週刊文春の守護神　喜田村洋一弁護士　との裁判経過【上杉隆】氏が証人として裁判所で証言する事となりました。

立花孝志

22 Mar 202414:27

Summary

TLDRThe transcript details a legal dispute involving a figure named Uesugi Takashi, who is facing allegations from a person named Kamikawa Takashi. Uesugi claims innocence, stating that the Tokyo District Public Prosecutors Office has found insufficient evidence for charges. Despite this, he alleges that Kamikawa is making defamatory statements. The situation has escalated, with Uesugi's company suffering from a flood of nuisance calls and mail, leading to staff resignations. Uesugi has filed complaints with the police for obstruction of business. The script also mentions a separate case involving a person named Ohashi, who has filed a complaint regarding alleged false statements in an NHK financial report. The speaker anticipates an interesting court session involving direct questioning of the parties involved, aiming to expose contradictions in their testimonies.

Takeaways

📅 The date mentioned in the script is March 22, 2024, indicating a future context for the events being discussed.
🤝 The speaker is engaging with a person named Uesugi Takashi, who is represented by a lawyer named Kitamura Yoichi from Bunshun.
🏢 The speaker mentions a previous court case and discusses ongoing legal issues, suggesting a complex legal battle.
📜 The speaker received a 'non-foundation' (無基礎) notice from the Tokyo District Public Prosecutors Office, indicating that they were not charged with any crime.
🚨 Despite the non-foundation notice, the speaker alleges that Uesugi continues to make serious accusations against them.
🏢 The speaker claims that Uesugi has falsely accused them of being involved in multiple cases, which are still under investigation.
📦 There are mentions of a large number of items being transferred and issues with the speaker's company, including phone calls and postal issues that led to employee stress and resignations.
🏠 The speaker has taken measures to file a complaint with the police regarding the harassment they have been facing.
👮‍♂️ The speaker criticizes the police and the prosecutor's office for not taking their complaints seriously enough.
🗳️ There is a mention of a person named Ohashi who has filed a complaint alleging that he was falsely accused in an NHK financial report.
🎥 The speaker plans to publicly question Uesugi in court, aiming to expose inconsistencies and falsehoods in his statements.

Q & A

What is the date mentioned in the script?
-The date mentioned in the script is March 22, 2024.
Who is the main subject of the discussion in the script?
-The main subject of the discussion is a person named Uesugi Takashi, who is involved in a legal dispute.
What is the role of the person named in the script as 'Kami Shūji'?
-Kami Shūji, also known as Kitamura Yōichi, is a lawyer who is representing someone named Uesugi in the legal matters discussed in the script.
What is the situation regarding the legal case involving Tokyo District Public Prosecutors Office's Special Investigation Division mentioned in the script?
-The script mentions that the speaker was called by the Tokyo District Public Prosecutors Office's Special Investigation Division for an investigation, but they were found to be completely innocent and not involved in the case.
What are the consequences mentioned in the script that affected the company and its employees?
-The script describes that the company faced a situation where a large number of items were transferred, causing a lot of phone calls and postal items to be delivered. This led to two employees resigning from the company due to the overwhelming workload and stress.
What actions did the speaker take in response to the issues faced by the company?
-The speaker mentioned that they have submitted a complaint of business obstruction to the police and a national lawsuit to the court due to the issues faced by the company.
What is the term 'Chen Shū Shō' mentioned in the script, and what does it refer to?
-The term 'Chen Shū Shō' refers to the act of writing false statements, which is a legal issue that can lead to questioning by the authorities if done.
What is the significance of the 'Ohashi Tadashi' mentioned in the script?
-Ohashi Tadashi is mentioned as a victim who filed a complaint with the police about a false statement made in an NHK financial report.
What is the role of the lawyer named Kitamura Yōichi in the upcoming court session?
-Kitamura Yōichi, as the representative of Uesugi, is expected to call Uesugi to testify in court and answer questions regarding the allegations.
What is the date and time scheduled for the court session mentioned in the script?
-The court session is scheduled for May 31, 2024, at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 415.
What is the speaker's intention regarding future interactions with YouTubers and political issues?
-The speaker intends to focus on political issues and the NHK problem, and will not engage with YouTubers who are primarily interested in generating views, as they have learned from past experiences.

Outlines

00:00

📚 Legal Battle with NHK and Accusations of Fabrication

The speaker discusses an ongoing legal dispute with NHK, a Japanese broadcasting organization, and the involvement of a lawyer named Kitamura Youichi from Bunshun. The speaker mentions a previous court case and the release of a statement that cleared them of suspicion from the Tokyo District Public Prosecutors Office's Special Investigation Division. Despite this, the speaker faces accusations of making false statements, which they vehemently deny. They describe the impact of these accusations on their company and employees, who have been overwhelmed by an influx of calls and documents. The speaker also mentions submitting a complaint to the police regarding harassment and interference with their business operations.

05:00

🕵️‍♂️ Confronting Allegations in Court and the Strategy for Cross-Examination

The speaker outlines their strategy for dealing with the accusations in court, focusing on the importance of cross-examination. They express their intention to question the defendant, Uesugi Takashi, directly about inconsistencies in their statements and actions. The speaker also discusses the process of submitting a complaint to the police and the potential for a public trial, where they plan to expose the defendant's contradictions. They highlight the significance of the court process, particularly the questioning of witnesses, as a means to reveal the truth.

