Trump bond deadline: $454M New York civil fraud penalty due by Monday | LiveNOW from FOX

LiveNOW from FOX
24 Mar 202412:01

Summary

TLDRThe transcript discusses the impending deadline for former President Trump to pay a $454 million fraud lawsuit settlement, as initiated by New York Attorney General Leticia James. Attorney Jeremy Rosenthal shares insights on the possible outcomes, including property seizures and the challenges Trump faces in meeting the bond amount. The conversation also touches on the possibility of bankruptcy and the complex legal and financial situation Trump is in, with other ongoing cases and the potential impact on his real estate and political ambitions.

Takeaways

  • 📊 The former president faces a deadline to pay $454 million in a fraud lawsuit put forth by New York Attorney General Leticia James.
  • 🔥 There's uncertainty about whether the payment will be made by the deadline, with speculation about various creative financing attempts.
  • 🛡️ The Appellate Court is unlikely to provide immediate relief, as their rulings are typically on Tuesdays and Thursdays.
  • 🔨 If the payment is not made, New York could potentially seize properties, with liens being a cost-effective enforcement method.
  • 🤷‍♂️ Trump's legal team argues that gathering the $454 million in a short timeframe is practically impossible.
  • 🤔 Many judgments in the American legal system go uncollected, highlighting the challenge of enforcing such a large financial judgment.
  • 💳 Real estate assets, like Trump Tower and Mar-a-Lago, are mentioned as examples of the former president's leveraged assets.
  • 🔍 Trump's lawyers attempted to negotiate the bond amount to a more manageable figure for immediate appeal, but faced legal standards.
  • 👥 In addition to this case, Trump faces other legal challenges, including criminal cases and other civil suits.
  • 🚫 Filing for bankruptcy is considered an unlikely option for Trump, as it would pause the litigation but also open up his assets to widespread claims.

Q & A

  • What is the deadline involving the former president and the $454 million fraud lawsuit?

    -The deadline mentioned in the script is related to a $454 million fraud lawsuit put forth by the New York attorney general, Leticia James, against the former president. The deadline is significant as it may lead to the seizure of properties if the amount is not paid.

  • What is the role of the Appellate Court in this case?

    -The Appellate Court's role is to potentially step in and offer relief regarding the bond amount. However, their rulings typically occur on Tuesdays and Thursdays, so immediate intervention is unlikely. The court's involvement could impact the deadline scenario.

  • How might the state of New York enforce the $454 million judgment?

    -New York State could enforce the judgment by filing liens on the properties involved in the case, which is a cost-effective way to ensure that the state gets its money if the properties are sold or closed on. This prevents the properties' value from being affected and forces the debtor to address the debt.

  • What does it mean for a real estate mogul like Trump to be leveraged to the hilt?

    -Being leveraged to the hilt means that the individual has maximized their use of borrowed money to invest in assets like real estate. This strategy can amplify potential gains but also increases the risk of not having liquid assets readily available to pay off large debts like the $454 million judgment.

  • How common is it for judgments to go uncollected?

    -According to the American Bar Association, about 80% of judgments go uncollected. This can be due to various reasons, including the debtor's inability or unwillingness to pay, lack of funds, or the complexity of locating and seizing assets.

  • What is the significance of the deadline for Trump's legal and financial situation?

    -The deadline is significant because it marks a point of potential crisis for Trump. If he fails to pay the $454 million by the deadline, it could lead to the seizure of his properties and further legal complications. It also coincides with other legal challenges he faces, increasing the pressure.

  • What was Trump's lawyers' argument regarding the immediate appeal of the judgment?

    -Trump's lawyers argued that the bond amount was too high, which effectively blocked their client from filing an immediate appeal. They sought relief from the intermediate Appellate Court to reduce the bond, allowing Trump to challenge the judgment without the full payment upfront.

  • How does the potential bankruptcy filing affect the collection of the judgment?

    -If Trump were to file for bankruptcy, it would introduce a federal intervention that could pause all collection efforts. The state of New York would have to wait in line behind other creditors, and the process would become more complex and time-consuming for all parties involved.

  • What is the difference between the financial case and criminal cases in terms of appeals and collection?

    -In financial cases like this one, appealing requires the posting of a bond, which can be a significant barrier. In criminal cases, appeals are less costly or even free, and public defenders may be appointed. The financial case involves the protection of assets, whereas criminal cases involve personal liberty.

  • What are the implications of Trump's other ongoing legal cases on this scenario?

