Israel and Doxxing

Summary

The video script is a satirical commentary on the double standards within the YouTube and mainstream media communities. It defends the act of 'doxing' when it exposes hypocrisy, particularly in the context of Australian media's pro-Israel bias. The script criticizes the media for manipulating public opinion and calls out their selective outrage over leaked messages that reveal coordinated campaigns against critics of Israel. It also mocks the overreaction to online threats and the media's role in creating fake crises to suppress free speech, all while highlighting the absurdity and irony of their actions.

Takeaways

• 😀 The speaker humorously defends what is considered 'indefensible' in the YouTube community, such as doxing, and challenges viewers to reassess their opinions on movies and comedy.
• 🎬 The speaker argues that 'The Love Guru' is an underrated comedy that has been wrongly criticized and suggests that societal standards of humor are skewed.
• 📢 The script criticizes mainstream media for manipulating public opinion and using terms like 'doxing' to push for censorship and control over information.
• 🗣️ The speaker points out the hypocrisy of journalists and media outlets that label certain actions as 'doxing' while engaging in similar behavior themselves.
• 📱 The script discusses a specific instance of leaked WhatsApp messages from a group called 'Jewish creatives and academics', which turned out to be more pro-Israel than just Jewish.
• 🤔 The speaker questions the authenticity of threats made against public figures, suggesting that many are exaggerated or not serious.
• 📰 The script highlights the role of the Australian press in creating fake crises and using them to push for legislation that benefits their own ideological standpoint.
• 🚫 The speaker argues against the criminalization of speech in Australia, especially when it involves support for a foreign country's actions, such as Israel's.
• 💡 The script suggests that there is a coordinated effort to silence dissenting voices and regulate public discourse in favor of specific political narratives.
• 🌐 The speaker calls for a return to trusting individual gut reactions to humor and entertainment, rather than relying on collective societal judgments.

Q & A

What is the main argument the speaker is making about doxing in the YouTube community?

The speaker argues that doxing, which is generally considered indefensible, is being defended in certain contexts, such as when it involves reporting on a coordinated campaign to manipulate public opinion on behalf of a foreign country, which they claim is happening in the Australian press.

Why does the speaker believe that 'The Love Guru' is a misunderstood movie?

The speaker believes 'The Love Guru' is misunderstood because they think it's funnier and more sophisticated than people give it credit for, suggesting that society has deluded itself into thinking it's too smart to enjoy such humor.

What is the speaker's stance on the term 'condescending' used in the script?

The speaker finds the term 'condescending' to be condescending itself, indicating a disdain for the way certain words or attitudes are used to belittle or look down upon others.

What does the speaker accuse the mainstream media of doing in relation to internet buzzwords?

The speaker accuses the mainstream media of manipulating and deliberately redefining internet buzzwords to push for a crackdown on their ideological and spiritual enemies.

Why does the speaker criticize the Australian press for their reaction to the WhatsApp group leak?

The speaker criticizes the Australian press for their reaction to the WhatsApp group leak because they believe the press is trying to criminalize the act of leaking messages from influential people who were happy to be political actors, and they argue that the press is being hypocritical by labeling this as doxing when they have done similar things in the past.

What is the speaker's opinion on the term 'self-hating Jew' as used in the WhatsApp messages?

The speaker finds the use of the term 'self-hating Jew' in the WhatsApp messages to be an example of aggressive and targeted language against those who criticize Israel, and they argue that this is part of a broader pattern of behavior by certain groups.

Why does the speaker mention Bo Burnham in the context of comedy?

The speaker mentions Bo Burnham to contrast the type of comedy he represents with the humor found in 'The Love Guru,' suggesting that Burnham's style is considered 'smart comedy' while 'The Love Guru' is dismissed, which the speaker believes is an unfair judgment.

What is the speaker's view on the concept of 'death threats' as discussed in the script?

The speaker views many so-called 'death threats' on the internet as overblown and not genuine, accusing some public figures of crying wolf and being narcissistic by assuming every negative message is a real threat.

What does the speaker suggest about the Australian press's handling of the 'Jewish creatives' WhatsApp group leak?

The speaker suggests that the Australian press is using the leak as an opportunity to create a fake crisis and to push for the criminalization of certain speech, all in the service of supporting a foreign government's interests.

What is the speaker's position on the Australian press and their coverage of Israel-related issues?

The speaker's position is critical of the Australian press, accusing them of facilitating a blood bath by supporting Israel's actions and attempting to suppress free speech in Australia to align with foreign interests.

