Strategy Consulting Process - How Elite Consulting Firms Do great Work

StrategyU
17 Jun 202408:31

Summary

TLDRThe speaker emphasizes the importance of process in strategy consulting, highlighting how both top-down and bottom-up approaches are essential for problem-solving. While consultants are trained in tactics, the real value comes from hands-on experience and the ability to shift between high-level hypothesis generation and detailed data analysis. The process of working through problems is compared to methods like McKinsey's issue tree analysis and Six Sigma's DMAIC. Ultimately, success in consulting relies on embracing the process, despite uncertainty, to deliver great results.

Takeaways

  • πŸ” The secret to successful strategy consulting lies in an obsessive focus on process and the way problems are approached.
  • πŸ‹οΈβ€β™‚οΈ Strategy consultants often don't realize the source of their work methodology, which comes from being immersed in the process and repeating tasks.
  • πŸ“š Structured problem-solving processes like McKinsey's 'Define, Structure, Prioritize, Issue Tree, Analysis, Synthesis, and Recommendations' are crucial.
  • πŸ”„ Other structured approaches like Six Sigma's DMAIC (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control) and the scientific method emphasize a similar iterative process.
  • πŸ“ˆ The process involves a simple four-step model: Define the problem, generate questions and hypotheses, conduct research and analysis, and derive answers.
  • πŸ”„ Consulting work oscillates between two modes: top-down (high-level thinking and problem definition) and bottom-up (data-driven sense-making).
  • πŸ€” Individuals often lean towards one mode or the other, with some preferring to dive into data (bottom-up) and others starting with a high-level outline (top-down).
  • πŸ“Š Consultants must develop proficiency in both modes, as junior analysts spend more time in bottom-up analysis, while senior roles require more top-down strategy.
  • πŸ“ˆ A typical consulting project involves a dynamic shift between top-down and bottom-up modes, with phases of problem definition, hypothesis generation, and data analysis.
  • πŸ’‘ To optimize this process, consultants should formally shift between modes, perhaps using different working environments for top-down strategic thinking and bottom-up data analysis.
  • πŸ† The process itself, with its back-and-forth between modes, is what leads to the creation of great work in consulting, even when the end product is initially unknown.

Q & A

  • What is considered the secret sauce of strategy consulting?

    -The secret sauce of strategy consulting is the obsessive focus on process in the way you work and approach problems.

  • Why do former strategy consultants often struggle to articulate their understanding of how to do the work?

    -Former strategy consultants often struggle because they are used to being thrown into the mix and doing things repeatedly, rather than relying on extensive training decks.

  • What are some structured processes for solving problems mentioned in the transcript?

    -Some structured processes mentioned include McKinsey's Define, Structure, Prioritize, Issue Tree, Analysis, Synthesis, and Recommendations, Six Sigma's DMAIC method (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control), and the Scientific Method (Question, Hypotheses, Experiment, Analysis).

  • How does the speaker simplify the process of doing knowledge work?

    -The speaker simplifies the process as: 1) Define the problem, 2) Come up with questions and hypotheses, 3) Do research and analysis, and 4) Come up with answers.

  • What are the two modes of thinking that the speaker discusses?

    -The two modes of thinking discussed are top-down and bottom-up thinking.

  • What is the difference between top-down and bottom-up thinking?

    -Top-down thinking involves starting from a high, abstract level such as defining a problem or developing hypotheses, while bottom-up thinking involves sense-making from data and information first.

  • How does the speaker describe the shift between top-down and bottom-up modes in a consulting project?

    -The speaker describes the shift as a time-based process where individuals move between defining problems and hypotheses at a high level (top-down) and diving into data and analysis to make sense of information (bottom-up).

  • Why is it important for consultants to develop both top-down and bottom-up thinking modes?

    -Consultants need to develop both modes to effectively navigate the complexities of projects, where they must alternate between defining problems and hypotheses and analyzing data to find solutions.

  • What does the speaker suggest as a method to shift between the two thinking modes?