    -Trump's other legal cases, such as the E. Gene Carroll case, add to the complexity and pressure of the situation. They could affect his financial resources and legal strategy, potentially influencing how he handles the $454 million judgment and its deadline.

  • How might the upcoming deadline impact Trump's political aspirations?

    -The deadline and the potential consequences of not meeting it could affect Trump's political image and credibility. It might influence public perception and support for his bid for the White House, adding another layer of complexity to his legal and political challenges.

Outlines

00:00

📰 Deadline Drama: Former President's $454M Fraud Lawsuit

The segment discusses the looming deadline involving a $454 million fraud lawsuit against a former president, brought forth by New York Attorney General Leticia James. The conversation revolves around the potential outcomes if the sum is not paid, including the possibility of New York seizing properties. Attorney Jeremy Rosenthal shares his insights, suggesting that the state may file liens as a cost-effective enforcement method. He also addresses the rarity of collecting such a large sum quickly, noting that most judgments go uncollected. The discussion highlights the complexity of the situation and the uncertainty of the outcome.

05:04

💰 Moguls and Money: Trump's Financial Predicament

This paragraph compares the financial situations of real estate moguls like Trump and other billionaires such as Elon Musk and Warren Buffett. It is suggested that Trump's assets are not as liquid as those of other moguls, making it difficult for him to write a check for such a large amount. The discussion touches on the convergence of factors creating a 'perfect storm' for Trump, who is described as being 'behind the 8-ball.' The conversation also briefly touches on the potential impact of other legal cases on Trump's financial situation.

10:05

🏛️ Legal and Financial Implications: Bankruptcy and Pride

The final paragraph delves into the potential legal and financial implications of Trump's situation, including the possibility of bankruptcy. It explains that bankruptcy would pause all litigation and place New York State in line behind other creditors, which could complicate matters further. The discussion also considers the 'pride factor' related to Trump's real estate holdings and his political ambitions. The segment concludes with a reflection on the high stakes involved in the civil lawsuit, with nearly half a billion dollars on the line.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡fraud lawsuit

A legal action brought against an individual or entity accused of fraudulent behavior, typically involving financial deception. In the context of the video, the fraud lawsuit refers to the case against the former president involving a significant amount of money.

💡Appellate Court

A court that reviews and potentially modifies the decisions of lower courts. Appellate courts typically focus on matters of law rather than re-examining the facts of the case. In the video, the speaker mentions the Appellate Court in relation to the potential for it to intervene in the case.

💡D-Day

A term originally used to describe the day of a significant military operation, but now more broadly applied to denote a critical day or turning point in a situation. In the video, 'D-Day' is used metaphorically to refer to the day when a major decision or event is expected to occur in the legal case.

💡liens

A legal claim or right that a creditor has over a debtor's property or assets. Liens are often used as a security interest to ensure payment of a debt. In the context of the video, the state could file liens on properties as a means to enforce the collection of the judgment amount.

💡collections

The process of recovering money owed for goods or services, or in this case, the enforcement of a court-ordered judgment. Collections can involve various legal actions and strategies to ensure that the debtor complies with the court's order.

💡bankruptcy

A legal process that helps individuals or businesses who are unable to repay their outstanding debts. It involves reorganizing or eliminating debts under the protection of the federal bankruptcy court.

💡assets

Resources owned by an individual or entity that have economic value and can be converted into cash. In the context of the video, assets refer to the properties and financial holdings that are subject to the fraud lawsuit and potential collection efforts.

💡E Gene Carroll case

A specific legal case in which the former president was ordered to pay tens of millions of dollars. This case is mentioned in the video as part of the broader context of the legal challenges facing the individual.

💡Trump Tower

A skyscraper in New York City that serves as the headquarters for The Trump Organization and contains luxury condominiums and retail space. In the video, it is mentioned as one of the properties that could be affected by the fraud lawsuit.

💡political landscape

The current state of political affairs and activities within a particular region or country. In the video, the political landscape is mentioned in relation to the former president's bid for the White House and how it may intersect with the legal issues he is facing.

💡public offering

The process by which a company offers its shares of stock to the public for the first time through an Initial Public Offering (IPO). This is typically done to raise capital for the company. In the video, the public offering is mentioned in the context of the former president's social media company.

Highlights

The eve of the deadline involving a $454 million fraud lawsuit against a former president, brought by New York Attorney General Leticia James.

Attorney Jeremy Rosenthal joins to discuss the potential outcomes if the former president does not pay the $454 million.

The former president is attempting to get financial institutions to help meet the bond amount.