Outlines

00:00

🎬 Defending Doxing and The Love Guru

The speaker begins by humorously committing a 'Cardinal S', a term likely referring to a significant social media faux pas, and defends doxing, a controversial practice in the YouTube and streaming community. The paragraph humorously compares doxing to having a 'normal kink' and suggests that the YouTube community often jumps on trends without much thought. The speaker then pivots to discuss the misunderstood comedy of 'The Love Guru', a film that they argue is ahead of its time and not given the credit it deserves. They criticize the public for pretending to be too smart for such humor and call out the double standards in what is considered acceptable comedy, using Bo Burnham as an example of modern comedy that is similarly dismissed. The speaker also touches on the media's role in manipulating public opinion and the redefinition of terms like 'doxing' to fit their narrative, suggesting a bias in how the media reports on certain behaviors depending on who is involved.

05:02

📰 Media Hypocrisy and the WhatsApp Leak

In this paragraph, the speaker discusses a specific incident where a WhatsApp group chat titled 'Jewish creatives and academics' was leaked, revealing conversations that were critical of Israel. The speaker points out the hypocrisy of pro-Israel groups and certain journalists who are trying to label the leak as 'doxing', while they themselves have engaged in similar behavior. The paragraph delves into the contents of the leaked messages, which included calls to harass pro-Palestinian individuals and derogatory remarks about Muslims. The speaker also addresses the reactions to the leak, including attempts to use legal means to silence those who shared the messages, and criticizes the double standard in how the media and certain groups react to leaked messages based on who is involved and what the messages contain.

10:03

🚨 The Culture War and the Legal Pursuit of Opinions

The final paragraph discusses the broader implications of the WhatsApp leak and the reactions to it, particularly the legal actions taken by groups like 'Lawyers for Israel' and the 'Zionist Federation'. The speaker criticizes these groups for their attempts to silence criticism and modulate speech in Australia, suggesting that there is a coordinated effort to criminalize certain opinions under the guise of fighting racism or anti-Semitism. The paragraph also touches on the irony of these groups accusing others of racism while engaging in their own divisive tactics. The speaker reflects on the current cultural and political climate, where the lines between free speech and hate speech are being manipulated for ideological purposes, and calls out the hypocrisy of those who claim to fight for equality while simultaneously suppressing dissenting voices.

Keywords

💡Doxing

Doxing refers to the act of publicly revealing private or personal information about an individual without their consent, often as a form of harassment. In the video, the speaker controversially defends doxing, criticizing how the media and political actors use this concept selectively, depending on their ideological alignment. The video suggests that the term is often misused to protect powerful individuals or groups while being weaponized against critics.

💡Popular opinion

Popular opinion refers to the collective attitudes and beliefs held by the majority of people in a community or society. The video critiques how the media tries to control popular opinion by pushing a specific narrative, especially through manipulative language and buzzwords like 'doxing.' The speaker argues that the internet has allowed people to spread their ideas freely, challenging the monopoly media outlets once held over shaping public discourse.

💡The Love Guru

The Love Guru is a 2008 comedy film starring Mike Myers. In the video, the speaker argues that the movie was unfairly criticized and slandered, not because it was bad, but because it was ahead of its time and too sophisticated for critics. The reference serves as an example of how certain works of art are misunderstood due to prevailing cultural biases and highlights the speaker’s broader point about the public's misguided perceptions.

💡Media manipulation

Media manipulation refers to the way the media controls or influences public opinion by shaping narratives to suit certain agendas. The speaker accuses the mainstream media of manipulating the public by misusing terms like 'doxing' and 'cyberbullying' to stifle dissent, protect allies, and demonize critics. The speaker claims that the press selectively applies these terms depending on who is being targeted or protected.

💡Israel-Palestine conflict

The Israel-Palestine conflict is a long-standing geopolitical struggle between Israelis and Palestinians over territorial, political, and cultural issues. In the video, the speaker discusses how media outlets and political groups manipulate narratives surrounding the conflict, accusing them of silencing pro-Palestinian voices and protecting pro-Israeli groups through accusations of anti-Semitism. This topic ties into the video’s broader critique of selective censorship and media bias.

💡Buzzwords

Buzzwords are popular terms or phrases that gain widespread usage but are often used vaguely or without real understanding. The speaker criticizes how the media uses buzzwords like 'doxing' and 'cyberbullying' to fabricate crises or manipulate public opinion. These terms, according to the speaker, are deliberately redefined to control the narrative and marginalize dissenting voices.