    -The speaker suggests formally shifting between the two modes by blocking off periods for data analysis and then summarizing findings, possibly using different working methods for each mode, such as using a computer for bottom-up and printing materials for top-down.

  • What does the speaker miss most about consulting after leaving?

    -The speaker misses the back-and-forth team environment and the process of shifting between top-down and bottom-up modes to create something impactful at the end of a project.

  • How does the speaker encourage clients to think about their work process?

    -The speaker encourages clients to focus on the meta process, which involves understanding how they solve problems and creating terms and approaches specific to their actual work.

Outlines

00:00

🧐 The Essence of Strategy Consulting: Process Focus

The paragraph emphasizes the critical role of process in strategy consulting. It highlights that consultants often excel due to their ingrained understanding of structured processes rather than specific tactics or techniques. The author points out that while consulting firms provide training in various methods, it's the repetitive application of these processes that truly hones consultants' skills. Several structured problem-solving approaches are mentioned, such as McKinsey's problem-solving process and the DMAIC method from Six Sigma. The author simplifies the consulting process into four steps: defining the problem, formulating questions and hypotheses, conducting research and analysis, and deriving conclusions. This is likened to the SCQA framework, which is also briefly introduced. The paragraph concludes by introducing a time-based process model that oscillates between top-down and bottom-up thinking, which is central to the consulting approach.

05:01

πŸ”„ Navigating the Top-Down and Bottom-Up Dynamics in Consulting

This paragraph delves into the practical application of the top-down and bottom-up thinking modes within a consulting project. It describes how consultants initially engage in top-down thinking to define the problem's scope and then transition into a bottom-up approach to analyze data and refine hypotheses. The author illustrates the iterative nature of consulting work, where consultants frequently switch between abstract strategic thinking and detailed data analysis. The importance of balancing both modes is underscored, with the author sharing personal experiences and recommending strategies for effectively toggling between them. The paragraph also touches on the diagnostic phase common in consulting, which serves to gather preliminary information before fully defining the project's objectives. Lastly, it discusses the value of process in consulting, suggesting that a focus on process is what ultimately leads to successful outcomes and is a key aspect that the author misses post-consulting.

Mindmap

Keywords

πŸ’‘Process

Process in the context of the video refers to the systematic approach and methodology used in strategy consulting. It is the core of the 'secret sauce' that leads to effective problem-solving. The speaker emphasizes the importance of process over specific tactics and techniques, suggesting that it is the iterative and structured way of working that truly shapes the consultant's ability to deliver results. The process involves defining problems, generating hypotheses, conducting research and analysis, and synthesizing findings into actionable recommendations.

πŸ’‘Strategy Consulting

Strategy Consulting is a professional service that focuses on addressing complex issues faced by organizations, typically involving the development of comprehensive plans for improving performance. In the video, strategy consulting is discussed as a field where the 'secret sauce' is the meticulous focus on process, rather than just the application of various tactics and techniques. The speaker reflects on the training and development of consultants within this field, highlighting the importance of process in achieving successful outcomes.

πŸ’‘Define

In the video, 'Define' is a crucial step in the consulting process, where the consultant seeks to clearly understand and articulate the problem at hand. This involves setting the scope and boundaries of the issue, which is essential for guiding subsequent analysis and research. The speaker mentions that defining the problem is often the starting point of a project, where consultants work at a high level to grasp the broadest aspects of the challenge they are addressing.

πŸ’‘Hypothesis

A hypothesis in the context of the video is a proposed explanation or assumption made by consultants to guide their investigation. It is a tentative statement about the relationship between variables or the nature of a problem, which is then tested through research and analysis. The speaker discusses how consultants develop hypotheses as part of the top-down thinking mode, which helps to shape the direction of their work and focus their efforts on finding solutions.

πŸ’‘Analysis

Analysis, as discussed in the video, is the detailed examination of data or information to draw conclusions or support hypotheses. It is a key component of the consulting process, where consultants engage in bottom-up thinking to make sense of the data and information they gather. The speaker emphasizes the iterative nature of analysis, where consultants may shift between analyzing data and refining their understanding of the problem or their hypotheses.