The Appellate Court is unlikely to intervene, as their rulings typically occur on Tuesdays and Thursdays.

Tomorrow could be a critical day for the former president, akin to D-Day.

The process of seizing properties in New York State is professional and not mob-run.

Liens could be filed against the properties, which is a cost-effective way for the state to enforce the judgment.

The lawyers believe this case is relatively straightforward due to the clear identification of assets in the 92-page judgment.

Trump's lawyers have called the task of gathering the money quickly a 'practical impossibility'.

Large companies like American Airlines or banks can handle similar litigation, but it's rare for individuals.

About 80% of judgments go uncollected, according to the American Bar Association.

Real estate moguls like Trump are leveraged to the hilt, with assets that are not easily liquidated.

Trump is facing a 'perfect storm' of financial and legal challenges.

The lawyers for Trump tried to reduce the immediate payment to $100 million, with the remainder to be paid later.

The appeals process is complex, with Trump needing to pay the bond before he can appeal the entire case.

Trump's case is financial, not criminal, which affects the terms and processes of the lawsuit.

Bankruptcy is a federal matter that would pause all litigation and put New York State in line behind other creditors.

Filing for bankruptcy is described as hitting the 'nuclear button' and is not considered a priority for Trump.

The situation is complicated by Trump's real estate holdings and the political landscape, including his bid for the White House.

There is a significant amount of money at stake in the civil lawsuit, nearly half a billion dollars.

Transcripts

play00:01

earlier this morning. there

play00:02

on Fox News as well, and

play00:03

we want to continue to

play00:04

dive into this because

play00:06

this is the eve of this

play00:07

deadline involving the

play00:10

former presidents of 454.

play00:11

million dollars in this

play00:15

fraud lawsuit. put forth by

play00:16

a New York. York attorney

play00:16

general Leticia James we're

play00:17

going to be joined right

play00:19

now by attorney Jeremy

play00:19

Rosenthal Jeremy. Thank you

play00:21

so much for joining us here.

play00:21

on live now from Fox and

play00:23

of course tomorrow. is the

play00:25

day that potentially New

play00:26

York. could see some of these

play00:28

properties if he doesn't

play00:30

pay this 454 million. some

play00:32

will that happen tomorrow

play00:33

or what's next in terms

play00:36

of what goes on here?

play00:37

It's anybody's. guess

play00:38

Uh, I mean maybe somebody

play00:40

comes to his rescue. He's

play00:43

currently uh trying to get

play00:45

shies trying to get Banks.

play00:47

uh trying to get creative

play00:49

with meeting this bond

play00:50

amount. Um that may or may

play00:53

not happen tomorrow. Uh, the

play00:54

Appellate Court, probably

play00:55

isn't going to step in

play00:56

most of their rulings. Uh,

play00:58

I'm told her on Tuesdays

play01:00

and Thursdays so we might

play01:02

not get help there. Uh, so

play01:03

tomorrow, could be kind of a

play01:05

D-Day for him.

play01:07

uh a day that's I mean, it's

play01:07

like predicting the

play01:10

weather. Um, I mean, I think

play01:11

we're all on this roller

play01:13

coaster. Yeah. Yeah, I I

play01:14

think we all are and

play01:15

of course this is just 1

play01:17

amongst many cases We've

play01:18

been following and of course

play01:19

they talk about seizing

play01:20

properties. What would that

play01:21

look like? How would a

play01:23

state? sees a property? How

play01:26

would that go down? um

play01:27

collections is its own.

play01:29

industry, right And this is

play01:31

New York State, uh even

play01:32

that that being the case. I

play01:34

don't think it's mob run,

play01:35

uh, which is the good news.

play01:36

uh, but collections are their

play01:39

own industry. Um, these uh

play01:41

the state knows where all

play01:42

these assets are because

play01:45

these assets

play01:46

were the subject of of this

play01:47

entire pace Um, you could

play01:50

see liens getting filed which

play01:51

is probably the most

play01:52

cost-effective way. for

play01:54

them to enforce it. uh

play01:57

meaning that before. Mr.

