy theories are problematic?
-The script argues that conspiracy theories are problematic because they are not falsifiable. Any evidence that contradicts the conspiracy is seen as further proof of it, which means the theory cannot be disproven through observation or evidence.
What is the role of falsifiability in distinguishing science from pseudoscience according to the script?
-The script suggests that falsifiability is a key factor in distinguishing science from pseudoscience. While pseudoscience often lacks testable predictions, science is characterized by theories that make specific, testable predictions that could potentially invalidate them if disproven.
How does the script relate the concept of falsifiability to the theory of evolution?
-The script uses the theory of evolution as an example of a scientific theory that is falsifiable. It has withstood every challenge, making the theory more powerful, not weaker, as it allows for the possibility of being proven wrong with new evidence.
What does the script suggest about the nature of scientific theories and their ability to be proven wrong?
-The script suggests that scientific theories are structured to allow for dispositive evidence that could potentially prove them wrong. This does not weaken them but rather strengthens them, as it allows for continuous testing and refinement.
Why does the script mention Isaac Newton and quantum mechanics?
-The script mentions Isaac Newton and quantum mechanics to illustrate that even well-established scientific theories can be proven wrong or mostly wrong with new discoveries, as Newton's laws of physics were with the advent of quantum mechanics.
What is the script's stance on the validity of the theory of relativity compared to other theories?
-The script's stance is that the theory of relativity, proposed by Albert Einstein, felt more rigorous than theories of history by Marx or psychoanalysis by Freud because it made specific predictions that could be tested and potentially disproven, unlike the more open-ended theories of Marx and Freud.
How does the script describe the approach of good scientists and technologists to their theories?
-The script describes that good scientists and technologists actively try to disprove their theories, as exemplified by Astro Teller, who rewards engineers for proving that ideas won't work, indicating a commitment to testing and falsifiability.
Outlines
π Flat Earth Conspiracy
This paragraph introduces the flat Earth conspiracy theory, suggesting that the world is a flat disc rather than a sphere. It humorously challenges the viewer's belief in photographs of Earth from space by implying they could be part of a conspiracy. The paragraph then discusses how flight patterns are manipulated to reinforce the illusion of a spherical Earth, which is a common argument used by flat Earth theorists. It sets the stage for a discussion on conspiracy theories and the difficulty of disproving them due to the nature of their non-falsifiable claims.
Mindmap
Keywords
π‘Flat Earth Theory
π‘Conspiracy Theories
π‘Falsifiability
π‘Illuminati
π‘Evidence
π‘Pseudoscience
π‘Albert Einstein
π‘Carl Popper
π‘Black Swan
π‘Astro Teller
π‘Quantum Mechanics
Highlights
The world is not a sphere but a flat disc, claimed as part of a conspiracy.
Conspiracies suggest space agencies are lying about the Earth being round.
The Illuminati controls flight patterns to make it seem like you're flying in a straight line.
Argument Clinic series focuses on spotting bad arguments on the internet, especially conspiracy theories.
Conspiracy theories exist for various events, including the JFK assassination and moon landing.
Conspiracy theorists dismiss evidence like photos of the moon landing or scientific studies.
Any evidence against the conspiracy becomes further proof of the conspiracy in believers' minds.
Conspiracy theories are not falsifiable, meaning they cannot be disproven by evidence.
Philosopher Karl Popper introduced the idea of falsifiability in 1934 as a way to distinguish science from pseudoscience.
Popper argued that good scientific theories forbid certain outcomes and are open to being disproven.
Einstein's theory of relativity had falsifiable predictions, unlike Marx's and Freud's theories.
Good scientists and technologists actively try to disprove their own theories to strengthen them.
Falsifiability makes a theory stronger as it withstands challenges over time, like the theory of evolution.
If a theory is not falsifiable, it's not worth debating, as it lacks the structure to be disproven.
Falsifiability differentiates science from pseudoscience, which is based on untestable claims.