πŸ’‘Top-Down Thinking

Top-Down Thinking is a cognitive approach where one starts with a broad perspective and then drills down to the specifics. In the video, this mode is contrasted with bottom-up thinking and is associated with activities like defining problems, developing hypotheses, and creating outlines for presentations. The speaker suggests that top-down thinking is essential for setting the stage for a project and for maintaining a holistic view of the work throughout the consulting process.

πŸ’‘Bottom-Up Thinking

Bottom-Up Thinking involves starting with the details and building up to a broader understanding. In the video, this mode is characterized by diving into data sets and information to make sense of them and to inform higher-level conclusions. The speaker notes that consultants often shift between top-down and bottom-up thinking throughout a project, with bottom-up thinking being particularly important for junior analysts who are tasked with data analysis and sense-making.

πŸ’‘Diagnostic Phase

The Diagnostic Phase, as mentioned in the video, is an initial stage in consulting projects where consultants gather information and insights about the client's situation before defining the problem and scoping the project. This phase is crucial for understanding the context and for shaping the direction of the consulting work. The speaker highlights how the diagnostic phase can even be offered as a free upfront service by some consulting firms to build trust and demonstrate the value of their process.

πŸ’‘SCQA Framework

The SCQA Framework, which stands for Situation, Complication, Question, Answer, is a storytelling technique that the speaker mentions as being similar to the consulting process. It is a method for structuring communication to ensure clarity and effectiveness. In the video, the SCQA framework is used as an example of how consultants might organize their thinking and their presentations to address a problem, propose questions, and offer solutions.

πŸ’‘Meta Process

The Meta Process, as discussed in the video, refers to the process of understanding and reflecting on one's own processes of work and problem-solving. It is about being aware of how one approaches tasks and how to optimize those approaches for better outcomes. The speaker encourages consultants to focus on their meta process, to think critically about how they solve problems, and to adapt their processes to fit the specific needs of their work and their clients.

Highlights

The secret sauce of strategy consulting is an obsessive focus on process.

Strategy consultants often don't realize where their understanding of how to do the work comes from.

Consulting firms train in tactics and techniques, but it's the process that leads to great work.

Structured processes for solving problems include McKinsey's issue tree analysis and the scientific method.

The process involves defining the problem, coming up with questions and hypotheses, doing research and analysis, and coming up with answers.

The best way to think about the consulting process is as a time-based process that shifts between top-down and bottom-up thinking.

Top-down thinking involves defining problems and developing hypotheses from a high-level perspective.

Bottom-up thinking is about sense-making from data and information.

People often fall into one or the other bucket, either top-down or bottom-up thinkers.

In consulting, you need to develop both top-down and bottom-up thinking modes.

Junior level analysts often spend more time in the bottom-up mode.

Shifting between top-down and bottom-up modes is a key part of a typical consulting project.

The process involves defining the problem, diving into data, refining hypotheses, and iterating between high-level and detailed analysis.

Consulting firms often have a diagnostic phase to gather information before scoping a project.

The process of consulting involves a back-and-forth between top-down and bottom-up thinking.

It's important to formally shift between the two modes to ensure a comprehensive approach to problem-solving.

Focusing on the meta-process of how you solve problems is crucial in consulting.

The process is what creates great work in consulting, and it's something that is deeply missed after leaving the field.