10:03

📅 Upcoming Court Date and Reflections on Legal Strategy

The speaker provides details about an upcoming court date scheduled for May 31st, emphasizing the importance of this event. They mention the possibility of the defendant not showing up due to fear and the potential impact this could have on the trial. The speaker also reflects on their past experiences with legal battles, including a recent loss in a representative rights lawsuit which they plan to appeal. They conclude by stating their intention to focus on issues related to NHK and national politics in the future, and to avoid engaging with certain types of YouTubers who they believe are only interested in generating views.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡NHK

NHK refers to Japan's national public broadcasting organization, which is a key entity mentioned in the script. It is central to the video's theme as the speaker discusses their conflict and legal battles with NHK, indicating a significant role in the narrative.

💡Reiwa

Reiwa is the current era name in Japan, which started in 2019. The script mentions 'Reiwa 6 year 2024,' indicating the current year in the Japanese calendar and providing a temporal context for the events being discussed.

💡Prosecution

The term 'prosecution' relates to the legal process where a case is brought against someone by a public authority. In the script, it is mentioned in the context of the speaker being called upon by the Tokyo District Public Prosecutors Office for investigation, highlighting a legal dispute.

💡Innocent

The concept of being 'innocent' is used to describe the speaker's legal status, as they claim to have been found not guilty and to have no basis for the accusations against them. This term is crucial as it underscores the speaker's stance in the legal matters discussed.

💡Shukan Bunshun

Shukan Bunshun is a weekly Japanese magazine known for its investigative journalism. The script mentions 'Shukan Bunshun's guardian,' which likely refers to a legal representative or entity associated with the magazine, indicating a connection to the legal and media aspects of the video's content.

💡Lawyer

A 'lawyer' is a legal professional who represents clients in legal matters. The script mentions 'lawyer' in the context of the speaker discussing their legal representation and the involvement of a lawyer named 'Kamamura Yoichi,' showing the importance of legal counsel in the situation.

💡Evidence

The term 'evidence' is used to refer to the information or objects used to establish facts in a legal case. The script discusses the lack of evidence as stated by the Tokyo District Public Prosecutors Office, which is a central point in the speaker's argument of innocence.

💡Defamation

Defamation is the act of damaging someone's reputation through false statements. The script implies that the speaker may be facing or has faced issues related to defamation, as they discuss the impact of false information and its legal implications.

💡Police

The 'police' are mentioned in the context of cooperating with investigations and reporting crimes. The speaker encourages reporting to the police if one has suspicions, indicating the role of law enforcement in the legal process.

💡Perjury

Perjury refers to the act of lying or making false statements under oath, particularly in a court setting. The script mentions 'perjury' in the context of the potential consequences of making false statements, which is a significant legal issue in the video's narrative.

💡Witness

A 'witness' is someone who provides testimony in a legal proceeding. The script discusses the process of witness questioning, which is a key part of the legal drama unfolding in the video, as it pertains to the truth and credibility of the statements made.

💡YouTube

YouTube is a video-sharing platform mentioned in the script as a medium through which some individuals gain views and attention. The speaker expresses their intention to stop engaging with certain types of YouTubers who profit from creating content, indicating a shift in their approach to dealing with online personalities.

Highlights

The date is March 22, 2024, and the discussion is about a legal dispute involving NHK.

Uesugi Takashi is facing off against a person named Uesugi, who is represented by a lawyer named Kitamura Yoichi.

There was a previous court case mentioned, which took place on March 8, and there is a decision expected today.

A statement has been issued that outlines the ongoing dispute and accusations.

The speaker was called in by the Tokyo District Public Prosecutors Office for an investigation and cooperated fully, resulting in no charges being filed.

Despite the Tokyo District Public Prosecutors Office stating there is insufficient evidence, Uesugi is making serious allegations.

Uesugi claims that the Tokyo District Public Prosecutors Office is conducting multiple ongoing investigations, and he is accused of making false statements.

The speaker has received a notice of non-prosecution and is emphasizing that they have not been charged with any crime.

There have been negative impacts on the speaker's company, including employees quitting due to harassment and an overwhelmed mail system.

The speaker's company and a company called No Border have filed reports of business obstruction with the police.

A person named Ohashi is mentioned, who is said to have lied in a financial report to NHK, leading to a complaint filed with the police.

The concept of 'Chen Shuchou' or making false statements in writing is discussed, and its potential legal consequences are highlighted.

There is an upcoming court date set for May 31, 2024, at 10 AM in Courtroom 415 for cross-examination.

The speaker is preparing to question Uesugi directly in court, focusing on inconsistencies in his statements.

The speaker expresses interest in understanding how Uesugi obtained information from the police and prosecutors, suggesting potential illegal activities.

The speaker declares an intention to stop engaging with certain types of YouTubers who profit from views and focus on more meaningful topics.

The speaker reflects on the lessons learned from a lawsuit involving representative rights and expresses a desire to engage with substantial individuals.