play01:58

Trump or or somebody tries

play02:00

to sell the property that

play02:01

the state of New York gets

play02:03

going to hurt the value you

play02:05

would think of some of those

play02:07

properties. some of

play02:08

properties. or closing on

play02:10

properties. that that's

play02:11

where things start to get

play02:13

expensive. Maybe. uh you

play02:17

have a situation where uh,

play02:17

they they want to spike

play02:19

the football. Uh, and and

play02:20

have a big showing of

play02:24

of tricky ways about this

play02:25

but as far as collections

play02:28

go um, I'll tell you this

play02:29

much the the lawyers that I

play02:31

know that that are into

play02:32

hardcore bankruptcy and

play02:33

into collections and things

play02:35

like that They say, this

play02:36

is a bit of a cakewalk

play02:37

because the hardest Single

play02:38

part about this is

play02:39

figuring out where all these

play02:40

assets are and they know

play02:42

because you just read the

play02:43

92 page judgment and they

play02:45

know where the asset are

play02:47

that is a very good point

play02:48

because obviously this is

play02:49

kind of what the whole

play02:51

premise of this case was

play02:52

about. I do want to ask you

play02:54

because Trump's lawyers have

play02:55

called it a practical.

play02:56

impossibility to get that

play02:58

money. this quickly as

play02:59

well and we're not talking

play03:01

about 10 million. We're not

play03:02

talking about 15 million in

play03:03

terms of this scope the

play03:05

size of this How rare is

play03:07

that And do you think it's

play03:09

even feasible for a person

play03:11

to get this amount? So

play03:13

when you when you look at

play03:14

companies like American

play03:15

Airlines or your big

play03:16

insurance companies or banks

play03:18

that might get sued. they

play03:20

can handle. in stomach You

play03:22

would think potentially this

play03:24

type of litigation or if

play03:25

they can't then there's

play03:26

there's bankruptcy which I

play03:28

think Mr. Trump has said I'm

play03:29

not he's not going to have

play03:30

that as an option that

play03:31

would stay things and that

play03:35

would cause things uh,

play03:37

appeals are pay-to-play. Um,

play03:39

the reason for that is uh

play03:41

80% of judgments under the

play03:43

American Bar Association.

play03:45

says about 80% of judgments

play03:46

go. uncollected. There's a

play03:47

lot of reasons that would

play03:48

go behind that. Uh, there's

play03:50

a lot of folks who don't pay

play03:51

their credit card bills and

play03:54

brings a lawsuit saying

play03:55

you're a deadbeat. Uh, you

play03:56

hadn't paid us and then

play03:58

they win. oftentimes a

play04:01

default judgment. Uh, but

play04:02

that's that's a a reason

play04:04

why a lot of judgments don't

play04:07

get paid or uh, somebody

play04:09

sues, a common dispute over

play04:10

a fence or something like

play04:13

building your fence takes

play04:15

the money and and just

play04:16

disappears you get a

play04:17

judgment of that guy against

play04:19

that guy. Um, and he's got

play04:20

no intentions of paying

play04:22

it. Uh, there's a lot of

play04:23

dead beats out there and

play04:24

courts have basically said,

play04:26

we're not going to let you

play04:27

use our courts as a

play04:30

mechanism for avoiding

play04:31

paying your debts you get

play04:34

your trial. You're not

play04:35

going to go spend a bunch

play04:37

of the other guys time and

play04:38

money that they've already

play04:38

spent trying to run this

play04:41

money down. It's put up or

play04:43

shut up and this just

play04:44

happens to be a really big

play04:46

number because the subject

play04:48

matter of it. uh is so

play04:51

is so big uh, that's what

play04:53

and that's what makes it

play04:55

verified are. um another

play04:58

point to this. is that Mr.

play04:59

Trump's a real estate guy

play05:04

problems like this but you

play05:06

got Elon Musk who? uh in

play05:07

Warren Buffett those guys

play05:08

probably lose this kind of

play05:09

money in their sofa at

play05:14

Mogul doesn't is leveraged

play05:15

to the hilt. That's what

play05:16

they do. They buy they

play05:18

sell they they mortgage

play05:19

they they do all those

play05:21

things. which makes their

play05:23

up. It's not liquid. They

play05:25

they can't write a check

play05:27

that big um, or or if they

play05:29

can it's pretty rare. Uh,

play05:31

so you got a lot of these

play05:31

different things that are

play05:33

sort of converging almost

play05:34

to make a perfect storm.

play05:36

I mean, uh, the guy is

play05:37

kind of behind the 8-ball

play05:39

tomorrow. We'll see what

play05:39

happens. I mean, I think if

play05:41

we learned anything, I think

play05:42

it's that we just don't

play05:43

know what's going to

play05:44

happen. guys probably lose

play05:45

this kind of money in their

play05:46

sofa at home. Um, The Real

play05:47

Estate Mogul doesn't

play05:48

is leveraged to the hilt.