Transcripts

play00:00

what's the secret sauce of strategy

play00:02

Consulting I would argue that it is the

play00:05

obsessive focus on process in the way

play00:08

you work and approach problems now an

play00:11

interesting thing I've noticed in doing

play00:14

work and helping train and working with

play00:16

former strategy Consultants is that they

play00:18

often don't understand where their

play00:20

understanding of how to do the work

play00:22

comes from they want me to come in with

play00:24

these extensive training decks uh

play00:26

showing in immense detail how to do

play00:29

different tactics and techniques but

play00:32

while consulting firms do train you in

play00:34

these tactics and techniques I really

play00:36

think it's the process and being thrown

play00:39

into the mix and doing things over and

play00:41

over again that leads to great

play00:47

work now there are many structured

play00:51

processes for solving problems mckines

play00:54

is Define structure prioritize issue

play00:57

tree analysis synthesis and

play00:59

recommendations comes from a famous memo

play01:02

that you have to read when you start the

play01:03

company but there's other famous

play01:05

structured approaches to solving

play01:07

problems for example in Six Sigma you

play01:10

have the dmic method Define measure

play01:13

analyze improve control the scientific

play01:16

method to is a similar approach question

play01:20

hypotheses experiment analysis and it's

play01:23

all pretty much doing the same thing

play01:25

it's saying here's this problem how can

play01:26

we come up with questions how can we

play01:29

analyze it and then how can we come to

play01:31

conclusions when I teach process and

play01:34

thinking about doing knowledge work with

play01:37

my clients in workshops I put it in a

play01:40

very simple way one Define the problem

play01:42

two come up with questions and

play01:44

hypotheses three do research and

play01:47

Analysis and then four come up with

play01:49

answers it's very similar to the scqa

play01:52

framework and I've linked below I have a

play01:55

video on that as well if you want to

play01:57

check it out but this doesn't really

play01:59

serve serve as a useful mental model of

play02:02

how things actually happen in consulting

play02:04

firms and broadly in knowledge

play02:08

work the best way I've been able to

play02:11

think about it is as a time-based

play02:13

process that shifts people between two

play02:17

modes these modes are top down and

play02:20

bottom up top down thinking is thinking

play02:22

of things from a highest most abstract

play02:25

level this might be things like defining

play02:28

a problem developing hypothesis es or

play02:30

even creating story boards of a final

play02:33

presentation or the answers bottom up is

play02:36

sense making from the data and

play02:38

information first and typically people

play02:40

fall into one or the other bucket you

play02:43

might want to pause and just think are

play02:45

you a top- down person or a bottom up

play02:47

person it's usually pretty easy to

play02:49

notice for example if you're somebody

play02:51

that feels completely comfortable like I

play02:53

do diving into a huge data set not

play02:56

knowing what you'll find but excited

play02:58

about that you're probably a bottomup

play03:00

person if you're somebody that likes to

play03:02

start with an outline a structure of the

play03:05

problem and know what the end product

play03:07

might look like before diving into it

play03:09

you're probably a top- down person in

play03:11

writing I love how the fantasy writer

play03:15

Brandon Sanderson writes about this as

play03:19

Discovery writing versus outline writing

play03:21

he says Discovery writers jump into the

play03:24

story if they're writing a novel and

play03:25

sort of figure out what the plot is

play03:27

along the way outline writing is when

play03:30

you start with an outline of what's

play03:32

going to happen and then fill in the

play03:34

holes right and the important thing he

play03:37

notes is that it's a spectrum you're

play03:40

never going to be 100% on one side or

play03:43

the other and in Consulting you have to

play03:45

develop both modes bottom up and top

play03:48

down when you're a junior level analyst

play03:50

you're often spending a lot of time in

play03:52

the bottom up mode for me this was

play03:54

really enjoyable but when I was shifted

play03:56

into the top down mode it was different

play03:59

and and challenging it was a muscle I

play04:01

had to build over

play04:04

time and so I want to dive in to this

play04:08

chart I've created to help really bring

play04:11

alive what it's like to shift between

play04:14

the top down and bottom up modes

play04:16

throughout a typical project or

play04:18

assignment that you're going to be

play04:20

working on you can think of this process

play04:22

as something that could map to something

play04:24

you work on over a couple of hours a

play04:27

week or even over a few months at at

play04:29

first you're at the top down you're

play04:32

defining the problem this is where