💡Cyberbullying

Cyberbullying is the act of harassing or intimidating individuals over digital platforms. The speaker mentions how the term 'cyberbullying' has been used by the media to justify crackdowns on certain types of speech. The speaker draws a parallel between the terms 'cyberbullying' and 'doxing,' arguing that both are selectively invoked to control discourse and silence critics, especially in political contexts.

💡Selective censorship

Selective censorship refers to the practice of suppressing certain viewpoints or content based on ideological or political preferences while allowing others to flourish. The speaker argues that the media and political groups engage in selective censorship by labeling some forms of speech, like criticism of Israel, as dangerous or hateful, while turning a blind eye to equally harmful rhetoric that aligns with their views.

💡Death threats

Death threats are violent messages directed at individuals, threatening their lives. In the video, the speaker distinguishes between real and exaggerated death threats, claiming that public figures often overreact to online threats. The speaker argues that mainstream media uses these threats to push a victim narrative, while others who face real physical danger (like the speaker) do not receive the same level of concern.

💡Zionist Federation

The Zionist Federation is a pro-Israel organization mentioned in the video. The speaker accuses the federation of engaging in campaigns to silence critics of Israel by labeling them as anti-Semitic. This group is used as an example of how political organizations use legal action and media manipulation to control discourse and suppress opposing viewpoints, especially in the context of the Israel-Palestine conflict.

Highlights

Defending doxing in the YouTube community and reevaluating opinions on movies considered too sophisticated.

The Love Guru is cited as an example of a movie that has been wrongfully criticized.

Critique of mainstream media's portrayal of comedy and the public's acceptance of it.

Argument that the term 'condescending' is used to dismiss humor that challenges societal norms.

Discussion on the double standards in defining doxing versus reporting on coordinated campaigns to manipulate public opinion.

Analysis of how the Australian press has been manipulating the definition of 'doxing' to fit their narrative.

Examination of the WhatsApp group 'Jewish creatives and academics' and its implications.

Criticism of the press for selectively applying the term 'doxing' based on the content and context of the leaked messages.

Comparison between the reactions to the 'Jewish creatives' leak and other instances of leaked messages.

Reflection on the role of the media in shaping public opinion and the dangers of their influence.

Commentary on the hypocrisy of those who cry 'racism' while engaging in discriminatory behavior themselves.

Discussion on the legal actions taken against individuals for their opinions, particularly in the context of Israel.

Analysis of the coordinated efforts to suppress free speech in Australia in the name of foreign interests.

The absurdity of the situation where public figures are claiming victimhood over perceived slights while ignoring larger issues.

Final thoughts on the importance of not letting external pressures dictate the discourse within a country.

