Federalist 10 | AP Gov | NEW!
Summary
TLDRIn this educational video, the presenter delves into Federalist No. 10, penned by James Madison, which addresses the issue of factions within the newly formed United States. Madison argues that a large republic is the optimal solution to mitigate the adverse effects of factions, as it dilutes the power of any single majority faction, thus protecting minority rights. The video contrasts Madison's views with those of Brutus, who favored smaller republics, and highlights Madison's belief in the virtue of a republic over a democracy, where representatives, being wiser and more knowledgeable, are less likely to oppress minorities.
Takeaways
- š Federalist 10 is considered highly significant in AP Gov, often referred to as the 'crown prince' of the Federalist Papers.
- š James Madison authored Federalist 10, focusing on the issue of factions and their impact on the new nation.
- š¤ Madison defines a faction as a group, either a majority or minority, united by interests contrary to the rights of others or the public good.
- ā Eliminating factions by destroying liberty or making everyone have the same opinion is deemed impractical and undesirable.
- š³ļø Madison argues against pure democracy, stating it leads to the tyranny of the majority over minorities.
- š A large republic, according to Madison, is the best solution to control factionalism by increasing the diversity of interests.
- š§ In a republic, representatives are expected to be more knowledgeable and less likely to oppress minorities compared to direct democracy.
- š Madison suggests that more factions in a larger republic dilute the power of any single faction, protecting minority rights.
- šļø The goal of the new government structure is to balance majority rule with the protection of minority rights.
- š The video script is part of an educational series aimed at helping students excel in their classes and exams.
Q & A
What is the significance of Federalist No. 10 in the context of American history?
-Federalist No. 10 is significant as it was written by James Madison to convince people to ratify the new Constitution. It discusses the issue of factions and their potential threat to the new nation.
Who are the authors of the Federalist papers, and what was their primary goal?
-The Federalist papers were written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay with the primary goal of persuading people to vote in favor of the ratification of the U.S. Constitution.
What does Madison define as a 'faction' in Federalist No. 10?
-Madison defines a faction as a group, either a majority or minority, united by a common interest that is adverse to the rights of other citizens or the public good.
What is Madison's proposed solution to control the negative effects of factions?
-Madison suggests that a large republic is the best way to control the negative effects of factions by creating a system where it is less likely for a majority to oppress a minority.
Why does Madison argue against removing the causes of factions?
-Madison argues that removing the causes of factions, such as by destroying liberty or making everyone have the same opinion, would be worse than the problem of factions themselves.
What are the two options Madison considers for the new nation to prevent majority factions from oppressing minorities?
-Madison considers setting up a democracy or a republic as the two options for the new nation to prevent majority factions from oppressing minorities.
Why does Madison criticize pure democracies in Federalist No. 10?
-Madison criticizes pure democracies because they allow majority factions to tyrannize and oppress minorities, as there is nothing to check the majority's power in direct democracies.
How does Madison's view on democracy differ from the modern understanding of the term?
-In contrast to the modern positive connotation of democracy, Madison and the framers of the Constitution viewed democracy as a system that could lead to mob rule and the oppression of minorities.
What is the counterintuitive solution Madison proposes to control factions?
-Madison's counterintuitive solution is to have more factions, which would dilute the power of any single majority faction, making it less likely to oppress others.
How does Madison's vision of a republic differ from a democracy in terms of faction control?
-In a republic, Madison argues that representatives who are more knowledgeable and have a broader perspective would be less likely to oppress minorities, unlike in a democracy where direct voting by the majority could lead to oppression.
What is the ultimate goal of Madison's solution as described in Federalist No. 10?
-The ultimate goal of Madison's solution is to allow the majority to make policy decisions while ensuring that minority rights are protected and not infringed upon by the majority.