play04:34

you're really trying to figure out what

play04:35

is the scope of what you're doing what

play04:38

are the big questions right and in doing

play04:41

this you may dig into detailed

play04:43

information or data to really inform

play04:45

that but you're really trying to stay at

play04:47

high level and figure out what is the

play04:50

broadest biggest problem that we're

play04:52

really solving here from there you're

play04:54

then of course going to dive into the

play04:57

data and sometimes you're not actually

play05:00

going to know what your hypotheses are

play05:03

about how to solve the problem or the

play05:06

direction you're going to take you may

play05:08

need to figure it out now doing this may

play05:11

actually reshape your own understanding

play05:14

of the problem and this is why a lot of

play05:17

consulting firms often have what they

play05:18

call a diagnostic phase this helps them

play05:21

get information from the client and the

play05:24

situation before having to scope the

play05:26

problem and actually sell a project so

play05:29

sometimes will even do that diagnostic

play05:31

phase as a free upfront project now once

play05:35

you've sort of like clarified that

play05:36

you're at the high level again right and

play05:38

you're defining the hypotheses now you

play05:41

might refine the problem statement and

play05:42

thenine the hypotheses and you're asking

play05:45

highle questions how can we generate

play05:47

more Revenue how can we cut cost high

play05:50

level questions like that right and then

play05:52

you're going back down you're into the

play05:54

mix and this is where it's chaotic in a

play05:56

project you're going to be shifting

play05:58

between modes you're going to be diving

play06:00

into the data but at the same time

play06:02

you're diving into the data you're

play06:03

asking yourself questions where does

play06:05

this fit in Does this answer the

play06:07

hypothesis does this change anything

play06:09

about the problem statement right back

play06:11

and forth between those two modes you

play06:13

might be working with a team where

play06:15

somebody like a project manager might be

play06:17

shaping and driving the top- down

play06:19

questions and how it fits into the

play06:21

bigger picture while you're working on a

play06:23

very specific chunk right or you might

play06:25

be responsible for both of those and you

play06:27

have to figure out how to shift between

play06:29

between those two different modes one

play06:31

thing I recommend people do is sort of

play06:33

like formally shift between the two

play06:36

different modes right so if you're going

play06:37

to just do a bunch of data analysis

play06:39

block off a period after that where

play06:42

you're going to summarize what you're

play06:44

looking at right and I actually like to

play06:46

do this in two different ways of working

play06:49

for example I might do the bottom up

play06:51

mode on a computer whereas the top down

play06:53

mode I might print stuff out and try to

play06:56

figure out what I'm actually looking at

play06:58

and so this is the best way I've figured

play07:00

out how to think about the Consulting

play07:05

process in my work with clients I often

play07:08

push them to think about how they

play07:10

actually work I ask them what is your

play07:13

process most of them look at me with a

play07:15

blank face I don't know what my process

play07:18

is and this is really about focusing on

play07:20

The Meta process what I say is like you

play07:23

need to talk about how you solve

play07:26

problems you need to be devoted to that

play07:28

if you're a senior person at a

play07:30

consulting firm you need to be thinking

play07:32

about how people work and then how do we

play07:35

make this Consulting process fit into

play07:38

our company create terms approaches that

play07:42

are specific to how you're actually

play07:43

doing work the more you focus on process

play07:47

the more annoying and frustrating it can

play07:49

be too because what you're doing in

play07:52

process is you're saying we actually

play07:55

don't know what the end product looks

play07:57

like we're going to trust the process

play07:59

hopefully better than the Philadelphia

play08:01

76ers did sport shout out anything you'd

play08:04

like to say oh just AES and know that

play08:08

the process is what creates the great

play08:10

work and after leaving Consulting this

play08:13

is probably the thing I miss the most is

play08:15

that back and forth that team

play08:17

environment where you're getting

play08:18

challenge you're shifting between the

play08:20

two different modes you don't know where

play08:22

you're going to end up and then somehow

play08:25

at the end of the project you end up

play08:26

creating something and you look back and

play08:28

go wow that process worked

Rate This
β˜…
β˜…
β˜…
β˜…
β˜…

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

Related Tags
Consulting ProcessProblem SolvingTop-Down ThinkingBottom-Up AnalysisProject ManagementData AnalysisHypothesis DevelopmentStrategic ThinkingTeam DynamicsKnowledge Work