Transcripts

let me commit a Cardinal S today and

defend what is generally indefensible in

the youtube/ streaming World Pia no only

joke you got to have to defend that it's

pretty popular in the YouTube world

seems it's every second creative side

hobby isn't it which guys can you just

get a normal kink like mine Aid ailia

you can Google that in your own

time no what is indefensible in the

YouTube Community is doxing but I'm a

pmic I'm a man on the Vanguard of

popular opinion and today not only am I

going to defend doxing but by the end of

this video you'll reassess your fluide

ster opinions on movies that have been

wrongfully slandered for years for being

too sophisticated and too ahead of their

time and if you don't like it as Guru

pitka from the 2008 soon to be sleeper

comedy cult classic The Love Guru once

said if you've got an isue here's a

teacher oh wait that was that was that

Austin P was dead if you got an issue

here's a tissue well the point stands as

does this point Mike Myers lives at 5 3

West I know you think this is a joke but

seriously re-watch or watch The Love

Guru it is a sign that something is

deeply wrong with society that we

collectively delude ourselves pretending

most Netflix standup specials are

adequately funny but we also ended Mike

my's Flawless career because we wanted

to pretend that we were too smart to

laugh at a fake Indian man making

jokes you are a I find that term

condescending

condescending that's a big word for you

well that stops today I'm not above it

now play the clip with the

kicking him in the nuts come on rewatch

it you're either a liar or a stone cold

psychopath if you can't admit that it's

funnier than who we think is smart

comedy Now Bo Burnham off seriously

is this what passes for musical comedy

now I can't really uh play the guitar

very well what is this self-conscious

that funny feeling how about that

funny shangbo I want Guru Pi his

Bollywood parody of 9 to5 look he sticks

his head up his don't ask I'm not being

factious either that is funny can we

stop thinking about this so much

and just go back to trusting our

immediate gut

responses no oh well it was worth a shot

I'd also like to get on the record that

you're either a liar or a stone cold

psychopath if you pretend that reporting

on a coordinated campaign to manipulate

public opinion which aggressively

Slanders and targets Australians on

behalf of a foreign country is the same

is doxing but surprise surprise that's

exactly what the Australian press has

been doing it's not even a new

phenomenon and in fact seems to be half

the Articles written by the mainstream

media in the west ever since Trump won

manipulating the amorphous and

mysterious nature of new internet

buzzwords deliberately redefining them

to push for a clamp down on their

ideological material and spiritual

enemies it's journalist attempting to

get governments to legislate their way

into people sharing the same set of

values as the very narrow set of values

held by themselves they did it with

trolling cyber bullying even Concepts as

nebula's bad movie stopped us

from getting to Love Guru too there was

going to be be a franchise do notice

though that there are never any calls to

regulate what is in essence the exact

same behavior when it is approved by the

editor of a major newspaper no it's

again just another boring display of the

media class's content and fear of the

minimal amount of equality the internet

has provided normal people to spread

their ideas to the media what has

emerged is this terrifying impenetrable

stubborn Frontier of popular opinion

opinions what they used to have a

monopoly on now information is being

spread without complete guidance from

those who know better so what do the

Press do they make a fake crisis and

Lawn to this fake crisis through a new

word which now makes an old phenomenon

seem like it's new to their geriatric

audience the crisis toour at the moment

is the word doxing New York Times

journalist Natasha Frost leaked the

contents of a WhatsApp group titled

Jewish creatives and academics now quick

disclaimer this wasn't released through

the New York Times it was distributed

mostly on social media which is why the

Press is so fixated on this leak Jewish

creatives at academics is also kind of

misleading as a title as going through

the contents of the WhatsApp messages

the determining factor in your

membership of this group was not being

Jewish but being slavishly devoted to

Israel even being willing to Target and

slow moderate Jewish critics of Israel

this is what one of those messages says

about Anthony Lowenstein a Jewish

journalist and critic of Israel

Lowenstein has always been a self- hated

Jew with an agenda against Israel he has

no credibility and has a very dark

history against the Jewish state of

course he would receive a positive

review at the SMH what else would you

expect from a publication with such a

history of generating hate against

Israel and the Jews another message

proclaimed Anthony Lowenstein is not

just critical of Israeli policy he's

rather vile about Israel so I would beg

to differ if you can see nothing good

about the Democracy of Israel and hold

it to standards different to any other

country in the world I would feel

comfortable saying that you're a

self-hating Jew or anti-semite and

Lowenstein is appalling his whole career

is based on being rabidly anti-israel

which should give you enough of an idea

that this isn't just a Jewish group chat

to all opinions from all Jews but did

you know that by me reading these

messages according to pro-israel groups

and their allies in the press That's do

Shing here's an example Stuart Cohen

journalist and one of the founders of

the WhatsApp group has been writing

articles at the AFR and Times of Israel

demanding Polie take action against

people who shared these messages with

all the confidence of a firste law

student claiming that sharing the

messages could be a breach of section

47417 of the criminal code using a

carriage service to Menace and harass

this is despite most of the leak

messages being calls to harass Pro

Palestinian people on social media of

course along with other Classics such as

shearing petitions demanding people get

fired for wearing Palestinian flag

Badges and even calling Muslim protest

is subhuman let me read this part it's

particularly hilarious it's a load of

they could arrest and charge

and let the judge decide if there is a

case the act of arresting would be

humiliating for these subhumans even if

it was thrown out of court it would show

the authorities are serious but they are