Outlines
š Introduction to Federalist 10
The speaker begins by introducing Federalist 10, emphasizing its significance as a key document in the context of the AP Government exam. The essay, penned by James Madison, is part of the Federalist Papers, a collection of essays written to persuade the public to support the ratification of the U.S. Constitution. Madison's focus in Federalist 10 is on factions, which he defines as groups united by a common interest that may infringe upon the rights of others or the public good. The speaker outlines Madison's argument that a large republic is the optimal solution to mitigate the adverse effects of factions. The summary also touches on Madison's dismissal of potential solutions such as eliminating the causes of factions or controlling their effects, highlighting the impracticality of these approaches.
š½ Madison's Solution: The Large Republic
In this section, the speaker delves into Madison's argument for a large republic as the best method to control factionalism. Madison counters the belief that smaller republics are preferable by arguing that in smaller republics, it is easier for a majority to form and oppress minorities. He contends that a larger republic, with its increased variety of parties and interests, makes it less likely for a single majority faction to dominate and infringe upon the rights of others. The speaker emphasizes Madison's point that more factions actually serve to dilute the power of any single faction, thus protecting minority rights. Additionally, Madison praises the republic form of government for its ability to elect representatives who are more knowledgeable and less likely to oppress minorities, contrasting this with the direct democracy approach. The speaker concludes by reiterating Madison's main thesis: a large republic is essential for balancing majority rule with the protection of minority rights.
Mindmap
Keywords
š”Federalist 10
š”Factions
š”James Madison
š”Public Good
š”Large Republic
š”Democracy vs. Republic
š”Representatives
š”Liberty
š”Majority Rule
š”Minority Rights
š”Pure Democracy
Highlights
Federalist 10 is considered the 'crown prince' among the Federalist papers, highly emphasized in AP Gov exams.
James Madison's Federalist 10 addresses the issue of factions and their impact on the new nation.
Madison defines a faction as a group united by interests contrary to the rights of others or the public good.
The solution to controlling factions is not to prevent them but to manage their negative effects.
Madison argues that destroying liberty or making everyone have the same opinion are not viable solutions.
Factions are a natural occurrence due to the inherent nature of people to form groups.
The goal is to ensure that majority factions cannot oppress minority factions.
Democracy, in Madison's view, leads to the tyranny of the majority over minorities.
In a pure democracy, there's no check on the majority's power to harm the minority.
Madison advocates for a large republic as the best way to control factional negative effects.
In a smaller republic, it's easier for a majority to oppress the minority due to fewer distinct parties.
A larger republic with more people introduces a greater variety of parties and interests, diluting factional power.
Madison praises republics for having representatives who are wiser and less likely to oppress minorities.
The ultimate goal is to balance majority rule with the protection of minority rights.
Federalist 10 aims to thread the needle between allowing majority policy-making and safeguarding minority rights.
The video concludes with a call to action for viewers to use the Ultimate Review Packet for exam preparation.
Transcripts
Hey everybody, welcome back! I readĀ Federalist 10 so you donāt have to!Ā Ā
Smash that like button to find out the biggestĀ threat to the new nation and Madisonās solution.
Okay, so if in AP Gov world theĀ Constitution is the King of Documents,Ā Ā
then Federalist ten is like the crown prince;Ā the AP exam is obsessed with this federalistĀ Ā
paper more than the others. Letās startĀ with just a tiny bit of background first.
As soon as the Constitutional Convention endedĀ debates were raging across the country overĀ Ā
whether people should vote to ratify or opposeĀ the new Constitution. Alexander Hamilton,Ā Ā
James, Madison, and John Jay wrote essaysĀ to convince people to vote for ratification,Ā Ā
and today we know these essaysĀ as the Federalist papers.
The tenth essay was written by JamesĀ Madison and has the super catchy title,Ā Ā
Federalist Number 10 and is all aboutĀ factions. Iām gonna cut to the chaseĀ Ā
and tell you Madisonās solution: a largeĀ republic is the best way to control theĀ Ā
negative effects of factions. Okay, withĀ that in mind letās start at the beginning.