play05:50

That's what they do. They

play05:51

buy they sell they they

play05:52

mortgage they they do all

play05:53

those things which makes

play05:54

their money their money's

play05:55

tied up. It's not liquid.

play05:56

They they can't write a

play05:58

check that big um, or or

play05:59

if they can it's pretty

play06:00

rare. Uh, so you

play06:01

got a lot of these different

play06:01

things that are sort of

play06:01

converging almost to make a

play06:02

perfect storm. I mean, uh, the

play06:02

guy is kind of behind the

play06:03

if we learned anything, I

play06:03

think it's that we just don't

play06:03

know what's going to happen

play06:04

next. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah and

play06:04

some like you mentioned some

play06:04

of that money is just tied up

play06:05

in some of the assets the As

play06:05

Trump Tower different

play06:05

Penthouse is Marlo ligo like

play06:06

you just heard from Eric Trump

play06:06

as well. I want to ask you

play06:06

because the lawyers for Trump

play06:06

kind of tried to get it down

play06:07

to like a hundred million just

play06:07

for Monday and then they'd

play06:07

continue to pick back. Was

play06:08

that a fair judge? Judgement

play06:08

do you think from from

play06:08

what we learned during

play06:09

this case from the judge?

play06:09

Uh, the appeals Parts the the

play06:09

kind of confusing part here.

play06:10

because and if we break it,

play06:10

let's break it down in

play06:11

half. Let's break it down

play06:13

into 2 parts. First thing

play06:14

is Trump, obviously wants

play06:16

to appeal the whole shebang

play06:16

he wants to appeal all

play06:18

of it because he thinks

play06:20

it's all bad, right He

play06:21

thinks that that the case

play06:23

against him was no good. He

play06:24

can't get there. until he

play06:26

pays this Bond. and now

play06:27

he's got an argument that

play06:29

this. and the second

play06:30

part. Is is that this Bond?

play06:33

is too big. so his

play06:35

argument then for the

play06:37

immediate appeal is look I

play06:37

want I I just can't even

play06:39

get my foot in the door.

play06:45

Um, until I can get some

play06:46

relief here, So he's

play06:47

trying to get the the

play06:49

intermediate Appellate Court

play06:50

to say that bond is too

play06:53

hot uh, it's not Let's Make

play06:54

a deal.

play06:55

Let's not bargaining or

play06:57

brokering. Uh, there there

play06:59

are legal standards. and and

play07:01

so far the appellate courts

play07:02

in New York, Haven't been

play07:03

inclined. to really help

play07:05

the guy out. Yeah. That was

play07:06

a really good description

play07:07

for someone that obviously

play07:08

doesn't work a ton in it

play07:10

like I do, Uh, I I do have

play07:11

to ask you another question

play07:12

because we also talked

play07:13

about it Trump having this

play07:15

case, but also a variety of

play07:17

other cases including the

play07:18

E Gene Carroll case where

play07:20

he was ordered to pay. uh

play07:20

tens of millions of

play07:21

dollars as well. How do

play07:23

they line up And what

play07:25

terms of presidents? Uh, do

play07:25

they line up when

play07:26

you're looking at

play07:27

different? cases different

play07:29

amounts that he owes

play07:30

people. is, New York. a top

play07:34

the list. uh MoneyWise.

play07:36

Yes. um all these other

play07:38

cases are criminal and I

play07:39

mean and it's a good

play07:41

tutorial if you will. uh,

play07:43

We learned Latin and law

play07:45

school. I don't know why.

play07:46

uh, because we tend to go

play07:46

to court and we tend to

play07:48

speak English, but uh,

play07:52

there's the the in Latin and

play07:53

criminal law there's Corpus

play07:54

to left guy. That's the

play07:55

body of the crime or a

play07:58

habias corpus. Uh, so in

play08:00

criminal law it is your

play08:02

body going into the can and

play08:04

then locking the door. Uh,

play08:05

and that's 1 set of rules

play08:07

and then this, New York

play08:09

State case is obviously all

play08:10

Financial. That's why he

play08:12

has to pay this Bond. to

play08:13

appeal if it was a

play08:15

criminal case. you you get a

play08:18

you get uh Criminal Appeals

play08:20

at no cost or or much

play08:21

less costs. Obviously You

play08:23

can have a public defender.

play08:25

Uh, do that. That's because

play08:26

it's that's because it's

play08:26

you you're getting locked

play08:28

up as an individual

play08:29

you're getting locked up.