not and they are a disgrace they are as

weak as and have shown it all along

no one was arrested at the opera house

except for the Jew the police minister

is weak as and out of her death so

is the police commissioner to which the

response is can we actively do something

about this and was also responded with

terrible language but it is alarming I

can't understand why they are not acting

maybe they are being intimidated by

local Muslim terrorists and thugs there

is a lot of criminal elements in the

Muslim Community I.E The biky Gangs High

Muslim prison population Muslim

intimidation on local councils Etc angry

face emoji I particularly like how that

comment started with language policing

and then ended with those muzzies are

criminals and also also I mean look at

all of this 18c anybody I mean I'm okay

with this because I'm only a little

dishonest I lie about normal things to

keep social situations smooth like

enjoying Bo burn comedy and not having

torture fantasies when I hear his name

I'm not a complete hypocrite like the

people crying over these leaked messages

that being said I do think in most

circumstances leaking private messages

is stupid and trivial especially if the

purpose is trying to catch a faux par or

regulate social interactions who cares

that shouldn't be in the public

domain but that is precisely what the

Press are usually cool with but when a

mass group chat containing a trove of

messages from influential people who

were completely happy to be political

actors demonstrated by the fact that

they joined the chat that's leaked all

of a sudden leaking messages is now

doxing and off limits sorry not playing

along with that the Press did the exact

same thing with the barrel Aro

recordings because they came from me

they were all of a sudden a breach of

the surveillance devices act okay well

it's been almost 2 years at New South

Wales police you going to charge me no

well maybe that was a lie also designed

to excuse lazy journalism kill a story

that was inconvenient to their owners

while continuing to delude M themselves

and Their audience that they have

standards and therefore they're

perfectly entitled to determine what is

the reportable truth these messages are

Illuminating and I'm going to look at

them despite any attempt to hide them

with vexatious allegations of doxing and

disgusting so stories about death

threats that are coming in the context

of Israel killing 40,000 people

another detour as one of the handful of

people in the Australian media who has

had actual experience with both real and

fake death threats let me tell you right

now there is a difference between

someone sending a graphic message over a

DM and someone burning down your

house this is a message for everyone not

just Zionist it is a supreme display of

narcissism to pretend that every

overblown threat or nasty message on the

Internet is an actual threat you are

crying wolf there is not one public

figure on Earth that hasn't received a

death threat don't be so

self-aggrandizing as to pretend that

someone would actually go out of their

way to kill you over your bog standard

opinions they're too busy trying to kill

me for my bog standard opinions and

Palestinian children anyway you know how

last week I covered the Zionist

Federation taking former SBS news reader

Mary kak sord under section 18c of the

racial discrimination act because Mary

committed the heinous act of sharing a

speech from a HB leader and comparing

his rhetoric to the actions of Israel

well these messages kind of show how

this plan fermented in response to Mary

sharing this video of Rabbi Eliza Cashel

the head of a pre-military Academy from

a West Bank settlement the Jewish

creatives academics chat said Mary cicus

is hellbent on fostering anti-Semitism

what's her problem and what can we do

here's the answer and I can see where

the creative part comes from this is

amazing I think this is going to get

edited out but just play the sidefill

music stamp one she shall be referred to

publicly as Mary KK

Kus me that's brilliant I'm still

going through those new R applications

can you send in a script applications

you now close I tweeted underneath can

others please perhaps this is suitable

for a lawyers group which brings me to

the mourar as what's that group the

lawyers for Israel Group which from what

I could understand is very similar to

the creatives for Israel group but their

lawyers are not creatives and therefore

they're not complete morons they were

behind a coordinated campaign to Al

antoinet Lou from the ABC at the Abc of

course sanctioned her whiny culture War

grievances against white people but as

soon as she shared a Human Rights Watch

report about Israel using starvation is

a weapon of War based on hard evidence

and lawyers for Israel complained she's

now racist just like white people see

this is the one good thing about October

7 of the war triggered well apart from

the cool paramotors I mean I'm Not

sanctioning the Killing I'm just saying

a must fly it on those things with guns

pretty cool but the other good thing is

that we now get to see all these joural

who cried racism forever fall over

themselves Pro Palestinian pro-israeli

partisans formerly on a Unity ticket

accusing others of racism all now on the

receiving end of the culture War

Inquisition they perpetuated for so so

long all accusing each other of racism

to further their ideological ends the

snake eating itself the racism or aoris

and as an affidia fiac that gets me Hur

it seems cicus was sent to lawyers for

Israel all the way back in December and

now she's being taken to court by the

Zionist Federation whose president

Jeremy liela is also claiming he is

exploring all legal options regarding

the leaking of the Jewish creatives

WhatsApp chat priorities in check

Australian press and Zionist Federation

play him against the backdrop of an

unimaginable blood bath that you

facilitated yeah you're really winning

hearts and Minds by winging about

imagined slights and cooking up

cancellation campaigns and court cases

like your Amber herd canceling

Johnny Deb guys This Is War not

# me too there is something seriously

off going on at the moment right there

is a coordinated attempt to criminalize

certain speech in Australia from people

acting on behalf of a foreign government

in Australia we should never have to

moderate our speech let alone moderate

it to support a foreign country's war of

aggression unless of course that country

is Burundi or prise of Burundi it' be a

perfect shooting location for Love Guru

too just saying

[Music]