In the opening sentence Madison claims thatĀ one of the best things about the new union isĀ Ā
that it will break and control the violenceĀ of faction. Listen, I may not know much,Ā Ā
but when he says āviolence of faction,āĀ I know that doesnāt sound good. So,Ā Ā
what is a faction anyway? Iām glad you asked.
Madison defines a faction as a majority orĀ minority of people who are united by someĀ Ā
common purpose that goes against the rightsĀ of other citizens or what we might call theĀ Ā
public good. So, basically factions are groupsĀ of people. But Madison isnāt worried about allĀ Ā
groups. Heās worried about groups that wantĀ to harm other citizens or society as a whole.
Now, Madison is super thorough andĀ spends the next several paragraphsĀ Ā
telling us different solutions that wonātĀ work before his final reveal that a largeĀ Ā
republic is the best way to control theĀ negative effects of factions. Iām going toĀ Ā
say that sentence enough times that youāllĀ have to remember it after the video ends.
First, Madison tells us that youĀ could remove the causes of factionsĀ Ā
or controlling the effects. Well, if youĀ want to remove the causes of faction,Ā Ā
thereās two ways to do this: destroyingĀ liberty or giving everybody the sameĀ Ā
opinion. Do either of those sound likeĀ good ideas? Yeah, didnāt think so.
Destroying liberty is worse thanĀ the problem of factions. So, yeah,Ā Ā
we could destroy liberty and then there wouldnātĀ be factions, but thatās a terrible solution. ItādĀ Ā
be like if you told a doctor that yourĀ foot hurts, so he amputates it. Like,Ā Ā
okay, the foot pain is gone but thatĀ solution is way worse than the problem!
And the second solution, giving everybody the sameĀ opinion isnāt realistic so that wonāt work either.Ā Ā
It needs to be emphasized that heās concludingĀ that the solution is not to prevent factions.
Madison says that the latent causes ofĀ faction are thus sewn in the nature of men,Ā Ā
which is an eighteenth-century way toĀ say that theyāre natural. People areĀ Ā
always gonna form groups, theyāre goingĀ to find people who similar to them,Ā Ā
who have similar hobbies or whatever stuff inĀ common and theyāll naturally form factions.
That being the case, the onlyĀ solution left is controlling theĀ Ā
negative effects of faction. And thisĀ raises another good question, namely:Ā Ā
what exactly are the negative effects ofĀ faction? Madison is focused on making sureĀ Ā
that majority factions are unable to oppressĀ minority factions even if they want to.
He says that the majority must be renderedĀ unable to come together and to carry intoĀ Ā
execution their schemes of oppression. InĀ other words, we have to set up a governmentĀ Ā
that makes it impossible for the majority toĀ harm others. The only two options that couldĀ Ā
be considered in the new nation areĀ setting up a democracy or a republic.
Listen, I know that these days, the word democracyĀ typically has a pretty positive connotation,Ā Ā
but that was most certainly not true backĀ then. Madison and most of the framers,Ā Ā
really, were not fans ofĀ democracy. Not at all. So,Ā Ā
the next section is MadisonĀ explaining how bad democracy is.
He says that in a pure democracy majority factionsĀ will tyrannize and oppress minorities. So, yeah,Ā Ā
he really doesnāt like democracy. LetāsĀ break this down further. First thing is toĀ Ā
know that heās talking about minorities in theĀ mathematical sense. When it comes to voting,Ā Ā
a minority is any group thatās lessĀ than fifty percent of the population,Ā Ā
so heās not talking about any specific minorityĀ and he certainly doesnāt have race in mind.
Next is that when he says pure democracy, heāsĀ referring to what we call direct democracy. HeāsĀ Ā
talking about a society with a small numberĀ of citizens who vote directly on policies.Ā Ā
And democracies can admit of no cure of theĀ mischiefs of faction because he says thereāsĀ Ā
nothing to check the inducements to sacrificeĀ the weaker party, meaning the minority party.
If youāre in a pure democracy, every issueĀ is decided by a vote and by definition theĀ Ā
majority will always win. So, if it wantsĀ to do something bad to the minority,Ā Ā
thereās nothing the minorityĀ can do to defend itself.