Transcripts
[Music]
what if I were to tell you that the
world is not in fact a sphere but
actually a flat disc you'd probably
point to photographs like these of Earth
from space and then I'd say hey if you
want to trust the space agencies to tell
you the truth go ahead but if you ask me
they're part of a conspiracy to lie to
you and then you'd say what about the
fact that if you fly in One Direction
long enough you end up in the same place
ha that's just what the Illuminati wants
you to think that's why they control the
flight pattern to make you think you're
going in a straight line when you're
actually flying in a circle this is
argument Clinic a series about spotting
bad arguments on the internet where
today we're talking about conspiracy
theories there's one out there for
everybody the JFK assassination the
faked moonland the Freemason chemtrail
CIA mind control rigged election Area 51
once you get going it's easy to see
secret plots and shadowy cabals
everywhere you look in all of these
cases people can point to evidence
disputing some of these claims the
photos of Neil Armstrong on the Moon the
Warren Commission report the studies
that keep showing that vaccines work
to which you will inevitably hear you
think the people who faked the moon
landing couldn't Jin up a couple of
phony photos wake up sheeple and there's
the problem any evidence that would seem
to contradict the conspiracy is further
proof of the conspiracy it cannot be
disproven or to use a term from science
it is not falsifiable a hypothesis is
falsifiable if you could imagine a way
to prove it wrong through observation so
let's say I've only ever seen white
swans and so I assume that all swans are
white this is a falsified iable claim
because if I were ever to see a Black
Swan it would be disproven pretty simple
really philosopher Carl poer came up
with the idea of falsifiability in his
1934 tretis logic de for he was German
he was trying to figure out why Albert
Einstein's theory of relativity felt
more rigorous than say Carl Marx's
theory of history or Sigman Freud's
theories of psychoanalysis Marx's and
Freud's followers pointed out that those
theories could explain pretty much
anything that ever happened open the
newspaper and you could interpret almost
every story through the lens of Marx's
ideas as for Freud you could explain
just about every action someone took as
a response to their parents or
repression or sublimation but to poer
this wasn't a feature of these theories
but a bug these theories had explanatory
power but no predictive power Einstein
on the other hand made specific
predictions about for instance how light
traveled predictions that if disproven
would invalidate his entire Theory and
popper said that's what separated
science from pseudo science as he wrote
Every Good scientific the theory is a
Prohibition it forbids certain things to
happen and the more a theory forbids the
better it is it sounds strange but good
scientists and technologists actually
spend a lot of time trying to disprove
their theories not prove them Astro
Teller who runs X alphabet's fanciful
moonshot division that builds
self-driving cars and Wi-Fi delivering
hot air balloons says he rewards
Engineers who prove that ideas won't
work that's it that's the secret run it
all the hardest parts of the problem
first get excited and cheer hey how are
we going to kill our project
today maybe you've spotted the sticky
part here The Logical end point of
falsifiability is that nobody can ever
completely prove anything you can never
know if someone won't someday discover
something that invalidates everything
you thought was true like if you're
Isaac Newton who totally locked down the
laws of physics until quantum mechanics
showed he was mostly wrong but that
doesn't mean mean what the cousin you
muted on Facebook thinks it means
calling Evolution just a theory doesn't
mean it's wrong or a guess a theory has
a structure that allows for dispositive
evidence it could potentially be proven
wrong someday if new evidence refutes it
so far Evolution has withstood every
challenge which has only made the theory
more powerful falsifiability doesn't
weaken the theory of evolution it
strengthens it and the opposite is also
true if a theory is not falsifiable it's
not worth debating so remember that the
next time your cousin wants to argue
that lizard aliens beneath the White
House run International banking that's
probably just the Chemtrails
talking
Browse More Related Video
Sir Karl Popper's "Science as Falsification"
Falsification v Verification
Why 10% Americans Think Earth is FLAT? | Dhruv Rathee
Karl Popper, Science, & Pseudoscience: Crash Course Philosophy #8
Why some conspiracy theories just wonβt die | Elise Wang | TEDxDuke
Coronavirus outbreak: Conspiracy theorists burn 5G towers, claiming link to COVID-19
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)