play08:34

Uh, he would be the best

play08:36

1 to ask which where is it?

play08:36

Hurt more right Does it

play08:39

hurt more? Uh the assets

play08:41

that are threatened? The

play08:43

Pride of factor because I

play08:45

think that a lot of folks

play08:46

who uh sitting through the

play08:48

trial this is obviously

play08:49

intensely personal to the

play08:53

man. Um, or I mean as as

play08:54

I think most people would

play08:56

be in a criminal setting

play08:57

they'd be afraid of getting

play08:59

locked up. Uh, so I I think

play09:03

that it's uh, I I I

play09:05

you know everybody. sleeps

play09:07

differently at night and uh

play09:10

and only he knows What

play09:11

hurts me more? is probably

play09:14

the best way to say it. Um

play09:15

obviously this 1 is pretty

play09:17

confounding to him and I

play09:19

and and clearly he's not.

play09:20

found himself in in this

play09:21

type of uh a predicament

play09:24

before Is a sugar. mama

play09:26

or daddy gonna come

play09:27

tomorrow and and and and and

play09:29

get him out of this? Uh, who

play09:32

knows? Uh, who knows but uh,

play09:34

he's behind the 8 ball. Um,

play09:35

there's just no question

play09:37

about that and I my guess

play09:41

is that if somebody would

play09:42

have bailed them out that

play09:43

would have happened by now

play09:45

He had that big. Um.

play09:47

public offering on his on

play09:49

his social media company

play09:51

which sounds like it's

play09:51

going to be a good

play09:54

long-term investment. Uh, but

play09:55

it doesn't sound like it's

play09:56

going to turn into Cash.

play09:59

tomorrow. Yeah the short

play10:00

term is. a very short for

play10:02

them with just about 24

play10:03

hours or so and of course

play10:05

you also mentioned just the

play10:06

pride factor that he has

play10:07

in the real estate and we

play10:08

throw in the whole

play10:10

political. landscape right

play10:11

now in the bid for the White

play10:12

House and it just becomes a

play10:14

whole mess. I I do have to

play10:14

ask you my last question

play10:16

because you brought the word

play10:18

up a couple times already

play10:19

bankruptcy and that could

play10:21

potentially talk about this

play10:24

he find for it's very very

play10:25

unlikely that the ego of

play10:27

Donald Trump files for

play10:28

bankruptcy, but if that

play10:30

does happen is that a

play10:31

possibility and what does

play10:34

that look like? It's messy

play10:35

uh bankruptcy is federal.

play10:38

So uh and and any

play10:39

time a litigant somebody in

play10:41

a in a case. bankruptcy

play10:44

everything gets stopped.

play10:46

and then the whole different

play10:49

set of folks come in. and

play10:50

the state of New York would

play10:52

actually have to wait in

play10:53

line behind other people.

play10:55

uh other creditors who could

play10:57

potentially try to seize

play11:00

those assets. Um, Uh, Mr.

play11:01

Trump has filed for

play11:03

everything I've read said,

play11:06

that's really not on his.

play11:08

uh, list of of priorities

play11:10

here or or or options if

play11:11

you will. Uh, probably a

play11:13

better way to put it. um,

play11:14

that would throw a

play11:15

big wrench in into all of

play11:17

these things. and and that

play11:19

would when it stays the

play11:20

litigation that's just the

play11:25

pausing it so that would

play11:26

have the legal effect of

play11:27

pausing it but it's kind

play11:29

of it it it's also sort

play11:31

of hit in the nuclear.

play11:33

button, right? I mean uh at

play11:35

what cost do we want to

play11:36

pause this thing? I mean

play11:38

do we want to let

play11:39

everybody kind of in on our

play11:42

assets and on picking away.

play11:43

or just New York State.

play11:45

Uh, really? a difficult

play11:47

choice for him for sure.

play11:48

Yeah, and it's very

play11:49

unlikely that happened, but

play11:50

I did want to get to some

play11:51

understanding if it does.

play11:54

breaking it down tomorrow,

play11:55

Of course, we're hurtling

play11:57

closer and closer to it

play11:58

nearly half of a billion

play11:58

dollars there on the line

play12:00

in this Federal. or this

play12:01

civil lawsuit. Excuse me.

play12:02

All right. Thanks again for

Rate This

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

Related Tags
FraudLawsuitTrumpPropertiesNewYorkStateLegalAnalysisFinancialConsequencesAppealProcessAssetSeizureBankruptcyOptionsRealEstateMogulPoliticalImpact