For this reason, he says that democraciesĀ have ever been spectacles of turbulenceĀ Ā
and contention. Theyāre totally incompatible withĀ personal security and protecting property rights,Ā Ā
and in general have been as short inĀ their lives as they are violent inĀ Ā
their deaths. This is a perfect example ofĀ the idea that democracy is really mob rule.
Now, weāre ready for the moment of truth:Ā Madison finally unveils his solution. So,Ā Ā
what is the best way to control theĀ negative effects of faction? UnlessĀ Ā
youāve been sleeping the whole time,Ā you should be able to say it with me:Ā Ā
a large republic is the best way toĀ control the negative effects of faction.
Remember Brutus preferred small republicsĀ and more democratic decision making and heĀ Ā
argued that large republics have alwaysĀ become tyrannical. And he was right. So,Ā Ā
Madison has to come up with a clever argumentĀ for why this large republic will be different.
He says that in a smaller republic youāreĀ going to have fewer distinct parties,Ā Ā
so there will be fewer competing interests andĀ the people will be more similar, so youāre oftenĀ Ā
going to have a majority that will be ableĀ to get its way. Brutus said the same thing.
And at first this might sound like a good thing,Ā but Madison points out the problem: it will beĀ Ā
too easy for the majority to get together andĀ execute their plans of oppression. In other words,Ā Ā
since itās easy to have a majority, itās easyĀ to have a majority that wants to oppress theĀ Ā
minority and thereās nothing the minorityĀ can do to stop it. Clearly, thatās not good.
On the other hand, if you extend the sphere,Ā meaning that you take in more people,Ā Ā
you have a larger area thatās under thisĀ government, then youāll have a greaterĀ Ā
variety of parties. There will be moreĀ competing interests, and itās less likelyĀ Ā
that a majority will exist that has the commonĀ motive to invade the rights of other citizens.
This is a very counter intuitive solution: heāsĀ saying that to control the problem of factions,Ā Ā
the answer is more factions. And withĀ more factions, the relative power ofĀ Ā
each faction will be diluted, making itĀ less likely that there will be a majorityĀ Ā
faction that actually wants to strip awayĀ the rights of others and be able to do so.
Madison doesnāt just focus on size, heĀ also praises a republic more broadly,Ā Ā
saying that the representatives will be people whoĀ are more knowledgeable, wiser, and have a higherĀ Ā
perspective of whatās best for the nation. AndĀ because of this, theyāll be less likely to oppressĀ Ā
minorities than people in a democracy would be ifĀ they were voting on policies directly themselves.
And here at the end of the essay, he says thatĀ he beholds a republican remedy for the diseaseĀ Ā
most incident to republican government.Ā Alright, so one more time say it with me:Ā Ā
a large republic is the best way to control theĀ negative effects of factions. And this time IāveĀ Ā
added at the end, and protect minorityĀ rights while maintaining majority rule.
Thatās the goal. Allow theĀ majority to make policy,Ā Ā
but donāt let it take awayĀ minority rights. Clearly,Ā Ā
thatās a tough balance but Madison is tryingĀ the thread that needle in Federalist 10.
And thatās it for this one. Until nextĀ time, this has been a LaMoney production.
Thanks again for watching, and if you wantĀ to do your best in class and on the exam,Ā Ā
consider checking out the Ultimate ReviewĀ Packet. Three full length practice tests,Ā Ā
great study guides, tons of practiceĀ for each unit, and exclusive FRQ helpĀ Ā
and practice. Preview unit one for free.Ā And I will see you in the next video.
Browse More Related Video
Federalist No. 10 (part 1) | US government and civics | Khan Academy
Federalist 10, Explained [AP Government FOUNDATIONAL Documents]
James Madison, the Federalist Papers
Democratic ideals of US government
AP Gov | 1.3 Government Power & Individual Rights | NEW!
Brutus no.1, EXPLAINED [AP Government Foundational Documents]
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)